Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 99–120

(Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality

Evidence from Twitter

| Radboud University Nijmegen
This chapter surveys the use of the first person present of the cognitive verb creer ‘believe’ in contemporary Peninsular Spanish. It is based on data that were gathered from Twitter. The different functions of creo ‘I believe’ are closely related to a limited set of syntactic patterns. Creo with complementizer que proves to be a highly frequent and prolific marker of evidentiality, epistemic modality and related functions. After a detailed description of these functions, I focus on creo que with and without subject personal pronoun yo. While creo que fits all functions equally well, the use of yo creo que is more restricted to speaker-oriented, subjective functions.
Keywords: cognitive verb, creer , first person, Spanish, subject pronoun
Published online: 19 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.05mul
References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, M. Á., & Serrano, M. J.
2010 El hablante en su discurso: expresión y omisión del sujeto de creo . Oralia, 13, 7–38.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A.
1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, R. E., & San José, M. Á.
2010 A reference grammar of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D.
2009 Twitter: “pointless babble” or peripheral awareness+social grooming? http://​www​.zephoria​.org​/thoughts​/archives​/2009​/08​/16​/twitter​_pointle​.html
Boye, K.
2012 Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, J., & Benjamin, C.
2013 A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cappelli, G.
2007 “I reckon I know how Leonardo da Vinci must have felt…” Epistemicity, evidentiality and English verbs of cognitive attitude. Pari: Pari Publishing.Google Scholar
2008 Antonymy and verbs of cognitive attitude: When know is the opposite of think and believe . In M. Bertuccelli Papi, A. Bertacca, & S. Bruti (Eds.), Threads in the complex fabric of language (529–546). Pisa, Felici Editore.Google Scholar
de Cock, B.
2014 Profiling discourse participants: forms and functions in Spanish conversation and debates. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
2007 Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi-)auxiliaries: a cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009 Evidentiality and epistemic modality. On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language, 16(1), 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B., & Pietrandrea, P.
2012 Modality at work. Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2109–2115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
2002 Corpus del español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. http://​www​.corpusdelespanol​.orgGoogle Scholar
Davidson, B.
1996 ‘Pragmatic weight’ and Spanish subject pronouns: The pragmatic and discourse uses of ‘tú’ and ‘yo’ in spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 543–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S.
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 359–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enríquez, E. V.
1984 El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Fraser, B.
1980 Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (15–34). Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1994 The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In T. Givón (Ed.), Voice and inversion (3–46). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Torrego, L.
1988 Perífrasis verbales: sintáxis, semántica y estilística. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975 Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts (41–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
de Haan, F.
1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M.
2015 Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics, 53(3), 479–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, A.
2012 The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude. Folia linguistica, 46(1), 133–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 A context-sensitive and functional approach to evidentiality in Spanish or why evidentiality needs a superordinate category. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, H., Foolen, A., Mulder, G., & van Mulken, V.
this volume). I think and I believe: Evidential expressions in Dutch.
Jucker, A. H., & Dürscheid, C.
2012 The linguistics of keyboard-to-screen communication. A new terminological framework. Linguistik online 56(6). http://​www​.linguistik​-online​.org​/56​_12​/juckerDuerscheid​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kattán-Ibarra, J., & Howkins, A.
2014 Spanish grammar in context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1972 Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In: P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, & G. C. Phares (Eds.), Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (183–228). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Landone, E.
2012 Discourse markers and politeness in a digital forum in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1799–1820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G.
2001 On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 359–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M.
2002 Subject pronoun usage among Spanish dialects. Unpublished manuscript. http://​www​.personal​.psu​.edu​/jml34​/pronouns​.pdf
Lyons, J.
1977 Semantics: Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995 Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, G.
2017 When feeling is thinking: A lexical-semantic analysis of evidential and epistemic predicates in Spanish. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haβler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (105–121). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001 Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction, 5(1), 53–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Subjectivity: Between discourse and conceptualization. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 106–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, R.
2012 The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 181–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Saying ‘sorry’: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plungian, V.
2010 Types of verbal evidentiality: An overview. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (15–59). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Posio, P.
2011 Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 777–798. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The functions of postverbal pronominal subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese. Studies in Hispanic & Lusophone Linguistics, 5(1), 149–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The expression of first-person-singular subjects in spoken Peninsular Spanish and European Portuguese: Semantic roles and formulaic sequences. Folia Linguistica, 47(1), 253–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Subject expression in grammaticalizing constructions: The case of creo and ancho ‘I think’ in Spanish and Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics, 63, 5–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA)
Corpus de referencia del español actual. http://​www​.rae​.es
Rodríguez Louro, C., & Harris, T.
2013 Evolution with an attitude: The grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language & Linguistics, 17, 415–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saeger, B.
2007 Usos y significados del verbo ‘creer’. In I. Castellón Masalles, & A. Fernández Montraveta (Eds.), Perspectivas de análisis de la unidad verbal (81–92). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
de Schepper, K., & de Hoop, H.
2012 Construction-dependent person hierarchies. In W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality and Theory of Mind across languages (383–403). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.
2002 ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language, 26(1), 125–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E., & Torres Cacoullos, R.
2012 What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 711–748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D.
2001 An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willett, T.
1988 A crosslinguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Mulder, Gijs
2017.  In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.