Chapter 8
The French future
Evidentiality and incremental information
Alda Mari | Institut Jean Nicod, CNRS/ENS/EHESS
We propose a new analysis for the French future, which treats it as a modal-evidential, articulating two perspectival points – a conjectural and a ratificational one. Considering that future also contributes a relative tense, we explain a variety of uses covering previously unexplained cases, including those in which the speaker knows that the prejacent is true. Finally, our account sheds some light on cross-linguistic facts and most notably on the relation between the ratificational French future and the conjectural future in Italian (akin to an epistemic modal), paving the way for a typological distinction between two types of languages: ‘conjectural future type’ languages and ‘ratificational future type’ ones.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Disentangling future from epistemic modality
- 3.The temporal and the ‘present ratification’ use
- 3.1
fut and past, scoping relations and relative tense
- 3.2Temporal and present ratification uses: truth conditions, inferences and direct evidence constraint
- 3.2.1The truth conditional dimension
- 3.2.2Deriving the inference of ignorance
- 3.3The direct evidence constraint of ratificational modals
- 3.4First set of predictions
- 4.Epistemic reading
- 4.1The epistemic interpretation of future with past
- 4.2Summary
- 5.Synchronic and cross-linguistic variation: the epistemic interpretation of simple future sentences
- 5.1Conjectural future and the competition with ‘devoir’
- 5.2Synchronic variation with eventives: a new hypothesis
- 5.3A note on cross-linguistic variation
- 6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgement
-
Notes
-
References
References (55)
References
Aikhenvald, A. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berretta, M. 1997. Sul futuro concessivo: Riflessioni su un caso (dubbio) di degrammaticalizzazione. Linguistica e Filologia, 5, 7–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bertinetto, P. M. 1979. Alcune ipotesi sul nostro futuro (con alcune osservazioni su potere e dovere). Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 4, 77–138.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boogaart, R. 2007. The past and perfect of epistemic modals. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskas (Eds.), Recent advances in the syntax and semantics of tense, aspect and modality (47–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boogaart, R., & Trnavac, R. 2011. Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality. In A. Patard, & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality (217–248). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broekhuis, H., & Verkuyl, H. 2013. Binary tense and modality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 973–1009. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caudal, P. 2012. Relations entre temps, aspect, modalité et évidentialité dans le système du français. Langue Française, 173, 115–129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Condoravdi, C. 2002. Temporal interpretation for modals. Modals for the present and modals for the past. In D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. Clark, & L. Casillas (Eds.), Stanford Papers on Semantics (59–87). Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Copley, B. 2002. The Semantics of the Future. PhD dissertation, MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S., & Peter, S. 1998. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 159–210. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dendale, P. 2001. Le futur conjectural versus devoir épistémique: différences de valeur et restrictions d’emploi. Le Français Moderne, 69(1), 1–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enç, M. 1996. Tense and modality. In S. Lappin (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory (345–358). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Falaus, A., & Laca, B. 2014. Les formes de l’incertitude. Le futur de conjecture en espagnol et le présomptif roumain. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 78, 313–366.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faller, M. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. 2010. Must…stay…strong! Natural Language Semantics, 18, 351–383. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2012. The future of Greek and Italian: An epistemic analysis. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 17, 255–270.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2013. A two dimensional analysis of the future: modal adverbs and speaker’s bias. Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 115–122.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2014. The future in Greek and Italian: metaphysical and epistemic dimensions. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2015. A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: the view from Greek and Italian. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2017a. Epistemic future and epistemic MUST: non-veridicality, evidence and partial knowledge. In J. Blaszczak, A. Giannakidou, D. Klimek-Jankowska, & K. Mygdalski (Eds.), Mood, aspect, modality revisited. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2017b. La dimension évaluative du futur: le rôle des adverbes. In L. Baranzini, & L. de Saussure (Eds.), Le Futur dans les Langues Romanes. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2017c. A unifies analysis of the future as epistemic modality. The view from Greek and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. 2017d. The semantic roots of positive polarity: epistemic modal verbs and adverbs in Greek and Italian. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, F. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, F. 2001. The relation between modality and evidentiality. In R. Müller, & M. Reis (Eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen (201–216). Hamburg: Buske.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Hoop, H., Foolen, A., Mulder, G., & van Mulken, V. this volume. I think and I believe: evidential expressions in Dutch.
Homer, V. 2010. Epistemic modals, high ma non troppo. Proceedings of Nels 40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laca, B. 2012. On modal tenses and tensed modals. Cahiers Chronos, 25, 163–198.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, J. 2012. Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality. Natural Language Semantics, 21, 1–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari, A. 2009. Disambiguating the Italian Future. Proceedings of Generative Lexicon, 209–216.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari, A. 2014. Each Other, asymmetry and reasonable futures. Journal of Semantics, 31(2), 209– 261. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari, A. 2015a. Modalités et temps. Des modèles aux données. Bern: Peter Lang. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari, A. 2015b. French future: exploring the future ratification hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 26(3), 353–378. d ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari, A. 2016. Assertability condition of epistemic (and fictional) attitudes and mood variation. Proceedings of SALT 26, 61–81.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mithun, M. 1986. Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (89–112). Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mulder, G. this volume. (Yo) creo que: as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality.
Narrog, H. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prior, A. 1957. Time and modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rocci, A. 2000. L’interprétation épistémique du futur en Italien et en Français: Une analyse procédurale. Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 22, 241–274.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Saussure, L., & Morency, P. 2011. A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. Journal of French Language Studies, 22, 207–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sthioul, B. 2007. Informations conceptuelle et procédurale: La piste beauzéenne. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskas (Eds.), Information temporelle, procédures et ordre discursif (105–121). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Squartini, M. 2004. Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance. Lingua, 114, 873–895. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sueur, J. P. 1979. Analyse sémantique des verbes ‘devoir’ et ‘pouvoir’. Le Français Moderne, 2, 97–119.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tasmowski, L. 1980. Un ‘devoir’ opérateur. Travaux de Linguistique, 1, 43–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tasmowski, L., & Dendale, P. 1998.
Must/will and doit/futur simple as epistemic modal markers. Semantic value and restrictions of use. In J. E. van der Auwera (Ed.), English as a human language. To honour Louis Goossens (325–336). Munich: Lincom Europa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomason, R. 1984. Combination of tense and modality. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic: Extensions of classical logic (135–165). Dordrecht: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Ippolito, Michela & Donka F. Farkas
2022.
Assessing alternatives: the case of the presumptive future in Italian.
Linguistics and Philosophy 45:4
► pp. 943 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.