Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 199226
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berretta, M.
1997Sul futuro concessivo: Riflessioni su un caso (dubbio) di degrammaticalizzazione. Linguistica e Filologia, 5, 7–40.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M.
1979Alcune ipotesi sul nostro futuro (con alcune osservazioni su potere e dovere). Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 4, 77–138.Google Scholar
Boogaart, R.
2007The past and perfect of epistemic modals. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskas (Eds.), Recent advances in the syntax and semantics of tense, aspect and modality (47–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boogaart, R., & Trnavac, R.
2011Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality. In A. Patard, & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic modality (217–248). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, H., & Verkuyl, H.
2013Binary tense and modality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 973–1009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caudal, P.
2012Relations entre temps, aspect, modalité et évidentialité dans le système du français. Langue Française, 173, 115–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Celle, A.
2004The French future tense and English will as markers of epistemic modality. Languages in Contrast, 5(2), 181–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Condoravdi, C.
2002Temporal interpretation for modals. Modals for the present and modals for the past. In D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. Clark, & L. Casillas (Eds.), Stanford Papers on Semantics (59–87). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Copley, B.
2002The Semantics of the Future. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S., & Peter, S.
1998Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 159–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, P.
2001Le futur conjectural versus devoir épistémique: différences de valeur et restrictions d’emploi. Le Français Moderne, 69(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Enç, M.
1996Tense and modality. In S. Lappin (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory (345–358). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Falaus, A., & Laca, B.
2014Les formes de l’incertitude. Le futur de conjecture en espagnol et le présomptif roumain. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 78, 313–366.Google Scholar
Faller, M.
2002Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A.
2010Must…stay…strong! Natural Language Semantics, 18, 351–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A.
2012The future of Greek and Italian: An epistemic analysis. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 17, 255–270.Google Scholar
2013A two dimensional analysis of the future: modal adverbs and speaker’s bias. Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 115–122.Google Scholar
2014The future in Greek and Italian: metaphysical and epistemic dimensions. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.Google Scholar
2015A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: the view from Greek and Italian. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.Google Scholar
2017aEpistemic future and epistemic MUST: non-veridicality, evidence and partial knowledge. In J. Blaszczak, A. Giannakidou, D. Klimek-Jankowska, & K. Mygdalski (Eds.), Mood, aspect, modality revisited. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2017bLa dimension évaluative du futur: le rôle des adverbes. In L. Baranzini, & L. de Saussure (Eds.), Le Futur dans les Langues Romanes. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017cA unifies analysis of the future as epistemic modality. The view from Greek and Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017dThe semantic roots of positive polarity: epistemic modal verbs and adverbs in Greek and Italian. Ms. University of Chicago and Institut Jean Nicod.Google Scholar
de Haan, F.
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.Google Scholar
2001The relation between modality and evidentiality. In R. Müller, & M. Reis (Eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen (201–216). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
de Hoop, H., Foolen, A., Mulder, G., & van Mulken, V.
this volume. I think and I believe: evidential expressions in Dutch.
Homer, V.
2010Epistemic modals, high ma non troppo. Proceedings of Nels 40.Google Scholar
Kissine, M.
2008From predictions to promises. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16, 169–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laca, B.
2012On modal tenses and tensed modals. Cahiers Chronos, 25, 163–198.Google Scholar
Lee, J.
2012Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality. Natural Language Semantics, 21, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mari, A.
2009Disambiguating the Italian Future. Proceedings of Generative Lexicon, 209–216.Google Scholar
2014Each Other, asymmetry and reasonable futures. Journal of Semantics, 31(2), 209– 261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aModalités et temps. Des modèles aux données. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bFrench future: exploring the future ratification hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 26(3), 353–378. d CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Assertability condition of epistemic (and fictional) attitudes and mood variation. Proceedings of SALT 26, 61–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, L., Rullmann, H., & Davis, H.
2007Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’at’imcets’. The Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 7, 201–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M.
1986Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (89–112). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, T.
2000On the ‘evidential’ nature of the ‘epistemic’ use of the German modals müssen and sollen. In J. van der Auwera, & P. Dendale (Eds.), Modal verbs in Germanic and Romance languages [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14], 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, G.
this volume. (Yo) creo que: as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality.
Narrog, H.
2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, A.
1957Time and modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
1947Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rocci, A.
2000L’interprétation épistémique du futur en Italien et en Français: Une analyse procédurale. Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 22, 241–274.Google Scholar
de Saussure, L., & Morency, P.
2011A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. Journal of French Language Studies, 22, 207–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sthioul, B.
2007Informations conceptuelle et procédurale: La piste beauzéenne. In L. de Saussure, J. Moeschler, & G. Puskas (Eds.), Information temporelle, procédures et ordre discursif (105–121). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Squartini, M.
2004Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance. Lingua, 114, 873–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sueur, J. P.
1979Analyse sémantique des verbes ‘devoir’ et ‘pouvoir’. Le Français Moderne, 2, 97–119.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tasmowski, L.
1980Un ‘devoir’ opérateur. Travaux de Linguistique, 1, 43–58.Google Scholar
Tasmowski, L., & Dendale, P.
1998 Must/will and doit/futur simple as epistemic modal markers. Semantic value and restrictions of use. In J. E. van der Auwera (Ed.), English as a human language. To honour Louis Goossens (325–336). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Thomason, R.
1984Combination of tense and modality. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic: Extensions of classical logic (135–165). Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willett, T.
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12, 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar