Cover not available
Part of
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 257–280

Chapter 10
From similarity to evidentiality

Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languages

 | University of Cologne | Australian National University, Canberra
This chapter argues that the synchronic uses of the Yurakaré (isolate, central Bolivia) polyfunctional suffix ‑shi plausibly reflect a diachronic path of semantic extension, first from a derivational suffix expressing similarity to an uncertain visual/perceptual evidential, and from there to an inferential evidential. Evidence for this claim comes from the correlation of the properties of the synchronic uses with well-known tendencies of semantic change, and from a sociolinguistic analysis of the synchronic uses of ‑shi. A cross-linguistic comparison further shows that there are various other languages with a similar evidential marker. For some of these languages, similar paths of diachronic development are plausible.
Keywords: diachronic development, inferential, polyfunctional suffix, semantic change, synchronic use
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on Yurakaré, method and data
  • 3.The synchronic uses of ‑shi
  • 4.Sociolinguistic distribution
  • 5.Cross-linguistic perspective
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.11gip
References (23)
References
Aikhenvald, A. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (273–312). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Barth, D., & Evans, N. 2017. SCOPIC design and overview. In D. Barth, & N. Evans (Eds.), Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 12: Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) (1–21).Google Scholar
Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A cross-linguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Evidentiality in Jarawara. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (165–187). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, M. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2011. A possible worlds semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials. In N. Li, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 20 (660–683).[URL]Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2003. Evidentiality in Western Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (291–306). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University. Nijmegen.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R., Hirtzel, V., & Gipper, S. 2010. Updating and loss of color terminology in Yurakaré: An interdisciplinary point of view. Language and Communication, 30(4), 240–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The Yurakaré archive. Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Gipper, S. 2011. Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. PhD thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Hirtzel, V. 2010. Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H. Jr. 1986. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (3–28). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Koring, L. 2012. Seemingly similar: Subjects and displacement in grammar, processing, and acquisition. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Mulder, G. this volume. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from Twitter.
San Roque, L., Gawne, L., Hoenigman, D., Miller, J. C., Rumsey, A., Spronck, S., Carroll, A., & Evans, N. 2012. Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation & Conservation, 6, 135–174.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whistler, K. W. 1986. Evidentials in Patwin. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (60–74). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gentens, Caroline & Kasper Boye
2024. Introduction: the development of manner expressions into complementizers or quotatives. Linguistics 62:3 ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Wiemer, Björn
2024. Polish jakoby: an exotic similative-reportive doughnut? Tracing the pathway and conditions of its rise. Linguistics 62:3 ► pp. 729 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.