Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 257–280

From similarity to evidentiality

Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languages

| University of Cologne | Australian National University, Canberra
This chapter argues that the synchronic uses of the Yurakaré (isolate, central Bolivia) polyfunctional suffix ‑shi plausibly reflect a diachronic path of semantic extension, first from a derivational suffix expressing similarity to an uncertain visual/perceptual evidential, and from there to an inferential evidential. Evidence for this claim comes from the correlation of the properties of the synchronic uses with well-known tendencies of semantic change, and from a sociolinguistic analysis of the synchronic uses of ‑shi. A cross-linguistic comparison further shows that there are various other languages with a similar evidential marker. For some of these languages, similar paths of diachronic development are plausible.
Keywords: diachronic development, inferential, polyfunctional suffix, semantic change, synchronic use
Published online: 19 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.11gip
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. B.
1986 Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (273–312). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Barth, D., & Evans, N.
2017 SCOPIC design and overview. In D. Barth, & N. Evans (Eds.), Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 12: Social Cognition Parallax Interview Corpus (SCOPIC) (1–21).Google Scholar
Boye, K.
2012 Epistemic meaning: A cross-linguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
2010 Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2003 Evidentiality in Jarawara. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (165–187). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2002 Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2011 A possible worlds semantics for Cuzco Quechua evidentials. In N. Li, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 20 (660–683).http://​elanguage​.net​/journals​/salt​/issue​/view​/220Google Scholar
Fortescue, M.
2003 Evidentiality in Western Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (291–306). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, R.
2006 A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University. Nijmegen.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R., Hirtzel, V., & Gipper, S.
2010 Updating and loss of color terminology in Yurakaré: An interdisciplinary point of view. Language and Communication, 30(4), 240–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The Yurakaré archive. Online language documentation, DoBeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. http://​corpus1​.mpi​.nl​/ds​/imdi​_browser/Google Scholar
Gipper, S.
2011 Evidentiality and intersubjectivity in Yurakaré: An interactional account. PhD thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2014 Intersubjective evidentials in Yurakaré: Evidence from conversational data and a first step toward a comparative perspective. Studies in Language, 38(4), 792–835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirtzel, V.
2010 Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H. Jr.
1986 The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (3–28). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Koring, L.
2012 Seemingly similar: Subjects and displacement in grammar, processing, and acquisition. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Mayer, M.
1969 Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Mulder, G.
this volume. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from Twitter.
San Roque, L., Gawne, L., Hoenigman, D., Miller, J. C., Rumsey, A., Spronck, S., Carroll, A., & Evans, N.
2012 Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation & Conservation, 6, 135–174.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whistler, K. W.
1986 Evidentials in Patwin. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (60–74). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar