Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 17–42
Previous research has shown that modality-preferential sensorimotor areas are relevant for processing of words referring to concrete objects or actions. However, whether modality preferential areas also play a role for abstract words is still under debate. In this chapter we will argue that the apparent lack of empirical evidence for a grounding of abstract words stems, at least in part, from the treatment of abstract words as one monolithic semantic category, rather than taking into account specific abstract word types and sub-categories. We will review classical and recent empirical evidence from neuropsychological, neuroimaging and behavioral approaches and demonstrate the necessity of considering specific semantic meaning types when investigating a possible grounding of concrete and abstract concepts, for both theoretical and methodological reasons.