Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 17–42

Chapter 1
The relevance of specific semantic categories in investigating the neural bases of abstract and concrete semantics

Previous research has shown that modality-preferential sensorimotor areas are relevant for processing of words referring to concrete objects or actions. However, whether modality preferential areas also play a role for abstract words is still under debate. In this chapter we will argue that the apparent lack of empirical evidence for a grounding of abstract words stems, at least in part, from the treatment of abstract words as one monolithic semantic category, rather than taking into account specific abstract word types and sub-categories. We will review classical and recent empirical evidence from neuropsychological, neuroimaging and behavioral approaches and demonstrate the necessity of considering specific semantic meaning types when investigating a possible grounding of concrete and abstract concepts, for both theoretical and methodological reasons.
Keywords: abstract semantics, concrete semantics, grounding, semantic sub-categories
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Disembodied and grounded models of semantics
    • 2.1Disembodied approaches towards semantics
    • 2.2Grounded approaches towards language comprehension
    • 2.3Hebbian learning and neural cell assemblies
  • 3.Semantics in the brain
    • 3.1Investigations of category specific semantic processing
    • 3.2Investigations of temporal dynamics of sensorimotor involvement in processing semantics
    • 3.3Behavioral evidence for an interplay of sensorimotor and conceptual systems
    • 3.4Neurostimulation evidence
    • 3.5Patient evidence
      • 3.5.1Impairments of the motor system
  • 4.The issue of abstract concepts
    • 4.1Classical accounts to explain differences between abstract and concrete concepts
    • 4.2Previous investigations on abstract words
  • 5.Identifying different classes of abstract words
    • 5.1Abstract mathematical terms
    • 5.2Abstract emotion words
    • 5.3Abstract mental words
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.02dre
References (77)
References
Arevalo, A. L., Baldo, J. V., & Dronkers, N. F. 2012. What do brain lesions tell us about theories of embodied semantics and the human mirror neuron system? Cortex 48(2), 242–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aviezer, H., Hassin, R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., Moscovitch, M., & Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychol. Science 19(7), 724–732.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bak, T. H., O’Donovan, D. G., Xuereb, J. H., Boniface, S., & Hodges, J. R. 2001. Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease–dementia–aphasia syndrome. Brain 124(1), 103–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrós-Loscertales, A., González, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., Costumero, V., & Ávila, C. 2012. Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex 22(11), 2554–2563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences 22(4), 637–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bienenstock, E. L., Cooper, L. N., & Munro, P. W. 1982. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2(1), 32–48 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. 2009. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19(12), 2767–2796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. 2014. Words As social Tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. 2009. Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings. In N. Taatgen, and H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society, 2304–2309.Google Scholar
Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T A. 2008. Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia 46(2), 743–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braitenberg, V. 1978. Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In Theoretical approaches tocomplex systems (pp.171–188). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Anzellotti, S., Strnad, L., & Lingnau, A. 2014. Embodied cognition and mirror neurons: A critical assessment. Annual review of neuroscience 37, 1–15.Google Scholar
Carota, F., Moseley, R., & Pulvermüller, F. 2012. Body-part-specific representations of semantic noun categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24(6), 1492–1509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Dreyer, F. 2012. A functional role for modality-specific perceptual systems in conceptual representations. PLoS One 7(3), e33321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Gray, C. D. 2003. Wanted: Fully operational definitions of dissociations in single-case studies. Cortex 39(2), 357–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., De Battisti, S., Vinson, D., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. 2014. How to assess abstract conceptual knowledge: construction, standardization and validation of a new battery of semantic memory tests. Functional Neurology 29(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
Dove, G. 2016. Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin and review 23(4), 1109–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, F. R., Frey, D., Arana, S., von Saldern, S., Picht, T., Vajkoczy, P., & Pulvermüller, F. 2015. Is the motor system necessary for processing action and abstract emotion words? Evidence from focal brain lesions. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. 2018. Abstract semantics in the motor system? – An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex 100, 52–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. 1969. Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875, 86–88.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 2008. Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44(4), 386–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. 2016. Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: a neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs. The European journal of neuroscience 43(6), 721–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. 2013. Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PloS one 8(6), e67090. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., Perani, D., & Tettamanti, M. 2016. Decoding the neural representation of fine-grained conceptual categories. NeuroImage 132, 93–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. 2012. Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex 48(7), 905–922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic bulletin and review 9(3), 558–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, J., Barros-Loscertales, A., Pulvermüller, F., Meseguer, V., Sanjuán, A., Belloch, V., & Ávila, C. 2006. Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage 32(2), 906–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guan, C. Q., Meng, W., Yao, R., & Glenberg, A. M. 2013. The motor system contributes to comprehension of abstract language. PloS one 8(9), e75183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42(1–3), 335–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O. 2016. Only time will tell–why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics. Psychonomic bulletin and review 23(4), 1072–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. 2004. Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human brain mapping 21(3), 191–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The lateralization of motor cortex activation to action-words. Frontiers in human neuroscience 5, 149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41(2), 301–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1949. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Holmes, V. T., & Langford, J. 1976. Comprehension and recall of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15(5), 559–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. 1992. The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Jansiewicz, E. M., Goldberg, M. C., Newschaffer, C. J., Denckla, M. B., Landa, R., & Mostofsky, S. H. 2006. Motor signs distinguish children with high functioning autism and Asperger’s syndrome from controls. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 36(5), 613–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, C. T. 1975. The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1(2), 130.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., & Tranel, D. 2012. Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex 48(7), 826–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, M., Sim, E. J., Herrnberger, B., Grothe, J., & Hoenig, K. 2008. The sound of concepts: four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. Journal of Neuroscience 28(47), 12224–12230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, B. Z. 2015. What is embodied about cognition? Language, cognition and neuroscience 30(4), 420–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of physiology-Paris 102(1), 59–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeser, S. D. 1974. Memory for meaning and wording in concrete and abstract sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(6), 682–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. 2012. A Role for the Motor System in Binding Abstract Emotional Meaning. Cerebral Cortex 22(7), 1634–1647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moseley, R. L., & Pulvermüller, F. 2014. Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and abstractions: local fMRI activity indexes semantics, not lexical categories. Brain and language 132, 28–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moseley, R. L., Shtyrov, Y., Mohr, B., Lombardo, M. V., Baron-Cohen, S., & Pulvermüller, F. 2015. Lost for emotion words: What motor and limbic brain activity reveals about autism and semantic theory. NeuroImage 104, 413–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neininger, B., & Pulvermüller, F. 2001. The Right Hemisphere’s Role in Action Word Processing: a Double Case Study. Neurocase 7(4), 303–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Postle, N., McMahon, K. L., Ashton, R., Meredith, M., & de Zubicaray, G. I. 2008. Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neuroimage 43(3), 634–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 1999. Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and brain sciences 22(02), 253–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. A brain perspective on language mechanisms: from discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order. Progress in neurobiology 67(2), 85–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Meaning and the brain: The neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25(5), 423–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in cognitive sciences 17(9), 458–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Neural Reuse of Action Perception Circuits for Language, Concepts and Communication. Progress in neurobiology 160, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. 2005. Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 21(3), 793–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quillian, M. R. 1969. The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the ACM 12(8), 459–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Karnath, H. O. 2009. An evaluation of traditional and novel tools for lesion behavior mapping. Neuroimage 44(4), 1355–1362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S. A., Brass, M., & Friederici, A. D. 2007. Comprehending prehending: neural correlates of processing verbs with motor stems. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 19(5), 855–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S. A., van Rooij, D., Lindemann, O., Willems, R. M., & Bekkering, H. 2010. The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 22(8), 1844–1851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. 1983. Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9(1), 82.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. 1989. Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 114–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences 3(3), 417–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shebani, Z., & Pulvermüller, F. 2013. Moving the hands and feet specifically impairs working memory for arm-and leg-related action words. Cortex 49(1), 222–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sejnowski, T. J. 1977. Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. Journal of mathematical biology 4(4), 303–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T., & Cooper, R. P. 2013. Is there a semantic system for abstract words? Frontiers in human neuroscience 7(175), 1–175),10.Google Scholar
Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. 2014. Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(18), 1918–1923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., & Perani, D. 2006. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Listening 17(2).Google Scholar
Tomasello, R., Garagnani, M., Wennekers, T., & Pulvermüller, F. 2017. Brain connections of words, perceptions and actions: a neurobiological model of spatio-temporal semantic activation in the human cortex. Neuropsychologia 98, 111–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tschentscher, N., Hauk, O., Fischer, M. H., & Pulvermüller, F. 2012. You can count on the motor cortex: finger counting habits modulate motor cortex activation evoked by numbers. Neuroimage 59(4), 3139–3148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. 2010. Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human brain mapping 31(10), 1459–1468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. 1983. Category specific access dysphasia. Brain 106, 859–878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Categories of knowledge: further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110, 1273–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. 1984. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107, 829–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., Labruna, L., D’Esposito, M., Ivry, R., & Casasanto, D. 2011. A Functional Role for the Motor System in Language Understanding Evidence from Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Psychological Science 22(7), 849–854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar