Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 43–58

Chapter 2
Abstract concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors

Embodied and grounded approaches to cognition have compellingly demonstrated that we comprehend concrete words simulating their meaning through our sensorimotor system (Barsalou 2008). Abstract words, i.e., words that do not have a single and concrete referent, are more difficult to account for in a grounded perspective. According to the Words As social Tools (WAT) proposal (Borghi and Binkofski 2014), in the acquisition and representation of abstract words language plays a central role. Abstract words are indeed mainly acquired through linguistic-social experience (Wauters et al. 2003). We report a behavioral experiment showing that the elaboration of abstract words involves the mouth motor system, as embodied counterpart of the activation of linguistic information, and that the involvement of the mouth is flexibly modulated by the task.
Keywords: abstract words, embodiment, grounded cognition, language processing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The WAT theory on abstract words and previous evidence on mouth activation
  • 2.The present study: An overview
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
      • Lexical decision task
      • Recognition task
  • 3.Results
    • Lexical decision
    • Recognition
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.03maz
References (56)
References
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. 1999. Concreteness context availability and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavioral Research Methods 31(4), 578–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altarriba, J. & Bauer, L. M. 2004. The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: a comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology 117(3), 389–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. L. 2010. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 245–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S. T., & Vigliocco, G. 2013. Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and language 125(1), 47–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. 2002. Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 34, 424–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. 2017. Pacifier overuse and conceptual relation of abstract and emotional concepts. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. 2005. Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher and R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp.129–163). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual. Review of Psychology 59, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, K. W., & Wilson, C. D. 2008. Language and simulations in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment and meaning (pp.245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. 2013. The acquisition of abstract words by young infants. Cognition 127(3), 391–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M. 1995. CoLFIS (Corpus e lessico di frequenza dell’Italiano scritto) [Corpus and frequency lexicon of written Italian]. Retrieved from the Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, [URL]Google Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G. 2018. Abstract Concepts: Structure, processing and Modeling. Editors’ Introduction. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F. 2009. Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings. In N. Taatgenand H. van Rijn (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2304–2309). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D. & Scorolli, C. 2011. Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 2:15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. 2014. Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Berlin and New York: Springer DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M. & Zarcone, E. 2016. Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontiers in Psychology 7:1498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., Tummolini, L. 2017. The Challenge of Abstract Concepts, Psychological Bulletin, vol. CXLIII, n. 3, 263–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F. & Tummolini, L. 2018a. Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 20170121. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G. & Tummolini, L. 2018b. Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of life reviews.Google Scholar
Clark, A. 1998. Magic words: How language augments human computation. Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes, 162–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R. 2013. Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7.Google Scholar
Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. 2010. Beyond the abstract–concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior research methods 42(4), 1042–1048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dove, G. 2011. On the need for embodied and disembodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Thinking in words: language as an embodied medium of thought. Topics in cognitive science 6(3), 371–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin and review, 1–13.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. 2011. When Digits Help Digits: Spatial–Numerical Associations Point to Finger Counting as Prime Example of Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 2, 260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. 2008. Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social neuroscience 3(3–4), 317–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. 2013. Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PloSone 8(6), e67090. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., Perani, D., & Tettamanti, M. 2016. Decoding the neural representation of fine-grained conceptual categories. NeuroImage 132, 93–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granito, C., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. 2015. Naming a Lego World. The Role of Language in the Acquisition of Abstract Concepts. PloSone 10(1), e0114615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Koenig, M. A. 2006. Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development 77, 505–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., & Andrews, M. 2009. Happiness is …an abstract word. The role of affect in abstract knowledge representation. In N. Taatgen and H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. 2011. The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140, 14–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Bergen, B. 2016. How language programs the mind. Topics in cognitive science 8 (2), 408–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meteyard, L, Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. 2012. Coming of Age: A Review of Embodiment and the Neuroscience of Semantics, Cortex, vol. XLVIII, n. 7, pp.788–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzuca, C., Barca, L., & Borghi, A. M. 2017. The Peculiarity of Emotional Words: A Grounded Approach. Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 8(2), 124–133.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. 2018. Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PEERJ, 6, pp. e5987–26.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Boot, I., & van Dantzig, S. 2011. Abstract concepts: sensory motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54, 217–248. Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ponari, M., Norbury, C, & Vigliocco, G. 2017. Acquisition of Abstract Concepts is Influenced by Emotional Valence, Developmental Science, Online First: February, 21th – 2017, Art. Nr. e12549.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012. Beyond human nature. How culture and experience shape our lives. London; New York, NY: Penguin; Norton.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain Mechanisms Linking Language and Action, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6 (7), 576–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. 2012. The semantic richness of abstract concepts. Frontiers inhuman neuroscience 6.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. 1992. Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory and Cognition 20(1), 96–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setti, A., Caramelli, N. 2005. Different domains in abstract concepts. In B. Bara, B. Barsalou, M. Bucciarelli (Eds.). Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science. Mahwah NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. 2018. Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. 2013. Introducing the special topic “The when and why of sensorimotor processes in conceptual knowledge and abstract concepts”. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7.Google Scholar
Troche, J., Crutch, S., & Reilly, J. 2014. Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in psychology, 5.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S., Vinson, D., Andrew, M., & Del Campo, E. 2013. The representation of abstract words: what matters? Reply to Paivio’s (2013) comment on Kousta et al. 2011. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142(1), 288–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. 2014. The neural representation of abstract words: the role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex 24(7), 1767–1777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (in press). Different kinds of abstract concepts. Sistemi Intelligenti vol XXXI/I. Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wauters, L. N., Tellings, A. E., Van Bon, W. H., & Van Haaften, A. W. 2003. Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct. Applied Psycholinguistics 24(03), 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Speed, Laura J. & Marc Brybaert
2022. Dutch sensory modality norms. Behavior Research Methods 54:3 ► pp. 1306 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.