Chapter published in:
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 2540
References

References

Blomberg, J.
2014The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 657–696.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B.
This volume. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French: How languages stick to well-trodden typological paths.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M.
1991Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–236). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S.
1980Deictic categories in the Tibeto-Burman verb. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar
1985The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (367–389). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1997Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hale, A., & Shrestha, K. P.
2006Newār (Nepāl Bhāsā). [Language of the World/Materials 256]. Munich: LINCOM GmbH.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J.
2003Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages (371–384). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (273–284). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. (453–467). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honda, I.
2004Grammaticalization of deictic motion verbs in Seke. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (285–310). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Im, S.-C.
2001Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Kansakar, T., Ishii, H., & Kiryu, K.
2002Conversation in Newar. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and African. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kawachi, K.
This volume. Should Talmy’s motion typology be expanded to visual motion? An investigation into expressions of motion, agentive motion, and visual motion in Sidaama (Sidamo).
Kölver, U., & Shresthacarya, I.
1994A dictionary of contemporary Newar. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Malla, K. P.
1985The Newari language: A working outline [Numenta Serindica 14]. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2017Idoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Problems in the Typology of Motion Expressions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2018Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., and Kawachi, K.
This volume. Introduction: Motion event descriptions in broader perspective.
Matsumoto, Y.
This volume. Neutral and specialized path coding: Toward a new typology of path-coding devices and languages.
Matsuse, I.
2017Newaru-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Newar]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (65–94). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Shakya, D. R.
1992Nominal and verbal morphology in six dialects of Newari. M.A. thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expressions of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & S. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narratives: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1976Semantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions (43–116). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985aLexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985bForce dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 293–337.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. P. & Hill, D.
1995When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 209–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar