Cover not available
Part of
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 25–40

Chapter 1
Distinct coding of Deixis and Path in Kathmandu Newar

| Center for Newar Studies
Focusing on the Kathmandu Newar language, which is spoken in the metropolitan area of Nepal (Kathmandu valley), this chapter discusses the coding patterns of Deixis, which have been relatively understudied. The chapter has two principal aims. The first is to describe how Deixis and Path are expressed in self-motion and various subtypes of caused motion events in Kathmandu Newar. The second is to discuss the implications of this analysis for the typology of motion expressions. I argue that the pervasiveness of Deixis and its distinct coding pattern in Kathmandu Newar permits us to distinguish between Deixis and Path.
Keywords: caused motion, deixis, path, self-motion, typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Deixis and Path in previous literature
  • 3.Motion expressions in Kathmandu Newar
    • 3.1Deixis and Path markers
    • 3.2Self-motion
    • 3.3Caused motion
    • 3.4More on path adverbs
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.01mat
References (31)
References
Blomberg, J. 2014. The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 657–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, B. This volume. Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English, and French: How languages stick to well-trodden typological paths.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (201–236). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1980. Deictic categories in the Tibeto-Burman verb. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University.Google Scholar
1985. The analysis-synthesis-lexis cycle in Tibeto-Burman: A case study in motivated change. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (367–389). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1997. Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hale, A., & Shrestha, K. P. 2006. Newār (Nepāl Bhāsā). [Language of the World/Materials 256]. Munich: LINCOM GmbH.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J. 2003. Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages (371–384). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004. Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (273–284). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Kathmandu Newar (Nepāl Bhāsā). In G. Thurgood & R. LaPolla (Eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. (453–467). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honda, I. 2004. Grammaticalization of deictic motion verbs in Seke. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present 2 [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 149] (285–310). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Im, S.-C.. 2001. Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Kansakar, T., Ishii, H., & Kiryu, K. 2002. Conversation in Newar. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and African. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kawachi, K. This volume. Should Talmy’s motion typology be expanded to visual motion? An investigation into expressions of motion, agentive motion, and visual motion in Sidaama (Sidamo).
Kölver, U., & Shresthacarya, I. 1994. A dictionary of contemporary Newar. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Malla, K. P. 1985. The Newari language: A working outline [Numenta Serindica 14]. Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2017. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Problems in the Typology of Motion Expressions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2018. Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., and Kawachi, K. This volume. Introduction: Motion event descriptions in broader perspective.
Matsumoto, Y. This volume. Neutral and specialized path coding: Toward a new typology of path-coding devices and languages.
Matsuse, I. 2017. Newaru-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Newar]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.) Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (65–94). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Shakya, D. R. 1992. Nominal and verbal morphology in six dialects of Newari. M.A. thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expressions of motion events. In S. Stromqvist & S. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narratives: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–259). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1976. Semantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions (43–116). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985a. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985b. Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers from the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 293–337.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. P. & Hill, D. 1995. When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Matsumoto, Yo, Kimi Akita, Anna Bordilovskaya, Kiyoko Eguchi, Hiroaki Koga, Miho Mano, Ikuko Matsuse, Takahiro Morita, Naonori Nagaya, Kiyoko Takahashi, Ryosuke Takahashi & Yuko Yoshinari
2022. Chapter 3. Linguistic representations of visual motion. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Osswald, Rainer & Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
2022. Chapter 10. The description of transitive directed motion in Lakhota (Siouan). In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.