Cover not available
Part of
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 1–22

Introduction
Motion event descriptions in broader perspective

| National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
| National Defense Academy of Japan
Article outline
  • 1.General statement
  • 2.Talmy’s motion typology
    • 2.1Overview of Talmy’s motion typology
    • 2.2Questions and extensions
      • 2.2.1Terms and assumptions
      • 2.2.2Manner salience and the third type: Slobin’s contributions
      • 2.2.3Intralinguistic variation
  • 3.Broader perspectives
    • 3.1Types of motion event descriptions
    • 3.2Deixis
    • 3.3Types of Manner
  • 4.The chapters in this volume
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.int
References (96)
References
Akita, K. 2017. The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (39–60). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F., & Essegbey, J. 2013. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., B. Levin, & Tham, Sh. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. C. 1975. Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions: An essay in stratificational semantics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael. 2013. Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J. 2014. Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai (Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, Vol. 53): The Faculties of Humanities and Theology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. 2008. Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 17–48.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83, 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., & Van Valin Jr., R. D. 2017. The macro-event property and the layered structure of the clause. Studies in Language, 41(1), 142–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardini, F.-E. 2008. Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 533–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1/3), 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. 2014. A closer look at Paths of vision, Manner of vision and their translation from English into Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14(2), 214–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. G. 1993. Jakaltek directionals: Their meaning and discourse function. Languages of the World, 7, 23–36.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewell, R. B. 2015. The semantics of German verb prefixes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M., & Blomberg, J. 2013. The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 364–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B., Stosic, D. & Cerruti, M. 2017. Within-type variation in Satellite-framed languages: The case of Serbian. Language Typology and Universals, 70, 637–660.Google Scholar
2010. The importance of being a prefix. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 247–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortis, J.-M. & Vittrant, A. 2016. Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. Language Typology and Universals, 69, 341–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A. 2013. Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. S. 1967. Look and see . Language, 43(4), 937–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. 2006. Static and dynamic location in French and English. First Language, 26, 103–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2013. Same family, different path: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2004. Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 2017. Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & ‎Hijazo-Gascón, A. (Eds.). 2015. New horizons in the study of motion: Bringing together applied and theoretical perspectives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Im, S.-C.. 2001. Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Imbert, C. 2012. Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 236–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kageyama, T. 1997. Tango o koeta gokeisei [Word formation beyond words]. In T. Kageyama & Y. Yumoto, Gokeisei to gainenkoozoo [Word formation and conceptual structure] (128–197). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kawachi, K. 2014. Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (103–136). Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
2016. Introduction: An overview of event integration patterns in African languages. Asian and African languages and linguistics, 10, 1–36. [Permanent URL: [URL]]
Kemmer, Suzanne. 2014. Fictive motion in the domain of light. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 79–118.Google Scholar
Koga, H. 2017. Niti-ei-doku-ro-go no ziritu-idoo-hyoogen: Taiyaku-koopasu o motiita hikaku-kenkyuu [Self-motion expressions in Japanese, English, German, and Russian: A comparative study using translation corpora]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (303–336). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A. 2004. Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace : Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (Eds.). 2012. Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamarre, C. 2008. The linguistic categorization of deictic direction in Chinese: With reference to Japanese. In D. Xu (Ed.), Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (69–97). Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Chuugokugo no idoo-hyoogen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no Ruikeiron [Typology of Motion Expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & M. Rafael (Eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates (49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ma, S. 2016. Fictive motion in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of coextension paths. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A. 2014. Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T. 2014. Fictive motion. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (771–790). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 1997. Kuukan-idoo no gengo-hyoogen to sono kakutyoo [Linguistic expressions of motion in space and their extensions]. In S. Tanaka & Y. Matsumoto, Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expressions of space and motion] (125–230). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
2001. Lexicalization patterns and caused and fictive motion: The case of typological split. Handout for a lecture at SUNY Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha. [Republished in A. Goldberg (Ed.), 2011. Cognitive linguistics, Vol III [Critical Concepts in Linguistics]. London: Routledge.]Google Scholar
2004. Nihongo no shikaku-hyoogen ni okeru kyokoo idoo [Fictive motion in Japanese expressions of vision]. Nihongo Bunpo, 4, 111–128.Google Scholar
2013. Determinants of Manner, Path, and Deixis saliency across languages. Paper presented at International Workshop SYLEX III: Space and Motion across Languages and Applications. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 21 November 2013.
2017a. Idoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Issues concerning the typology of motion event descriptions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017b. Nihongo ni okeru idoo-zisyoo-hyoogen no taipu to keiro no hyoogen. [Types of motion-event expressions and expressions of Path in Japanese]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (247–273). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017c. Eigo ni okeru idoo-zisyoo-hyoogen no taipu to keiro-hyoogen. [Types of motion-event expressions and expressions of Path in English]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (25–38). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017d. Idoo-hyoogen no seishitu to sono ruikeisei [Nature of motion expressions and their typological status]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (337–353). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2018. Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K. 2017. The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., Andreani, F., Eguchi, K., Imazato, N., Kawachi, K., Matsuse, I., Nagaya, N., Morita, T., Takahashi, K., Takahashi, R. & Yoshinari, Y. 2013. Crosslinguistic tendencies in the intralinguistic variations of motion descriptions: An experimental study of manner, path, and deixis. Presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on June 23–28, 2013.
Meex, B. 2004. Motion, path and aspect: The case of the German path adpositions über and durch . In H. Cuyckens, T. Mortelmans, & W. De Mulder (Eds.), Belgian Journal of Linguistics 18: Adpositions of Movement: Proceedings of the International Conference on Adpositions of Movement (Leuven 2002), 299–322. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Morita, T. 2011. Intratypological variation in motion events in Japanese and French: Manner and deixis expressions as parameters for cross-linguistics comparison. Cognitextes 6 [[URL]]. DOI logo
Morita, T., & M. Ishihashi. 2017. Nihongo to furansugo no idoo-hyoogen: Hanashikotoba to kakikotoba no tekusuto kara no koosatsu. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (275–302). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Oh, K.-J. 2003. Language, cognition, and development: Motion events in English and Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ohara, K. H. 2002. Linguistic encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A preliminary look. The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies (Keio University), 41, 122–153.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in English and Turkish. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoglu-Demiralp, E. E. Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P. 1989. Typological mixture in the lexicalization of manner and cause in Emai. In P. Newman & R. D. Botne (Eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics, 5, 127–140. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T. 1995. Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 167–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997. Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Relations between Paths of motion and Paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. C. M. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (197–222). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2017. Typologies and language use. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.) Motion and space across languages and applications (419–446). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. BLS 20, 487–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A. 2014. Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 2005. Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 299–310.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. 2000. Expressions of emanation fictive motion events in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
2017. Tai-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Thai]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009. Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (389–402). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012. Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
2016. Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2, 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thepkanjana, Kinkarn. 1986. Serial verb construction in Thai. Doctoral disseration, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Toratani, K. 2012. The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, A. 2013. Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(2), 169–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The correlation between motion event encoding and path verb lexicon size in the Indo-European language family. Folia Linguistica Historica, 35, 307–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B. 2001. A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 54, 298–323.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B., & Sölling, A. 2013. The encoding of motion events: Building typology bottom-up from text data in many languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (77–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G. 1995. Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: with reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G., & Schwarze, C. 2002. The lexicalization of movement concepts in French, Italian, Japanese and Korean: Towards a realistic typology. Arbeitspapier (Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz), 112, 1–32.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. 2007. Spatial semantics. In H. Cuyckens & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M., & Oh, E. 2007. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gathercole, Virginia C. Mueller, Hans Stadthagen-González, María Carmen Parafita Couto, Hannah N. M. De Mulder, Rocío S. Pérez-Tattam, Evelyn Bosma, Bonka Zdravkova Borisova & Miriam Greidanus Romaneli
2022. Moveable Figures and Grounds: Making the Case for the Dual Nature of Motion Events as Events of Motion and Change of State. In Developing Language and Literacy [Literacy Studies, 23], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Matsumoto, Yo, Kimi Akita, Anna Bordilovskaya, Kiyoko Eguchi, Hiroaki Koga, Miho Mano, Ikuko Matsuse, Takahiro Morita, Naonori Nagaya, Kiyoko Takahashi, Ryosuke Takahashi & Yuko Yoshinari
2022. Chapter 3. Linguistic representations of visual motion. In Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description [Human Cognitive Processing, 72], ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.