Chapter published in:
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 122
References

References

Akita, K.
2017The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (39–60). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F., & Essegbey, J.
2013Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., B. Levin, & Tham, Sh. W.
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, D. C.
1975Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions: An essay in stratificational semantics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael
2013Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (55–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J.
2014Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai (Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund, Vol. 53): The Faculties of Humanities and Theology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Boas, H. C.
2008Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, 17–48.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K.
2007Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83, 495–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., & Van Valin Jr., R. D.
2017The macro-event property and the layered structure of the clause. Studies in Language, 41(1), 142–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardini, F.-E.
2008Manner of motion saliency: An inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics, 19, 533–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M.
1991Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1/3), 83–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P.
2014A closer look at Paths of vision, Manner of vision and their translation from English into Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14(2), 214–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. G.
1993Jakaltek directionals: Their meaning and discourse function. Languages of the World, 7, 23–36.Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C.
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (201–235). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewell, R. B.
2015The semantics of German verb prefixes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M., & Blomberg, J.
2013The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 364–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B., Stosic, D. & Cerruti, M.
2017Within-type variation in Satellite-framed languages: The case of Serbian. Language Typology and Universals, 70, 637–660.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2007Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The importance of being a prefix. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 247–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fortis, J.-M. & Vittrant, A.
2016Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. Language Typology and Universals, 69, 341–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J., & Stefanowitsch, A.
2013Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. S.
1967 Look and see . Language, 43(4), 937–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H.
2006Static and dynamic location in French and English. First Language, 26, 103–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2013Same family, different path: Intratypological differences in three Romance languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2004Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Sound symbolism and motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2017Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & ‎Hijazo-Gascón, A.
(Eds.) 2015New horizons in the study of motion: Bringing together applied and theoretical perspectives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Im, S.-C.
2001Typological patterns of motion verbs in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Imbert, C.
2012Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 236–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1983Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kageyama, T.
1997Tango o koeta gokeisei [Word formation beyond words]. In T. Kageyama & Y. Yumoto, Gokeisei to gainenkoozoo [Word formation and conceptual structure] (128–197). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Kawachi, K.
2014Patterns of expressing motion events in Kupsapiny. In O. Hieda (Ed.), Recent advances in Nilotic linguistics (103–136). Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
2016Introduction: An overview of event integration patterns in African languages. Asian and African languages and linguistics, 10, 1–36. [Permanent URL: http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10108​/85062]
Kemmer, Suzanne
2014Fictive motion in the domain of light. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 5: 79–118.Google Scholar
Koga, H.
2017Niti-ei-doku-ro-go no ziritu-idoo-hyoogen: Taiyaku-koopasu o motiita hikaku-kenkyuu [Self-motion expressions in Japanese, English, German, and Russian: A comparative study using translation corpora]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (303–336). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2004Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace : Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B.
(Eds.) 2012Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamarre, C.
2008The linguistic categorization of deictic direction in Chinese: With reference to Japanese. In D. Xu (Ed.), Space in languages of China: Cross-linguistic, synchronic and diachronic perspectives (69–97). Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Chuugokugo no idoo-hyoogen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no Ruikeiron [Typology of Motion Expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
2013Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & M. Rafael (Eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates (49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ma, S.
2016Fictive motion in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of coextension paths. Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Imai, M., Gennari, S. P., Saji, N., & Majid, A.
2014Human locomotion in languages: Constraints on moving and meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 107–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T.
2014Fictive motion. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (771–790). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
1997Kuukan-idoo no gengo-hyoogen to sono kakutyoo [Linguistic expressions of motion in space and their extensions]. In S. Tanaka & Y. Matsumoto, Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expressions of space and motion] (125–230). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
2001Lexicalization patterns and caused and fictive motion: The case of typological split. Handout for a lecture at SUNY Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha. [Republished in A. Goldberg (Ed.) 2011 Cognitive linguistics, Vol III [Critical Concepts in Linguistics]. London: Routledge.]Google Scholar
2004Nihongo no shikaku-hyoogen ni okeru kyokoo idoo [Fictive motion in Japanese expressions of vision]. Nihongo Bunpo, 4, 111–128.Google Scholar
2013Determinants of Manner, Path, and Deixis saliency across languages. Paper presented at International Workshop SYLEX III: Space and Motion across Languages and Applications. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 21 November 2013.
2017aIdoo-hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Issues concerning the typology of motion event descriptions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017bNihongo ni okeru idoo-zisyoo-hyoogen no taipu to keiro no hyoogen. [Types of motion-event expressions and expressions of Path in Japanese]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (247–273). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017cEigo ni okeru idoo-zisyoo-hyoogen no taipu to keiro-hyoogen. [Types of motion-event expressions and expressions of Path in English]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (25–38). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2017dIdoo-hyoogen no seishitu to sono ruikeisei [Nature of motion expressions and their typological status]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (337–353). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
2018Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., Andreani, F., Eguchi, K., Imazato, N., Kawachi, K., Matsuse, I., Nagaya, N., Morita, T., Takahashi, K., Takahashi, R. & Yoshinari, Y.
2013Crosslinguistic tendencies in the intralinguistic variations of motion descriptions: An experimental study of manner, path, and deixis. Presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on June 23–28, 2013.
Meex, B.
2004Motion, path and aspect: The case of the German path adpositions über and durch . In H. Cuyckens, T. Mortelmans, & W. De Mulder (Eds.), Belgian Journal of Linguistics 18: Adpositions of Movement: Proceedings of the International Conference on Adpositions of Movement (Leuven 2002), 299–322. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Morita, T.
2011Intratypological variation in motion events in Japanese and French: Manner and deixis expressions as parameters for cross-linguistics comparison. Cognitextes 6 [https://​cognitextes​.revues​.org​/498]. Crossref
Morita, T., & M. Ishihashi
2017Nihongo to furansugo no idoo-hyoogen: Hanashikotoba to kakikotoba no tekusuto kara no koosatsu. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (275–302). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Oh, K.-J.
2003Language, cognition, and development: Motion events in English and Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ohara, K. H.
2002Linguistic encodings of motion events in Japanese and English: A preliminary look. The Hiyoshi Review of English Studies (Keio University), 41, 122–153.Google Scholar
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Slobin, D. I.
2003Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in English and Turkish. In A. S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoglu-Demiralp, E. E. Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (259–270). Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P.
1989Typological mixture in the lexicalization of manner and cause in Emai. In P. Newman & R. D. Botne (Eds.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics, 5, 127–140. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T.
1995Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 167–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1997Mind, code, and text. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (437–467). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Relations between Paths of motion and Paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. C. M. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (197–222). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2017Typologies and language use. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.) Motion and space across languages and applications (419–446). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N.
1994Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. BLS 20, 487–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kopecka, A., & Majid, A.
2014Manners of human gait: A crosslinguistic event-naming study. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(4), 701–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Y.
2005Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 299–310.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K.
2000Expressions of emanation fictive motion events in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
2017Tai-go no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Thai]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (389–402). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
2016Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2, 133–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thepkanjana, Kinkarn
1986Serial verb construction in Thai. Doctoral disseration, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Toratani, K.
2012The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 90–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkerk, A.
2013 Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change, 3(2), 169–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The correlation between motion event encoding and path verb lexicon size in the Indo-European language family. Folia Linguistica Historica, 35, 307–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B.
2001A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung, 54, 298–323.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B., & Sölling, A.
2013The encoding of motion events: Building typology bottom-up from text data in many languages. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (77–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G.
1995Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: with reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In U. Egli, P. Pause, C. Schwarze, A. von Stechow, & G. Wienold (Eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language (301–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wienold, G., & Schwarze, C.
2002The lexicalization of movement concepts in French, Italian, Japanese and Korean: Towards a realistic typology. Arbeitspapier (Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz), 112, 1–32.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2007Spatial semantics. In H. Cuyckens & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M., & Oh, E.
2007On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar