The objective of the present paper is to compare two kinds of research traditions that developed in the course of the last decades to understand mental and linguistic processing. One tradition relies on the perspective and methodology commonly used in social psychology, cognitive psychology and related fields, while the other is rooted in some form or other in linguistics, drawing mainly or exclusively on language data. In both research traditions it has been argued that certain parts of human behavior exhibit a dualistic organization which can be described in terms of dual process frameworks of analysis. The paper argues that findings made in psychological and linguistic work exhibit a number of commonalities which are in need of explanation.
Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A.2007. Base-rate respect: From ecological validity to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241–297.
Bay, E.1964. Principles of classification and their influence on our concepts of aphasia. In De Reuck, A. V. S., & Maeve O’Connor (Eds.), Disorders of language: CIBA Symposium. London: J. and A. Churchill.
Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C.1998. Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current directions in psychological science 7(1), 1–8.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brinton, L. J.2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E.2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.
Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L.2002. Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamical perspective. In R. M. French, & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1–40). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
De Neys, W.2006. Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science 17(5), 428–433.
Debaisieux, J.-M.2007. La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue, 28, 119–132.
Debaisieux, J.-M.2018. Utterances: One speaker but two resources, micro and macro syntax. Paper presented at the international workshop One Brain – Two Grammars? Examining dualistic approaches to grammar and cognition
, Rostock, 1–2 March 2018.
Dennett, D. C.1978. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.
Deulofeu, J.2017. La macrosyntaxe comme moyen de tracer la limite entre organisation grammaticale et organisation du discours. Modèles Linguistiques, 74, 135–166.
Dik, S. C.1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. (Functional Grammar Series, 21.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J.2001. From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, S.1994. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. The American Psychologist 49(8), 709–724.
Evans, J. St. B. T.2003. In two minds: dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10), 454–459.
Evans, J. St. B. T.2008. Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
Evans, J. St. B. T.2012. Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 18(1), 5–31.
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E.1996. Rationality and Reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E.2013. Dual process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(3), 223–241.
Ferstl, E. C., & D. Yves von Cramon. 2001. The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325–340.
Frankish, K.2010. Dual process and dual system theories of reasoning. Philosophy Compass 5(10), 914–926.
Freud, S.[1900] 1953. The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vols. 4 and 5). London: Hogarth.
Gawrowski, B. & Creighton, L. A.2013. Dual process theories. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (282–312). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gernsbacher, M.1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Groves, P. M. & Thompson, R. F.1970. Habituation: A dual process theory. Psychological Review 77(5), 419–450.
Halliday, M. A. K.1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London, New York, Melbourne, Auckland: Arnold.
Haselow, A.2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 375–424.
Haselow, A.2016a. A processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences, 54, 77–101.
Haselow, A.2016b. Intensifying adverbs ʽoutside the clauseʼ. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause. (379–415). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Head, H.1926. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B.2019. Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2), 411–442.
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., & Kuteva, T.2016. On insubordination and cooptation. In N. Evans, & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (39–63). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.2013. An outline of discourse grammar. In S. Bischoff, & C. Jany (Eds.), Functional approaches to language (175–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.2015. On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. Oxford Handbooks Online in Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics, 55, 1–43.
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., & Kaltenböck, G.2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language & Cognition, 6, 146–180.
Hughlings Jackson, J.1874 [1932]. On the nature of the duality of the brain. In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson, Volume 2 (129–145). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
James, W.[1890] 1950. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D.1990. Right Hemisphere and Verbal Communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Joanette, Y., P. Goulet, B. Ska, & J. Nespoulous. 1989. Informative content of narrative discourse in right brain-damaged right-handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81–105.
Jucker, A. H.1993. The discourse marker well: a relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5), 435–452.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E., & Gernsbacher, M.2000. Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310–336.
Kahneman, D.2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S.2002. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. (49–81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.1972. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A.1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.2011. On Thetical Grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 848–893.
Kintsch, W.1974. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kruglanski, A. W., Erb, H. P., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Chun, W. Y.2006. On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 153–165.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G.2011. Intuitive and deliberative judgements are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.
Kuteva, T., & Heine, B.2020. On the structure of early language. Analytic vs holistic language processing and grammaticalization. In: C. Sinha (Ed.) Oxford handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindell, A. K.2006. In your right hand: Right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychological Review, 16(3), 131–148.
Long, D. L., & Baynes, K.2002. Discourse representation in the two cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(2), 228–242.
Luria, A. R.1966. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. New York: Basic.
MacFarlane, J.2014. Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marini, A.2012. Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1), 68–78.
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U.2005. The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93, 46–54.
Maschler, Y.1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society, 23, 325–366.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D.2009. Intuitive and reflective inferences. In J. St. B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), Two minds: Dual processes and beyond (149–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nespoulous, J. L., Code, C., Virbel, J., & Lecours, A. R.1998. Hypotheses on the dissociation between “referential” and “modalizing” verbal behaviour in aphasia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 311–331.
Osman, M.2004. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 988–1010.
Prat, C. S., Long, D. L., & Baynes, K.2007. The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language, 100(3), 283–294.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman.
Reber, A. S.1993. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidtis, D., Canterucci, G., & Katsnelson, D.2009. Effects of neurological damage on production of formulaic language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23(4), 270–284.
Sloman, S. A.1996. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
Sloman, S. A.2002. Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (379–398). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K. E.1999. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E.2004. The Robot’s Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F.2000. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.
Talmont-Kaminski, K.2010. Review of Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Keith Frankish (eds.), Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Philosophy in Review, 30(5), 331–333.
Traugott, E. C.1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XII, Manchester.
Tsujii, T., & Watanabee, S.2009. Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research, 1287, 118–125.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.1974. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–31.
van Dijk, T. A.1980. Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Van Lancker, D.1988. Nonpropositional speech: Neurolinguistic studies. In Ellis, A. (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (49–118). Volume 3. London: L. Erlbaum.
Van Lancker, D.1990. The neurology of proverbs. Behavioral Neurology 3, 169–87.
Van Lancker, D.1997. Rags to riches: Our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language 57(1), 1–11.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.2004. When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39(1), 1–44.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.2012. Formulaic language and language disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 62–80.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Postman, W. A.2006. Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere damaged subjects. Aphasiology 20(5), 411–426.
Wason, P. C., & Evans, J. St. B. T.1975. Dual Processes in Reasoning?Cognition 3(2), 141–154.
2022. Book Review: Bernd Heine, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva and Haiping Long, The Rise of Discourse Markers. Discourse & Communication 16:6 ► pp. 735 ff.
2021. On the structure of early language. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.