Haiping Long |
Sun Yat-sen University |
Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf
The objective of the present paper is to compare two kinds of research traditions that developed in the course of the last decades to understand mental and linguistic processing. One tradition relies on the perspective and methodology commonly used in social psychology, cognitive psychology and related fields, while the other is rooted in some form or other in linguistics, drawing mainly or exclusively on language data. In both research traditions it has been argued that certain parts of human behavior exhibit a dualistic organization which can be described in terms of dual process frameworks of analysis. The paper argues that findings made in psychological and linguistic work exhibit a number of commonalities which are in need of explanation.
2007Base-rate respect: From ecological validity to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 241–297.
1964Principles of classification and their influence on our concepts of aphasia. In De Reuck, A. V. S., & Maeve O’Connor (Eds.), Disorders of language: CIBA Symposium. London: J. and A. Churchill.
Beeman, M., & Chiarello, C.
1998Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current directions in psychological science 7(1), 1–8.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brinton, L. J.
2008The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E.
2002Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.
Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L.
2002Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamical perspective. In R. M. French, & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1–40). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
De Neys, W.
2006Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science 17(5), 428–433.
2007La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue, 28, 119–132.
2018Utterances: One speaker but two resources, micro and macro syntax. Paper presented at the international workshop One Brain – Two Grammars? Examining dualistic approaches to grammar and cognition
, Rostock, 1–2 March 2018.
1993The discourse marker well: a relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5), 435–452.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E., & Gernsbacher, M.
2000Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310–336.
2011Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S.
2002Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. (49–81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
1972Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A.
1973On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
1974The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kruglanski, A. W., Erb, H. P., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Chun, W. Y.
2006On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 153–165.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G.
2011Intuitive and deliberative judgements are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97–109.
Kuteva, T., & Heine, B.
2020On the structure of early language. Analytic vs holistic language processing and grammaticalization. In: C. Sinha (Ed.) Oxford handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindell, A. K.
2006In your right hand: Right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychological Review, 16(3), 131–148.
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XII, Manchester.
Tsujii, T., & Watanabee, S.
2009Neural correlates of dual-task effect on belief-bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Brain Research, 1287, 118–125.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.
1974Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–31.
van Dijk, T. A.
1980Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Van Lancker, D.
1988Nonpropositional speech: Neurolinguistic studies. In Ellis, A. (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (49–118). Volume 3. London: L. Erlbaum.
Van Lancker, D.
1990The neurology of proverbs. Behavioral Neurology 3, 169–87.
Van Lancker, D.
1997Rags to riches: Our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language 57(1), 1–11.
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2004When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39(1), 1–44.
2021. On the structure of early language. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.