The brain and the mind behind grammar
Dualistic approaches in grammar research and (neuro)cognitive studies of language
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Two traditions of grammatical research
- 2.Linguistic approaches to dualism
- 3.Psychological approaches to dualism
- 4.Neurological approaches to dualism
- 5.The contributions to this volume
-
Notes
-
References
References
References
Auer, P.
2009 On-line syntax: thoughts on the temporality of spoken language.
Language Sciences 31(1), 1–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bahlmann, J., Gunter, T., & Friederici, A.
2006 Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: An electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1829–1842.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berrendonner, A.
1990 Pour une macro-syntaxe.
Travaux de Linguistiques, 21, 25–36.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berrendonner, A.
2003 Eléments pour une macro-syntaxe: actions communicatives, types de clauses, structures périodiques. In:
A. Scarano (Ed.),
Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral. Actes du colloque international de Florence, avril 1999 (93–110). Roma: Bulzoni.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, D.
2002 Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blakemore, D.
2007 ‘Or’-parentheticals, ‘that is’-parentheticals and the pragmatics of reformulation.
Journal of Linguistics, 43, 311–339.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanche-Benviste, C. et al.
1990 Le frainçais parlé: Etudes grammaticales. Paris: CNRS.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blanken, G.
1991 The functional basis of speech automatisms (recurring utterances).
Aphasiology, 5, 103–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blonder, L., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K.
1991 The role of the RH in emotional communication.
Brain 114 (3), 1115–1127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D.
1976 Meaning and memory.
Forum Linguisticum 1, 1–14.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borod, J., Bloom, R., Brickman, A., Nakhutina, L. & Curko, E.
2002 Emotional processing deficits in individuals with unilateral brain damage.
Applied Neuropsychology 9(1), 23–36.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization.
Language, 88, 1–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boye, K. & Bastiaanse, R.
2018 Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics.
Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1), 29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brady, M., Armstrong, L., & Mackenzie, C.
2006 An examination over time of language and discourse production abilities following right hemisphere brain damage.
Journal of Neurolinguistics 19(4), 291–310.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brauer, J., & Friederici, A.
2007 Functional neural networks of semantic and syntactic processes in the developing brain.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1609–1623.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brownell, H. & Joanette, Y.
(Eds.) 1993 Narrative discourse in neurological impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J.
2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caplan, Rochelle & Mirella Dapretto
2001 Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study.
Neuroreport 12(16), 3625–3632.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, W.
1994 Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Champagne-Lavau, M. & Joanette, Y.
2009 Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits.
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 413–426.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chantraine, Y., Joanette, Y., & Ska, B.
1998 Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. In
M. Paradis (Ed.),
Pragmatics in neurogenic communication disorders (21–32). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E.
2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking.
Cognition, 84, 73–111.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Code, C.
1987 Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. London: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Code, C.
1991 Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In
C. Code (Ed.),
The characteristics of aphasia (155–177). London: Taylor & Francis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Code, C.
1997 Can the right hemisphere speak? Brain and Language, 57, 38–59.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulmas, F.
1981 Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E.
2000 Critère illocutoire et articulation informative. In:
M. Bilger (Ed.),
Corpus. Méthodologie et applications linguistiques (350–367). Paris: Champion.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Debaisieux, J.-M.
2007 La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination.
Faits de Langue, 28, 119–132.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Debaisieux, J.-M.
2018 Utterances: One speaker but two resources, micro and macro syntax. Paper presented at the International Workshop
One Brain –Two Grammars? Examining dualistic approaches to grammar and cognition
, Rostock, 1–2 March 2018.
Degand, L. & Evers-Vermeul, J.
Deloufeu, J.
2017 La macrosyntaxe comme moyen de tracer la limite entre organisation grammaticale et organisation du discours.
Modèles Linguistiques, 73, 135–166.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Devinsky, O.
2000 Right cerebral hemisphere dominance for a sense of corporeal and emotional self.
Epilepsy and Behavior 1(1), 60–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S. C.
1997 The theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edwards, S., & Knott, R.
1994 Assessing spontaneous language abilities of aphasic speakers. In:
D. Graddol, &
J. Swann (Eds.),
Evaluating language (91–101). Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. St. B. T.
2003 In two minds: dual processs accounts of reasoning.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10), 454–459.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. St. B. T.
2008 Dual processsing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition.
Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–78.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. St. B. T.
2012 Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning.
Thinking & Reasoning 18(1), 5–31.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E.
1996 Rationality and Reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E.
2013 Dual-process theories of higher cognition – Advancing the debate.
Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(3), 23–241.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frankish, K.
2010 Dual-process and dual-system theories of reasoning.
Philosophy Compass 5(10), 914–926.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frankish, K., & Evans, J. St. B. T.
2009 The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In:
J. St. B. T. Evans, &
K. Frankish (Eds.),
Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond (1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank-Job, B.
2006 A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In:
K. Fischer (Ed.),
Approaches to discourse particles (359–374). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, A.
2004 The neural basis of syntactic processes. In
M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),
The cognitive neurosciences (789–801). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, A., & Alter, K.
2004 Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model.
Brain and Language 89(2), 267–276.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friederici, A., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. & Anwander, A.
2006 The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(7), 2458–2463.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gernsbacher, M.
1990 Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldinger, S. D.
1998 Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical acces.
Psychological Review 105, 251–279.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
1994 Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1992 Pronoun resolution and discourse models.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 266–283.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffin, R., Friedman, O., Ween, J., Winner, E., Happé, F., & Brownell, H.
2006 Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: refining the scope of impairment.
Laterality, 11, 195–225.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagoort, P.
2005 On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416–423.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
1999 Acquired “theory of mind” impairments following stroke.
Cognition, 70, 211–240.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, A.
2013 Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse.
Folia Linguistica 47(2), 375–424.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, A.
2016a A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the ‘final field’ in spoken syntax.
Language Sciences, 54, 77–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haselow, A.
2017 Spontaneous spoken English. An integrated approach to the emergent grammar of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B.
2019 Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing.
Folia Linguistica 53(2), 411–442.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., Kaltenböck, G., & Long, H.
2013 An outline of Discourse Grammar. In:
S. Bischoff &
C. Jeny (Eds.),
Reflections on functionalism in linguistics (175–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.
2017 Cooptation as a discourse strategy.
Linguistics, 55, 1–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, L.
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, L.
2010 Functional Discourse Grammar. In:
B. Heine &
H. Narrog (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (367–400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hird, K., & Kirsner, K.
2003 The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: An analysis of intentional structure.
Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17(4–5), 309–315.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ifantidou-Trouki, E.
1993 Sentential adverbs and relevance.
Lingua, 90(1–2), 69–90.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, R.
1995 The boundaries of the lexicon. In
M. Everaert,
E.-J. van der Linden,
A. Schenk, &
R. Schreuder (Eds.),
Idioms. Structural and psychological perspectives (133–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joseph, R.
1990 Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology and behavioral neurology. New York: Plenum.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kac, M. B.
1972 Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because
.
Language 48(3), 626–632.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahneman, D.
2011 Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S.
2002 Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In:
T. Gilovich,
D. Griffin, &
D. Kahneman (Eds.),
Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (49–81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
Kintsch, W.
1988 The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model.
Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehman Blake, M.
2010 Communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. In
J. S. Damico,
N. Muller, &
M. J. Ball (Eds.),
The handbook of language and speech disorders (556–576). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lum, J. A. G., & Bleses, D.
2012 Declarative and procedural memory in Danish speaking children with specific language impairment.
Journal of Communication Disorders 45(1), 46–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U.
2005 The role played by the RH in the organization of complex textual structures.
Brain and Language, 93, 46–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marini, A.
2012 Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere.
Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1), 68–78.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maschler, Y.
1994 Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation.
Language in Society, 23, 325–366.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, S.
1999 Exploring the process of inference generation in sarcasm: a review of normal and clinical studies.
Brain and Language 68(3), 486–506.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1990 Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 369–386.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1992 Inference during reading.
Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1998 Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990’s.
Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mitchell, R. L. C., & Crow, T. J.
2005 Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: The forgotten hemisphere? Brain 128(5), 963–978.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mogensen, J.
2011 Almost unlimited potentials of a limited neural plasticity: Levels of plasticity in development and reorganization of the injured brain.
Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 13–45.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moon, R. E.
1998 Fixed expressions and text: A study of the distribution and textual behavior of fixed expressions in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, P.
1994 Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere brain damage. In
Chapey, R. (Ed.),
Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (514–534). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, P. S.
1999 Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego, CA: Singular.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Okada, R., Okuda, T., Nakano, N., Nishimatsu, K., Fukushima, H. et al.
2013 Brain areas associated with sentence processing: A functional MRI study and a lesion study.
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 470–478.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parola, A., Gabbatore, I., Bosco, F., Bara, B., Cossa, F., Gindri, P. & Sacco, K.
2016 Assessment of pragmatic impairment in right hemisphere damage.
Journal of Neurolinguistics 39 (1), 10–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallier, C., Devauchelle, A., & Dehaene, S.
2011 Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2522–2527.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prat, C. S., Long, D. L., & Baynes, K.
2007 The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation.
Brain and Language 100(3), 283–294.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roll, M., Gosselke, S., Lindgren, M., & Horne, M.
2013 Time-driven effects on processing grammatical agreement.
Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1004.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabbagh, M. A.
1999 Communicative intentions and language: evidence from right hemisphere damage and autism.
Brain and Language 70(1), 29–69.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schremm, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
2015 Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases.
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 68–84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebeok, T. A.
1972 Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K.
2012 Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model.
Journal of Neurolinguistics 25 (4), 213–239.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J.
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sloman, S. A.
1996 The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speedie, L. J., Wertmann, E., Ta’ir, J., & Heilman, K.
1993 Disruption of automatic speech following a right basal ganglia lesion.
Neurology, 43, 1768–1774.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanovich, K. E.
1999 Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanovich, K. E.
2004 The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tenpenny, P. L.
1995 Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 339–363.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tompkins, C., Fassbinder, W., Lehman-Blake, M., & Baumgaertner, A.
2002 The nature and implications of right hemisphere language disorders: Issues in search of answers. In:
A. E. Hillis (Ed.),
The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation (429–448). New York: Psychology Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C.
1995 The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XII, Manchester (available at
[URL])
Ullman, M. T.
2004 Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model.
Cognition 92(1–2), 231–270.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, M. T.
2015 The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In:
Gregory Hickok and
Steven L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (953–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S.
1997 A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 289–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. A.
1980 Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Lancker, D.
1990 The neurology of proverbs.
Behavioral Neurology, 3, 169–187.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Lancker, D.
1993 Nonpropositional speech in aphasia. In
G. Blanken,
J. Dittmann,
H. Grimm,
J. C. Marshall, &
C.-W. Wallesch (Eds.),
Linguistic disorders and pathologies. An international handbook (215–224). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2004 When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language.
International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39(1), 1–44.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Postman, W.
2006 Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects.
Aphasiology 20(5), 411–426.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Lancker Sidtis, D. & Sidtis, J.
2018 The affective nature of formulaic language: A right- hemisphere subcortical process.
Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 573.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vigneau, M., Beauscousin, V., Herve, P., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houde, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.
2006 Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing.
NeuroImage, 30, 1414–1432.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
1993 Linguistic form and relevance.
Lingua, 90(1–2), 1–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, A.
2002 Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, A., & Perkins, M.
2000 The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model.
Language & Communication 20(1), 1–28.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)