Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 125


Auer, P.
2009On-line syntax: thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahlmann, J., Gunter, T., & Friederici, A.
2006Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: An electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1829–1842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berrendonner, A.
1990Pour une macro-syntaxe. Travaux de Linguistiques, 21, 25–36.Google Scholar
2003Eléments pour une macro-syntaxe: actions communicatives, types de clauses, structures périodiques. In: A. Scarano (Ed.), Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral. Actes du colloque international de Florence, avril 1999 (93–110). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D.
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007‘Or’-parentheticals, ‘that is’-parentheticals and the pragmatics of reformulation. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 311–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benviste, C. et al.
1990Le frainçais parlé: Etudes grammaticales. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Blanken, G.
1991The functional basis of speech automatisms (recurring utterances). Aphasiology, 5, 103–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blonder, L., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K.
1991The role of the RH in emotional communication. Brain 114 (3), 1115–1127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
1976Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
Borod, J., Bloom, R., Brickman, A., Nakhutina, L. & Curko, E.
2002Emotional processing deficits in individuals with unilateral brain damage. Applied Neuropsychology 9(1), 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88, 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K. & Bastiaanse, R.
2018Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1), 29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brady, M., Armstrong, L., & Mackenzie, C.
2006An examination over time of language and discourse production abilities following right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19(4), 291–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, J., & Friederici, A.
2007Functional neural networks of semantic and syntactic processes in the developing brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1609–1623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brownell, H. & Joanette, Y.
(Eds.) 1993Narrative discourse in neurological impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, Rochelle & Mirella Dapretto
2001Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study. Neuroreport 12(16), 3625–3632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994Discourse, consciousness and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Champagne-Lavau, M. & Joanette, Y.
2009Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 413–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chantraine, Y., Joanette, Y., & Ska, B.
1998Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. In M. Paradis (Ed.), Pragmatics in neurogenic communication disorders (21–32). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E.
2002Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Code, C.
1987Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
1991Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In C. Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (155–177). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
1997Can the right hemisphere speak? Brain and Language, 57, 38–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F.
1981Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cresti, E.
2000Critère illocutoire et articulation informative. In: M. Bilger (Ed.), Corpus. Méthodologie et applications linguistiques (350–367). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Debaisieux, J.-M.
2007La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue, 28, 119–132.Google Scholar
2018Utterances: One speaker but two resources, micro and macro syntax. Paper presented at the International Workshop One Brain –Two Grammars? Examining dualistic approaches to grammar and cognition , Rostock, 1–2 March 2018.
Degand, L. & Evers-Vermeul, J.
2015Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1), 59–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deloufeu, J.
2017La macrosyntaxe comme moyen de tracer la limite entre organisation grammaticale et organisation du discours. Modèles Linguistiques, 73, 135–166.Google Scholar
Devinsky, O.
2000Right cerebral hemisphere dominance for a sense of corporeal and emotional self. Epilepsy and Behavior 1(1), 60–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1997The theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S., & Knott, R.
1994Assessing spontaneous language abilities of aphasic speakers. In: D. Graddol, & J. Swann (Eds.), Evaluating language (91–101). Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T.
2003In two minds: dual processs accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10), 454–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Dual processsing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 18(1), 5–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E.
1996Rationality and Reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E.
2013Dual-process theories of higher cognition – Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(3), 23–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K.
2010Dual-process and dual-system theories of reasoning. Philosophy Compass 5(10), 914–926. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frankish, K., & Evans, J. St. B. T.
2009The duality of mind: An historical perspective. In: J. St. B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond (1–29). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, B.
2006A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In: K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (359–374). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friederici, A.
2004The neural basis of syntactic processes. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (789–801). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friederici, A., & Alter, K.
2004Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language 89(2), 267–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. & Anwander, A.
2006The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(7), 2458–2463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.
1990Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, S. D.
1998Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical acces. Psychological Review 105, 251–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
1994Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1992Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 266–283.Google Scholar
Griffin, R., Friedman, O., Ween, J., Winner, E., Happé, F., & Brownell, H.
2006Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: refining the scope of impairment. Laterality, 11, 195–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P.
2005On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
1999Acquired “theory of mind” impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70, 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, A.
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 375–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aA processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the ‘final field’ in spoken syntax. Language Sciences, 54, 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bIntensifying adverbs ʽoutside the clauseʼ. In: G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the Clause (379–415). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Spontaneous spoken English. An integrated approach to the emergent grammar of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
2016Extra-clausal constituents and language contact. The case of discourse markers. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause (243–272). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2), 411–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., Kaltenböck, G., & Long, H.
2013An outline of Discourse Grammar. In: S. Bischoff & C. Jeny (Eds.), Reflections on functionalism in linguistics (175–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.
2017Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics, 55, 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, L.
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Functional Discourse Grammar. In: B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (367–400). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hird, K., & Kirsner, K.
2003The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: An analysis of intentional structure. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17(4–5), 309–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou-Trouki, E.
1993Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua, 90(1–2), 69–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1995The boundaries of the lexicon. In M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms. Structural and psychological perspectives (133–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Joseph, R.
1990Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology and behavioral neurology. New York: Plenum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kac, M. B.
1972Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because . Language 48(3), 626–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.
2011Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S.
2002Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (49–81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4), 848–893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
1988The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehman Blake, M.
2010Communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. In J. S. Damico, N. Muller, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders (556–576). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lum, J. A. G., & Bleses, D.
2012Declarative and procedural memory in Danish speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders 45(1), 46–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U.
2005The role played by the RH in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93, 46–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A.
2012Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33(1), 68–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Y.
1994Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society, 23, 325–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S.
1999Exploring the process of inference generation in sarcasm: a review of normal and clinical studies. Brain and Language 68(3), 486–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1990Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 369–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990’s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. L. C., & Crow, T. J.
2005Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: The forgotten hemisphere? Brain 128(5), 963–978. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mogensen, J.
2011Almost unlimited potentials of a limited neural plasticity: Levels of plasticity in development and reorganization of the injured brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 13–45.Google Scholar
Moon, R. E.
1998Fixed expressions and text: A study of the distribution and textual behavior of fixed expressions in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Myers, P.
1994Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere brain damage. In Chapey, R. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (514–534). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Myers, P. S.
1999Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Okada, R., Okuda, T., Nakano, N., Nishimatsu, K., Fukushima, H. et al.
2013Brain areas associated with sentence processing: A functional MRI study and a lesion study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 470–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parola, A., Gabbatore, I., Bosco, F., Bara, B., Cossa, F., Gindri, P. & Sacco, K.
2016Assessment of pragmatic impairment in right hemisphere damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics 39 (1), 10–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A.
2009Grammarians’ languages versus humanists’ languages and the place of speech act formulas in models of linguistic competence. In: R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language. Volume 1: Distribution and Historical Change (3–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Devauchelle, A., & Dehaene, S.
2011Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2522–2527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat, C. S., Long, D. L., & Baynes, K.
2007The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100(3), 283–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Gosselke, S., Lindgren, M., & Horne, M.
2013Time-driven effects on processing grammatical agreement. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, M. A.
1999Communicative intentions and language: evidence from right hemisphere damage and autism. Brain and Language 70(1), 29–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schremm, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
2015Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 68–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. A.
1972Perspectives in Zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K.
2012Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25 (4), 213–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. A.
1996The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speedie, L. J., Wertmann, E., Ta’ir, J., & Heilman, K.
1993Disruption of automatic speech following a right basal ganglia lesion. Neurology, 43, 1768–1774. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E.
1999Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenpenny, P. L.
1995Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 339–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, C., Fassbinder, W., Lehman-Blake, M., & Baumgaertner, A.
2002The nature and implications of right hemisphere language disorders: Issues in search of answers. In: A. E. Hillis (Ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation (429–448). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XII, Manchester (available at https://​web​.stanford​.edu​/~traugott​/ect​-papersonline​.html)
Ullman, M. T.
2004Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92(1–2), 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In: Gregory Hickok and Steven L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (953–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S.
1997A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 289–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
1980Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, D.
1990The neurology of proverbs. Behavioral Neurology, 3, 169–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Nonpropositional speech in aphasia. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C.-W. Wallesch (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies. An international handbook (215–224). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2004When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Formulaic and novel language in a “dual process” model of language competence: Evidence from surveys, speech samples, and schemata. In: R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & Kathleen M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language. Volume 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations (445–470). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Postman, W.
2006Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology 20(5), 411–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D. & Sidtis, J.
2018The affective nature of formulaic language: A right- hemisphere subcortical process. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigneau, M., Beauscousin, V., Herve, P., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houde, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.
2006Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 30, 1414–1432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, T.
2003Interjections, language, and the ‘showing/saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition, 11(1), 39–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1–2), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A.
2002Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A., & Perkins, M.
2000The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication 20(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar