Chapter published in:
Neglected Aspects of Motion-Event Description: Deixis, asymmetries, constructions
Edited by Laure Sarda and Benjamin Fagard
[Human Cognitive Processing 72] 2022
► pp. 4367
References
Akita, K., Matsumoto, Y., & Ohara, K. H.
2010Idōhyōgen no ruikeiron ni okeru tyokuzi-teki-keiro-hyōgen to yōtai-goi-repātorī [Deictic path expressions and manner lexicon in the typology of motion expressions]. In T. Kageyama (Ed.), Lexicon forum 5 (1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Aske, J.
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall, M. Meacham & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, B.
2020Looking into visual motion expressions in Dutch, English and French: How languages stick to well-trodden typological paths. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (235–280). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P.
2014A closer look at Paths of vision, Manner of vision and their translation from English into Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14 (2), 214–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eguchi, K.
2017Hangarī-go ni okeru idōhyōgen [Motion expressions in Hungarian]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idōhyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (39–64). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Filipović, L.
2010The importance of being a prefix. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (247–266). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. S.
1967 Look and see . Language, 43 (4), 937–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, D.
2004Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In A. Saxena (Ed.), Himalayan languages. Past and present (273–284). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasko, V.
2010Semantic composition of motion verbs in Russian and English: The case of intratypological variability. In V. Hasko & R. Perelmutter (Eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (197–223). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M.
2002Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B.
2011A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. A case study: From Latin to Romance. Cahiers de Faits de Langue, 3 , 151–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalıskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., & Hijazo-Gascón, A.
2012Variation in motion events: theory and applications. In L. Filipović & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures (349–371). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, K.
2020Should Talmy’s motion typology be expanded to visual motion? An investigation into expressions of motion, agentive motion, and visual motion in Sidaama (Sidamo). In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (205–234). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koga, H.
2017Niti-ei-doku-ro-go no ziritu-idōhyōgen: Taiyaku-kōpasu o motiita hikaku-kenkyū [Self-motion expressions in Japanese, English, German, and Russian: A comparative study using translation corpora]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idōhyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (303–336). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
forthcoming). Motion event descriptions in Japanese. In Y. Matsumoto Ed. Motion event descriptions from a crosslinguistic perspective Berlin & New York Mouton de Gruyter
Koga, H., & Ohori, T.
2008Reintroducing inverse constructions in Japanese: The deictic verb kuru ‘to come’ in the paradigms of argument encoding. In R. D. Van Valin Jr. (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (35–57). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2004Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Ph. D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.
2006The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories (83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ma, S.
2016Fictive motion in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study of coextension paths. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Auckland.
Matsumoto, Y.
1996Complex predicates in Japanese: A syntactic and semantic study of the notion ‘word’. Stanford: CSLI Publications & Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
1997Kūkan-idō no gengo-hyōgen to sono kakutyō [Linguistic expressions of motion in space and their extensions]. In S. Tanaka & Y. Matsumoto (Eds.), Kūkan to idō no hyōgen [Expressions of space and motion] (125–230). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
2001Lexicalization patterns and caused and fictive motion: The case of typological split. Handout for a lecture at SUNY Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2004Nihongo no shikaku-hyōgen ni okeru kyokō idō [Fictive motion in Japanese expressions of vision]. Nihongo bunpō, 4 (1), 111–128.Google Scholar
2014Common tendencies in the descriptions of manner, path and cause across languages: A closer look at their subcategories. Paper presented at Langacross 2 (Linguistic diversity and cognition: implications for first and second language acquisition), June 21, 2014, Université Lille 3, France.
2017aNihongo ni okeru idō-zisyō-hyōgen no taipu to keiro no hyōgen [Types of motion-event expressions and expressions of path in Japanese]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idō-hyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (247–276). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2017bIdō-hyōgen no seishitu to sono ruikeisei [Nature of motion expressions and their typological status]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idō-hyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (337–354). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2018Motion event descriptions in Japanese from typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi and T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Neutral and specialized Path coding: Toward a new typology of Path coding devices and languages. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (281–316). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and Space across Languages and Applications (95–122). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., & Kawachi, K.
2020Motion event descriptions in broader perspective. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (1–22). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuse, I.
2017Newāru-go no idōhyōgen [Motion expressions in Newar]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idō-hyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (65–94). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2020Distinct coding of Deixis and Path in Kathmandu Newar. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (25–40). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morita, T., & Ishibashi, M.
2017Nihongo to furansugo no idōhyōgen: Hanashikotoba to kakikotoba no tekusuto kara no kōsatsu [Motion expressions in Japanese and French: Discussion based on spoken and written texts]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idō-hyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (275–302). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
2003Directional verbs in Japanese. In E. Shay & U. Seibert (Eds.), Motion, direction and location in languages: In honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (259–286). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2000Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2009Relations between Paths of motion and Paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. C. Mueller Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to Language: Studies in Honor of Melissa Bowerman (197–222). New York & London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K.
2000Expressions of emanation fictive motion events in Thai. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
2017Tai-go no idōhyōgen. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idōhyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (129–158). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2018Deictic motion constructions in Japanese and Thai. In P. Prashant & T. Kageyama (Eds.), The handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (291–312). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Syntactic and semantic structures of Thai motion expressions. In Y. Matsumoto and K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions (105–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalıskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (389–402). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thepkanjana, K.
1986Serial verb construction in Thai. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Wnuk, E.
2021Ways of looking: Lexicalizing visual paths in verbs. Journal of Linguistics, 57, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshinari, Y.
2017Itaria-go no idōhyōgen [Motion expressions in Italian]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idōhyōgen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (189–211). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar