Cover not available
Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 405–438

Chapter 13
Contrasts and analogies in cluster categories of emotion concepts in monolingual and cross-linguistic contexts

contempt

| University of Applied Sciences in Konin
| University of Lodz
The chapter focuses on the similarities and contrasts in the nature, function and cognitive semantic description of British English versus Polish moral emotion cluster concepts in their contrastive and translational contexts, particularly of contempt and its relationship with disgust and anger. The first part of the chapter is devoted to the role of analogy in cross-cultural variation in emotion concepts. The presentation of the cluster nature of such concepts is framed in terms of particular Emotion Events (Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Wilson 2013) and is taken as an analogous point of departure in their intra- and cross-linguistic analysis. Three complementary and multidisciplinary methodological paradigms were employed: GRID instrument, online emotions sorting task, and cognitive corpus-based linguistics. The conclusions indicate areas of analogy in the semantic content of the examined clusters of emotion concepts, on the one hand, and intra- and inter-linguistic contrasts, on the other.
Keywords: anger, conceptual clusters, corpus, disgust, Emotion Event, English, GRID, online emotions sorting, Polish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Analogy
    • 1.2Introducing contempt/anger/disgust cluster
    • 1.3Linguistic characterisation of the cluster
      • 1.3.1Syntactic-semantic frames
    • 1.4Aims
  • 2.Materials and methods
    • 2.1Online emotions sorting methodology
      • 2.1.1Procedure
      • 2.1.2Participants
    • 2.2GRID
      • 2.2.1Procedure
      • 2.2.2Participants
  • 3.Online emotions sorting and GRID results
    • 3.1Online emotions sorting results
      • 3.1.1Contempt vs. pogarda – anger and fear cluster co-occurrences
      • 3.1.2Contempt vs. pogarda – humiliation co-occurrences
    • 3.2GRID results
      • 3.2.1GRID conclusions
  • 4.Language data
    • 4.1Materials and methods
    • 4.2Collocational links between contempt and disgust
    • 4.3Contempt metaphoricity
      • 4.3.1English
      • 4.3.2Polish
    • 4.4Parallel corpus data
    • 4.5Contempt and disgust
      • 4.5.1Disgust metaphoricity
    • 4.6Contempt and anger
      • 4.6.1Anger metaphoricity
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.13lew
References (63)
References
Bar, M. 2007. The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 280–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L. F. 2006. Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28–58. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In L. Gershkoff-Stowe, & D. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories. Carnegie Symposium Series (389–431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boiger, M., Ceulemans, Y., Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Mesquita, B. 2018. Beyond essentialism: Cultural differences in emotions revisited. Emotion, 18(8), 1142–1162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. 1999. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Lindquist, K. A., & Gray, K. 2015. A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubé, L., & Le Bel, J. 2003. The content and structure of laypeople’s concept of pleasure. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 263–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. 1972. Universal and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In J. R. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, (207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ellsworth P. C., & Scherer, K. R. 2003. Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (572–595). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B. et al.. 2002. Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition and Emotion, 16(1), 61–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, J. J. R., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. 2007. The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1050–1057. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, J. J. R., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (Eds.). 2013. Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H. 1986. The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. 1989. Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 212–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gervais, M. M., & Fessler, D. M. T. 2017. On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax – a functional-typological introduction. Volume II. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, R. 1961. The History of the Contempt Power. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1, 1–29.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. 2007. Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7, 853–868. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. 2003. The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (Ed.). 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heider, K. G. 1991. Landscapes of emotion: Mapping three cultures of emotion in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoemann, K., Xu, F., & Barrett, L. F. 2019. Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 1830–1849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. 1977. Human emotions. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100, 68–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. 1992. Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 1986. Metaphors of anger, pride and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammars. Vol. I. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of cognitive grammars. Vol. II. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. S., & Ellsworth, P. C. 2013. Maggots and morals: Physical disgust is to fear as moral disgust is to anger. In J. J. R. Fontaine, K. R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (271–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. 1996. Cross-linguistic and language-specific aspects of semantic prosody. In K. Jaszczolt, & K. Turner (Eds.), Contrastive semantics and pragmatics, vol. 1. Meanings and representations (153–178). Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Approximative spaces and the tolerance threshold in communication. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 2(2), 2-19.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. 2013. English fear and Polish starch. In J. J. R. Fontaine, K. R. Scherer., & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (425–436). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B., & Wilson, P. A. 2014. Self-conscious emotions in collectivistic and individualistic cultures: A contrastive linguistic perspective. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics, vol. 2. New empirical and theoretical paradigms (123–148). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Wilson, P. A. 2016. Physical and moral disgust in socially believable behaving systems in different cultures. In A. Esposito, & L. Jain (Eds.), Socially Believable Behaving Systems (105–132). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, B. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, F. Gill, E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (105–132). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. 2015. The role of contempt in intercultural cooperation. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(5), 429–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto D, Hwang H. C., & Frank M. G. 2017. Emotion and aggressive intergroup cognitions: The ANCODI hypothesis. Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frida, N. H. 2013. Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. 2006. The psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pęzik, P. 2014. Graph-based analysis of collocational profiles. In V. Jesenšek, & P. Grzybek (Eds.), Phraseologieimwörterbuch und korpus (phraseology in dictionaries and corpora). Praha: Filozofska fakuteta.Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. 1980. Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Reips, U-D. 2002. Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozin. P., Lowery. L., Imada, S., & Haidt. J. 1999. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger. disgust) and three moral codes (community. autonomy. divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. 2003. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R. 1984. On the nature and function of emotions: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer, & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2005. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44, 693–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review, 5, 150–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., Ceni, A., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. 2010. NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016, [URL]/ from the Social Media Research Foundation, [URL]Google Scholar
Soriano, C. 2013. Conceptual metaphor theory and the GRID paradigm in the study of anger in English and Spanish. In J. J. R. Fontaine, K. R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (410–424). Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. 1962. Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. I: The positive affects. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 2014. Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. A., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. 2014. Affective robotics: Modelling and testing cultural prototypes. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 814–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Pride in British English and Polish: A cultural-linguistic perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (247–288). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C-B., & Liljenquist, K. 2006. Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313 (5792), 1451–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wilson, Paul & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk
2023. Prototypes in emotion concepts. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.