1986Lokale Präpositionen im Deutschen und ihre griechischen Entsprechungen. Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre.
Bailey, C. J. & R. Shuy
(Eds1973New ways of analysing variation in English. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Barcelona, A.
2003Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (207–277). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1996The German über. In Pütz, M. & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (73–107). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bennet, D. C.
1975Spatial and temporal uses of English prepositions: An essay in stratificational semantics. London: Longman.
Berezina, E. N.
2008Kontseptualizatsija prostranstva: predlogi against, opposite v sovremiennom anglijskom jazyke i ikh russkije sootvetstvija. [Oryg. Березина Е.Н. Концептуализация пространства: предлоги against, opposite в современном английском языке и их русские соответствия.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Moscow: Russian Academy of Science [Москва: Pоссийская Aкадемия Наук]. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/kontseptualizatsiya-prostranstva-predlogi-against-opposite-v-sovremennom-angliiskom-yazyke-i.
Bierwiaczonek, B.
2013Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
Bierwisch M. & E. Lang
(Eds1987aGrammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven. Studia grammatica 26, 27. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Bierwisch, M. & E. Lang
(Eds1987bSemantische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven (Studia grammatica). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Bierwisch, M. & E. Lang
(Eds1989Dimensional adjectives: Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Bluszcz, A.
1987Relacje przestrzenne w polskich, czeskich i słowackich konstrukcjach z wyrażeniami przyimkowymi. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.
Boroditsky, L.
2001aDoes language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43, 1–22.
Boroditsky, L.
2001bHow does our language shape the way we think. Retrieved from: https://www.edge.org/conversation/lera_boroditsky-how-does-our-language-shape-the-way-we-think
.
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W.
2003Sex, syntax and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (61–78). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Borozdina, I. S.
2003Semantika prostranstvennykh predlogov: na matieriale anglijskogo i russkogo jazykov. [Oryg. Бороздина И.С. Семантика пространственных предлогов: На материале английского и русского языков.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Курск:
Pоссийская Aкадемия Наук
. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/semantika-prostranstvennykh-predlogov-na-materiale-angliiskogo-i-russkogo-yazykov
.
Brecht, R. D., & Levine, J. S.
[1986] 2016Case in Slavic. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, Inc.
[1981] 1988The Story of over: Polysemy, semantics and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Press.
Chernyshev A. B.
2010Kognitivnoe modelirovanije semantiki prostranstvennykh i vremennykh neproizvodnykh predlogov s obshtshim znachenijem ’dvizhenije k konechnomu objektu’: na matieriale anglijskogo i russkogo jazykov. [Oryg. Чернышев А.Б. Когнитивное моделирование семантики пространственных и временных непроизводных предлогов с общим значением "движение к конечному объекту": на материале английского и русского языков.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/kognitivnoe-modelirovanie-semantiki-prostranstvennykh-i-vremennykh-neproizvodnykh-predlogov
.
Chłopicki, W., Pawelec, A., & A. Pokojska
(Eds2007Cognition in language: Volume in honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska (255–272). Kraków: Tertium.
Cienki, A. J.
1989Spatial cognition and semantics of prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Cienki, A. J.
1998STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9–2, 107–149.
Clark, H. H.
1996Communities, commonalities, and communication. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (324–355). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
1999Domains and image schemas. Cognitive linguistics 10–11, 1–31.
Cooper, G. S.
1968A semantic analysis of English locative prepositions. Cambridge: Bolt, Beranek and Newman Inc.
Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C.
2004Saying, seeing, and acting : The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Essays in cognitive psychology. Hove: Psychology Press.
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, A. D.
[2000] 2006Aspects of the micro-structure of word meanings. In Y. Ravin, & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy. Theoretical and computational approaches (30–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cuyckens, H.
1993The Dutch spatial preposition in: A cognitive-semantic analysis. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Ed.), The Semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing (27–73). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dancygier, B.
1997How Polish structures space: Prepositions, direction nouns, case, and metaphor. In A. Foolen, & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (28–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
De Cuypere, L.
2013Debiasing semantic analysis: the case of the English preposition to. Language Sciences 37, 122–135.
De Knop, S.
2013A sociolinguistic analysis of the German alternation between bis an and bis zu constructions. Belgium, Europe: Peter Lang.
De Knop, S., & Mollica, F.
2017The family of German dative constructions. In P. Pérez-Sobrino, F. Ruiz de Mendoza, & A. Luzondo (Eds.), Constructing Families of Constructions. (205–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1989Cognitive perspective on complementation. In D. Jespers, W. Klooster, Y. Putseys, & P. Seuren (Eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon. Studies in honor of Wim de Geest (113–139). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Dirven, R.
1993Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of prepositions. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Ed.), The semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing (73–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R., & R. Pörings
(Eds2003Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Drosdowski, G., Köster, R., Müller, W., & W. Scholze-Stubenrecht
(Eds1994Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Duffley, P.
2003The gerund and the to‑infinitive as subject. Journal of English Linguistics 31–4, 324–352.
Duffley, P.
2004Verbs of liking with the infinitive and the gerund. English Studies 4, 358–380.
Duffley, P.
2007A natural-language semantics approach to infinitival and gerund-participial complementation in English. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Studies 22, 55–67.
Duffley, P.
2009Complementation with verbs of choice in English. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 54–1, 1–26.
Duffley, P., & Fisher, R.
2005Verb+to+infinitive vs. verb+to+gerund participle: A preliminary exploration. Langues et linguistique 31, 31–61.
Eroms H. W.
1981Valenz, Kasus und Präpositionen: Untersuchungen zur Syntax und Semantik präpositionaler Konstruktionen in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Heidelberg: Winter.
Evans, V.
[2009] 2010How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, V., & Tyler, A.
2005Rethinking English ‘prepositions of movement’: The case of to and through. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 18:1, 247–270.
Everett, C.
2013Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fauconnier, G.
[1985] 1994Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fischer, O., Van Kemenade, A., Koopman, W., & Van Der Wurff W.
2000The syntax of Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, R. & Duffley, P.
2009Can vs. be able to: Why ‘semi-modals’ are not modals. In P. Sutcliffe, L. Stanford & A. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum 35: Language and linguistics in North America 1608–2008: Diversity and convergence. Houston, TX: LACUS.
Foolen, A. & F. van der Leek
(Eds1997Constructions in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Fries, N.
1988Präpositionen und Präpositionalphrasen im Deutschen und im Neugriechischen. Aspekte einer kontrastiven Analyse Deutsch-Neugriechisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Geeraerts, D.
2006Prospects and problems of prototype theory. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (141–165). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D.
(Ed2006Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gentner, D., & S. Goldin-Meadow
(Eds2003Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
[1995] 2006The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. In D. Geeraerts, R. Dirven, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (141–165). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Glucksberg, S.
2001Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Górska, E.
1999On parts and wholes: A cognitive study of English schematic part terms. Warszawa: Sigillum Universitatis Varsoviensis.
Grady, J. E.
1997aFoundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2
.
Grady, J. E.
1997bTHEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive linguistics, 8–4, 267–290.
Gries, S.
2006Introduction. In S. Gries, & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–17.
Gries, S., & A. Stefanowitsch
(Eds2006Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gumperz, J. J., & S. C. Levinson
(Eds1996Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Habel, C., Herweg, M., & K. Rehkämper
(Eds1989Raumkonzepte in Verstehensprozessen. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu Sprache und Raum. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Haertlé, I.
2017Does grammatical gender influence perception? A study of Polish and French speakers. Psychology of Language and Communication 21 (1), 386–407.
Haider, H.
1993Deutsche Syntax – generativ. Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.
Hampe, B.
2005Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hampe, B.
(Ed2005From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hanks, W.
[1996] 1999Language form and communicative practices. In J. J. Gumpertz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (232–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M.
1989From purposive to infinitive – A universal path of gramaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10:1–2, 287–310.
Herskovits, A.
[1986] 2010Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herweg, M.
1988Zur Semantik einiger lokaler Präpositionen des Deutschen. Überlegungen zur Theorie der lexikalischen Semantik am Beispiel von in, an, bei und auf. Stuttgart: IBM Deutschland GmbH.
Herweg, M.
1989Ansätze zu einer semantischen Beschreibung topologischer Präpositionen. In C. Habel, M. Herweg, & K. Rehkämper (Eds.), Raumkonzepte in Verstehensprozessen. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu Sprache und Raum (99–127). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ho-Abdullah, I.
2010Variety and variability: A corpus-based lexical-semantics analysis of prepositional usage in British, New Zealand and Malaysian English. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hoffman, S.
2005Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based study. London: Routledge.
Hofman, T. V.
2005Kontseptualizatsija prostranstva v semantike predlogov: tieoretiko-eksperimentalnoe issledovanije predlogov nad, naverkhu, poverkh, sverkh, vyshe, svyshe. [Oryg. Гофман Т.В. Концептуализация пространства в семантике предлогов: Теоретико-экспериментальное исследование предлогов над, наверху, поверх, сверх, выше, свыше.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Moscow: Russian Academy of Science. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/kontseptualizatsiya-prostranstva-v-semantike-predlogov-teoretiko-eksperimentalnoe-issledovan
.
Holland, D., & N. Quinn
(Eds1987Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hüllen, W., & R. Schulze
(Eds1988Understanding the lexicon. Meaning, sense, and world knowledge in lexical semantics. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Jackendoff, R.
1983Semantics and cognition. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Janda, L. A.
1993A geography of case semantics: the Czech dative and the Russian instrumental. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Janda, L.
2013Quantitative methods in cognitive linguistics: An introduction. In L. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader (1–32). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Janda, L.
(Ed2013Cognitive linguistics: The quantitative turn. The essential reader. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jespers, D., Klooster, W., Putseys, Y., & P. Seuren
(Eds1989Sentential complementation and the lexicon. Studies in Honor of Wim de Geest (113–139). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Jespersen, O.
1927A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part III. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Johnson, M.
1987The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kalisz, R.
2001Językoznawstwo kognitywne w świetle językoznawstwa funkcjonalnego. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Kalyuga M.
2015The Russian Prepositions перед, против and напротив: a cognitive linguistic approach. Russian Language Journal, Vol. 65, 25–36
Kaufmann, I.
1993Semantic and conceptual aspects of the preposition durch. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Ed.), The semantics of prepositions. From Mental Processing to Natural Mental Processing (221–247). New York, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kempton, W.
1981The Folk classification of ceramic: A study of cognitive prototypes. New York: Academic Press.
Khoruzhaya J. N.
2007Semanticheskie funktsii prostranstvennykh i vremennykh predlogov v nemetskom i russkom jazykakh. [Oryg. Хоружая E.Н. Семантические функции пространственных и временных предлогов в немецком и русском языках.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Krasnodar: Kuban State University. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/semanticheskie-funktsii-prostranstvennykh-i-vremennykh-predlogov-v-nemetskom-i-russkom-yazykakh
.
Kibrik A. E.
1970K tipologii prostranstvennykh znachenij (na materiale padezshnyghk system dagestanskighk jazykov). Jazyk i chelovek. Moscow. MGU, 110–156. [Oryg. Кибрик А. Е. (1970) К типологии пространственных значений (на материале падежных систем дагестанских языков). Язык и человек. Москва: Изд. МГУ 1970. С 110–156.]
Klebanowska, B.
1971Znaczenie lokatywne polskich przyimków właściwych. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Kostyuchenkova N. V.
2004Predstavlenie gorizontalnoi osi ’vperedi-pozadi’ v kognitivnom aspekte: na materiale russkogo, norvezhskogo i anglijskogo jazykov. [Oryg. Костюченкова Н.В.Представление горизонтальной оси "впереди-позади" в когнитивном аспекте: На материале русского, норвежского и английского языков.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/predstavlenie-gorizontalnoi-osi-vperedi-pozadi-v-kognitivnom-aspekte-na-materiale-russkogo-n.
2018Przyimki w wyrokach unijnych i krajowych. Analiza korpusowa dystrybucji i funkcji przyimków prostych, złożonych i wtórnych. Comparative Legilinguistics 35, 89–119.
Krzeszowski, T.
1986Prototypes and equivalence. Papers and studies in contrastive linguistics 21, 5–20.
Krzeszowski, T.
1997Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.
Labov, W.
1973The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C. J. Bailey, & R. Shuy (Eds.), New Ways of Analysing Variation in English (340–373). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G.
1990The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1), 39–75.
Lakoff, G.
[1979] 1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G.
[1979] 2006The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (185–238). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
[1980] 2003Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
1989More than cool reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J. & A. Schwartz
(Eds1991Master metaphor list (2nd ed.). Retrieved from: http://araw.mede.uic.edu/alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf
.
Lambert, S.
2010Beyond recipients: Towards a typology of dative uses. Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing.
Lang, E.
1987Semantik der Dimensionsauszeichnung räumlicher Objekte. In M. Bierwisch, & E. Lang (Eds.), Semantische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven (287–458). Studia grammatica 26, 27. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Lang, E.
1989The semantics of dimensional designation of spatial objects. In M. Bierwisch, & E. Lang (Eds.), Dimensional adjectives: Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation (263–417). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Lang, E.
1993The meaning of German projective prepositions: A two-level approach. In C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt (Ed.), The semantics of prepositions. From Mental Processing to Natural Mental Processing (249–291). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W.
1991Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W.
2000Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W.
2008Cognitive Grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R. W.
2013Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech. G. N.
1969Towards a semantic description of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Leech, G.
2011Frequency, corpora and language learning. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger (7–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Lehmann, W. P.
(Ed1988Prototypes in language and cognition. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
Leontieva N. N., & Nikitina, S. E.
1969Smyslovye otnoshenija peredavaemyje ruskimi predlogami. Slavica IX. Debrecen, 15–63. [Oryg. Леонтьева Н. Н., Никитина С. Е. (1969) Смысловые отношения, передаваемые русскими предлогами. Slavica IX. Debrecen, 15–63.]
Levinson, S. C.
[2003] 2004Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2002Semanticheskije predstavlenia relevantnye dlja opisania znachenia rjada prostranstvennykh predlogov i narechij. [Oryg. Лягушкина Н. В. Семантические представления, релевантные для описания значения ряда пространственных предлогов и наречий.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Moscow: Russian Academy of Science. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/semanticheskie-predstavleniya-relevantnye-dlya-opisaniya-znacheniya-ryada-prostranstvennykh-predlogov-i-narechij
.
Lyons, J.
[1977] 1996Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacLaury, R.
1991Prototypes revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 20, 55–74.
2004Predlog kak sredstvo kontseptualizatsii prostranstvennykh otnoshenij. [Oryg. Мальцева О. Л. Предлог как средство концептуализации пространственных отношений.] (Unpublished PhD dissertation.) Tver: Kursk State University. Retrieved from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/predlog-kak-sredstvo-kontseptualizatsii-prostranstvennykh-otnoshenii-strony
.
Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska, J., & Safranow, K.
2020Zum Einfluss des Genus auf die Konzeptualisierung der Objekte vor dem Hintergrund der verkörperten Kognition. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 50 (4), 605–647.
Meunier, F., De Cock, S., Gilquin, G., & M. Paquot
2013Satzwertige zu-Infinitivkonstruktionen. In J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach, & H. Altmann (Eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen (338–355). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Reddy, M. J.
[1979] 1993The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rice, S.
1996Prepositional prototypes. In Pütz, M., & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (135–165). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rice, S., & Kabata, K.
2007Crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns of the ALLATIVE. Linguistic Typology 11, 451–514.
Rosch, E.
1973On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (111–144). New York: Academic Press.
Rosch, E.
1975Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3), 192–233.
Rosch, E.
1978Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd
(Eds1978Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. M.
1975Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605.
Rudkiewicz, K.
2016Cognitive explorations into the category schema of for. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
1995Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind the linguist’s or the language user’s?Cognitive Linguistics 6:1, 89–130.
Saphiro, L.
2011Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge.
Sapir, E.
[1929] 1949The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), The selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality (160–166). Barkeley: University of California Press.
Šarić, L.
2008Spatial concepts in Slavic. A cognitive linguistic study of preposition and cases. (Slavistische Studienbucher. Neue Folge, Book 19). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Schulc-Brzozowska, M.
2009Deutsche und polnische Präpositionen: ein Vergleich aus monosemnatischer Sicht. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Schulze, R.
1993The meaning of (a)round: A study of an English preposition. In A. Geiger, & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualization and mental processing in language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schwarz, M.
1992Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Francke: Tübingen.
Segel, E., & Boroditsky, L.
2011Grammar in art. Frontiers in Psychology 1, 1–3.
Selivestrova O. N.
2004Trudy po semantikie. [Oryg. О. Н. Селиверстова, Труды по семантике.] Москва: Studia Philologica. [Moscow: Studia Philologica.]
Selivestrova O. N., & Malyar, T. N.
1998Prostranstvenno-distancionnye predlogi i narecija v russkom i anglijskom jazykach. [Oryg. Ce ливерстовa О. Н.Т. H. Маляр, Пространственно-дистанционные предлоги и наречия в русском и английском языках.] München: Sagner.
Siegmund, D. O.
2022The central limit theorem. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/science/probability-theory/The-central-limit-theorem
.
Sheremeteva E. S.
2008Otymennye relyativy sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. [Oryg. Шереметьева Е.С., Oтыменные релятивы современного русского языка. Cемантические этюды. Владивосток: Дальневост.] Semanticheskie etyudy. Vladivostok: Dalnevost.
Shiganova G. A.
2003Relyativnye frazeologizmy russkogo jazyka. [Oryg. Шинганова Г.А., Релятивные фразеологизмы русского языка. Челябинск: Челябинский государственный университет.] Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk National University.
Slobin, D. I.
[1996] 1999From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009The semantics of complementation in English: A cognitive semantic account of two English complement constructions. Language Sciences 31, 360–388.
Sutcliffe, P., Stanford, L., & A. Lommel
(Eds2009LACUS Forum 35: Language and linguistics in North America 1608–2008: Diversity and convergence. Houston, TX: LACUS.
Sweetser, E.
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sysak-Borońska, M. G.
1975Some remarks on the spatio-relative system in English and Polish. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 3, 185–208.
Szwedek, A.
2007Polysemy and metaphorization. In W. Chłopicki, A. Pawelec, & A. Pokojska (Eds.), Cognition in language: Volume in honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska (255–272). Kraków: Tertium.
Talmy, L.
1978The relation of grammar to cognition. A synopsis. In D. L. Waltz (Ed.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing 2 (14–24). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Talmy, L.
1983How language structures space. In H. L. Pick, & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. (14–24). New York & London: Plenum Press.
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol.1. Concept structuring system. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Talmy, L.
2005The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (199–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taylor, J. R.
[1989] 1995Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Taylor, J. R.
2002Cognitive grammar. Oxford textbooks in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. R.
2003Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (324–347). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trofimova A.
2014O roli russkikh predlogov v strukturirovanii prostranstva. [Oryg. Трофимова A., О роли русских предлогов в структурировании пространства.] Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/7969-416-7.35.
Turner, M.
1991Reading minds. The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
2003The semantics of English prepositions. Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vandeloise, C.
1991Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Verspoor, M.
1996The story of -ing: A subjective perspective. In M. Pütz, & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (417–454). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vinogradova, E. N., & Klobukova, L. P.
2017Preposition: the biggest challenges of a small part of speech. RUDN Journal of Russian and Foreign Languages Research and Teaching, 15 (3), 299–316.
Vsevolodova M. V., & Vladimirskij, E. Y.
1982Sposoby vyrazhenija prostranstvennykh otnoshenij v sovremennom russkom jazykie. Moscow: Russkij jazyk. [Oryg. Всеволодова М. В., Владимирский Е. Ю. 1982 Способы выражения пространственных отношений в современном русском языке. Москва: Русский язык.]
Wahrig, G., Krämer, H., & H. Zimmermann
(Eds1984Brockhaus Wahrig: Deutsches Wörterbuch in sechs Bänden. Wiesbaden: Brockhaus.
Waltz, D. L.
(Ed1978Theoretical issues in natural language processing 2. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Wasilewska, K.
2018Frekwencja oraz funkcje przyimków złożonych i wtórnych w sprawozdaniach administracyjnych. LingVaria XIII 1(25), 273–291.
Wegener, H.
1985Der Dativ im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Wegener, H.
1989Eine Modalpartikel besonderer Art: Der Dativus Ethicus. In H. Weydt (Ed.), Sprechen mit Partikeln (56–73). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Weinsberg, A.
1973Przyimki przestrzenne w języku polskim, niemieckim i rumuńskim. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Weydt, H.
(Ed1989Sprechen mit Partikeln. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Whorf, B. L.
[1940] 1956Linguistics as an exact science. Technology Review, 43. Reprinted in J. B. Carroll (Ed.), In Language, thought and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 220–232.
Wierzbicka, A.
1985Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
Wierzbicka, A.
[1986] 2016The meaning of case: A study of the Polish dative. In R. D. Brecht, & J. S. Levine (Eds.), Case in Slavic (386–426). Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, Inc.
Wittgenstein, L.
1958Philosophical investigations. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscobe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wójcik, T.
1979Z zagadnień teorii przyimka. Kielce: Pracownia Poligraficzna.
Wöllstein, A.
2008Konzepte der Satzkonnexion. Stauffenberg: Narr.
Wunderlich, D.
1991How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics?Linguistics 29, 591–621.
Zelinsky-Wibbelt, C.
(Ed1993The Semantics of prepositions: From mental processing to natural language processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.