Cover not available
Part of
Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity
Edited by Anna Piata, Adriana Gordejuela and Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
[Human Cognitive Processing 75] 2022
► pp. 125–146

Chapter 6
Time-creation in film

An embodied cognitive perspective

| University of Antwerp
This chapter aims to discuss the creation of time in cinema from an embodied cognitive perspective. Drawing on principles of Cognitive linguistics, we first discuss briefly how our ordinary thinking about time is informed by spatial knowledge. Knowing how space shapes temporal thought, we subsequently show how filmmakers may cue this spatio-temporal logic in the direction of two opposing models of time-creation in cinema: one model in which cinematic creativity serves the purpose of optimal narrative clarity, and another model in which creativity resolves around the opposite goal of spatio-temporal ambiguity. We illustrate both models through various case-examples drawn from classical narrative cinema and modern and postmodern art cinema, respectively.
Keywords: arthouse cinema, film style, narrative cinema, time spatialization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Spatio-temporal reasoning
  • 3.Creating spatio-temporal clarity in cinema
    • 3.1Creativity within spatio-temporal template I
    • 3.2Creativity within spatio-temporal template II
    • 3.3Creativity within spatio-temporal template III
  • 4.Creating spatio-temporal ambiguity in cinema
    • 4.1Accident (1967)
    • 4.2Last Year at Marienbad (1961)
    • 4.3I am Thinking of Ending Things (2020)
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.75.06coe
References (41)
References
Adair, G. (2019). Linking past and present in Sjöberg’s ‘Miss Julie’. The Kinetograph. [URL]
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2004). Film art: An introduction (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & and Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, E. (1984). Point of view in the cinema. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Projecting a camera: Language-games in film theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. (2009). Puzzle films. Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catania, S., & Bianco, L. (2002). L’année derniére à Marienbad and the cartography of an orphic life-in-death: The modern Katábasis of Resnais. Melita Theologica, 53(1), 81–100.Google Scholar
Coëgnarts, M. (2019). Film as embodied art: Bodily meaning in the cinema of Stanley Kubrick. Boston, MA: Academic Studies Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coëgnarts, M., & Kravanja, P. (2015a). On the embodiment of temporal meaning in cinema: Perceiving time through the character’s eyes. In M. Coëgnarts & P. Kravanja (Eds.), Embodied cognition and cinema (pp. 245–270). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
(2015b). With the past in front of the character: Evidence for spatial-temporal metaphors in cinema. Metaphor & Symbol, 30(3), 218–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deaca, M. (2020). The control cycle in film: Circular coupling from brain to culture. Berlin: Sciendo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time image (H. Tomlison & R. Galeta, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Dewell, R. (2005). Dynamic patterns of containment. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 369–394). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logohcp.12Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space > time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordejuela, A. (2021). Flashbacks in film: A cognitive and multimodal analysis. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2003). Impulsive decision making and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 298–306.Google Scholar
Kiss, M., & Willemsen, S. (2017). Impossible puzzle films: A cognitive approach to contemporary complex cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovács, A. B. (2007). Screening modernism: European art cinema, 1950 1980. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Milne, T. (1967). Losey on Losey. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Monaco, J. (1977). How to read a film: The art technology, language, history and theory of film and media. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3): 401–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R. E., Motz, B. A., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor & Symbol, 21(3), 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G. (2011). Spatial time in the West and the East. In M. Brdar, M. Omazi, V. P. Takac, T. Gradecak-Erdeljic & G. Buljan (Eds.), Space in time and language (pp. 1–40). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Regal, M. S. (1995). Harold Pinter: A question of timing. Hampshire: Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1992). What does facial expression express? In K. T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (pp. 139–165). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J., Maes, A., & Ferdinandusse, H. (2009). Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric: The case of symmetric object alignment. Metaphor & Symbol, 24(3), 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teng, N. Y. (2009). Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 197–211). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S. (2002). Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor & Symbol, 17(4), 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turim, M. (1989). Flashbacks in film: Memory and history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Weelden, L., Maes, A., Schilperoord, J., & Cozijn, R. (2011). The role of shape in comparing objects: How perceptual similarity may affect visual metaphor processing. Metaphor & Symbol, 26(4), 272–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Weelden, L., Maes, F., & Schilperoord. (2018). How visual form affects metaphoric conceptualization: The role of shape similarity. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: structure and process (pp. 147–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zettl, H. (2017). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar