Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018.
The participants as objects: Variation And Meaning Of First‐ And Second‐Person Object Encoding In Spanish.
Studia Linguistica 72:3
► pp. 571 ff.

Andreou, Maria, Eva Knopp, Christiane Bongartz & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
Andréasson, Maia
2013.
Object shift in Scandinavian languages: The impact of contrasted elements.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36:2
► pp. 187 ff.

Ariel, Mira
2004.
Accessibility Marking: Discourse Functions, Discourse Profiles, and Processing Cues.
Discourse Processes 37:2
► pp. 91 ff.

Ariel, Mira
2014.
Orconstructions: Monosemy vs. polysemy. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 333 ff.

Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
Arnold, Jennifer E.
2015.
Women and Men Have Different Discourse Biases for Pronoun Interpretation.
Discourse Processes 52:2
► pp. 77 ff.

Arnold, Jennifer E. & Shin-Yi C. Lao
2015.
Effects of psychological attention on pronoun comprehension.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:7
► pp. 832 ff.

Arnold, Jennifer E. & Duane G. Watson
2015.
Synthesising meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:1-2
► pp. 88 ff.

Arnold, Jennifer E. & Sandra A. Zerkle
2019.
Why do people produce pronouns? Pragmatic selection vs. rational models.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34:9
► pp. 1152 ff.

ATEŞ, BEYZA Ş. & AYLİN C. KÜNTAY
2018.
Referential interactions of Turkish-learning children with their caregivers about non-absent objects: integration of non-verbal devices and prior discourse.
Journal of Child Language 45:1
► pp. 148 ff.

Balaban, Noga, Michal Biran & Yaron Sacher
2019.
Theory of Mind and referring expressions after Traumatic Brain Injury.
Aphasiology 33:11
► pp. 1319 ff.

Balaban, Noga, Naama Friedmann & Mira Ariel
2016.
The effect of theory of mind impairment on language: Referring after right-hemisphere damage.
Aphasiology 30:12
► pp. 1424 ff.

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robin L. Hill, Mary Ellen Foster & Manabu Arai
2014.
Tuning accessibility of referring expressions in situated dialogue.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:8
► pp. 928 ff.

Batory, Anna
2014.
Reorganization of personal identity in the context of motivational dynamics and internal dialogical activity.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 55:4
► pp. 362 ff.

Bel, Aurora & Estela García-Alcaraz
Bel, Aurora, Marta Ortells & Gary Morgan
2015.
Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners.
International Journal of Bilingualism 19:5
► pp. 608 ff.

Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo
Blinova, Olga
2023.
“Plain and Natural” Versus “Accurate and Unambiguous”: Pronominal Intrasentential Anaphora in Russian Legislative Texts. In
Literature, Language and Computing,
► pp. 31 ff.

Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2014.
Competition in argument interpretation: Evidence from the neurobiology of language. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 107 ff.

Borthen, Kaja & Gøril Thomassen
Brentari, Diane, Joshua Falk, Anastasia Giannakidou, Annika Herrmann, Elisabeth Volk & Markus Steinbach
2018.
Production and Comprehension of Prosodic Markers in Sign Language Imperatives.
Frontiers in Psychology 9

Brunetti, Lisa, Laia Mayol & Xavier Villalba
2020.
Bridging Strength, Monotonicity, and Word Order Choices in Catalan.
Discourse Processes 57:8
► pp. 703 ff.

Burmester, Juliane, Antje Sauermann, Katharina Spalek & Isabell Wartenburger
2018.
Sensitivity to salience: linguistic vs. visual cues affect sentence processing and pronoun resolution.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:6
► pp. 784 ff.

Büring, Daniel
2016.
Intonation and Meaning,

Cao, Yilun, Yuhan Guo, Chang Wang & Yunyuan Li
2022.
Evaluation and Optimization of Refuge Green Space in the Central Area of Tianjin for Geological Disasters.
Sustainability 14:23
► pp. 15507 ff.

CHAVES, RUI P. & JERUEN E. DERY
2019.
Frequency effects in Subject Islands.
Journal of Linguistics 55:3
► pp. 475 ff.

Cheng, Yi-Yang
2023.
Tense-aspect conditioned agent marking in Kanakanavu, an Austronesian language of Taiwan.
Open Linguistics 9:1

COLE, MARCELLE
2017.
Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English.
English Language and Linguistics 21:2
► pp. 381 ff.

Company Company, Concepción
2010.
Reanálisis, ¿mecanismo necesario de la gramaticalización? Una propuesta desde la diacronía del objeto indirecto en español.
Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española :5
► pp. 35 ff.

Contemori, Carla & Elisa Di Domenico
2021.
Microvariation in the division of labor between null- and overt-subject pronouns: the case of Italian and Spanish.
Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4
► pp. 997 ff.

Contemori, Carla & Elisa Di Domenico
2023.
The Production of Subject Anaphoric Expressions in Italian and Mexican Spanish: A Forced-Choice Experimental Study.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 
Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis
2017.
The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity,

Cristofaro, Sonia
2014.
Competing motivation models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations?. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 282 ff.

Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler
2013.
Visual intonation in two sign languages.
Phonology 30:2
► pp. 211 ff.

DATTNER, Elitzur & Dorit RAVID
2023.
The development of Hebrew zero and pronominal subject realization in the context of first and second person.
Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff.

de Prada Pérez, Ana
2018.
Subject pronoun expression and language mode in bilingual Spanish
.
Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 11:2
► pp. 303 ff.

Debreslioska, Sandra, Asli Özyürek, Marianne Gullberg & Pamela Perniss
2013.
Gestural Viewpoint Signals Referent Accessibility.
Discourse Processes 50:7
► pp. 431 ff.

Di Domenico, Elisa & Ioli Baroncini
2019.
Age of Onset and Dominance in the Choice of Subject Anaphoric Devices: Comparing Natives and Near-Natives of Two Null-Subject Languages.
Frontiers in Psychology 9

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben & Katharina Korecky‐Kröll
2014.
Conflicting vs. convergent vs. interdependent motivations in morphology. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 180 ff.

Du Bois, John W.
2014.
Motivating competitions. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 262 ff.

Eilers, Sarah, Simon P Tiffin-Richards & Sascha Schroeder
2019.
The repeated name penalty effect in children’s natural reading: Evidence from eye tracking.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:3
► pp. 403 ff.

Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022.
Assessing the complexity of lectal competence: the register-specificity of the dative alternation after give
.
Cognitive Linguistics 33:4
► pp. 727 ff.

Federzoni, Silvia, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac & Cécile Fabre
Fossard, Marion, Amélie M. Achim, Lucie Rousier-Vercruyssen, Sylvia Gonzalez, Alexandre Bureau & Maud Champagne-Lavau
2018.
Referential Choices in a Collaborative Storytelling Task: Discourse Stages and Referential Complexity Matter.
Frontiers in Psychology 9

Francis, Elaine J. & Laura A. Michaelis
2014.
Why move? How weight and discourse factors combine to predict relative clause extraposition in English. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 70 ff.

Fukumura, Kumiko & Roger P.G. van Gompel
2012.
Producing Pronouns and Definite Noun Phrases: Do Speakers Use the Addressee’s Discourse Model?.
Cognitive Science 36:7
► pp. 1289 ff.

García-Sierra, Adrián, Juan Silva-Pereyra, Graciela Catalina Alatorre-Cruz & Noelle Wig
2021.
An Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) Study of Complex Anaphora in Spanish.
Frontiers in Psychology 12

Gatt, Albert, Emiel Krahmer, Kees van Deemter & Roger P.G. van Gompel
2014.
Models and empirical data for the production of referring expressions.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:8
► pp. 899 ff.

Gerrig, Richard J., William S. Horton & Amanda Stent
2011.
Production and Comprehension of Unheralded Pronouns: A Corpus Analysis.
Discourse Processes 48:3
► pp. 161 ff.

GRAF, EILEEN, ANNA THEAKSTON, ELENA LIEVEN & MICHAEL TOMASELLO
2015.
Subject and object omission in children's early transitive constructions: A discourse-pragmatic approach.
Applied Psycholinguistics 36:3
► pp. 701 ff.

HAENDLER, Yair & Flavia ADANI
2018.
Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension: a study with Hebrew-speaking children.
Journal of Child Language 45:4
► pp. 959 ff.

Haiman, John
2014.
Six competing motives for repetition. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 246 ff.

Haspelmath, Martin
2014.
On system pressure competing with economic motivation. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 197 ff.

Hawkins, John A.
2014.
Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 54 ff.

Helmbrecht, Johannes
2014.
Politeness distinctions in personal pronouns: A case study on competing motivations. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 315 ff.

Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Inbal Arnon, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider
2013.
The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments.
Language and Cognitive Processes 28:1-2
► pp. 48 ff.

Holler, Anke & Lisa Irmen
2007.
Empirically Assessing Effects of the Right Frontier Constraint. In
Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications [
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4410],
► pp. 15 ff.

Huang, Yi Ting & Jennifer E. Arnold
2018.
Talking About SOME and ALL: What Determines the Usage of Quantity-Denoting Expressions?.
Discourse Processes 55:8
► pp. 686 ff.

Hughes, Mary E. & Shanley E. M. Allen
2014.
Competing motivations in children's omission of subjects? The interaction between verb finiteness and referent accessibility. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 144 ff.

Hübl, Annika & Markus Steinbach
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022.
The syntax of existential constructions.
Journal of Speech Sciences 11
► pp. e022001 ff.

Jaeger, T. Florian & Harry Tily
2011.
On language ‘utility’: processing complexity and communicative efficiency.
WIREs Cognitive Science 2:3
► pp. 323 ff.

Janke, Vikki
2018.
Discourse effects on older children’s interpretations of complement control and temporal adjunct control.
Language Acquisition 25:4
► pp. 366 ff.

JANKE, VIKKI & LAURA R. BAILEY
2017.
Effects of discourse on control.
Journal of Linguistics 53:3
► pp. 533 ff.

Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018.
Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic.
Topics in Linguistics 19:2
► pp. 57 ff.

Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012.
Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study.
Research in Language 10:4
► pp. 423 ff.

Jeshion, Robin
2015.
Referentialism and Predicativism About Proper Names.
Erkenntnis 80:S2
► pp. 363 ff.

Jeshion, Robin
2017.
‘The’ Problem for the-Predicativism.
The Philosophical Review 126:2
► pp. 219 ff.

Kaiser, Elsi
2010.
Effects of Contrast on Referential Form: Investigating the Distinction Between Strong and Weak Pronouns.
Discourse Processes 47:6
► pp. 480 ff.

Kaiser, Elsi
2011.
Salience and contrast effects in reference resolution: The interpretation of Dutch pronouns and demonstratives.
Language and Cognitive Processes 26:10
► pp. 1587 ff.

Kaiser, Elsi & John C. Trueswell
2008.
Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution.
Language and Cognitive Processes 23:5
► pp. 709 ff.

Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
2014.
Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: Two competing domains?. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 348 ff.

Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos
2016.
From syntagmatic to paradigmatic spatial zeroes: The loss of the prepositionsein inner Asia Minor Greek.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:2
► pp. 309 ff.

Kingston, Sarah
2023.
Audio research methods, attitudes, and accessibility theory: Using audio vignettes to elicit attitudes towards sex work.
Qualitative Research ► pp. 146879412311769 ff.

Knutsen, Dominique, Marion Fossard & Amélie M Achim
2022.
Comparing individual and collective management of referential choices in dialogue.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 75:4
► pp. 712 ff.

Koornneef, Arnout, Jakub Dotlačil, Paul van den Broek & Ted Sanders
2016.
The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69:3
► pp. 455 ff.

Koornneef, Arnout W. & Ted J. M. Sanders
2013.
Establishing coherence relations in discourse: The influence of implicit causality and connectives on pronoun resolution.
Language and Cognitive Processes 28:8
► pp. 1169 ff.

Krajewski, Grzegorz & Elena Lieven
2014.
Competing cues in early syntactic development. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 163 ff.

Krifka, Manfred & Fereshteh Modarresi
Kroon, Caroline
2017.
Textual Deixis and the ‘Anchoring’ Use of the Latin Pronoun hic.
Mnemosyne 70:4
► pp. 585 ff.

Kruijer, Mike & Ezra la Roi
2018.
Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions.
Mnemosyne 71:5
► pp. 799 ff.

LAI, YAO-YING & MARIA MERCEDES PIÑANGO
2019.
Searching for specific sentence meaning in context: the conceptual relation between participants.
Language and Cognition 11:4
► pp. 582 ff.

Lamers, Monique J. A. & Helen de Hoop
2014.
Animate object fronting in Dutch: A production study. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 42 ff.

Langlois, Valerie J., Sandra A. Zerkle & Jennifer E. Arnold
2023.
Does referential expectation guide both linguistic and social constraints on pronoun comprehension?.
Journal of Memory and Language 129
► pp. 104401 ff.

Levshina, Natalia & David Lorenz
2022.
Communicative efficiency and the Principle of No Synonymy: predictability effects and the variation of want to and wanna.
Language and Cognition 14:2
► pp. 249 ff.

MacWhinney, Brian
2014.
Conclusions: Competition across time. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 364 ff.

Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik
2014.
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,

Malchukov, Andrej
2014.
Resolving alignment conflicts: A competing motivations approach. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 16 ff.

Mayerhofer, Bastian, Katja Maier & Annekathrin Schacht
2016.
Priming Interpretations: Contextual Impact on the Processing of Garden Path Jokes.
Discourse Processes 53:8
► pp. 675 ff.

Medina Fetterman, Ana M., Natasha N. Vazquez & Jennifer E. Arnold
2022.
The Effects of Semantic Role Predictability on the Production of Overt Pronouns in Spanish.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51:1
► pp. 169 ff.

Meir, Natalia & Rama Novogrodsky
2019.
Prerequisites of Third-Person Pronoun Use in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With Autism and Typical Language Development.
Frontiers in Psychology 10

Mondorf, Britta
2014.
Apparently competing motivations in morphosyntactic variation. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 209 ff.

Moravcsik, Edith
2014.
Introduction. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 1 ff.

Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014.
Where do motivations compete?. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 299 ff.

Novogrodsky, Rama
2013.
Subject pronoun use by children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 27:2
► pp. 85 ff.

Novogrodsky, Rama & Lisa R. Edelson
2016.
Ambiguous pronoun use in narratives of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy 32:2
► pp. 241 ff.

Nykiel, Joanna
2015.
Constraints on ellipsis alternation: A view from the history of English.
Language Variation and Change 27:2
► pp. 227 ff.

NYKIEL, JOANNA
2017.
Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation.
English Language and Linguistics 21:1
► pp. 27 ff.

Peace, Meghann M.
2015.
Other-Orientation in Nonnative Spanish and Its Effect on Direct Objects.
Foreign Language Annals 48:4
► pp. 669 ff.

Pennisi, Paola
2019.
Personal Reference in Subjects with Autism. In
Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [
Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20],
► pp. 409 ff.

Perera, C. K. & A. K. Srivastava
2016.
Animacy-Based Accessibility and Competition in Relative Clause Production in Hindi and Malayalam.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:4
► pp. 915 ff.

Pericchi, Natalia, Kristin Davidse, Bert Cornillie & Freek Van De Velde
2020.
A diachronic study of indirect object doubling in Argentinian Spanish.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52:1
► pp. 45 ff.

Pfeiffer, Martin
2014.
Formal vs. functional motivations for the structure of self‐repair in German. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 229 ff.

Raković, Mladen, Philip H. Winne, Zahia Marzouk & Daniel Chang
2021.
Automatic identification of knowledge‐transforming content in argument essays developed from multiple sources.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37:4
► pp. 903 ff.

Recanati, François
2003.
Literal Meaning,

Rivas, Javier & Esther L. Brown
2021.
O infinitivo flexionado en galego: unha análise variacionista baseada na lingua oral.
Estudos de Lingüística Galega ► pp. 1 ff.

Roberts, Leah, Marianne Gullberg & Peter Indefrey
2008.
ONLINE PRONOUN RESOLUTION IN L2 DISCOURSE: L1 Influence and General Learner Effects.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30:3
► pp. 333 ff.

Rodríguez-Riccelli, Adrián
Rowland, Caroline F., Claire Noble & Angel Chan
2014.
Competition all the way down: How children learn word order cues to sentence meaning. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 127 ff.

Ruiz, Ramón González & Dámaso Izquierdo Alegría
2020.
Encapsulación y estructura informativa: análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de las variables influyentes en la selección de patrones temático-remáticos en el editorial periodístico.
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 136:3
► pp. 749 ff.

Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019.
Verbal –s. In
Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,
► pp. 25 ff.

Rusten, Kristian A.
2019.
Referential Null Subjects in Early English,

Ryan, Jonathon
2015.
Overexplicit Referent Tracking in L2 English: Strategy, Avoidance, or Myth?.
Language Learning 65:4
► pp. 824 ff.

Salem, Susanna, Thomas Weskott & Anke Holler
Sanagavarapu, Lalit Mohan, Jahfar Ali Pichen, Syed Mohd Ali Rizwi, Y. Raghu Reddy & Dipti Sharma
2020.
Text Cohesion in CQA - Does It Impact Rating?. In
Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration [
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11987],
► pp. 21 ff.

Sanders, Ted J.M. & Morton Ann Gernsbacher
2004.
Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.
Discourse Processes 37:2
► pp. 79 ff.

Sandoz, Mélanie, Katia Iglesias, Amélie M Achim, Jean-François Démonet & Marion Fossard
2020.
Referential adjustment during discourse production in Alzheimer’s disease.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 42:7
► pp. 710 ff.

Sandoz, Mélanie, Katia Iglesias, Amélie M. Achim & Marion Fossard
2023.
The contribution of discursive and cognitive factors in referential choices made by elderly people during a narrative task.
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff.

Sauermann, Antje & Natalia Gagarina
2017.
Grammatical Role Parallelism Influences Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in German.
Frontiers in Psychology 8

Schoubye, Anders J.
2013.
Ghosts, Murderers, and the Semantics of Descriptions.
Noûs 47:3
► pp. 496 ff.

Schumacher, Petra B.
2017.
Semantic‐Pragmatic Processing. In
The Handbook of Psycholinguistics,
► pp. 392 ff.

Scott, Kate
2017.
Prosody, Procedures and Pragmatics. In
Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [
Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],
► pp. 323 ff.

Scott, Kate
2019.
Referring Expressions, Pragmatics, and Style,

Serrano, María José
2018.
The Construction of Advertising Discourse by the Use of the Second-Person Object Te and the Clitic Se
.
Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 6:2
► pp. 173 ff.

Serrano, María José
2018.
Managing subjectivity: Omission and expression of first-person singular object a mí in Spanish media discourse.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 63:3
► pp. 423 ff.

Serrano, María José
2022.
Going beyond address forms.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 87 ff.

Serrano, María José
2023.
Sintaxis y discurso: el infinitivo independiente en los tuits como variante y punto de vista desubjetivador .
Moenia 
Seržant, Ilja A. & Jana Taperte
Shlonsky, Ur
2009.
Hebrew as a partial null‐subject language*.
Studia Linguistica 63:1
► pp. 133 ff.

Sperlich, Darcy
2020.
A Beginning Synthesis. In
Reflexive Pronouns: A Theoretical and Experimental Synthesis [
Language, Cognition, and Mind, 8],
► pp. 1 ff.

Steinbach, Markus & Edgar Onea
2016.
A DRT Analysis of Discourse Referents and Anaphora Resolution in Sign Language.
Journal of Semantics 33:3
► pp. 409 ff.

Strunk, Jan
2014.
A statistical model of competing motivations affecting relative clause extraposition in German. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. 88 ff.

Tan, Ed S., Miruna M. Doicaru, Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint & Moniek M. Kuijpers
THEAKSTON, ANNA L.
2012.
“The spotty cow tickled the pig with a curly tail”: How do sentence position, preferred argument structure, and referential complexity affect children's and adults’ choice of referring expression?.
Applied Psycholinguistics 33:4
► pp. 691 ff.

Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2014.
A főnévi mutató névmások indexikális használatát befolyásoló tényezők a magyarban.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 1:1
► pp. 67 ff.

Tóth, Enikő & Péter Csatár
2015.
Egy interfész jelenség: indexikális demonstratívumok azonosító fókuszban.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1
► pp. 63 ff.

Vallejos, Rosa
2019.
Llegaron en sus canoa: innovación gramatical en el español de la Amazonía peruana.
Letras (Lima) 90:131
► pp. 77 ff.

van Deemter, Kees, Albert Gatt, Roger P.G. van Gompel & Emiel Krahmer
2012.
Toward a Computational Psycholinguistics of Reference Production.
Topics in Cognitive Science 4:2
► pp. 166 ff.

van der Wal, Jenneke
2022.
A Featural Typology of Bantu Agreement,

Vande Casteele, An & Alejandro Palomares Ortiz
2022.
An exploratory study on pro-drop in a written description task in L2 Spanish
.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2
► pp. 437 ff.

VANDERBAUWHEDE, GUDRUN
2012.
Les emplois référentiels du SN démonstratif en français et en néerlandais: pas du pareil au même.
Journal of French Language Studies 22:2
► pp. 273 ff.

VARTIAINEN, TURO
2013.
Subjectivity, indefiniteness and semantic change.
English Language and Linguistics 17:1
► pp. 157 ff.

Vogels, Jorrig, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2013.
Who is where referred to how, and why? The influence of visual saliency on referent accessibility in spoken language production.
Language and Cognitive Processes 28:9
► pp. 1323 ff.

Wagner, Michael & Jeffrey Klassen
2015.
Accessibility is no alternative to alternatives.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:1-2
► pp. 212 ff.

Wang, Tingting & Alison Gabriele
2022.
Individual differences modulate sensitivity to implicit causality bias in both native and nonnative processing.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff.

Wiechmann, Daniel & Arne Lohmann
2013.
Domain minimization and beyond: Modeling prepositional phrase ordering.
Language Variation and Change 25:1
► pp. 65 ff.

Wienholz, Anne, Derya Nuhbalaoglu-Ayan, Nivedita Mani, Annika Herrmann, Edgar Onea & Markus Steinbach
Wittenberg, Eva, Shota Momma & Elsi Kaiser
2021.
Demonstratives as bundlers of conceptual structure.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1

Yang, Yaping
2022.
Referring Expressions, Pragmatics and Style: Reference and Beyond.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 40:2
► pp. 243 ff.

Ye, Yining & Jennifer E. Arnold
2023.
Discourse‐level adaptation in pronoun comprehension.
Language and Linguistics Compass 17:2

ZHANG, AILI & NAYOUNG KWON
2022.
The interpretational preferences of null and overt pronouns in Chinese.
Journal of Linguistics 58:3
► pp. 649 ff.

Zyzik, Eve
2017.
Subject expression in L2 Spanish: Convergence of generative and usage-based perspectives?.
Second Language Research 33:1
► pp. 33 ff.

Çokal, Derya & Patrick Sturt
2018.
Effect of Referring Expression on Antecedent-Grouping Choice in Plural Reference Resolution.
Discourse Processes 55:2
► pp. 157 ff.

Çokal, Derya, Patrick Sturt & Fernanda Ferreira
2018.
Processing ofItandThisin Written Narrative Discourse.
Discourse Processes 55:3
► pp. 272 ff.

[no author supplied]
2014.
List of abbreviations. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. xviii ff.

[no author supplied]
2014.
Copyright Page. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. iv ff.

[no author supplied]
2014.
Preface. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. vii ff.

[no author supplied]
2014.
List of figures and tables. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. xiv ff.

[no author supplied]
2014.
Notes on contributors. In
Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage,
► pp. viii ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.