Cover not available
Article published In:
Latin Grammars in Transition, 1200 - 1600
Edited by Anneli Luhtala and Mark E. Amsler
[Historiographia Linguistica 44:2/3] 2017
► pp. 228–254
Articles / Aufätze

Syntax in the earliest Latin-Portuguese grammatical treatises

| Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro
This essay analyses the most central concepts of Latin syntactical theory in the earliest pedagogical grammars written in Portugal during the 14th and 15th centuries, namely concord, government, and transitivity. The sources include two unpublished treatises preserved in manuscripts of Portuguese origin, one from the end of the 14th century and the other dated 1427, and the first grammar printed in Portugal (1497). They are representative of the teaching of Latin in Portugal at different levels of learning. All three treatises use the vernacular as a pedagogical aid, and Pastrana’s grammar also employs images to illustrate the main syntactical concepts. All treatises discuss government using the regular medieval terminology of regere “to govern” and regi “to be governed”. Like in Spanish, Italian and English grammars of Latin, the three concords belong to the basic syntactical doctrine. The major difference between these textbooks lies in their employment of the concept of transitivity. It is little more than mentioned in the two manuscripts, but highly relevant in the printed grammar.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reglas pera enformarmos os menỹos en latin
    • 2.1Syntactical concepts
    • 2.2The rules of ‘concord’
    • 2.3The treatment of government
    • 2.4The treatment of ‘transitivity’
  • 3.Hic incipiunt notabilia que fecit cunctis
    • 3.1 Syntactical concepts in the Notabilia
    • 3.2 ‘Concord’ in the Notabilia
    • 3.3 ‘Government’ in the Notabilia
    • 3.4 ‘Transitivity’ in the Notabilia
  • 4. Grammatica of Juan de Pastrana
    • 4.1 Syntactical Concepts in Pastrana’s Grammatica
    • 4.2Pastrana’s treatment of ‘construction’
    • 4.3‘Government’ in Pastrana’s Grammar
    • 4.4Pastrana’s discusson of ‘transitivity’
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00003.fer
References (52)
References
A. Primary sources
Alexander de Villa-Dei. Das Doctrinale des Alexander de Villa-Dei. Kritisch-exegetische Ausgabe by Dietrich Reichling. Berlin: A. Hofmann, 1845 (Repr., New York: Burt Franklin, 1974.)Google Scholar
Arte de Prisciano y Castellano. Madrid, the Spanish National Library, MS 10073.
GL = Grammatici Latini. Ed. by Heinrich Keil. 81 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1855–1880. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1981.)Google Scholar
Grammatica Proverbiandi. See Vicente Calvo Fernández. 1995, Part II, 1–365.Google Scholar
Pastrana, Juan de. 1497. Grammatica Pastrane. Incipit compendium breue et utile: Siue tractatus intitulatus: Thesaurus pauperum siue speculum puerorum editum a magistro Johanne de. Ulixbone: Impressum per Valentinum Fernandi de Moravia. MS Lisbon, National Library of Portugal, INC 1425. [URL]. [Last accessed: 20 January 2017.)
Peter Helias. Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by Leo Reilly. 21 vols. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Priscian. Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum Grammaticarum libri XVIII. Ed. by Martin Hertz=GL 2–3.
Reglas = Anonymous. Reglas pera enformarmos os menỹos en latin. MS Oxford, Bodleian Library, Digby 261, ff. 76r–82v.
Remigius, Schleswig 1486. A Latin Grammar in Facsimile Edition with a Postscript by Jan Pinborg. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, 1982.Google Scholar
Rodríguez de Caracena, Juan. 1427. Hic incipiunt notabilia que fecit cunctis (= Notabilia). MS Lisbon, National Library of Portugal, Alc. 791, ff. 5r–93v. [URL]. (Last accessed 20 January 2017.)
Tre Latinske Grammatiker, Donatus, Fundamentum, Regulae. Ed. by Jan Pinborg & Erik Dal. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1979.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Anselmo, Artur. 1979/1980. “Incunábulos Portugueses em Latim (1494–1500)”. Humanitas 31/321.167–196.Google Scholar
Barreto, Manuel Saraiva. 1985. “Os ‘Notabilia’ gramaticais alcobacenses”. Euphrosyne Nova Série 131.79–94.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Antecedentes medievais da gramática renascentista”. O Humanismo Português: 1500–1600. Primeiro Simpósio Nacional, 21–25 de Outubro de 1985 ed. by José Vitorino de Pina Martins et al., 163–175. Lisboa: Academia das Ciências de Lisboa.Google Scholar
BS=Biblia Sacra Juxta Vulgatam Clementinam. 2005. Electronic edition by Michaele Tvveedale. London. [URL]. (Last accessed: 13 February 2017.)
Calvo Fernández, Vicente & Miguel Ángel Esparza Torres. 1999. “El ‘Arte de Prisciano y Castellano’: una gramática medieval con glosas romances”. Romanistik in Geschichte und Gegenwart 5:2.135–158.Google Scholar
Calvo Fernández, Vicente. 1993. “ Un ejemplo de empleo del romance en la didáctica del latín medieval: la traducción de participios en la Gramática de Prisciano y castellano”. Revista de Filología Románica 101.267–283.Google Scholar
. 1995. Grammatica proverbiandi: la enseñanza del latín en la baja edad media española: estudio y edición del texto contenido en el ms. 8950 de la Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid. Doctoral Thesis. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. [URL]. (Last accessed: 17 February 2017.)
. 2000. Grammatica Proverbiandi. Estudio de la Gramática Latina en la Baja Edad Media Española. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Codoñer, Carmen. 2000. Gramáticas Latinas de Transición: Juan de Pastrana y Fernando Nepote. Introducción y Edición Crítica. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Esparza Torres, Miguel Ángel & Vicente Calvo Fernández. 1994. “La grammatica proverbiandi y la nova ratio nebrissensis ”. Historiographia Linguistica 21:1/2.39–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Gonçalo. 2010. “Reglas para enformarmos os menỹos en latin (MS. séc. XIV)”. Ideias Linguísticas na Península Ibérica (séc. XIV a séc. XIX). Projeção da Linguística Ibérica na América Latina e Ásia, vol. 11, ed. by Carlos Assunção et al., 223–236. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Vernacular and language teaching in the Portuguese Middle Ages: The MS. Digby 26 and the Reglas para enformarmos os menỹos en latim ”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 23:1.55–70.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Gramática especulativa medieval em Portugal: Os Notabilia alcobacenses”. Métodos y Resultados Actuales en Historiografía de la Lingüística, vol. I1, ed. by María Luisa Calero Vaquero et al., 183–192. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Sources of the Notabilia (1427): A medieval handwritten grammatical treatise from the Portuguese monastery of Alcobaça”. Folia Linguistica Historica 381.75–89.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin Margareta. 2014. “Medieval Commentators on the Notion ‘persona agentis’ in Priscian’s Syntactic Theory”. Historiographia Linguistica 41:2/3.219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Moreno, Ángel. 1989. “ Grammatica Castellana de Palácio: Un nuncio de Nebrija”. Revista de Literatura Medieval 11.41–51.Google Scholar
Hunt, R[chard]. W. 1980. Collected Papers on the History of Grammar in the Middle Ages. Edited with an introduction, a selected bibliography and indices by G. L. Bursill-Hall (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 5.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, L[ouis]. G. 2002. The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae. (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 101.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, Corneille Henri. 1990a. “On Mediaeval Syntactic Thought with Special Reference to the Notion of Construction”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 12:2.139–176. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 1990b. “Transitivity, Intransitivity and Related Concepts in 12th Century Grammar: An explorative study”. De Ortu Grammaticae: Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbesen & Konrad Koerner, 161–189 (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 43.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien A. 1994. ‘Grammar’. Carolingian Culture: Emulation and innovation ed. by Rosamund McKitterick, 88–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano Guillén, Carmen. 1995. “Juan de Pastrana y su singular clasificación de la dictio dentro de la gramática del S. XV”. Minerva 91.187–196.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. 1993. “Syntax and Dialectic in Carolingian Commentaries on Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae ”. History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages ed. by Vivien A. Law, 145–191 (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 71.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Pedagogical grammars before the eighteenth century”. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics ed. by Keith Allan, 341–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Scholastic Influence on Syntactical Theory in Pedagogical Grammars”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 24:1.51–70.Google Scholar
. 2017 in press. “Teaching Agreement: A case study in the language pedagogy of three humanist treatises on syntax from Early Modern England”. The History of Language Learning and Teaching I. 16th–18th Century ed. by Nicola McLelland & Richard Smith. Cambridge: Legenda.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 1994. ‘Carolingian Thought’. Carolingian Culture: Emulation and innovation ed. by Rosamund McKitterick, 171–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nascimento, Aires Augusto. 1989. “ Pueris laica lingua reserabit: As ‘Reglas pera enformarmos os menynos en Latin.’ MS Oxford, BL, Digby 26 (séc. XIV)”. Euphrosyne Nova Série 171.209–232.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1997. “Nebrija and the Medieval Grammatical Tradition”. Antonio de Nebrija: Edad media y Renacimiento ed. by Carmen Codoñer & Juan Antonio González Iglesias (= Acta Salmanticensia, Estudios Filológicos, 257), 247–257. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Pérez Rodríguez, Estrella & Carmen Lozano Guillén. 1988. “‘Suppositum’ y ‘appositum’ en la teoría sintáctica medieval y su proyección en el Renacimiento”. Minerva: Revista de Filología Clásica 21.287–332.Google Scholar
Ponce de León Romeo, Rogelio. 2014. “Notas sobre la gramática escolar latinoportuguesa a inicios del siglo XVI: Los tratados de António Martins y Pedro Rombo”. Métodos y resultados actuales en Historiografía de la Lingüística ed. by María Luisa Calero et al., 585–593. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Ramalho, Américo da Costa. 1977–1978. “Um capítulo da história do humanismo em Portugal: O ‘Prologus’ de Estêvão Cavaleiro”. Humanitas 29/301.51–74.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert]. H. 1980. “Functional Syntax in Medieval Europe”. Studies in Medieval Linguistic Thought dedicated to Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall ed. by E. F. Konrad Koerner, Hans-J. Niederehe & R. H. Robins (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 26), 231–240. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosier, Irène. 1984. “Transitivité et ordre des mots chez les grammairiens médiévaux”. Matériaux pour une histoire des theories linguistiques ed. by Sylvain Auroux et al., 181–189. Lille: PUL.Google Scholar
. 1994. “L’introduction des notions de sujet et de prédicat dans la grammaire médiévale”. Archives et documents de la SHESL, 2e série 101.81–119.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2010. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy ed. by Robert Pasnau & Christina van Dyke, vol. I1, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez Salor, Eustaquio. 2002. “Nebrija contra pastrana en el Portugal de 1500”. In Centro de Estudos Clássicos (ed.), Cataldo e André de Resende: Congresso Internacional do Humanismo Português (Coimbra, Lisboa, Évora, 25 a 29 de Outubro de 2000), 185–206. Lisboa: Centro de Estudos Clássicos.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. 1984. An Edition of the Middle English Grammatical Texts. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Verdelho, Telmo. 1995. As Origens da Gramaticografia e da Lexicografia Latino-Portuguesas. Aveiro: Instituto Nacional de Investigação Científica.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fernandes, Gonçalo
2017. Sources of theNotabilia(1427), a medieval handwritten grammatical treatise from the Portuguese monastery of Alcobaça. Folia Linguistica 51:s38-s1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.