Cover not available
Article published In:
Latin Grammars in Transition, 1200 - 1600
Edited by Anneli Luhtala and Mark E. Amsler
[Historiographia Linguistica 44:2/3] 2017
► pp. 255–277
Articles / Aufätze

Latin parsing grammars from the Carolingian age to the later Middle Ages

Trends and developments

| Joensuu, Finland
This article traces the history of Latin parsing grammars from Late Antiquity up to the 14th century, focusing on the group of texts with the incipit Dominus quae pars. These grammars circulating mainly north of the Alps were intended to be studied at the elementary and intermediate levels of education following the study of the Donatus minor. By asking questions about a chosen headword of each part of speech in turn, the parsing manuals offered a technique which allowed the pupil to put into practice what he had already learnt and the teacher to focus on the information he considered as relevant, including different aspects of morphology, semantics, etymology, prosody or accentuation. A number of novelties introduced into the theoretical grammars also filtered down to the lower levels of teaching. Thus, when a section on syntax began to be incorporated into pedagogical grammars in the 12th century, some syntactical concepts also entered into parsing grammars. From the 13th century onwards, elements of Aristotelian logic and physics were also integrated into the theory of the parts of speech and their syntax in the Dominus quae pars texts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The origins of the parsing method in Antiquity
  • 3.Early medieval parsing grammars
  • 4.The re-emergence of parsing grammars: 800–1000
  • 5.Parsing grammars 1100–1400: The rise in popularity
  • 6.Postscript
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00004.rei
References (59)
References
A. Primary sources
Alexander de Villa-Dei. Das Doctrinale des Alexander de Villa-Dei. Kritisch-exegetische Ausgabe by Dietrich Reichling. (= Monumenta Germaniae Pedagogica, 12.) Berlin: A. Hofmann, 1893. (Repr., New York: Burt Franklin, 1974.)Google Scholar
Anima quae pars. Ed. by Don Chapman. “Anima quae pars’: A Tenth-Century Parsing Grammar”. The Journal of Medieval Latin 121.180–204 (2002). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beatus quid est. Ed. by Martha Bayless. “Beatus quid est and the Study of Grammar in Late Anglo-Saxon England”. History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages ed. by Vivien Law, 67–110. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 71.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pseudo-Beda. Cunabula grammaticae artis Donati. (= PL, 90), 613–632 C. Paris, 1850.Google Scholar
Donatus, Aelius. Ars minor, Ars maior. Ed. by Louis Holtz. Donat et la traditon de l’enseignement grammatical: Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe–IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS, 1981.Google Scholar
Donatus, Fundamentum, Regulae. Tre Latinske Grammatikker. Donatus, Fundamentum, Regulae. Ed. by Jan Pinborg & Erik Dal. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1979.Google Scholar
Evrard of Béthune. Eberhardi Bethuniensis Graecismus. Ed. by Johann Wrobel. Breslau: G. Koebner, 1887.Google Scholar
GL = Grammatici Latini. Ed. by Heinrich Keil. 81 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1855–1880. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1981.)Google Scholar
Grammatici Latini supplementum. Anecdota Helvetica quae ad grammaticam Latinam spectant ex bibliothecis Turicensi Einsidlensi Bernensi. Ed. by Hermann Hagen. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1870.Google Scholar
Julian of Toledo. Ars Iuliani Toletani Episcopi: Una gramática latina de la España visigoda. Ed. by Maria Maestre Yenes. (= Publicaciones del Instituto provincial de investigaciones y estudios Toledano, Serie 2: Vestigios del pasado, 5). Toledo: Instituto provincial de investigaciones y estudios Toledano, 1973.Google Scholar
Magister quae pars. Ed. by E. Klug. De florilegiis codicis Monacensis 6292 et codicis Trevirensis 1092. Greifswald: Doctoral dissertation, 1913.Google Scholar
Magnus quae uox. Ed. by Jee Yeon Jang. A critical edition of Magnus quae uox? with introduction, commentary and translation. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
Papias. Ars Grammatica. Ed. by Roberta Cervani. Bologna: Pàtron Editore, 1998.Google Scholar
Paolo Camaldolese. Il Donatus di Paolo Camaldolese. Ed. by Vito Sivo. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo, 1990.Google Scholar
Peter Helias. Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by Leo Reilly. 21 vols. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Peter of Pisa. Ars grammatica. Ed. by Michael Gorman & Elke Krotz. Grammatical Works Attributed to Peter of Pisa, Charlemagne’s Tutor. (= Bibliotheca Weidmanniana, 16.) Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann, 2014.Google Scholar
. Grammatica. Ed. by Anneli Luhtala & Anna Reinikka. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis. Brepols, forthcoming.
PL = Patrologiae (latinae) cursus completus. 2211 vols. Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1844–64.Google Scholar
Priscian. Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum Grammaticarum libri XVIII. Ed. by Martin Hertz=GL II–III.
. Prisciani Caesariensis Opuscula II. Institutio de nomine et pronomine et uerbo; Partitiones duodecim uersuum Aeneidos principalium. Ed. by Marina Passalacqua. (= Sussidi eruditi, 48.) Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 1999.Google Scholar
Remigius, Schleswig 1486. See Pinborg, ed. 1982a.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Black, Robert D. 1996. “‘Ianua’ and Elementary Education in Italy and Northern Europe in the Later Middle Ages”. Italia ed Europa nella linguistica del Rinascimento I: L’Italia e il mondo romanzo ed. by Mirko Tavoni et al., 5–22. Modena: Panini.Google Scholar
2001. Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Tradition and innovation in Latin schools from the twelfth to the fifteenth century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L[eslie]. 1977. “Teaching Grammars of the Middle Ages”. Historiographia Lingsuistica 41.1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L. 1981a. A Census of Medieval Latin Grammatical Manuscripts. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
1981b. “Medieval Donatus Commentaries”. Historiographia Linguistica 8:1.69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CIMAGL = Cahiers de l’institut du Moyen-Age grec et latin. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen 1969– .[URL] since 2010.
Colombo Timelli, Maria. 1997. “Manuels français de syntaxe latine du XVe siècle: Répertoire et typologie”. Histoire Épistemologie Langage 19:2.133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Rita & Ineke Sluiter. 2009. Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language arts and literary theory, AD 300–1475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Droz, Eugénie. 1964. “Les ‘Regule’ de Remigius, Münster en Westphalie, 1486”. Studi di bibliografia in onore di Tammaro de Marinis ed. by Romeo De Maio, 265–280. Verona: G. Mardersteig.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin Margareta. 1973. “The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum ”. CIMAGL 111.1–57.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Speculative Grammar”. A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy ed. by Peter Dronke, 177–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glück, Manfred. 1967. Priscians Partitiones und ihre Stellung in der spätantiken Schule. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Jeudy, Colette & Yves Riou. 1989. Les manuscrits classiques latins des bibliothèques publiques de France. I: Agen-Évreux. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 1988. Guardians of Language: The grammarian and society in late antiquity. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Louis G[erard]. 2002. The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy, and the Modistae. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, Corneille Henri. 1978. “Master Guido and his View on Government: On twelfth century linguistic thought”. Vivarium 161.108–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. “Scholasticism versus Humanism: A conflict of interests? Late fifteenth-century reflections on grammar in northwestern Europe”. Language and Cultural Change: Aspects of the study and use of language in the Later Middle Ages and the Renaissance ed. by Lodi Nauta, 23–58. Leuven-Paris-Dudley: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1982. The Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. “Grammatica normativa nel XIII sec.” Aspetti della letteratura latina nel secolo XIII ed. by Claudio Leonardi & Giovanni Orlandi, 125–145. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Memory and the Structure of Grammars in Antiquity and the Middle Ages”. Manuscripts and Tradition of Grammatical Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance I1 ed. by Mario De Nonno et al., 9–58. Cassino: Università degli studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. 1993. “Syntax and Dialectic in Carolingian Commentaries on Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae .” History of Linguistic Thought in the Early Middle Ages ed by Vivien Law (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 71), 145–191. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Excerpta da Prisciano, Diomede e Pompeo compilati da Pietro da Pisa nel codice Bruxell. II 2572”. Manuscripts and Tradition of Grammatical Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance I1 ed. by Mario De Nonno et al., 327–350. Cassino: Università degli studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Pedagogical Grammars before the Eighteenth Century”. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics ed. by Keith Allan, 341–358. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molinier, A. 1890. Catalogue des manuscrits de la bibliothèque Mazarine III1. Paris: E. Plon.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Marina. 1978. I codici di Prisciano. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Le Partitiones di Prisciano nella tradizione medievale e umanistica”. MOUSA: Scritti in onore di Giuseppe Morelli ed. by Giovanni Cupaiuolo, 371–380. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1982a, ed. Remigius, Schleswig 1486, A Latin Grammar in Facsimile Edition with a Postscript. (= Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Historisk-filosofiske Meddelelser, 50.4.) Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard, 1982.Google Scholar
. 1982b. “Speculative Grammar”. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism 1100–1600 ed. by Norman Kretzmann et al., 254–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, Robert H[enry]. 1993. The Byzantine Grammarians: Trends in linguistics. (= Studies and Monographs, 70.) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 1994. “L’introduction des notions de sujet et de prédicat dans la grammaire médiévale”. Archives et documents de la SHESL 101.81–119.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Grammar”. Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy II1 ed. by Robert Pasnau & Christina Van Dyke, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Remigio. 1896. “La scuola e gli studi di Guarino Guarini Veronese”. Catania: Galati.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. 1984. An Edition of the Middle English Grammatical Texts. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Wolfgang. 1969. “Die Ianua (Donatus): Ein Beitrag zur lateinischen Schulgrammatik des Mittelalters und der Renaissance”. Beiträge zur Inkunabelkunde 41.43–80.Google Scholar
Sivo, Vito. 2008. “Paolo Camaldolese tra grammatica e retorica”. Schede medievali 461.43–82.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles. 1869. Notices et extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrins grammaticales au moyen âge. Paris: Imprimerie impériale.Google Scholar
Töns, Ulrich. 2008. “‘Fundamentum scholarium’. Die Grammatik des Johannes Kerckmeister (1486) als Zeugnis des Humanismus in Münster”. Frühmittelalterliche Studien 421.329–397.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Luhtala, Anneli
2020. Secondary Grammar Education in the Middle Ages. In The History of Grammar in Foreign Language Teaching, DOI logo
Moul, Victoria
2020. Grammar in verse: Latin pedagogy in seventeenth-century England. In The History of Grammar in Foreign Language Teaching, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.