Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 45:1/2 (2018) ► pp.179–210

That Was Not ‘Lenneberg’s Dream’

| Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Eric Heinz Lenneberg (1921–1975), a neuroscientist and linguist born in Düsseldorf, published his masterpiece Biological Foundations of Language in 1967. This book, now recognized as a classic in the field, inaugurated the scientific study of the biology of language, and has since its publication exerted an enormous influence. However, some interpretations of this work do not accurately capture the author’s biological and linguistic thinking. Here I concentrate on one such interpretation, that of leading generative acquisitionist Kenneth Wexler (1942-), who has formulated what he terms ‘Lenneberg’s dream’, portraying Lenneberg as believing that a trait like language is directly rooted in the genome. The present paper will show that Lenneberg’s view was in fact quite different from that assumed by Wexler. First, while the latter author explicitly adopts the genocentric stance that has characterized generative grammar since its very inception, the former relativized the role of genes and rejected the genome as the direct source of language. Second, Wexler’s position can be shown to be preformationist, assuming the genome to contain a specific program for language; Lenneberg, in contrast, never embraced that position and instead adopted an opposite, epigenesist stance. In sum, Lenneberg dreamt a completely different dream.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Lenneberg’s context: Why his (1967) book matters
  • 3.Two opposite views on the role of genes and the developmental process
  • 4.Genocentrism and preformation in generative grammar
  • 5.Wexler’s approach to linguistic development
  • 6.Wexler’s formulation of ‘Lenneberg’s dream’
  • 7.Lenneberg’s views on genes
  • 8.Why Lenneberg was accurate and Wexler isn’t
  • 9.Lenneberg’s views on development
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00020.lon
References (130)
References
Amundson, Ron. 2007. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & David Lightfoot. 2002. The Language Organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Patrick. 2001. “Behavioral Development and Darwinian Evolution”. Cycles of Contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 149–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benítez Burraco, Antonio & Víctor M. Longa. 2011. “El papel del ADN fósil en Paleoantropología: FOXP2, Neandertales y lenguaje”. Zephyrus: Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología LXVII1.45–68.Google Scholar
Benítez Burraco, Antonio, & Víctor M. Longa. 2012. “On the inference ‘Neanderthals had FOXP2 = they had complex language”. The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference (EVOLANG9) ed. by Thomas C. Scott-Phillips, Mónica Tamariz, Erica A. Cartmill & James R. Hurford, 50–57. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert C. & Noam Chomsky. 2016. Why Only Us. Language and Evolution. Cambridge, Mss.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert C., Angela D. Friederici, Noam Chomsky & Johan J. Bolhuis. 2013. “Evolution, Brain, and the Nature of Language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17:2.89–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen & Judith F. Kroll. In press. “The Neurobiology of language: looking beyond monolinguals”. Biolinguistics 111.
Blumberg, Mark S. 2005. Basic Instinct. The Genesis of Behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Víctor M. Longa. 2011. “Lenneberg’s Views on Language Development and Evolution and their Relevance for Modern Biolinguistics”. Biolinguistics 5:3.254–273.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit & Kenneth Wexler. 1987. “The Maturation of Syntax”. Parameter Setting ed. by Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams, 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Bi-Unique Relations and the Maturation of Grammatical Principles”. NLLT 101.147–189.Google Scholar
Brown, Eric R. 1975. “Eric H. Lenneberg”. Foundations of Language Development: A multidisciplinary approach, vol. I1 ed. by Eric H. Lenneberg & Elizabeth Lenneberg, v–vi. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger W. & Eric H. Lenneberg. 1954. “A Study in Language and Cognition”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 491.454–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Sean B. 2005. Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The new science of Evo Devo and the making of the animal kingdom. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Catlin, Jack. 1978. “Discussion of the Papers by Stolzenberg and Chomsky”. Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg ed. by George A. Miller & Elizabeth Lenneberg, 271–280. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row. [Quoted from the 2nd ed. by James McGilvray. Christchurch, New Zealand: Cybereditions, 2002.]Google Scholar
. 1976. “On the Biological Basis of Linguistic Capacities”. The Neuropsychology of Language: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg ed. by Robert W. Rieber, 1–24. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “The Biolinguistic Perspective after 50 Years”. Quaderni del Dipartamento di Linguistica, Universitá di Firenze 141.3–12.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Three Factors in Language Design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36:1.1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Approaching UG from below”. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics ed. by Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner, 1–29. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Opening Remarks”. Of Minds & Language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country ed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu, 13–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Language and Other Cognitive Systems: What is special about language?”. Language Learning and Development 71.263–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Eric H. 2006. The Regulatory Genome: Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Burlington, Mass.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Cedric Boeckx. 2011. “Introduction: Contours of the biolinguistic research agenda”. The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty ed. by Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx, 1–16. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Kenneth Wexler, Robert C. Berwick, Cedric Boeckx, Lyle Jenkins, Juan Uriagereka, Karin Stromswold, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Heidi Harley, Andrew Wedel, James McGilvray, Elly van Gelderen & Thomas G. Bever. 2010. “The Biological Nature of Human Language”. Biolinguistics 41.4–34.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Simon E. & Sonja C. Vernes. 2015. “Genetics and the Language Sciences”. Annual Review of Linguistics 11.289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. In press. “What Would Lenneberg Think? Biolinguistics in the third millennium”. Biolinguistics 111.
Fodor, Jerry & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. 2010. What Darwin Got Wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel. 2006. “Lenneberg, Eric H. (1921–1975). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd ed. by Keith Brown, vol. VII1, 43–44. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, Norman. 1965a. “Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man. Part I”. Brain 881.237–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965b. “Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man. Part II”. Ibid., pp. 585–644.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. & Michael J. F. Barresi. 2016. Developmental Biology. 11th ed. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Scott F. & Richard M. Burian. 2003. “Developmental Genetics”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology ed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson, 68–74. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Brian. 1994. How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The evolution of complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Gilbert. 1997. Synthesizing Nature-Nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2001. “A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View: Early formulation and current status”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 41–54. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “On Making Behavioral Genetics Truly Developmental”. Human Development 461.337–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay & Richard C. Lewontin. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 2051.581–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. & Russell D. Gray. 2001. “Darwinism and Developmental Systems”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 195–218. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Discussion: Three ways to misunderstand developmental systems theory”. Biology and Philosophy 201.417–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. & Robin D. Knight. 1998. “What is the Developmentalist Challenge?”. Philosophy of Science 651.253–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. & Karola Stotz. 2000. “How the Mind Grows: A developmental perspective on the biology of cognition”. Synthese 1221.29–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. & Cedric Boeckx. 2013. “Introducing the volume”. The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics ed. by Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann, 1–3. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language Acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Brian K. & Wendy M. Olson. eds. 2003. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Jan G. Kooij. 1988. “The Innateness Hypothesis”. Explaining Language Universals ed. by John A. Hawkins, 31–55. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A Theory of Syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina. 2002. “Clausal Structure in Child Greek: A reply to Varlokosta, Vainikka and Rohrbacher and a reanalysis”. The Linguistic Review 191.225–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, Eva & Marion J. Lamb. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Lyle. 1979. “The Genetics of Language”. Linguistics & Philosophy 31.105–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Timothy. 1987. “The Persistence of Dichotomies in the Study of Behavioral Development”. Developmental Review 71.149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Timothy & Laura Edwards. 2002. “Genes, Interactions, and the Development of Behavior”. Psychological Review 1091.26–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1995. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of twentieth-century biology. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Eric S. & Robert A. Weinberg. 2000. “Genomics: Journey to the center of biology”. Science 2871.1777–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrman, Daniel S. 1953. “A Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior”. The Quarterly Review of Biology 28:4.337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1953. “Cognition in Ethnolinguistics”. Language 291.463–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957. “A Probabilistic Approach to Language Learning”. Behavioral Science 21.1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1960. “Language, Evolution, and Purposive Behavior”. Culture in History: Essays in honor of Paul Radin ed. by Stanley Diamond, 869–893. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1961. “Color Naming, Color Recognition, Color Discrimination: A re-appraisal”. Perceptual and Motor Skills 121.375–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1962a. “A Laboratory for Speech Research at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center”. New England Journal of Medicine 2661.385–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1962b. “Understanding Language without Ability to Speak: A case report”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65:6.419–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964a. “Language Disorders in Childhood”. Harvard Educational Review 34:2.152–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964b. “A Biological Perspective of Language”. New Directions in the Study of Language ed. by Eric H. Lenneberg, 65–88. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966. “The Natural History of language”. The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach ed. by Frank Smith & George A. Miller, 219–252. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1969. “On Explaining Language”. Science 1641.635–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H., Irene A. Nichols & E. F. Rosenberger. 1964. “Primitive Stages of Language Development in Mongolism”. Disorders of Communication 421.119–137 Baltimore, N.Y..: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H., Freda G. Rebelsky & Irene A. Nichols. 1965. “The Vocalization of Infants Born to Deaf and to Hearing Parents”. Human Development 81.23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levit, Georgy S., Uwe Hossfeld & Lennart Olsson. 2006. “From the ‘Modern Synthesis’ to Cybernetics: Ivan Ivanovich Schmalhausen (1884–1963) and his research program for a synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology”. Journal of Experimental Zoology, Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 306B:2.89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. 1970. “The Units of Selection”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11.1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000a. The Triple Helix: Gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 2000b. “Foreword”. In Susan Oyama, The Ontogeny of Information. Developmental Systems and Evolution, vii–xv. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lickliter, Robert. 2008. “The Growth of Developmental Thought: Implications for a new evolutionary psychology”. New Ideas in Psychology 261.353–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lickliter, Robert & Hunter Honeycutt. 2003. “Developmental Dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology”. Psychological Bulletin 129:6.819–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Rethinking Epigenesis and Evolution in Light of Developmental Science”. Oxford Handbook of Developmental Behavioral Neuroscience ed. by Mark S. Blumberg, John H. Freeman & Scott R. Robinson, 30–47. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1982. The Language Lottery. Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2006. How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longa, Víctor M. 2008. “Una visión crítica sobre la noción de ‘programa genético’ desde la biología y la lingüística: Consecuencias para la conceptualización de la ontogenia del lenguaje”. Verba 351.347–385.Google Scholar
Longa, Víctor M. & Guillermo Lorenzo. 2012. “Theoretical Linguistics Meets Development: Explaining FL from an epigenecist point of view”. Language, From a biological point of view. Current Issues in Biolinguistics ed. by Cedric Boeckx, María Carmen Horno Chéliz & José L. Mendívil Giró, 52–84. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Guillermo & Víctor M. Longa. 2009. “Beyond Generative Geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view”. Lingua 1191.1300–1315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. El innatismo: Origen, variaciones y vitalidad de una idea. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Maienschein, Jane. 2005. “Epigenesis and preformationism”. Stanford Enclyclopedia of Philosophy. [[URL]].
Mameli, Matteo & Patrick Bateson. 2006. “Innateness and the Sciences”. Biology and Philosophy 211.155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marx, Otto. 1967. “Appendix B: The history of the biological basis of language”. Lenneberg 1967: 443–469.Google Scholar
Maynard-Smith, John & Eörs Szathmáry. 1999. The Origins of Life: From the birth of life to the origin of language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, David S. 2001. The Dependent Gene: The fallacy of ‘Nature vs. Nurture’. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Moss, Lenny. 2003. What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Gert B. & Lennard Olson. 2003. “Epigenesis and epigenetics”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology ed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson, 114–123. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, Ulric, Daniel Tapper & Eleanor J. Gibson. 1975. “Eric H. Lenneberg: September 19, 1921–May 31, 1975”. Office of the Dean of the University Faculty of Cornell University. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
Oyama, Susan. 2000[1982]. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental systems and evolution. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Terms in Tension: What do you do when all the good words are taken?”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 177–193. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oyama, Susan, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, eds. 2001. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder & Lamar Roberts. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1980. “Introductory remarks”. Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky ed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, 57–61. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo. In press. “From Zero to Fifty: Considerations on Eric Lenneberg’s Biological Foundations of Language and updates”. Biolinguistics 111.
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poeppel, David & David Embick. 2005. “Defining the Relation between Linguistics and Neuroscience”. Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones ed. by Anne Cutler, 103–118. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Raff, Rudolf A. 2000. “Evo-Devo: The evolution of a new discipline”. Nature Review Genetics 11.74–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, Jason Scott. 2003. “Developmental Systems Theory”. Keywords & Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology ed. by Brian K. Hall & Wendy M. Olson, 94–97. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking development seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Richard. 2004. “Innateness and Cognitive Science”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:3.136–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda B. & Esther Thelen. 2003. “Development as a Dynamic System”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:8.343–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1999. Chomsky. Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer, John P., Mark S. Blumberg, Bob McMurray, Scott R. Robinson, Larissa K. Samuelson & J. Bruce Tomblin. 2009. “Short Arms and Talking Eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate”. Child Development Perspectives 31.79–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D’Arcy W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Rosalind & Stephen Crain. 2013. “Parameters: The pluses and the minuses”. The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax ed. by Marcel den Dikken, 927–970. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Rosalind & Kenneth Wexler. 1999. Principle B, Ellipsis, and Interpretation in Child Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trettenbrein, Patrick C. ed. In press. “50 years later: A tribute to Eric Lenneberg’s Biological Foundations of Language ”, Special issue of Biolinguistics 111.
Vercelli, Donata & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. 2009. “Language in an Epigenetic Framework”. Of Minds & Language: A dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country ed. by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini, Juan Uriagereka & Pello Salaburu, 97–107. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Bruce W. & David J. Depew. 2001. “Developmental Systems: Darwinian evolution, and the unity of science”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 239–253. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, Mary. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth. 1990. “Innateness and Maturation in Linguistic Development”. Developmental Psychobiology 23:7.645–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Optional Infinitives, Head Movement and the Economy of Derivations”. Verb Movement ed. by David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein, 305–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage”. Lingua 1061.23–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Lenneberg’s Dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment”. Language Competence across Populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment ed. by Yonata Levi & Jeannette Schaeffer, 11–61. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Grammatical Computation in the Optional Infinitive Stage”. Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition ed. by Jill de Villiers & Tom Roeper, 53–118. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Luria’s Biolinguistic Suggestion and the Growth of Language”. The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics ed. by Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann, 94–128. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William. 1999. “Generativity, Entrenchment, Evolution, and Innateness: Philosophy, evolutionary biology, and conceptual foundations of science”. Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical essays ed. by Valerie G. Hardcastle 139–179. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Generative Entrenchment and the Developmental Systems Approach to Evolutionary Processes.”. Cycles of Contingencies: Developmental systems and evolution ed. by Susan Oyama, Paul E. Griffiths & Russell D. Gray, 219–237. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2004. “Toward a Theory of Language Growth”. Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics ed. by Lyle Jenkins, 37–56. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Norrman, Gunnar
2024. Reconceptualizing the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition: An appraisal of Lenneberg's work on the epigenesis of language. Language Sciences 105 ► pp. 101645 ff. DOI logo
Longa, Víctor M.
2021. On evolution, change, and beyond. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.