Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 46:3 (2019) ► pp.3356
References (35)
References
Andresen, Julie Tetel. 1990. Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anónimo. 1586. Arte y vocabulario en la lengua general del Perú llamada qquichua, y en la lengua Española. Lima: Antonio Ricardo.Google Scholar
Baxtin, Mixail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays ed. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist and transl. by Vern McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann M. 2011. Too Much to Know: Managing scholarly information before the modern age. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Lisa. 2019. Our Beloved Kin: A new history of King Philip’s War. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1995. Forms and Meanings: Texts, performances, and audiences from Codex to Computer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 2010. Poetry and the Police: Communication networks in eighteenth-century Paris. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Dippold, Steffi. 2013. “The Wampanoag Word: John Eliot’s ‘Indian Grammar’, the vernacular rebellion, and the elegancies of native speech author(s)”. Early American Literature 481: 543–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Ponceau, Peter Stephen. 1819. “Report as Corresponding Secretary, and a Correspondence between the Reverend John Heckewelder and Peter S. DuPonceau Esqu. Respecting the Languages of the American Indians”. Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society 11: xvii–xlvi, 351–448.Google Scholar
. 1827. Preface to David Zeisberger, Grammar of the Language of the Lenni Lenape, or Delaware Indians. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 31: 65–96.Google Scholar
. 1830–1831. “Philology”. Encyclopædia Americana ed. by Francis Lieber et al.. 101:81–99. Philadelphia: Carey & Lea.Google Scholar
. 1838. Mémoire sur le système grammatical des langages de quelque nations indiennes de l’Amérique du Nord. Paris: Pihan de la Forest.Google Scholar
Eliot, John. 1666. The Indian Grammar Begun. Cambridge, Mass.: Marmaduke Johnson.Google Scholar
. 1822. The Grammar of the Massachusetts Indian Language ed. by John Pickering and Peter Stephen Du Ponceau. Massachusetts Historical Society Publications. Boston: Phelps & Farnham.Google Scholar
González Holguín, Diego. 1607. Gramática y arte nueva de la lengua general de todo el Perú, llamada lengua qquichua, o lengua del Inca. Lima: Francisco del Canto.Google Scholar
Goodman, Roy & Pierre Swiggers. 1991–1993. “Albert Gallatin’s Table of North American Native Languages (1826)”. Orbis, 361:240–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Horatio. 1846. Ethnography and Philology. Philadelphia: C. Sherman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Jill. 1999. The Name of War: King Philip’s War and the origins of American identity. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mackert, Michael. 1994. “Horatio Hale and the Great U.S. Exploring Expedition.” Anthropological Linguistics 361:1–26.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Donald. 2002. Making Meaning: “Printers of the mind” and other essays. Ed. by Peter McDonald & Michael Suarez. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, John. 1819. “Art. XI: Review of Du Ponceau (1819)”. North American Review 91: 179–187.Google Scholar
. 1830–1831. “Indian Languages of America”. Encyclopædia Americana ed. by Francis Lieber et al., 61: 581–600. Philadelphia: Carey & Lea.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert. 1999. “Du Ponceau and General and Amerindian Linguistics”. The Prix Volney, volume II: Early nineteenth-century contributions to general and Amerindian linguistics: Du Ponceau and Rafinesque ed. by Joan Leopold, 1–36. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Santo Tomás, Domingo de. 1560. Grammatica, o arte de la lengua general de los Indios de los reynos de Peru. Valladolid: Fernández de Cordova.Google Scholar
Schreyer, Rüdiger. 2000. “‘Savage’ Languages in Eighteenth-Century Theoretical History of Language”. The Language Encounter in the Americas, 1492–180, ed. by Edward Gray & Norman Fiering, 310–26. New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Murphy. 1983. “Peter Stephen Du Ponceau and His Study of Languages: A historical account”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1271: 143–179.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1991. “Philologists Meet Algonquian: The ‘Observations’ by Du Ponceau and Pickering on Eliot’s Grammar”, 346–358. Papers of the Twenty-Second Algonquian Conference (1990), ed. by William Cowan. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Americanist Linguistics and the Origin of Linguistic Typology: Peter Stephen Du Ponceau’s ‘Comparative Science of Language’”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1421:18–46.Google Scholar
. 2009. “David Zeisberger’s Description of Delaware Morphology (1827)”. Historiographia Linguistica 361:325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “History and Historiography of Linguistics: Status, Standards and Standing”. EUTOMIA: Revista Online de Literatura e Linguística, 3.2:1–18.Google Scholar
Tooker, William Wallace. 1896. John Eliot’s first Indian teacher and interpreter, Cockenoe-de-Long Island : and the story of his career from the early records. New York: F. P. Harper.Google Scholar
Turner, James. 2014. Philology: The forgotten origins of the modern humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeisberger, David. 1827. “A Grammar of the Language of the Lenni Lenape of Delaware Indians. Trans. Pierre Stephen Du Ponceau”. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 31:97–250.Google Scholar
. Unpublished. Grammaticalischer Aufsatz von der Delawar Sprache. MS Am 767 (6), Houghton Library, Harvard University.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.