Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 48:2/3 (2021) ► pp.316322
Beauzée, Nicolas
1765 “Régime”. Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers ed. by D. Diderot & J. Le Rond D’Alembert, vol. 141, 5–11.Google Scholar
Clark, Stephen Watkins
1847Science of English language. A practical grammar: In which words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their offices, and their relations to each other. Illustrated by a complete system of diagrams. New York, NY: A. S. Barnes.Google Scholar
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine & Christopher D. Manning
2008 “The Stanford Typed Dependencies Representation”. Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, 1–8. Manchester. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajičová, Eva, Kim Gerdes & Leo Wanner
2011 “Introduction”. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling), 35–55 (p. iii–iiv). Barcelona.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard
2007Language Networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1969 [1937]Analytic Syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Kern, Franz
1888Leitfaden für den Anfangsunterricht in der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Nicolaishe Verlags-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1988Dependency Syntax: Theory and practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck (2nd edition 1966).Google Scholar
2015Elements of structural syntax. Translated by T. Osborne and S. Kahane. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar