Article In:
Historiographia Linguistica: Online-First Articles

The distributed invention of enunciation theory

 | University of Edinburgh
In the second half of the 20th century a linguistic approach emerged that aimed to complement the analysis of language structure: énonciation, centred on speakers and the act of speaking. Émile Benveniste has had his role raised to author of the theory, despite its developing simultaneously in work by Roman Jakobson and Jacques Lacan, and later Tzvetan Todorov, with each of whom he had professional and personal ties. Others who figure in its formulation are J. L. Austin, Charles Bally, Leonard Bloomfield, Jacques Damourette and Édouard Pichon, Bronisɬaw Malinowski, Hendrik Pos and, to some extent, Karl Bühler. Of particular significance is work published in 1969 by Jean Dubois and Michel Foucault, both of whom give enunciation a clearer and fuller treatment than is found in the 1970 paper by Benveniste regarded as the locus classicus. The present article argues for, not sidelining Benveniste, but approaching the invention of enunciation as dialogic – a case of distributed cognition – instead of treating it on the lines of the ‘Great Man theory of history’ which this journal’s founder, E. F. K. Koerner, worked hard to oppose.
Article outline
  • 1.Benveniste
  • 2.Dubois
  • 3.Todorov
  • 4.Malinowski
  • 5.Bloomfield
  • 6.Austin
  • 7.Lacan
  • 8.Jakobson; Bühler
  • 9.Pos, Damourette & Pichon, Bally, Sauvageot
  • 10.Foucault
  • 11.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (102)
References
Alegría Polo, Marcos Alberto. 2014. Sentido y evento: El problema de la significación en Bühler y Benveniste. Tesis de maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires. [URL]
Angermuller, Johannes. 2014. Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in enunciative pragmatics. Houndmills, Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. French version, Analyse du discours poststructuraliste: Les voix du sujet dans le langage chez Lacan, Althusser, Foucault, Derrida, Sollers, trans. by Rosine Inspektor & Johannes Angermuller. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “The Analysis of Discursive Subjects”. Handbook of Political Discourse ed. by Piotr Cap, 180–203. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, Michel. 1986. Linguistique et psychanalyse: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan et les autres. Paris: Méridiens-Klincksieck. English version, see Arrivé 1992.Google Scholar
. 1992. Linguistics and Psychoanalysis: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan and others. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Trans. by James Leader of Arrivé 1986.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Langage et psychanalyse, linguistique et inconscient: Freud, Saussure, Pichon, Lacan. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Ce que Lacan retient de Damourette et Pichon: l’exemple de la négation”. Langages 1241.113–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Preface to Ono 20071, 9–13.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1961a. Philosophical Papers. Ed. by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon Press. French version, Écrits philosophiques, trans. by Lou Aubert & Anne-Lise Hacker, Paris: Seuil, 1994.Google Scholar
1961b. “Performative Utterances”. Unscripted broadcast, BBC Third Channel, 24 Aug. 1956, corrected transcript first publ. in Austin (1961a: 220–239).Google Scholar
1962a. “Performatif-constatif”. La philosophie analytique, Cahiers de Royaumont, 271–304. Paris: Minuit. English version, “Performative-Constative”, trans. by G. J. Warnock, in Philosophy and Ordinary Language ed. by Charles E. Caton, 22–54. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar
1962b. How To Do Things With Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press. French version, Quand dire c’est faire trans. by Gilles Lane. Paris: Le Seuil, 1970.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1946. “Structures des relations de personne dans le verbe”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 43/1, fasc. 1, no 126, 1–12. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 225–236.)Google Scholar
. 1949. “Le système sublogique des prépositions en latin”. Travaux de Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5: Recherches structurales, 177–184. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 132–139.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1954. “Tendances récentes en linguistique générale”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 47e–51e années:1/21.130–145. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 3–17.)Google Scholar
. 1956a. “Remarques sur la fonction du langage dans la découverte freudienne”. La psychanalyse 11.3–16. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 75–87.)Google Scholar
. 1956b. “La nature des pronoms”. For Roman Jakobson, 34–37. The Hague: Mouton. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 251–257.)Google Scholar
. 1958. “De la subjectivité dans la langue”. Journal de Psychologie, juillet-sept., 257–265. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 258–266.)Google Scholar
. 1963. “La philosophie analytique et le langage”. Les études philosophiques 18/11.3–11. (Repr. in Benveniste 19661: 267–276.)Google Scholar
. 1964. “Documents pour l’histoire de quelques notions saussuriennes”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 211.131–135Google Scholar
. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris: Gallimard. English version, see Benveniste 1971.Google Scholar
. 1968. “Structuralisme et linguistique” (interview with Pierre Daix). Les lettres françaises, no 1242 (24–30 juillet), 10–13. (Repr. in Benveniste 19741: 11–28.)Google Scholar
. 1969. “Sémiologie de la langue”. Semiotica 11.1–12, 127–135. (Repr. in Benveniste 19741: 43–66.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1970a. “L’appareil formel de l’énonciation”. Langages 171.12–18 (repr. in Benveniste 19741: 79–88). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1970b. “Structure de la langue et structure de la société”. Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica (Congresso Internazionale Olivetti, Milano, 14–17 ottobre 1968), 459–460. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità. (Repr. in Benveniste 19741: 91–102.)Google Scholar
. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics, trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek, Coral Gables. Florida: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale 2. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 2012. Dernières leçons: Collège de France, 1968 et 1969. Ed. by Jean-Claude Coquet & Irène Fenoglio. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Gallimard, Seuil. English version, see Benveniste 2019 [2012].Google Scholar
. 2019 [2012]. Last Lectures: Collège de France, 1968 and 1969 trans. by John E. Joseph. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 1951. Actes de la Conférence européenne de sémantique (Nice, 26–31 mars 1951), organisée par M. E. Benveniste (Paris), avec la participation de MM. C. E. Bazell (Istanbul), G. Devoto (Florence), J. R. Firth (Londres), H. Frei (Genève), L. Hjelmslev (Charlottenlund), J. Lotz (Columbia U. New-York), A. Sommerfelt (Oslo), S. Ullmann (Glasgow). Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1924. Rev. of Saussure (1922 [1916]). Modern Language Journal 8:5.317–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.; London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
. 1935. “Linguistic Aspects of Science”. Philosophy of Science 21.499–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Chiss, Jean-Louis. 1986. “Charles Bally: Qu’est-ce qu’une ‘théorie de l’énonciation’?”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 8:2.165–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coquet, Jean-Claude. 1987. “Linguistique et sémiologie”. Actes sémiotiques-Documents IX 1, 881.5–20.Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-Jacques. 1981. “Quelques problèmes théoriques et méthodologiques en analyse du discours, à propos du discours communiste adressé aux chrétiens.” Langages 621.9–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damourette, Jacques & Édouard Pichon. 1911–1930. Des mots à la pensée: Essai de grammaire de la langue française. 71 vols. Paris: d’Artrey.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jean. 1969. “Énoncé et énonciation”. Langages 131.100–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Eribon, Didier. 1989. Michel Foucault. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Falco, Mariacristina. 2022. “Saussure, Bühler, Benveniste: Sign and enunciation”. With Saussure, Beyond Saussure: Between linguistics and philosophy of language ed. by Marina De Palo & Stefano Gensini, 99–111. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Fenoglio, Irène. 2017. “Sur la notion de ‘sujet’ chez Benveniste”. Linx 741.175–188. [URL]. DOI logo
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. English version, see Foucault 1972.Google Scholar
. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge trans. by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
. 1976. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard. English version.Google Scholar
. 1978. The History of Sexuality, vol. 11: An introduction, trans. by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. 1952. “Discourse Analysis”. Language 28:1.1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1969. “L’énoncé en analyse”. Langages 131.111–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1970. “Le sexe fait ‘comme’ signe”. Langages 171.42–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1957. “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb”. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Language & Literatures. (Repr. in Jakobson, Selected Writings, vol. 21: Word and language, 386–392. The Hague: Mouton, 1971; partial repr. as “Shifters and Verbal Categories” in Jakobson 19901: 386–392.)Google Scholar
. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics”. Style in Language ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. On Language. Ed. by Linda Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Claude Lévi-Strauss. 2018. Correspondance 1942–1982. Ed. by Emmanuelle Loyer & Patrice Maniglier. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2017. “The Arbre-Tree Sign: Pictures and words in counterpoint in the Cours de linguistique générale ”. Semiotica 217:1.147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Language, Mind and Body: A conceptual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2019. “The Resistant Embrace of Formalism in the Work of Émile Benveniste and Aurélien Sauvageot”. Form and Formalism in Linguistics ed. by James McElvenny, 141–174. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
2022a. “The Affective, the Conceptual and the Meaning of ‘Life’ in the Stylistics of Charles Bally”. Language & Communication 861.60–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022b. “Making Grammars Concrete Again: Aurélien Sauvageot’s Esquisses of Finnish and Hungarian”. The Architecture of Grammar: Studies in linguistic historiography in honour of Pierre Swiggers ed. by Tim Denecker, Piet Desmet, Lieve Jooken, Peter Lauwers, Toon Van Hal & Raf Van Rooy, 457–470. Leuven: Peeters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023. “What Structuralism Is Not”. Structuralism as One — Structuralism as Many: Studies in structuralisms ed. by Lorenzo Cigana & Frans Gregersen, 201–224. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
In press. “Koerner, Saussure, Chomsky: An eternal upbraiding of the ‘Great man theory’”. Language & History.
Joseph, John E., Chloé Laplantine & George-Jean Pinault. 2020. “Lettres d’Émile Benveniste à Claude Lévi-Strauss (1948–1967)”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 42:1.155–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1971. “Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic theory in Western studies of language: A critical evaluation of the evolution of Saussurean principles and their relevance to contemporary linguistic theories. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in General Linguistics in the Department of Modern Languages, Simon Fraser University”, [URL]
Kristeva, Julia. 2012. “Préface: Émile Benveniste, un linguiste qui ne dit ni ne cache, mais signifie”. In Benveniste (2012: 13–40).Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1945. “Le temps logique et l’assertion de certitude anticipée: Un nouveau sophisme”. Cahiers d’art, 1940–1944, 32–42. (Repr. in Lacan 1966b: 197–213). English version, “Logical Time and the Assertion of Anticipated Certainty”, in Lacan (2006 [1966b]: 161–175.)Google Scholar
. 1956. “Fonction et champ de la parole et du langage dans la psychanalyse: Rapport du Congrès de Rome tenu à l’Istituto di Psicologia della Università di Roma les 26 et 27 septembre 1953”. La psychanalyse 11.81–166. (Repr. in Lacan 1966b: 237–322). English version, “The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis”, in Lacan (2006 [1966b]: 197–268).Google Scholar
. 1958. “Le désir et son interpretation”. Seminar of 12 Nov. 1958, [URL] (publ. version in Lacan 2013).
. 1966a [1960]. “Subversion du sujet et dialectique du désir dans l’inconscient freudien”. Paper read (with the title “La dialectique”) at the Congrès réuni à Royaumont par les soins des Colloques philosophiques internationaux, 19–23 Sep. 1960, and first published (in rewritten form) in Lacan (1966b: 793–827). English version, “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious”, in Lacan 2006 [1966b]: 671–702).Google Scholar
. 1966b. Écrits. Paris: Seuil. English version, see Lacan 2006.Google Scholar
. 2006. Écrits: The first complete edition in English trans. by Bruce Fink, in collaboration with Hélöise Fink & Russell Grigg. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
. 2013. Le séminaire, livre VI: Le désir et son interprétation (1958–1959). Ed. by Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: La Martinière. English version, see Lacan 2019.Google Scholar
. 2019. Desire and Its Interpretation: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VI, trans. by Bruce Fink, Cambridge & Medford, Mass.: Polity.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1968. Rev. of Benveniste (1966b). Language 44:1.94–96.Google Scholar
Lie, Sulgi. 2020. Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema: The outside of film. Trans. by Daniel Fairfax. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. (Orig. publ. as Die Aussenseite des Films: Zur politischen Filmästhetic, Zürich & Berlin: Diaphanes, 2012.)Google Scholar
Lock, Charles. 1992. “Roman Jakobson and the Future of Linguistics” (rev. art. on Jakobson 1990). Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue canadienne des Slavistes 34:3.311–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lösener, Hans. 2010. “Die Origo der Subjektivität: ich, jetzt, hier bei Bühler und Benveniste”. Grammatik — Praxis — Geschichte: Festschrift für Wilfried Kürschner ed. by Abraham P. ten Cate, Reinhard Rapp, Jürg Strässler, Maurice Vliegen & Heinrich Weber, 155–165. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lotz, John. 1951. Letter to Émile Benveniste, 9 Jan. 1951. Papiers d’Orientalistes 29 (2), f. 22. Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisɬaw. 1923. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. Supplement to C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The Meaning of Meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism, 451–510, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Miller, Alexander. 2022. “Formation and Development of the Concept of Discourse in Lacan and Benveniste”. Psychoanalysis and History 24:2.151–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude. 2002. Le périple structural: Figures et paradigmes. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Mitelman, Myriam. 2015. “Secrets de l’énonciation”. Ironik! Le bulletin UFORCA pour l’Université Populaire Jacques-Lacan no. 9 (sep. 2015). [URL]
Normand, Claudine. 1986. “Les termes de l’énonciation de Benveniste”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 8:2.191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Aya. 2007. La notion d’énonciation chez Émile Benveniste. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann and Brugman(n), Karl. 1878. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, Part 11. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Pos, Hendrik J. 1939. “Phénoménologie et linguistique”. Revue internationale de philosophie 1/21.354–365.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1881. De l’emploi du génitif absolu en sanscrit, thèse pour le doctorat présentée à la Faculté de Philosophie de l’Université de Leipzig. Genève: Imprimerie Jules-Guillaume Fick.Google Scholar
. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. Paris and Lausanne: Payot. (2nd ed. 1922; subsequent eds essentially unchanged). English version, Course in General Linguistics, trans. by Wade Baskin, New York: Philosophical Library, 1959.Google Scholar
Sauvageot, Aurélien. 1946. Esquisse de la langue finnoise. Paris: La Nouvelle Édition.Google Scholar
. 1951. Esquisse de la langue hongroise. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Sicard, l’Abbé. 1808. Élémens de grammaire générale, appliqués à la langue française, tome 21. 3rd ed. Paris: chez Deterville.Google Scholar
Silverman, Hugh J. 1994. “French Structuralism and After: De Saussure, Lévi-Strauss, Barthes, Lacan, Foucault”. Twentieth-Century Continental Philosophy ed. by Richard Kearney, 390–408. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Russell. 2021. “Enunciation”. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Literature ed. by John Frow. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šťastná, Eva. n. d. “Words Referring to Their Own Utterance: Jakobson and Benveniste on shifters”. [URL]
Sumpf, Joseph & Jean Dubois. 1969. “Problèmes de l’analyse du discours”. Langages 131.3–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1970. “Problèmes de l’énonciation”. Langages 171.3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Mikhaïl Bakhtine: Le principe dialogique, suivi de: Écrits du cercle de Bakhtin. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Postface: Émile Benveniste, le destin d’un savant”. In Benveniste (2012: 183–197).Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1966. “Explorations in Semantic Theory”. Current Trends in Linguistics III ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 395–477. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar