Editorial published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:1 (1974) ► pp.110
References (25)
References
Arens, Hans. 1955. Sprachwissenschaft: Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg & Munich: K. Alber. (2nd enl. ed., 1969.)Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1965. “Structural Linguistics and the Philosophy of ScienceDiogenes 511.111–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benfey, Theodor. 1869. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland seit dem Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts mit einem Rückblick auf die früheren Zeiten. Munich: J. G. Cotta (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1965.)Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1966. “Strukturalismus: Geschichte, Probleme und Methoden”. Kursbuch 51.77–152. [E. transi., Modern Linguistics: Its development, methods and problems. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.]Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. “The Study of Language”. Language by L. Bloomfield, 3–20. New York: Holt, Rinehardt & Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964 [1962]. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1880. Einleitung in das Sprachstudium: Ein Beitrag zur Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. (6th ed., 1919.) [E. transi., Introduction to the Study of Language: A critical survey. Ibid., 1882. New ed. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1973.]Google Scholar
Dingwall, William Orr. 1963. “Transformational Grammar: Form and theory. A contribution to the history of linguistics”. Lingua 121.233–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvin, Paul Lucian. 1970. “Moderation in Linguistic Theory”. Language Sciences 91.1–3.Google Scholar
Gray, Louis Herbert. 1939. “The History of the Study of Language”. Foundations of Language by L. H. Gray, 419–60. New York: Macmillan. (3rd printing, 1960.)Google Scholar
lvić, Milka. 1962. Pravci u lingvistici. Ljubljana: Državna Založba Slovenije [E. transi., Trends in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1965. (2nd printing, 1970.)]Google Scholar
Jankowsky, Kurt Robert. 1972. The Neogrammarians: A re-evaluation of their place in the development of linguistic science. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1972. “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: 19th and 20th century paradigms”. AnL 14:7.255–80. (Rev. version to appear in History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret. The Hague: Mouton [in press].)Google Scholar
1973. “The Humboldtian Tradition in Western Linguistics”. FL [to appear].Google Scholar
Leroy, Maurice. 1963. Les grands courants de la linguistique moderne. Brus-sels: Presses Univ. de Bruxelles. (2nd enl. ed., 1971.) [E. transi, The Main Trends in Modem Linguistics. Oxford: B. Blackwell; Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1967.]Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1969. “History and Histories of Linguistics”. RomPh 221.530–66.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1959. Nya vägar inom sprakforskningen: En orientering i modern lingvistik. Stockholm: Svenska bokforlaget; Copenhagen: E. Munks-gaard. (4th ed., 1969.). [E. transi., New Trends in Linguistics: An orientation. Stockholm & Lund: Naturmetodens Språkinstitut, 1964.]Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer. (5th ed., 1920.)Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1916. Et Blik paa Sprogvidenskabens Historie, med saerligt Hensyn til det historiske Studium av Sprogets Lyd. Copenhagen: Universi-tetsbogtrykkeriet (J. H. Schultz).Google Scholar
. 1924. Sprogyidenskaben i det nit tende Aarhundrede: Metoder og Resultater. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. [E. transi., Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1931. (Repr., under the title The Discovery of Language, Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1962.)]Google Scholar
Raumer, Rudolf von. 1870. Geschichte der germanischen Philologie. Munich: J. G. Cotta. (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1965.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, Robert Henry. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans; Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1968. (2nd printing, 1970.)Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm (ed.). 1916–36. Geschichte der indogermanischen Sprachwissenschaft seit ihrer Begründung durch Franz Bopp. 61 vols. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner, later on Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Troike, Rudolph Charles. 1972. “Lest the Wheel Be too oft Re-invented: Towards a reassessment of the intellectual history of linguistics”. Festschrift for Archibald A. Hill ed. by Edgar Polomé, et al. (The Hague: Mouton [in press]).Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Kaltner, Leonardo Ferreira & Melyssa Cardozo Silva dos Santos
2021. A gramática de Anchieta e a gramaticografia humanística renascentista. Cadernos de Linguística 2:3  pp. e356 ff. DOI logo
Kaltner, Leonardo Ferreira & Melyssa Cardozo Silva dos Santos
2021. A Decima Classis do Schola Aquitanica (1583). Cadernos de Linguística 2:4  pp. e501 ff. DOI logo
Bologna, Maria Patrizia
2011.  Due secoli di pensiero linguistico: Dai primi dell’Ottocento a oggi. By Giorgio Graffi. Historiographia Linguistica 38:3  pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Mackert, Michael
1993. Interpretation, authorial intention, and representation: Reflections on the historiography of linguistics. Language Sciences 15:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Dörner, Andreas & Gregor Meder
1987. Heinrich Bauers ‘Vollständige Grammatik der Neuhochdeutschen Sprache’ (1827–1833). Historiographia Linguistica 14:3  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1976. The Semantic Theory of James Harris. Historiographia Linguistica 3:3  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Baum, Richard
1975. Die ‘Ideologen’ Des 18. Jahrhunderts und Die Sprachwissenschaft. Historiographia Linguistica 2:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Editors’ notes. Historiographia Linguistica 48:2-3  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.