Two contrasting attitudes towards the scientific study of language have been apparent from the earliest period of linguistic studies in Europe. The forms that the contrast has taken have varied from one era to another. In Greece the debate was between the claims of grammar to be a science (téchnè) and the opinion that its was no more than practical knowledge (empeiría). In the Middle Ages the scholastic speculative grammarians maintained that their theory of grammar embodied a superior level of adequacy over against the mere accurate record of observed fact provided by Priscian and the didactic grammarians. A similar opposition was seen in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries between rationalist linguists, with their emphasis on linguistic universals and on the importance of ‘general grammar’, and the empiricists, who paid most attention to the individual differences of each language, to be accurately observed and independently classified. These continuing attitudes are still a matter of controversy today, and each has an essential place in the progress of linguistic science.
[384–322 B.C.] Analytica priora et posteriora [Prior analytics; Posterior analytics]. Ed. by W[illiam] D[avid] Ross, with introd. and appendices by L. Minio-Paluello. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press 1968 [Cited as An.Pri. and An.Post., respectively.]
[384–322 B.C.] Metaphysica [Metaphysics]. Ed. by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1924 (Repr. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press 1966.) [Cited as Metaph.]
Arnauld, A.
seeLancelot, N.
Bach, Emmom
1964Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bach, Emmom, and Robert T. Harms
(eds.)1968Universals in Linguistic Theory. Ibid.
Beauzée, Nicolas
1767Grammaire générale; ou. Exposition raisonnée des éléments nécessaires pour servir de fondement à l’étude de toutes les langues. 21 vols. Paris: J. Barbou. (Repr. of 1819-ed., with an introd. by Barrie E. Bart-lett, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog 1973.)
Bekker, Immanuel
(ed.)1816Anecdota Graeca, Vol II1. Berlin: G. Reimer. (Repr. Graz: Akad. Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt 1965.)
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: H. Holt.
Bumann, Waltraud
1965Die Sprachtheorie Heymann Steinthals. Meisenheim: A. Hain.
Chomsky, Noam
1961 “On the Notion ‘Rule of Grammar’ ”. Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects ed. by Roman Jakobson, 6–24. Providence, R.I. (Repr. in The Structure of Language ed. by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerold J. Katz, 119–36. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1964.)
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1966Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Cordemoy, Géraud
1668A Philosophical Discourse concerning Speech; conformable to the Cartesian principles. London: J. Martin. (Repr., together with Cordemoy’s Discourse Written to a Learned Frier (1670), with an introd. by Barbara Ross. Delmar, N.Y.: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints 1972.)
Diogenes -Laertius
[c.200–250 A.D.] [Lives and opinions of eminent philosophers]. Ed. by Robert D. Hicks. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dionysius Thrax
[fl.100 B.C.] Cited from Bekker 1816 (Also in Grammatici graeci ed. by Gustav Uhlig, vol. I1. Leipzig: Teubner 1883.)
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 “The Case for Case”. Bach & Harms 1968.1–88.
Firth, John Rupert
1946 “The English School of Phonetics”. TPhS 1947.92–132.
Gill, Alexander
1903 [1621]Logonomia Anglica. Ed. by Otto L[uitpold] Jiriczek. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner.
Halliday, M[ichael] A. K.
1961 “Categories of the Theory of Grammar”. Word 171.241–92.
Hjelmslev, Louis
1928Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst&Søn. (2nd. ed. 1968.)
Hockett, Charles F.
1965 “Sound Change”. Lg 411.185–204.
Hume, Alexander
1865 [c.1617]Of the Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue: A treates noe shorter then necessaire, for the schooles. Ed. by Henry Benjamin] Wheatley. London: Trübner & Co.
[
Lancelot, Claude, and Antoine Arnauld] 1846 [1660]Grammaire générale et raisonnée [de Port Royal]; contenant les fondemens de l’art de parler, expliqués dune manière claire et naturelle. Les raisons de ce qui est commun à toutes les langues et des principales différences qui s’y recontrent; et plusieurs remarques nouvelles sur la langue françoise. Ed. by Alexandre Bailly. Paris: Hachette. (Repr. Geneva: Slatkine 1968.)
Leitzmann, Albert
(ed.)1908Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Introduction by Berthold Delbrück. Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer.
Ruscelli, Giroiano
1581Commentarii delia lingua italiana. Ed. posthumously by Vincenzo Ruscelli. Venice: D. Zenaro.
Sahlin, Gunver
1928César Chesneau du Marsais et son rôle dans l’évolution de la grammaire générale. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.
Thurot, Charles
1868Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. ïmpr. Impériale. (Repr. Frankfurt/M.: Minerva 1964.)
Trager, George L.
1948 Review of Lingua, vol.I1 (1948) UAL 141.207–08.
Wallerand, G.
(ed.)1913Les OEuvres de Siger de Courtrai: Etude critique et textes inédits. Louvain: Acad, de Louvain.
Wallis, John
1765 [1653]Grammatica linguae Anglicanae: Cui praefigitur, De loquela: sive sonorum formation, tractatus grammatico-physicus. 6th ed. London: W. Bowyer. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
William of Conches
.
Cited fromThurot1868.
Zvegincev, V[ladimir] A[andreevič]
1972 “Bor’ba meždu empirizmom i racio-nalismom v sovremennoj amerikanskoj lingvistike [The struggle between empiricism and rationalism in modern American linguistics]”. Voprosy Filosolii 26:1.137–46. (E. transl, in General Systems 171.189–97 [1972].)
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Auroux, Sylvain
1998. Références. In La raison, le langage et les normes, ► pp. 307 ff.
1984. Typological and universal linguistics. Lingua 64:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
THOMAS, MARGARET
1995. Medieval and Modern Views of Universal Grammar and the Nature of Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal 79:3 ► pp. 345 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.