Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:1 (1974) ► pp.11–26

Theory-Orientation Versus Data-Orientation

A recurrent theme in linguistics

| University of London
Two contrasting attitudes towards the scientific study of language have been apparent from the earliest period of linguistic studies in Europe. The forms that the contrast has taken have varied from one era to another. In Greece the debate was between the claims of grammar to be a science (téchnè) and the opinion that its was no more than practical knowledge (empeiría). In the Middle Ages the scholastic speculative grammarians maintained that their theory of grammar embodied a superior level of adequacy over against the mere accurate record of observed fact provided by Priscian and the didactic grammarians. A similar opposition was seen in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries between rationalist linguists, with their emphasis on linguistic universals and on the importance of ‘general grammar’, and the empiricists, who paid most attention to the individual differences of each language, to be accurately observed and independently classified. These continuing attitudes are still a matter of controversy today, and each has an essential place in the progress of linguistic science.
Published online: 1 January 1974
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.1.03rob
References (33)
References
Aristotle [384–322 B.C.]. Analytica priora et posteriora [Prior analytics; Posterior analytics]. Ed. by W[illiam] D[avid] Ross, with introd. and appendices by L. Minio-Paluello. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1968. [Cited as An.Pri. and An.Post., respectively.]Google Scholar
[384–322 B.C.]. Ethica Nichomachea [Nichomachean ethics]. Ed. by Ingram Bywater. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1894. [Cited zsEth.Nic]Google Scholar
[384–322 B.C.]. Metaphysica [Metaphysics]. Ed. by W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. (Repr. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1966.) [Cited as Metaph.]Google Scholar
Arnauld, A., see Lancelot, N.
Bach, Emmom. 1964. Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmom, and Robert T. Harms (eds.). 1968. Universals in Linguistic Theory. Ibid.Google Scholar
Beauzée, Nicolas. 1767. Grammaire générale; ou. Exposition raisonnée des éléments nécessaires pour servir de fondement à l’étude de toutes les langues. 21 vols. Paris: J. Barbou. (Repr. of 1819-ed., with an introd. by Barrie E. Bart-lett, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973.)Google Scholar
Bekker, Immanuel (ed.) 1816. Anecdota Graeca, Vol II1. Berlin: G. Reimer. (Repr. Graz: Akad. Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, 1965.)Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt.Google Scholar
Bumann, Waltraud. 1965. Die Sprachtheorie Heymann Steinthals. Meisenheim: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1961. “On the Notion ‘Rule of Grammar’ ”. Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects ed. by Roman Jakobson, 6–24. Providence, R.I. (Repr. in The Structure of Language ed. by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerold J. Katz, 119–36. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Géraud. 1668. A Philosophical Discourse concerning Speech; conformable to the Cartesian principles. London: J. Martin. (Repr., together with Cordemoy’s Discourse Written to a Learned Frier (1670), with an introd. by Barbara Ross. Delmar, N.Y.: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1972.)Google Scholar
Diogenes -Laertius [c.200–250 A.D.]. [Lives and opinions of eminent philosophers]. Ed. by Robert D. Hicks. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dionysius Thrax [fl.100 B.C.]. Cited from Bekker 1816. (Also in Grammatici graeci ed. by Gustav Uhlig, vol. I1. Leipzig: Teubner, 1883.)Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case”. Bach & Harms 1968.1–88.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1946. “The English School of Phonetics”. TPhS 1947.92–132.Google Scholar
Gill, Alexander. 1903 [1621]. Logonomia Anglica. Ed. by Otto L[uitpold] Jiriczek. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M[ichael] A. K. 1961. “Categories of the Theory of Grammar”. Word 171.241–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1928. Principes de grammaire générale. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst&Søn. (2nd. ed., 1968.)Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1965. “Sound Change”. Lg 411.185–204.Google Scholar
Hume, Alexander, 1865 [c.1617]. Of the Orthographie and Congruitie of the Britan Tongue: A treates noe shorter then necessaire, for the schooles. Ed. by Henry Benjamin] Wheatley. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
[Lancelot, Claude, and Antoine Arnauld]. 1846 [1660]. Grammaire générale et raisonnée [de Port Royal]; contenant les fondemens de l’art de parler, expliqués dune manière claire et naturelle. Les raisons de ce qui est commun à toutes les langues et des principales différences qui s’y recontrent; et plusieurs remarques nouvelles sur la langue françoise. Ed. by Alexandre Bailly. Paris: Hachette. (Repr. Geneva: Slatkine, 1968.)Google Scholar
Leitzmann, Albert (ed.). 1908. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Introduction by Berthold Delbrück. Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ruscelli, Giroiano. 1581. Commentarii delia lingua italiana. Ed. posthumously by Vincenzo Ruscelli. Venice: D. Zenaro.Google Scholar
Sahlin, Gunver. 1928. César Chesneau du Marsais et son rôle dans l’évolution de la grammaire générale. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles. 1868. Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. ïmpr. Impériale. (Repr. Frankfurt/M.: Minerva, 1964.)Google Scholar
Trager, George L. 1948. Review of Lingua, vol.I1 (1948). UAL 141.207–08.Google Scholar
Wallerand, G. (ed.). 1913. Les OEuvres de Siger de Courtrai: Etude critique et textes inédits. Louvain: Acad, de Louvain.Google Scholar
Wallis, John. 1765 [1653]. Grammatica linguae Anglicanae: Cui praefigitur, De loquela: sive sonorum formation, tractatus grammatico-physicus. 6th ed. London: W. Bowyer. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press, 1969.)Google Scholar
William of Conches. Cited from Thurot 1868.Google Scholar
Zvegincev, V[ladimir] A[andreevič]. 1972. “Bor’ba meždu empirizmom i racio-nalismom v sovremennoj amerikanskoj lingvistike [The struggle between empiricism and rationalism in modern American linguistics]”. Voprosy Filosolii 26:1.137–46. (E. transl, in General Systems 171.189–97 [1972].)Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Dini, Pietro U.
2005. Towards A Baltic Linguistics Historiography?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26:5 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Auroux, Sylvain
1998. Références. In La raison, le langage et les normes, ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Isermann, Michael
1996. John Wallis on adjectives the discovery of phrase structure in the Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae (1653). Historiographia Linguistica 23:1-2 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
THOMAS, MARGARET
1995. Medieval and Modern Views of Universal Grammar and the Nature of Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal 79:3 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Robins, R. H.
1988. Leonard Bloomfield: The Man and the man of Science. Transactions of the Philological Society 86:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Swiggers, P.
1984. Typological and universal linguistics. Lingua 64:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Clerico, Geneviève
1982. A Propos de César Chesneau du Marsais et Son Rôle Dans L’évolution de la Grammaire Générale (Paris, 1928) De Gunvor Sahlin. Historiographia Linguistica 9:1-2 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Koerner, E. F. K.
1977. First Announcement of International Conference on the History of Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 4:2 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Forsgren, Kjell-Åke
1976.  The Linguistic Work of Friedrich Karl Fulda. By Joann Vogt. Historiographia Linguistica 3:3 ► pp. 366 ff. DOI logo
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1976. The Semantic Theory of James Harris. Historiographia Linguistica 3:3 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Breva-Claramonte, Manuel
1975. Sanctius’ Minerva of 1562 and the Evolution of His Linguistic Theory. Historiographia Linguistica 2:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Constantinescu, Ilinca
1974. John Wallis (1616–1703). Historiographia Linguistica 1:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.