Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:2 (1974) ► pp.169–183

John Eliot of Massachusetts and the Beginnings of American Linguistics

| University of Wisconsin
The author puts forward the claim that The Indian Grammar Begun (1666) of John Eliot of Massachusetts (1604–90) constitutes the first published account of an ‘exotic’ language that can rightfully be called scientific (0.). The first portion of the argument treats Eliot’s English-based orthography and the problems it poses in the description of a language completely different from English (1.). Eliot’s use of a ‘morphophonemic’ transcription is presented (2.). Eliot’s The Logick Primer (1672) is suggested as a source of particular insights into the Puritan understanding and use of logic (3.). Having speculated about the impact that Jesus College, Cambridge, may have had on Eliot’s linguistic accomplishments in his analysis of an Amerindian language (4.), the author concludes that Eliot derserves to be called the true founder of American linguistics, in particular since he anticipated modern use of levels of representation by more than a century (5.).
Published online: 1 January 1974
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.2.04min
References (29)
References
Clarke, Martin L. 1959. Classical Education in Britain 1500–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Day, Gordon M., Karl V. Teeter, et al. 1967. Contributions to Anthropology: Linguistics I (Algonquian). National Musuem of Canada (Ottawa), Bulletin 214, Anthropological Series No. 78, Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.Google Scholar
Dobson, Eric J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. 21 vols. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. (First ed., 1957.)Google Scholar
Dunn, Catherine M., ed. 1969. The Logicke of the Most Excellent Philosopher Peter Ramus Martyr. Northridge, Calif.: San Fernando State College, Renaissance Editions No. 3.Google Scholar
Duponceau, Peter S. 1822. “Notes and Observations on Eliot’s Indian Grammar. Addressed to John Pickering, Esq.” Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91.247–312.Google Scholar
Eames, Wilberforce. 1937. “The Discovery of a Lost Cambridge Imprint: John Eliot’s Genesis, 1655.” Transactions of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts 341.11–12.Google Scholar
Eliot, John (tr.). 1663. The Holy Bible; containing the Old Testament and The New. Translated into The Indian Language… Cambridge, Mass.: Printed by Samuel Green and Marmaduke Johnson. (2nd edition, “much corrected and amended,” 1685. Printed by Samuel Green.) Evans Nos. 72, 385.Google Scholar
. 1666. The Indian Grammar Begun: or, an Essy to Bring the Indian Language into Rules… Cambridge (Mass.): Printed by Marmaduke Johnson. Available as Evans No. 1061, Readex Microprint Edition of Early American Imprints. Also reprinted in Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91, 247–312. 1822. [Quotes pertain to this reprint.]Google Scholar
. 1672. The Logick Primer. Some Logical Notions to Initiate the Indians in the Knowledge of the Rule of Reason… Cambridge, Mass.: Printed by Marmaduke Johnson. Available as Evans No. 1661, Readex Microprint Edition of Early American Imprints. Also reprinted as The Logic Primer, Cleveland (Ohio): Burrows Bros., 1904. [Page references are to the reprint.]Google Scholar
Farnaby, Thomas. 1641. Systema Grammaticum. London: A. Crooke. (Facsimile-repr. Menston, Yorks.: Scolar Press. 1969.)Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1965. “The Eastern Algonquian Intrusive Nasal.” IJAL 311.206–220.Google Scholar
. 1971. “More on the Nasalization of PA *a: in Eastern Algonquian”. IJAL 371.139–145.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1967. “Roger Williams’ Sound Shift: A Study in Algonkian [sic]”. To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, Vol. 11, pp. 816–32. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hanzeli, Victor H. 1969. Missionary Linguistics in New France: A Study of 17th and 18th century descriptions of American Indian languages. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1929–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Vol.I, Part ii. Leipzig: C. H. Tauchnitz. (Repr. Oxford: Blackwell; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1964.)Google Scholar
Miller, Perry. 1954. The New England Mind: The seventeenth century. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mulinger, James B. 1884. The University of Cambridge, Vol.II1. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J., S.J. 1958. Ramus: Method, and the Decay of Dialogue; from the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, John. 1822. “The Massachusetts Language.” Massachusetts Historical Society Collections, 2nd Series, Vol. 91.223–42.Google Scholar
, ed. 1829a. Josiah Cotton, Vocabulary of the Massachusetts (or Natick) Indian Language. Cambridge, Mass.: E. W. Metcalf & Co.Google Scholar
. 1829b. “Indian Languages of America.” An appendix to vol. VI1 of Encyclopaedia Americana: A popular dictionary of arts, sciences, literature, history, politics, and biography, brought down to the present time: including a copious collection of original articles in American biography on the basis of the seventh edition of the German Conversations-Lexicon. Edited by Francis Lieber. 131 v. Philadelphia: Desilver, Thomas & Co. 1st ed. 1829; 2nd ed. 1836, pp.581–600.Google Scholar
Powicke, Frederick James, ed. 1931. Some Unpublished Correspondence of the Reverend Richard Baxter and the Reverend John Eliot, the Apostle of the American Indians, 1656–1682. Manchester: University Press. (Reprinted from “The Bulletin of the John Rylands Library,” vol. 15, no. 2, July 1931.)Google Scholar
Silver, Shirley. 1960. “Natick Consonants in Reference to Proto-Central Algonquian: I & II.” IJAL 261.112–20, 234–64.Google Scholar
Stevens, Cj [sic]. 1954. Early American Phonology. Louisiana State University Doctoral Dissertation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Trumbull, James Hammond, ed. 1866. “Roger Williams, a key in the language of America.” Narnaganset Club Publications, 1st series, Vol. 21.Google Scholar
, ed. 1903. Natick Dictionary. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of Ethnology, Bulletin 25. With an introd. by Edward Everett Hale.Google Scholar
Updike, Daniel B. 1966. Printing Types, their History, Forms, and Use: A study in survivals. Vol. 21. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Alden T. 1965. New England Frontier: Puritans and Indians 1620–1675. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Winslow, Ola E. 1968. John Eliot: Apostle to the Indians. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Uckelman, Sara L.
2024.  John Eliot's Logick Primer : A Bilingual English-Massachusett Logic Textbook . History and Philosophy of Logic 45:3 ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Kilarski, Marcin
2018. American Indian Languages in the Eyes of 17th-Century French and British Missionaries. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53:s1 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010. The History of Linguistic Fieldwork. In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Fountain, Catherine
2009. Worthy the Name of a Grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 36:2-3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Salmon, Vivian
1985. Missionary linguistics in seventeenth century Ireland and a North American Analogy. Historiographia Linguistica 12:3 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.