Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:3 (1974) ► pp.341350
References (30)
References
Beck, Lewis W. 1969. Early German Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1970. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger L. 1967. Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Conception of Linguistic Relativity. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1923. “Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Festschrift für Paul Hensel, 105–27. Greiz i. V.: Ohag.Google Scholar
. 1964. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Vol. 11: Die Sprache. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [First ed., 1923]Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christmann, Hans Helmut. 1967. Beiträge zur Geschichte der These vom Weltbild der Sprache. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Ehrenstein, Walter. 1965. Probleme des höheren Seelenlebens. Munich: Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael. 1970. The Bisected Brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolf. 1856. Wilhelm von Humboldt. Berlin: Gaertner.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1903–08. Werke. 71 vols. ed. by Albert Leitzmann. (= Gesammelte Schriften, 1–7.) Berlin: B. Behr. (Repr. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1967–68.)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1956. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Critical ed. Hamburg: F. Meiner. [Contains the text of both the 1781(A) and 1787(B) editions.]Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang, and H. von Restorff. 1935. “Zur Theorie der Reproduktion”. Psychologische Forschung 211.56–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Körner, Stephen. 1955. Kant. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Leitzmann, Albert, ed. 1908. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
, ed. 1940. Wilhelm von Humboldts Briefe an. Christian Gottfried Körner. Berlin: Ebering.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Penn, Julia M. 1972. Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheinert, Moritz. 1908. “Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 131.141–95.Google Scholar
Schiller, Paul von. 1933. “Stroboskopische Alternatiwersuche”. Psychologische Forschung 171.179–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slagle, Uhlan V. 1973. “On the Possibility of Correlating the Structure of Perception with the Structure of Thought and Meaning”. Linguistics 1171.85–96.Google Scholar
1974. Language, Thought, and Perception. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp. 1962. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Spranger, Eduard. 1908. “W. v. Humboldt und Kant”. Kant-Studien 131.57–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann, ed. 1884. Die sprachphilosophischen Werke Wilhelm von Humboldts. Berlin: F. Dümmler.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1909. “Kant und die Sprachwissenschaft”. IF 261.382–422.Google Scholar
Wallach, Hans. 1961. “Some Considerations concerning the Relation between Perception and Cognition”. Documents of Gestalt Psychology, ed. by Mary Henle, 164–71. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Max. 1923. “Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt”. Psychologische Forschung 41.301–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Robert P. 1963. Kant’s Theory, of Mental Activity. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900. Völkerpsychologie. Vol. 1, pt. 2. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. (3rd. ed., 1911.)Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Burwick, Frederick
1987. Kant and Hegel: Organicism and Language Theory. In Approaches to Organic Form [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 105],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
PARMENTIER, RICHARD J.
1985. Semiotic Mediation: Ancestral Genealogy and Final Interpretant. In Semiotic Mediation,  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
van der Wal, M. J.
1985. The Kantian mentalism of Johannes Kinker (1764–1845). Topoi 4:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Arens, Hans
1977. Zur Neueren Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik. Historiographia Linguistica 4:3  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Heeschen, Volker
1977. Weltansicht – Reflexionen Über Einen Begriff Wilhelm Von Humboldts. Historiographia Linguistica 4:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Picardi, Eva
1977. Some Problems of Classification in Linguistics and Biology, 1800–1830. Historiographia Linguistica 4:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
Slagle, Uhlan V.
1975.  Der Begriff der sprachlichen Kreativität in der neueren Linguistik. By Bernard Imhasly. Historiographia Linguistica 2:2  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.