Article published In:
Historiographia LinguisticaVol. 1:3 (1974) ► pp.341–350
The Kantian Influence on Humboldt’s Linguistic Thought
Humboldt’s theory of language reflects Kant’s influence to a far greater extent than is generally realized. In fact, Kantian cognitive and perceptual universals play a crucial role in the later formulations of Humboldt’s linguistic thinking. Indeed, not only did Humboldt derive the universals of grammatical case from the Kantian categories of relation in his mature work, but he also applied Kant’s schema concept in a systematic way to the fundamental problems of language during his last period of scholarly activity. Moreover, it can be shown that the Kantian aspects of his theory do not conflict with his widely quoted and misinterpreted formulations concerning the nature of linguistic diversity. It is suggested that much of the confusion in regard to just what Humboldt actually meant would have been dispelled long ago had researchers made adequate use of two neglected, but extremely important, major manuscripts from his mature period. More importantly still, one can plausibly argue that Humboldt was correct in assuming that Kant, not Descartes, provided linguistics with the key for dealing adequately with the central problems of language and mind.
References
Beck, Lewis W.
1969 Early German Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Brekle, Herbert E.
1970 Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: W. Fink.
Brown, Roger L.
1967 Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Conception of Linguistic Relativity. The Hague: Mouton. 
Cassirer, Ernst
1923 “Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Festschrift für Paul Hensel, 105–27. Greiz i. V.: Ohag.
1964 Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Vol. 11: Die Sprache. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [First ed. 1923]
Chomsky, Noam
1966 Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.
Christmann, Hans Helmut
1967 Beiträge zur Geschichte der These vom Weltbild der Sprache. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.
Ehrenstein, Walter
1965 Probleme des höheren Seelenlebens. Munich: Reinhardt.
Gazzaniga, Michael
1970 The Bisected Brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Haym, Rudolf
1856 Wilhelm von Humboldt. Berlin: Gaertner.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1903–08 Werke. 71 vols. ed. by Albert Leitzmann. (=
Gesammelte Schriften, 1–7.) Berlin: B. Behr. (Repr. Berlin: W. de Gruyter 1967–68.)
Kant, Immanuel
1956 Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Critical ed. Hamburg: F. Meiner. [Contains the text of both the 1781(A) and 1787(B) editions.]
Köhler, Wolfgang, and H. von Restorff
1935 “Zur Theorie der Reproduktion”. Psychologische Forschung 211.56–112.
Körner, Stephen
1955 Kant. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin.
Leitzmann, Albert
ed. 1908 Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Halle: M. Niemeyer.
ed. 1940 Wilhelm von Humboldts Briefe an. Christian Gottfried Körner. Berlin: Ebering.
Paton, H. J.
1936 Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. London: Allen & Unwin.
Penn, Julia M.
1972 Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas. The Hague: Mouton.
Scheinert, Moritz
1908 “Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 131.141–95.
Schiller, Paul von
1933 “Stroboskopische Alternatiwersuche”. Psychologische Forschung 171.179–214.
Slagle, Uhlan V.
1973 “On the Possibility of Correlating the Structure of Perception with the Structure of Thought and Meaning”. Linguistics 1171.85–96.
1974 Language, Thought, and Perception. The Hague: Mouton.
Smith, Norman Kemp
1962 A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Humanities Press.
Spranger, Eduard
1908 “W. v. Humboldt und Kant”. Kant-Studien 131.57–129.
Steinthal, Heymann
ed. 1884 Die sprachphilosophischen Werke Wilhelm von Humboldts. Berlin: F. Dümmler.
Streitberg, Wilhelm
1909 “Kant und die Sprachwissenschaft”. IF 261.382–422.
Wallach, Hans
1961 “Some Considerations concerning the Relation between Perception and Cognition”. Documents of Gestalt Psychology, ed. by Mary Henle, 164–71. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Wertheimer, Max
1923 “Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt”. Psychologische Forschung 41.301–50.
Wolff, Robert P.
1963 Kant’s Theory, of Mental Activity. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Wundt, Wilhelm
1900 Völkerpsychologie. Vol. 1, pt. 2. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. (3rd. ed. 1911.)
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Arens, Hans
1977. Zur Neueren Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik. Historiographia Linguistica 4:3 ► pp. 319 ff. 
Burwick, Frederick
1987. Kant and Hegel: Organicism and Language Theory. In Approaches to Organic Form [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 105], ► pp. 153 ff.
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
1975.
Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origins of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought. By Julia M[yrle] Penn. Historiographia Linguistica 2:1 ► pp. 102 ff.
Heeschen, Volker
1977. Weltansicht – Reflexionen Über Einen Begriff Wilhelm Von Humboldts. Historiographia Linguistica 4:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
PARMENTIER, RICHARD J.
1985. Semiotic Mediation: Ancestral Genealogy and Final Interpretant. In Semiotic Mediation, ► pp. 359 ff.
Picardi, Eva
1977. Some Problems of Classification in Linguistics and Biology, 1800–1830. Historiographia Linguistica 4:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Slagle, Uhlan V.
1975.
Der Begriff der sprachlichen Kreativität in der neueren Linguistik. By Bernard Imhasly. Historiographia Linguistica 2:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
van der Wal, M. J.
1985. The Kantian mentalism of Johannes Kinker (1764–1845). Topoi 4:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.