Humboldt’s theory of language reflects Kant’s influence to a far greater extent than is generally realized. In fact, Kantian cognitive and perceptual universals play a crucial role in the later formulations of Humboldt’s linguistic thinking. Indeed, not only did Humboldt derive the universals of grammatical case from the Kantian categories of relation in his mature work, but he also applied Kant’s schema concept in a systematic way to the fundamental problems of language during his last period of scholarly activity. Moreover, it can be shown that the Kantian aspects of his theory do not conflict with his widely quoted and misinterpreted formulations concerning the nature of linguistic diversity. It is suggested that much of the confusion in regard to just what Humboldt actually meant would have been dispelled long ago had researchers made adequate use of two neglected, but extremely important, major manuscripts from his mature period. More importantly still, one can plausibly argue that Humboldt was correct in assuming that Kant, not Descartes, provided linguistics with the key for dealing adequately with the central problems of language and mind.
Beck, Lewis W.1969. Early German Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Brekle, Herbert E.1970. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: W. Fink.
Brown, Roger L.1967. Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Conception of Linguistic Relativity. The Hague: Mouton.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1923. “Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Festschrift für Paul Hensel, 105–27. Greiz i. V.: Ohag.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1964. Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Vol. 11: Die Sprache. 4th ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [First ed., 1923]
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.
Christmann, Hans Helmut. 1967. Beiträge zur Geschichte der These vom Weltbild der Sprache. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.
Ehrenstein, Walter. 1965. Probleme des höheren Seelenlebens. Munich: Reinhardt.
Gazzaniga, Michael. 1970. The Bisected Brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Haym, Rudolf. 1856. Wilhelm von Humboldt. Berlin: Gaertner.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1903–08. Werke. 71 vols. ed. by Albert Leitzmann. (= Gesammelte Schriften, 1–7.) Berlin: B. Behr. (Repr. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1967–68.)
Kant, Immanuel. 1956. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Critical ed. Hamburg: F. Meiner. [Contains the text of both the 1781(A) and 1787(B) editions.]
Köhler, Wolfgang, and H. von Restorff. 1935. “Zur Theorie der Reproduktion”. Psychologische Forschung 211.56–112.
Leitzmann, Albert, ed. 1908. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm von Humboldt und August Wilhelm Schlegel. Halle: M. Niemeyer.
Leitzmann, Albert, ed. 1940. Wilhelm von Humboldts Briefe an. Christian Gottfried Körner. Berlin: Ebering.
Paton, H. J.1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. London: Allen & Unwin.
Penn, Julia M.1972. Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas. The Hague: Mouton.
Scheinert, Moritz. 1908. “Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie”. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 131.141–95.
Schiller, Paul von. 1933. “Stroboskopische Alternatiwersuche”. Psychologische Forschung 171.179–214.
Slagle, Uhlan V.1973. “On the Possibility of Correlating the Structure of Perception with the Structure of Thought and Meaning”. Linguistics 1171.85–96.
Slagle, Uhlan V.1974. Language, Thought, and Perception. The Hague: Mouton.
Smith, Norman Kemp. 1962. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Humanities Press.
Spranger, Eduard. 1908. “W. v. Humboldt und Kant”. Kant-Studien 131.57–129.
Steinthal, Heymann, ed. 1884. Die sprachphilosophischen Werke Wilhelm von Humboldts. Berlin: F. Dümmler.
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1909. “Kant und die Sprachwissenschaft”. IF 261.382–422.
Wallach, Hans. 1961. “Some Considerations concerning the Relation between Perception and Cognition”. Documents of Gestalt Psychology, ed. by Mary Henle, 164–71. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Wertheimer, Max. 1923. “Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt”. Psychologische Forschung 41.301–50.
Wolff, Robert P.1963. Kant’s Theory, of Mental Activity. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900. Völkerpsychologie. Vol. 1, pt. 2. Leipzig: W. Engelmann. (3rd. ed., 1911.)
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Burwick, Frederick
1987. Kant and Hegel: Organicism and Language Theory. In Approaches to Organic Form [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 105], ► pp. 153 ff.
PARMENTIER, RICHARD J.
1985. Semiotic Mediation: Ancestral Genealogy and Final Interpretant. In Semiotic Mediation, ► pp. 359 ff.
van der Wal, M. J.
1985. The Kantian mentalism of Johannes Kinker (1764–1845). Topoi 4:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.