Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 12:1/2 (1985) ► pp.2762
References (77)
Bibliography
Alexander of Villedieu. Ca. 1200. Doctrinale puerorum. Edited with an introduction by Dietrich Reichling. Berlin: Hofmann, 1893.Google Scholar
Alston, Robin C. 1964. “The Introductions in frennshe of Pierre Valence and the Lambeth fragment 1528”. SNph 361.101–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, James D. 1972. “The Development of the English-French, French-English Bilingual Dictionary: A study in comparative lexicography.” Word 281, supplement 1–144.Google Scholar
Arnold, I. D. O. 1937. “Thomas Sampson and the Orthographica Gallica”. MAev 61.193–209.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J. 1939. “Les sources du Femina Nova .” In Studies presented to M.K. Pope, 1–9. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, Alexander. 1521. Introductory to wryte and to pronounce Frenche. London: Robert Coplande.Google Scholar
Barton, Johan. 1409. Donait francois pur briefment entroduyr les Angloys en le droit language de Paris et du pais la d’entour. Ed. by E. Stengel (1878:25–40).Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander. 1962. “Notes on Walter de Bibbesworth’s Treatise”. PhQ 411.361–72.Google Scholar
Berndt, Rolf. 1965. “The Linguistic Situation in England from the Norman Conquest to the Loss of Normandy”. PhP 81.145–63.Google Scholar
. 1972. “The Period of the Final Decline of French in Medieval England.” ZAA 201.341–69.Google Scholar
Bibbesworth, Walter de. Ca. 1280. Le treytez ke moun sire Gautier de Bibelesworthe fist a ma dame Dionisie de Mounchesny pur aprise de langwage. Le traite de Walter de Bibbesworth sur la langue francaise Ed. by Annie Owen. Paris: Presses universitaires, 1929.Google Scholar
Bouton, Charles. 1972. Les grammaires françaises de Claude M auger à l’usage des Anglais (XVIIe siècle). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Caxton, William. 1480. Dialogues. (‘A Book for Travellers’). Edited by H. Bradley for the Early English Text Society. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude. 1968. Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Coyrefully, M. T. (14th century). Tractatus ortografie. Edited by E. Stengel (1878).Google Scholar
Dell, François. 1973. Les règles et les sons. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dillinger, Dale. 1974. History of Linguistics: The Renaissance and Ellipsis in the Grammars of Despauterius, Linacre, Scaliger and Sanctius. PhD Thesis, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Donatus, Aelius. Ca. 4th c. A.D. De partibus orationis ars minor. Edited by H. Keil in Grammatici latini, Vol. 41, pp.355–66. Leipzig: Teubner, 1864. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1961.).Google Scholar
Donnet, Daniel. 1980. “La syntaxe chez Theodore de Gaza: Introduction à une lecture critique du livre IV de l’Institutio Grammatical .“ CILL 61.31–47.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jacques (Sylvius). 1531. In linguam gallicam isagoge, una cum eiusdem Grammatica Latinogallica, ex Hebrais, Graecis & Latinis authoribus. Paris: Robert Estienne. (Repr., Slatkine Reprints, Geneva, 1971.)Google Scholar
DuWes, Gilles. 1532. An Introductorie for to lerne to rede, to pronounce, and to speke Frenche trewly. London: Thomas Godfrey. Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston, 1972, and with an introduction by F. Genin published in conjunction with Palsgrave’s Lesclaircissement by the Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 1852.Google Scholar
Emerson, O. 1916. “English and French in the Time of Edward III”. RR 71.127–43.Google Scholar
Emmons, Kintzing Blyth. 1972. The Grammar of Louis Meigret: Its contribution to the history of French linguistics. PhD Thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Eberhard of Bethune. 12th c. Graecismus. Edited with an introduction by Johann Wrobel. Bratislava: G. Koebner, 1887.Google Scholar
Femina. (Ca. 1415). Edited by W. Aldis Wright. Cambridge: Roxburghe Club, 1909.Google Scholar
Gamberini, Spartaco. 1970. Lo studio dell’italiano in Inghilterra nel ’500 e nel ’600. Messina: G. D’Anna.Google Scholar
Gessler, Jean. 1931. Le livre des mestiers de Bruges et ses dérivés. Bruges.Google Scholar
. 1933. “Fragments d’anciens traités pour l’enseignement du français en Angleterre”. LB 251.1–21.Google Scholar
. 1934. La manière de language qui enseigne à bien parler et écrire le français; modèles de conversation composés en Angleterre à la fin du XIVe siècle . Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Gulstad, Daniel. 1976. “La funcíon del rasgo distintivo en la teoría fonológica renacentista entre ortógrafos de lenguas romances”. Actes du XIIIe congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes tenu à l’Universite Laval du 29 août au 5 septembre, 1971. Vol. I1, 135–42. Quebec; Presses universitaires de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar
Hausmann, Franz-Josef. 1980a. “Louis Meigret: Humaniste et Linguiste”. HL 71.335–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1980b. Louis Meigret: Humaniste et Linguiste. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
, ed. 1980. Louis Meigret, Le Traité de la Grammaire française (1550). Le Menteur de Lucian. Aux I ceteurs (1548). Edition établie selon l’orthographe moderne, subdivisée en paragraphes, annotée et augmentée d’une introduction, d’un glossaire ainsi que d’un index. Ibid.Google Scholar
Horner, Patrick J. 1977. “The Use and Knowledge of Spoken French in Early 15th Century England”. Notes and Queries 241.488.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French Syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lambley, Kathleen. 1920. The Teaching and Cultivation of the French Language in England during Tudor and Stuart Times. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lily, William. 1527. Lily’s Latin Grammar. Edited by S. Blach in “Shakespeare’s Lateingrammatik”. Jahrbuch der deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft 441.65–117 (1908) and 451.51–100 (1909).Google Scholar
Linacre, Thomas. 1524. De emendata structura latini sermonis libri sex. London: Pynson. (Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston, 1968.)Google Scholar
Malecot, Andre. 1977. Introduction à la phonétique française. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manière de langage. (14th-15th centuries.). Edited by E. Stengel (1878:1–15).Google Scholar
Maraschio, Nicoletta. 1977. “Il parlato nella speculazione linguistica del Cinquecento”. SGI 61.207–226.Google Scholar
Martianus Capella. 5th century. A.D. De nuptiis Mercuriae et Philologiae. Transl. by William H. Stahl & Richard Johnson, with E. L. Burge. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Meigret, Louis. 1550. Le tretté de la grammȩre françoȩze. Ed. by Wendelin Foerster. Heilbronn: Henninger, 1888. (Repr., Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970. For new edition, see Hausmann 1980.)Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul. 1903. “Les manuscrits français de Cambridge”. Romania 321.1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michelant, Henri Victor. 1875. Le livre des mestiers; dialogues français-flamands composés au XIVe siècle par un maître d’école de Bruges. Paris: Tross.Google Scholar
Nebrija, Antonio de. 1503. De vi ac potestate litterarum deque illarum falsa prolatione. Salamanca: printer unknown.Google Scholar
Orthographia Gallica. 14th century. Edited by J. Sturzinger in Altfranzösische Bibliothek, Volume 81. Heilbronn: Henninger, 1884.Google Scholar
Owen, Annie. 1929. Le traité de Walter de Bibbesworth sur la langue française. Paris: Presses universitaires.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700. The Latin Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, John. 1530. Lesclaircissement de la langue francoyse. London: John Haukyns. Published in conjunction with Du Wes’ Introductory and an introduction by F. Genin, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1852. (Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston, 1968.)Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1982. “Antonio de Nebrija and the Dawn of Modem Phonetics”. Res Publica Litterarum 51.221–32.Google Scholar
. 1983. “The Cabbala and the History of Linguistics”. 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers ed. by Frances Ingemann, 152–68. Lawrence, Ks: Linguistics Department, Univ. of Kansas.Google Scholar
Perotti, Niccolo. 1480. Nicolo Perotti ad pyrrhum perottum nepotem ex fratre suavissimo rudimenta grammatices. Milan: Pachel.Google Scholar
Perrin, Noel. 1972. “Before Fun City”. The New Yorker 481:84–92.Google Scholar
Pirenne, Henri. 1929. “L’instruction des marchands au moyen âge”. Annales d’histoire économique et sociale 11.13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. K. 1910. “The Orthographic Treatise of T.H. Parisii Studentis”. MLR 51.185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priscian (6th century A.D.) Institutiones grammaticae. Ed. by M. Hertz in Grammatici latini, vols. 2 and 31. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1885. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1961.)Google Scholar
Quintilian, Marcus Fabius (c. 35–95 A.D.) Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim. Ed. by Michael Winterbottom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Read, M. K. & J. Trethewey, 1976. “Two Renaissance Contributions to the Semantic Analysis of Language”. VR 351.1–12.Google Scholar
Rothwell, William A. 1982. “A Mis-Judged Author and a Mis-Used Text: Walter de Bibbesworth and his ‘Tretiz’”. MLR 771.282–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schane, Sanford. 1968. French Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Gerhard. 1933. Bemerkungen zum Traité des Walter von Bibbesworth. Berlin: Liebheit & Thiesen.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Christian. 1980. “La grammaire de Gilles Du Wes, étude lexicale”. RLiR 431.1–45.Google Scholar
Shipman, George R. 1953. The Vowel Phonemes of Meigret. Washington: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sodergard, Osten, ed. 1953. “Une manière de parler (15th c.)”. NphM 541.201–225.Google Scholar
Starnes, Dewitt T. 1954. Renaissance Dictionaries, English-Latin and Latin-English. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stengel, E. 1878. “Die ältesten Anleitungsschriften zur Erlernung der französischen Sprache”. Zeitschrift für neufranzösische Sprache und Literatur 11.1–40.Google Scholar
1889. Chronologisches Verzeichnis französischer Grammatiken. Oppeln. Repr. with an introduction and supplementary bibliography by H.-J. Niederehe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1976.Google Scholar
Stevenson, W. H. 1901. “The Introduction of English as the Vehicle of Instruction in English Schools”. An English Miscellany Presented to F. J. Furnivall, 421–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Suggett, Helen. 1946. “The Use of French in England in the Later Middle Ages”. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 281.61–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurot, Charles. 1881. De la prononciation française depuis le commencement du XVIe siècle d’après les témoignages des grammairiens. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. (Repr., Geneva: Slatkine, 1966.Google Scholar
Tory, Geoffroy. 1529. Champ Fleury. Paris: Gourmont.Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1978. An Introduction to French Phonology and Morphology. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Valence, Pierre. 1528. Introductions in Frensche. London: Wynkyn de Worde (?). (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo della. 1471 [ca. 1440]. De linguae latinae elegantia libri sex. Rome: J.P. de Lignamine, 1471.Google Scholar
Varro, M. T. 1st c. B.C. De lingua latina. Ed. and Transl. by Roland G. Kent. London: W. Heinemann, 1938.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. M. 1943. “English and French in England, 1100–1300”. History 281.37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kibbee, Douglas A.
1990. Language variation and linguistic description in 16th-century France. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1-2  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
SWIGGERS, PIERRE
1989. Les premières grammaires occitanes: les Razos de trobar de Raimon Vidal et le Donatz proensals d’Uc (Faidit). Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 105:1-2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.