Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 12:1/2 (1985) ► pp.27–62

John Palsgrave’s ‘Lesclaircissement De La Langue Francoyse’ (1530)

| University of Illinois
John Palsgrave, an Englishman, wrote the first detailed grammar of the French language, Lesclaircissement de la langue francoyse (1530). This work is remarkable not only for its length but also for its quality. Palsgrave wrote a pedagogical text for his English readers, using a system which leads the learner from the development of passive skills (interpretation, both oral andintellectual, of written texts) to the development of active skills (expressing oneself in the target language). At the same time, he responded to the French Humanist desire to bring the vernacular languages under the control of ‘rules certayne’.In its grammatical method, Lesclaircissement exemplifies a stage in the development of Humanist grammar, as the Renaissance grammarians moved from a method based on forms to a more abstract representation of linguistic facts. As such, Palsgrave’s work stands half-way between the early Renaissance calques upon Donatus and the later excursions into logical grammar. In phonetics, Palsgrave’s attention to detail leads him to a clear recognition of the importance of nasal vowels in French (even if his articulatory description of the nasal vowels leaves something to be desired). In phonology, he aspires to a greater level of abstraction through his attempts to link liaison and elision phenomena to French phonotactics. In morpho-syntax, he uses the notion of perfection in language to provide an underlying structure in which the syntactic and the logical structure are explicit. He then explains how the languages in question ‘circumlocute’ to express the underlying structures. In this way, he prefigures the work of Meigret in French grammar. For all of his accomplishments, however, Palsgrave’s work had little influence on his successors. It had only one printing of 750 copies, and Palsgrave himself restricted the sales. Still, the work deserves our attention because of its wealth of detail and because of the method it uses.
Published online: 1 January 1985
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.12.1-2.03kib
References

Bibliography

Alexander of Villedieu
Ca. 1200 Doctrinale puerorum. Edited with an introduction by Dietrich Reichling. Berlin: Hofmann 1893.Google Scholar
Alston, Robin C.
1964 “The Introductions in frennshe of Pierre Valence and the Lambeth fragment 1528”. SNph 361.101–110.Google Scholar
Anderson, James D.
1972 “The Development of the English-French, French-English Bilingual Dictionary: A study in comparative lexicography.” Word 281, supplement 1–144.Google Scholar
Arnold, I. D. O.
1937 “Thomas Sampson and the Orthographica Gallica”. MAev 61.193–209.Google Scholar
Arnould, E. J.
1939 “Les sources du Femina Nova .” In Studies presented to M.K. Pope, 1–9. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, Alexander
1521 Introductory to wryte and to pronounce Frenche. London: Robert Coplande.Google Scholar
Barton, Johan
1409 Donait francois pur briefment entroduyr les Angloys en le droit language de Paris et du pais la d’entour. Ed. by E. Stengel (1878:25–40).Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander
1962 “Notes on Walter de Bibbesworth’s Treatise”. PhQ 411.361–72.Google Scholar
Berndt, Rolf
1965 “The Linguistic Situation in England from the Norman Conquest to the Loss of Normandy”. PhP 81.145–63.Google Scholar
1972 “The Period of the Final Decline of French in Medieval England.” ZAA 201.341–69.Google Scholar
Bibbesworth, Walter de
Ca. 1280 Le treytez ke moun sire Gautier de Bibelesworthe fist a ma dame Dionisie de Mounchesny pur aprise de langwage. Le traite de Walter de Bibbesworth sur la langue francaise Ed. by Annie Owen. Paris: Presses universitaires 1929.Google Scholar
Bouton, Charles
1972 Les grammaires françaises de Claude M auger à l’usage des Anglais (XVIIe siècle). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Caxton, William
1480 Dialogues. (‘A Book for Travellers’). Edited by H. Bradley for the Early English Text Society. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. 1900.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude
1968 Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Coyrefully, M. T.
(14th century). Tractatus ortografie Edited by E. Stengel (1878).Google Scholar
Dell, François
1973 Les règles et les sons. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dillinger, Dale
1974 History of Linguistics: The Renaissance and Ellipsis in the Grammars of Despauterius, Linacre, Scaliger and Sanctius. PhD Thesis, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Donatus, Aelius
. Ca. 4th c. A.D. De partibus orationis ars minor Edited by H. Keil in Grammatici latini, Vol. 41, pp.355–66. Leipzig: Teubner 1864 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1961.).Google Scholar
Donnet, Daniel
1980 “La syntaxe chez Theodore de Gaza: Introduction à une lecture critique du livre IV de l’Institutio Grammatical .“ CILL 61.31–47.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jacques (Sylvius)
1531 In linguam gallicam isagoge, una cum eiusdem Grammatica Latinogallica, ex Hebrais, Graecis & Latinis authoribus. Paris: Robert Estienne. (Repr., Slatkine Reprints, Geneva 1971.)Google Scholar
DuWes, Gilles
1532 An Introductorie for to lerne to rede, to pronounce, and to speke Frenche trewly. London: Thomas Godfrey. Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston 1972, and with an introduction by F. Genin published in conjunction with Palsgrave’s Lesclaircissement by the Imprimerie Nationale, Paris 1852.Google Scholar
Emerson, O.
1916 “English and French in the Time of Edward III”. RR 71.127–43.Google Scholar
Emmons, Kintzing Blyth
1972 The Grammar of Louis Meigret: Its contribution to the history of French linguistics. PhD Thesis, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Eberhard of Bethune
. 12th c. Graecismus Edited with an introduction by Johann Wrobel. Bratislava: G. Koebner 1887.Google Scholar
Femina
(Ca. 1415) Edited by W. Aldis Wright. Cambridge: Roxburghe Club 1909.Google Scholar
Gamberini, Spartaco
1970 Lo studio dell’italiano in Inghilterra nel ’500 e nel ’600. Messina: G. D’Anna.Google Scholar
Gessler, Jean
1931 Le livre des mestiers de Bruges et ses dérivés. Bruges.Google Scholar
1933 “Fragments d’anciens traités pour l’enseignement du français en Angleterre”. LB 251.1–21.Google Scholar
1934 La manière de language qui enseigne à bien parler et écrire le français; modèles de conversation composés en Angleterre à la fin du XIVe siècle . Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Gulstad, Daniel
1976 “La funcíon del rasgo distintivo en la teoría fonológica renacentista entre ortógrafos de lenguas romances”. Actes du XIIIe congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes tenu à l’Universite Laval du 29 août au 5 septembre, 1971. Vol. I1, 135–42. Quebec; Presses universitaires de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar
Hausmann, Franz-Josef
1980a “Louis Meigret: Humaniste et Linguiste”. HL 71.335–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980b Louis Meigret: Humaniste et Linguiste. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
ed. 1980 Louis Meigret, Le Traité de la Grammaire française (1550). Le Menteur de Lucian. Aux I ceteurs (1548). Edition établie selon l’orthographe moderne, subdivisée en paragraphes, annotée et augmentée d’une introduction, d’un glossaire ainsi que d’un index. Ibid.Google Scholar
Horner, Patrick J.
1977 “The Use and Knowledge of Spoken French in Early 15th Century England”. Notes and Queries 241.488.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1975 French Syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lambley, Kathleen
1920 The Teaching and Cultivation of the French Language in England during Tudor and Stuart Times. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lily, William
1527 Lily’s Latin Grammar. Edited by S. Blach in “Shakespeare’s Lateingrammatik”. Jahrbuch der deutschen Shakespeare-Gesellschaft 441.65–117 (1908) and 451.51–100 (1909).Google Scholar
Linacre, Thomas
1524 De emendata structura latini sermonis libri sex. London: Pynson. (Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston 1968.)Google Scholar
Malecot, Andre
1977 Introduction à la phonétique française. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manière de langage
. (14th-15th centuries) Edited by E. Stengel (1878:1–15).Google Scholar
Maraschio, Nicoletta
1977 “Il parlato nella speculazione linguistica del Cinquecento”. SGI 61.207–226.Google Scholar
Martianus Capella
. 5th century. A.D. De nuptiis Mercuriae et Philologiae Transl. by William H. Stahl & Richard Johnson, with E. L. Burge. New York: Columbia Univ. Press 1977.Google Scholar
Meigret, Louis
1550 Le tretté de la grammȩre françoȩze. Ed. by Wendelin Foerster. Heilbronn: Henninger 1888 (Repr., Geneva: Slatkine Reprints 1970 For new edition, see Hausmann 1980.)Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul
1903 “Les manuscrits français de Cambridge”. Romania 321.1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michelant, Henri Victor
1875 Le livre des mestiers; dialogues français-flamands composés au XIVe siècle par un maître d’école de Bruges. Paris: Tross.Google Scholar
Nebrija, Antonio de
1503 De vi ac potestate litterarum deque illarum falsa prolatione. Salamanca: printer unknown.Google Scholar
Orthographia Gallica
. 14th century Edited by J. Sturzinger in Altfranzösische Bibliothek, Volume 81. Heilbronn: Henninger 1884.Google Scholar
Owen, Annie
1929 Le traité de Walter de Bibbesworth sur la langue française. Paris: Presses universitaires.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A.
1976 Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700. The Latin Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palsgrave, John
1530 Lesclaircissement de la langue francoyse. London: John Haukyns. Published in conjunction with Du Wes’ Introductory and an introduction by F. Genin, Paris: Imprimerie Nationale 1852 (Reprinted by the Scolar Press, Menston 1968.)Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1982 “Antonio de Nebrija and the Dawn of Modem Phonetics”. Res Publica Litterarum 51.221–32.Google Scholar
1983 “The Cabbala and the History of Linguistics”. 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers ed. by Frances Ingemann, 152–68. Lawrence, Ks: Linguistics Department, Univ. of Kansas.Google Scholar
Perotti, Niccolo
1480 Nicolo Perotti ad pyrrhum perottum nepotem ex fratre suavissimo rudimenta grammatices. Milan: Pachel.Google Scholar
Perrin, Noel
1972 “Before Fun City”. The New Yorker 481:84–92.Google Scholar
Pirenne, Henri
1929 “L’instruction des marchands au moyen âge”. Annales d’histoire économique et sociale 11.13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, M. K.
1910 “The Orthographic Treatise of T.H. Parisii Studentis”. MLR 51.185–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priscian
(6th century A.D.) Institutiones grammaticae Ed. by M. Hertz in Grammatici latini, vols. 2 and 31. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner 1885 (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms 1961.)Google Scholar
Quintilian, Marcus Fabius
(c. 35–95 A.D.) Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecim Ed. by Michael Winterbottom. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1970.Google Scholar
Read, M. K. & J. Trethewey
1976 “Two Renaissance Contributions to the Semantic Analysis of Language”. VR 351.1–12.Google Scholar
Rothwell, William A.
1982 “A Mis-Judged Author and a Mis-Used Text: Walter de Bibbesworth and his ‘Tretiz’”. MLR 771.282–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schane, Sanford
1968 French Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Gerhard
1933 Bemerkungen zum Traité des Walter von Bibbesworth. Berlin: Liebheit & Thiesen.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Christian
1980 “La grammaire de Gilles Du Wes, étude lexicale”. RLiR 431.1–45.Google Scholar
Shipman, George R.
1953 The Vowel Phonemes of Meigret. Washington: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sodergard, Osten
ed. 1953 “Une manière de parler (15th c.)”. NphM 541.201–225.Google Scholar
Starnes, Dewitt T.
1954 Renaissance Dictionaries, English-Latin and Latin-English. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stengel, E.
1878 “Die ältesten Anleitungsschriften zur Erlernung der französischen Sprache”. Zeitschrift für neufranzösische Sprache und Literatur 11.1–40.Google Scholar
1889 Chronologisches Verzeichnis französischer Grammatiken. Oppeln. Repr. with an introduction and supplementary bibliography by H.-J. Niederehe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1976.Google Scholar
Stevenson, W. H.
1901 “The Introduction of English as the Vehicle of Instruction in English Schools”. An English Miscellany Presented to F. J. Furnivall, 421–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Suggett, Helen
1946 “The Use of French in England in the Later Middle Ages”. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 281.61–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurot, Charles
1881 De la prononciation française depuis le commencement du XVIe siècle d’après les témoignages des grammairiens. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. (Repr., Geneva: Slatkine 1966.Google Scholar
Tory, Geoffroy
1529 Champ Fleury. Paris: Gourmont.Google Scholar
Valdman, Albert
1978 An Introduction to French Phonology and Morphology. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Valence, Pierre
1528 Introductions in Frensche. London: Wynkyn de Worde (?). (Repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1967.)Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo della
1471 [ca. 1440] De linguae latinae elegantia libri sex. Rome: J.P. de Lignamine 1471.Google Scholar
Varro, M. T. 1st c. B.C.
De lingua latina Ed. and Transl. by Roland G. Kent. London: W. Heinemann 1938.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. M.
1943 “English and French in England, 1100–1300”. History 281.37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kibbee, Douglas A.
1990. Language variation and linguistic description in 16th-century France. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1-2 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Liddle, Michel H. W.
1992. For to Speke Frenche Trewely. The French Language in England, 1000–1600: its status, description and instruction. Par Douglas A. Kibbee. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
SWIGGERS, PIERRE
1989. Les premières grammaires occitanes: les Razos de trobar de Raimon Vidal et le Donatz proensals d’Uc (Faidit). Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 105:1-2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.