The binarity hypothesis in phonology: 1938–1985
Juana Gil | Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset, Madrid
This paper presents a short history of what has been one of the central hypotheses of phonological theory for many years. The binarity problem has been one of most discussed issues of distinctive feature theory since it was first formulated. In structural phonology (more precisely, the Jakobsonian system) binarism has always been a fundamental concept, and most phonological systems have been based on it. Similarly, all the underlying representations postulated in the SPE framework are thought of as being binary. In current phonology, however, the main interest of many investigators has moved to the suprasegmental level or to metrical phonology, and consequently, the binarity problem remains unresolved. There have been numerous and varied opinions regarding binarism in distinctive feature theory. Some authors argue that binarity proposals are not compatible with phenomena such as coarticulation, but others claim that the non-positivist nature of phonological analysis and the indisputable usefulness of binary features are arguments strong enough to maintain the hypothesis. Finally, other linguists (working from different perspectives) propose a somewhat more relaxed conception of binarity adopting its basic implications. It seems, therefore, time for a review of this classic problem in modern phonology. At the same time, it is also worth restating the question and trying to get some insight into it using the instrumental methods that phonetics provide. This seems to be the construct truly corresponding to the speaker’s mind.
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1971 “
On the Description of Apicalized Consonants”.
Lin 21.103–107.
Anderson, Stephen R.
1974 The Organization of Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
Anglin, M.
1971 Perceptual Space of English Vowels in Word-Context. Ph. dissertation, Howard Univ., Washington, D.C.
Armstrong, Daniel & Cornells H. van Schooneveld
eds. 1977 Roman Jakobson: Echoes of his scholarship. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
Bach, Emmon & Robert Harms
eds. 1968 Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Baitaxe, Christiane
1978 Foundations of Distinctive Feature Theory. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1957 “
Three Methodological Remarks on Fundamentals of Language
”.
Word 131.323–335.
Bluhme, Herman
1974 “
Segmental Phonemes versus Distinctive Features in English”.
Linguistics 1261.11–24.
Bondarko, L. V. & L. R. Zinder
1968 “
Distinctive Features of Phonemes and Their Physical Characteristics”.
ZPhon 211.74–76.
Campbell, Lyle
1974 “
Phonological Features: Problems and proposals”.
Language 501.52–65.
Carnochan, John
1962 Contribution to the Discussion on Roman Jakob-son, “The Phonemic Concept of Distinctive Features”.
Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Helsinki 1961) ed. by
Antti Sovijäri &
Pentti Aalto, 444–445. The Hague: Mouton.
Chao, Yuen Ren
1954 Review article on Jakobson, Fant & Halle (1951).
RomPh 81.40–46.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Contreras, Heles
1969a “
Simplicity, Descriptive Adequacy, and Binary Features”.
Language 451.1–8.
Contreras, Heles
1969b “
Vowel Fusion in Spanish”.
Hispania 521.60–62.
Crothers, John
1978 “
Typology and Universals of Vowel Systems”.
Greenberg,
Ferguson &
Moravcsik 1978:94–152.
Delas, Daniel
1973 “
Phonétique, phonologie et poétique chez Roman Jakobson”.
Langue Française 191.108–119.
Donegan, Patricia J.
1976 “
Raising and Lowering”.
Papers from the 12th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 145–160. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Ege, Niels
1965 “
The Danish Vowel System”.
Gengo Kenkyu 471.21–35.
Fant, Gunnar
1967 The Nature of Distinctive Features”.
To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 634–642. The Hague: Mouton.
Fant, Gunnar
1973 Speech Sounds and Features. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Ferguson, Charles A.
1977 “
New Directions in Phonological Theory: Language acquisition and universals research”.
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory ed. by
Roger Cole, 247–299. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli
1958 “
What can the New Techniques of Acoustic Phonetics Contribute to Linguistics?”.
Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists (Oslo, 1957) ed. by
Eva Sivertsen, 433–478. Oslo: Oslo Univ. Press.
Garvin, Paul L.
1953 Review article on Jakobson, Fant & Halle (1951) Language 291.472–481.
Goyvaerts, Didier & Geoffrey Pullum
Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik
eds. 1978 Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
Gross, Maurice, Morris Halle & Marcel-Paul Schützenberger
eds. 1973 The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages. Paris: Mouton.
Halle, Morris
1957 “
In Defense of the Number Two”.
Studies Presented to Joshua Whatmough on his Sixtienth Birthday, 65–72. The Hague: Mouton.
Halle, Morris & Kenneth Stevens
1969 “
On the Feature ‘Advanced Tongue Root’”.
MIT RLE Quarterly Progress Report 941.209–215.
Hanson, Göte
1967 “
Dimensions in Speech Sound Perception: An experimental study of vowel perception”.
Ericsson Technics 231.3–175.
Harris, James W.
1969 Spanish Phonology. Cambridge; Mass.: MIT Press.
Harris, James W.
1970 “
Sequences of Vowels in Spanish”.
Lin 11.129–134.
Henrici, Gert
1975 Die Binarismus-Problematik in der neueren Linguistik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Hockett, Charles F.
1955 A Manual of Phonology. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
Holenstein, Elmar
1974 Jakobson ou le structuralisme phénoménologique. Paris: Éditions Seghers.
Holenstein, Elmar
1977 “
Jakobson’s Contribution to Phenomenology”.
Armstrong &
van Schooneveld 1977:145–162.
Horálek, Karel
1964 “
À propos de la théorie des oppositions binaires”.
Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists (Cambridge, 1962) ed. by
Horace G. Lunt, 414–417. The Hague: Mouton.
Hurford, James
1971 “
The State of Phonology”.
Linguistics 211.5–41.
Husserl, Edmund
1901–1928 Logische Untersuchungen. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Imai, Kunihiko
1975 Review article on Chomsky & Halle (1968).
Goyvaerts &
Pullum 1975:413–432.
Ivić, Pavle
1965 “
Roman Jakobson and the Growth of Phonology”.
Linguistics 181.35–78.
Jakobson, Roman
1962 [1938] “
Observations sur le classement phonologique des consonnes”.
Selected Writings I1, 272–279. The Hague: Mouton.
Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant & Morris Halle
1951 Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Our reference is to the 11th ed. of 1976.)
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
1956 Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton. (2nd ed. 1971.)
Jakobson, Roman & Linda R. Waugh
1979 The Sound Shape of Language. Brighton: The Harvester Press.
Kiparsky, Paul
1968 “
Linguistic Universals and Linguistic Change”.
Bach &
Harms 1968:170–202.
Krohn, Robert
1972 “
On the Sequencing of Tautosegmental Features”.
Papers in Linguistics 51.114–123.
Krohn, Robert
1981 “
Is there a Constraint on Tongue-Height Features?”.
Lingua 531.353–369.
Ladefoged, Peter
1968 “
The Nature of General Phonetic Theories”.
Georgetown University Round Table: Selected Papers in Linguistics (1961–1965), 283–298. Washington: Georgetown Univ. Press.
Ladefoged, Peter
1971a Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Ladefoged, Peter
1971b “
The Limits of Phonology”.
Form and Substance: Phonetic and linguistic papers presented to Eli Fischer-Jørgensen. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag. 47–56.
Ladefoged, Peter
1975 A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
Ladefoged, Peter
1980a “
What Are the Linguistic Sounds Made of?”.
Language 561.485–502.
Ladefoged, Peter
1980b “
Articulatory Parameters”.
Language and Speech 231.25–30.
Lindau, Mona
1978 “
Vowel Features”.
Language 541.541–563.
Lindau, Mona
1979 “
The Feature ‘Expanded’”.
Journal of Phonetics 71.163–178.
Lisker, Leigh & Arthur Abramson
1964 “
A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical measurements”.
Word 201.384–422.
McCawley, James D.
1973 “
On the Role of Notation in Generative Phonology”.
Gross et al. 1973:51–62.
Maddieson, Ian
1984 Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Malmberg, Bertil
1963 Structural Linguistics and Human Communication. Berlin: Springer.
Martinet, André
1955 Économie des changements phonétiques. Berne: A. Francke. (3rd ed. 1971.)
Martinet, André
1965 La linguistique synchronique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Moulton, William G.
1973 “
Vowel Systems with Five Heights”.
Lexicography and Dialect Geography: Festgabe für Hans Kurath, 187–194. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
Naro, Anthony J.
1970 “
Binary or n-ary Vowel Height Features? Historical evidence”.
Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 533–542. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Naro, Anthony J.
1971 “
Resolution of Vocalic Hiatus in Portuguese: Diachronic evidence for binary features”.
Language 471.381–394.
Ohala, John J.
1985 “
Around flat”.
Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, 223–241. New York: Academic Press.
Ohala, John J. & Jeri J. Jaeger
eds. 1986 Experimental Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
Parker, Frank
1976 “
Refining the Notion of Distinctive Feature”.
Lingua 381.61–70.
Pauliny, Eugen
1966 “
The Principle of Binary Structure in Phonology”.
Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 21.121–126.
Postal, Paul M.
1968 Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Rivas, Alberto
1978 “
Hierarchical Classes of Features in Binary-Feature Phonology”.
Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 178–188. Cambridge, Mass. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ruwet, Nicolas
1963 Préface to
Roman Jakobson,
Essais de linguistique générale, 7–21. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Šaumjan, Sebastian
1968 Problems of Theoretical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton.
Saltarelli, Mario
1973 “
Orthogonality, Naturalness and the Binary Framework”.
Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 798–807. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
Sanders, Gerald A.
1974 “
The Simplex-Feature Hypothesis”.
Glossa 81.141–192.
Schourup, Laurence
1973 “
Where Binarity Fails”.
OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 141.27–36. Columbus, Ohio: Dept. of Linguistics, Ohio State Univ.
Singh, Sadanand & D. R. Woods
1971 “
Perceptual Structure of 12 American English Vowels”.
JASA. 491.1861–1866.
Sommerstein, Alan H.
1977 Modern Phonology. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press.
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeyevič
1939 Grundzüge der Phonologic (=
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 7.) Prague. (Our reference is to the French translation,
Principes de phonologie
, transl. by
Jean Can-tineau: Paris: Klincksieck 1949.)
Ungeheuer, Gerold
1959 “
Das logistische Fundament binärer Phonemklassifikationen”.
SL 131.69–97.
Utaker, Arild
1974 “
On the Binary Opposition”.
Linguistics 1341.73–93.
Vennemann, Theo & Pater Ladefoged
1973 “
Phonetic Features and Phonological Features”.
Lingua 321.61–74.
Wang, William S-Y.
1968 “
Vowel Features, Paired Variables and the English Vowel Shift”.
Language 441.695–708.
Wilson, Robert D.
1966 “
A Criticism of Distinctive Features”.
Journal of Linguistics 21.195–206.
Williamson, Kay
1977 “
Multivalued Features for Consonants”.
Language 531.843–871.
Winteler, Jost
1876 Die Ker enzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus in ihren Grundzügen dargelegt. Leipzig & Heidelberg: F. C. Winter.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Maciukenas, James & Kathryn Riley
2007.
2007 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.