Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 16:1/2 (1989) ► pp.131148
References
Apollonius Dyscolus
. Apollonii Dyscoli quae super sunt. 31 vols. Ed. by Richard Schneider & Gustav Uhlig. (= Grammatici Graeci II:1–2.) Leipzig: Teubner 1878–1910 (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1965.)Google Scholar
Austin, J(ohn) L(angshaw
1911–1960). 1965How to do Things with Words. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl
1922Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica. (= Philologus Supplementband 15.2.) Leipzig: Dieterich. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1967.)Google Scholar
Blank, David L.
1982Ancient Philosophy and Grammar, the syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= American Philological Association; American Classical Studies, 10.) Chico, California: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1964 “A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11.225–40.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise
1983 “Le schéma ‘addition, soustraction, mutation, métathèse’ dans les textes anciens”. Histoire – Epistémologie – Langage 51.23–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, Vincenzo
1958–59 “Dionisio Trace e la techne a lui attribuita”. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, ser. II, 271.169–210 and 281.87–118.Google Scholar
Egli, Urs
1970Zwei Aufsätze zum Vergleich der stoischen Sprachtheorie mit modernen Theorien. (= Arbeitspapier Nr. 2.) Bern: Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1966 “Non-Thematic Subjects in Contemporary English”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 21.239–256.Google Scholar
Goetz, Georg & Friedrich Schoell
eds. 1910M. Terentii Varronis De Lingua Latina quae supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W.
1976 Review of Taylor (1975) HL 31.252–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 23.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan
1980Transl. of Dionysius Thrax – Technē Grammatikē. Work in Progress No.131, ed. by J. A. Kemp, J. Miller & Elizabeth Uldall. Edinburgh: Department of Linguistics, Edinburgh Univ.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1974 “The Case Theory of Maximus Planudes”. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists ed. Luigi Heilman, vol.11, 107–110. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, Dirk M.
1984 “Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods”. Mnemosyne 371 (= Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics, 2), 291–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J.
1975Declinado: A study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 2.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons
1979The Grammatical Papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. (= Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letter en en Schone Kunsten van België; Klasse der Letteren XLI, 92.) Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Householder, Fred W.
1995. Aristotle and the Stoics on Language. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Householder, Fred W.
1995. Dionysius Thrax, the Technai, and Sextus Empiricus. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Householder, Fred W.
1995. Apollonius Dyscolus and Herodian. In Concise History of the Language Sciences,  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.