Cover not available
Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 16:1/2 (1989) ► pp.131–148
Review article

History of Linguistics in the Classical Period

| Indiana University
Published online: 1 January 1989
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.16.1-2.09hou
References (18)
References
Apollonius Dyscolus. Apollonii Dyscoli quae super sunt. 31 vols. Ed. by Richard Schneider & Gustav Uhlig. (= Grammatici Graeci II:1–2.) Leipzig: Teubner, 1878–1910. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.)Google Scholar
Austin, J(ohn) L(angshaw, 1911–1960). 1965. How to do Things with Words. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl. 1922. Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica. (= Philologus Supplementband 15.2.) Leipzig: Dieterich. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms, 1967.)Google Scholar
Blank, David L. 1982. Ancient Philosophy and Grammar, the syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= American Philological Association; American Classical Studies, 10.) Chico, California: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1964. “A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11.225–40.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise. 1983. “Le schéma ‘addition, soustraction, mutation, métathèse’ dans les textes anciens”. Histoire – Epistémologie – Langage 51.23–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, Vincenzo 1958–59. “Dionisio Trace e la techne a lui attribuita”. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, ser. II, 271.169–210 and 281.87–118.Google Scholar
Egli, Urs. 1970. Zwei Aufsätze zum Vergleich der stoischen Sprachtheorie mit modernen Theorien. (= Arbeitspapier Nr. 2.) Bern: Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1966. “Non-Thematic Subjects in Contemporary English”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 21.239–256.Google Scholar
Goetz, Georg & Friedrich Schoell, eds. 1910. M. Terentii Varronis De Lingua Latina quae supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W. 1976. Review of Taylor (1975). HL 31.252–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 23.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan. 1980. Transl. of Dionysius Thrax – Technē Grammatikē. Work in Progress No.131, ed. by J. A. Kemp, J. Miller & Elizabeth Uldall. Edinburgh: Department of Linguistics, Edinburgh Univ.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H. 1974. “The Case Theory of Maximus Planudes”. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists ed. Luigi Heilman, vol.11, 107–110. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, Dirk M. 1984. “Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods”. Mnemosyne 371 (= Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics, 2), 291–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J. 1975. Declinado: A study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 2.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons. 1979. The Grammatical Papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. (= Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letter en en Schone Kunsten van België; Klasse der Letteren XLI, 92.) Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Householder, Fred W.
1995. Aristotle and the Stoics on Language. In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Householder, Fred W.
1995. Dionysius Thrax, the Technai, and Sextus Empiricus. In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Householder, Fred W.
1995. Apollonius Dyscolus and Herodian. In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.