Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 17:1/2 (1990) ► pp. 2947
References
Aarsleff, Hans
1974 “The Tradition of Condillac: The problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 93–156. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous
1771Gramática de la lengua castellana, compuesta por la Real Academia Española. Madrid: D. Joachin de Ibarra. (Repr., ed. by Ramón Sarmiento, Madrid: Editora Nacional 1984.)Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Claude Lancelot
1660Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris: Pierre le Petit.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Pierre Nicole
1965 [1662]La Logique, ou l’art de penser. Édition critique par Pierre Clair et François Girbal. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Baum, Richard
1976“Dependenzgrammatik”: Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftlicher und kritischer Sicht. (= Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Beiheft 151.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Buffier, Claude, S.J.
1709Grammaire françoise sur un plan nouveau pour en rendre les principes plus clairs et la pratique plus aisée. Paris: chez Nicolas le Clerc, Michel Brunet, Leconte et Montalant.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude
1968Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). (= Publications romanes et françaises, 100.) Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures (= Janua Linguarum, 4.) The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Covington, Michael A.
1984Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 39.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Rijk, L. M.
1972Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the history of early terminist logic. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten
1982 “Ancient Scholastic Logic as the Source of Medieval Scholastic Logic”. The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy ed. by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg, 101–127. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Gabriel
1747Les Vrais principes de la langue françoise, ou La parole réduite en méthode, conformément aux lois de l’usage. Paris: Le Breton.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, Martin
1859Prisciani grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII ex recensione Martini Hertzii, vol. II libros XIII-XVIII continens. (= Grammatici Latini ex recensione Henrici Keilii, 3.) Leipzig: Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1961.)Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1961Prologomena to a Theory of Language. Transl, by Francis J. Whitfield. 2nd ed. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Louis
1981Donat et la tradition de renseignement grammatical. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard
1984Word Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1836Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman
1967 “History of Semantics”. Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. by Paul Edwards, vol.VII1, 358–406. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1968William of Sherwood’s Treatise on Syncategorematic Words. Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Norman Kretzmann. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
1975 “Transformationalism and the Port-Royal Grammar”. Antoine Arnauld. & Claude Lancelot, General and Rational Grammar, ed. by Jacques Rieux and Bernard E. Rollin, 176–195. (= Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 208.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman & Eleonore Stump
1988The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Vol.11: Logic and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1960A Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Maierù, Alfonso
1972Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica. (= Lessico intellettuale europeo, 8.) Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de
1768Oeuvres de Maupertuis. Vol.I1. Nouvelle édition corrigée et augmentée. Lyons: Jean-Marie Bruyset.Google Scholar
Meiser, Carl
1880Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii Commentarii in librum Aristoteles Peri hermeneias II1. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A.
1988Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
Migne, Jean-Paul
1891Patrologiae cursus completus, Series Latina. Vol.641. Paris: Garnier Frères.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A.
1966A Synopsis of English Syntax. (= Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 19.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1975 “The Grammatical Tradition and the Rise of the Vernaculars”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics, 231–275. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1976 “On the Historical Source of Immediate Constituent Analysis”. Notes from the Linguistic Underground ed. by James D. McCawley, 229–242. (= Syntax and Semantics, 7.) New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1966 “The Development of the Word Class System of the European Grammatical Tradition”, Foundations of Language 21.3–19. (Repr. in Robins 1970:185–203.)Google Scholar
1970Diversions of Bloomsbury: Selected writings on linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène
1987 “La Syntaxe des Modistes: À propos d’un ouvrage récent”. Le Moyen âge 931.461–468.Google Scholar
Schoemann, Georg Friedrich
1862Die Lehre von den Redetheilen nach den Alten. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre
1983 “Grammaire et théorie du langage chez Buffier”. Dix-huitième siècle 151.285–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck. (2nd ed. 1966.)Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles
1869Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. Paris: Imprimerie impériale. (Repr., Frankfurt am Main: Minerva 1964.)Google Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm
1880Logik: Eine Untersuchung der Principien der Erkenntniss und der methodenwissenschaftlichen Forschung. Vol.I1: Erkenntnisslehre. Stuttgart: F. Enke.Google Scholar
1900Völkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Vol.I1, Part 1: Die Sprache. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

No author info given
1993.  In The Byzantine Grammarians, Crossref logo
Cigana, Lorenzo
2020.  In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212],  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo
Colombat, Bernard
2020.  In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212],  pp. 60 ff. Crossref logo
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
2014. Medieval Commentators on the Notion ‘persona agentis’ in Priscian’s Syntactic Theory. Historiographia Linguistica 41:2-3  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Hudson, Richard
2010. Reaction to: “The myth of Language Universals and cognitive science”. Lingua 120:12  pp. 2676 ff. Crossref logo
Hudson, Richard
2017. Structural priming supports grammatical networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 Crossref logo
Kruijff, G.-J.M.
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,  pp. 444 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Yalan
2020. Quantitative Analysis of Dependency Structures. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 27:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Zhixiu
2015. Various Views of Dependency from the Perspective of Definitions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:03  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.