Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 17:1/2 (1990) ► pp.49–65

Language variation and linguistic description in 16th-century France

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The first French grammarians to consider the French language condemned variation – historical variation, geographical variation, and sociolinguistic variation. For the French language to be first among vernacular languages, it had to have fixity, to be governed by absolute rules. How can one determine if a lexical item, pronunciation feature, or morphological feature should be accepted? Some would study the best authors, but the list of such authors is a matter of debate. Others would define the ‘true French’ geographically, but they tend to choose their own regions. Ultimately, the choice depends on a sense of ‘usage’ which is in harmony with the ‘naïve puissance ’ of the language, the pursuit of which may ultimately lead to a reunification of word and object, a unity lost at the Tower of Babel. The grammarians’ attacks on variation serve biblical as well as political destiny.
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.06kib
References (37)
References
A. Primary sources
Bovelles, Charles de. 1533. Liber de differentia vulgarium linguarum, & Gallici sermonis varietate. Paris: R. Estienne. (New ed., with introduction and French translation by Colette Dumont-Demaizière, Paris: Klincksieck, 1973.)Google Scholar
Cotgrave, Randle. 1611. A Dictionarie French and English. London: Adam Islip.Google Scholar
De Sainliens, Claude. 1593. A Dictionarie French and English. London: Woodcock.Google Scholar
Du Wes, Gilles. 1532(?). An introductorie for to lerne to rede, to pronounce, and to speke Frenche trewly. London: Thomas Godfray.Google Scholar
Estienne, Henri. 1566. Apologie pour Hérodote. Geneva: Estienne. (Critical ed. by Paul Ristelhuber, Paris: Liseux, 1879.)Google Scholar
. 1578. Deux dialogues du nouveau langage françois Italianize et autrement desguizé, principalement entre les courtisans de ce temps. Geneva: Estienne. (Critical ed. by Pauline-Marie Smith, Geneva: Slatkine, 1980.)Google Scholar
. 1579. De la precellence du langage françois. Paris: Estienne.Google Scholar
Lotharingischer Psalter (Bibl. Mazarine no. 798). Altfranzösische Überstezung des XIV Jahrhunderts. (= Altfranzösische Bibliothek, 4.) Ed. by Friedrich Apfelstedt. Heilbronn: Henninger, 1881.Google Scholar
Meigret, Louis. 1550. Le tretté de la grammere françoeze. Paris: C. Wechel. (Edition in modern orthography by Franz-Josef Hausmann. (= Lingua et Traditio, 5). Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1980.)Google Scholar
Palsgrave, John. 1530. Lesclarcissement de la langue francoyse. London: J. Hawkyns.Google Scholar
Tory, Geoffroy. 1529. Champfleury. Paris: Gourmont.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Atkinson, James B. 1974. “Naiveté and Modernity: The French Renaissance battle for a literary vernacular”. Journal of the History of Ideas 351.179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budagov, Ruben Aleksandrovič. 1961. “La normalisation de la langue littéraire en France aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles”. Beiträge zur romanischen Philologie 11.143–158.Google Scholar
Caput, Jean-Pol. 1972. “Naissance et évolution de la notion de norme en français”. Langue française 161.63–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattelæns, Monika. 1988. “Henri Estienne, historien de la langue”. Cahiers V.-L. Saulnier 5. Henri Estienne: Actes du colloque organisé à l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne le 12 mars, 1987 par le Centre V.-L. Saulnier, 77–84. Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure de Jeunes Filles.Google Scholar
Céard, J. 1980. “De Babel à la Pentecôte: La transformation du mythe de la confusion des langues au XVIe siècle”. Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 421.577–594.Google Scholar
Demaizière, Colette. 1978. “Latin et langues vulgaires au XVIe siècle”. Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 41.370–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. La grammaire française du XVIème siècle: les grammairiens picards. 21 vols. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Deux aspects de l’idéal linguistique d’Henri Estienne: hellénisme et parisianisme”. Cahiers V.-L. Saulnier 5. Henri Estienne: Actes du colloque organisé à l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne le 12 mars, 1987 par le Centre V.-L. Saulnier, 63–75. Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure de Jeunes Filles.Google Scholar
Dubois, Claude-Gilbert. 1970. Mythe et langage au seizième siècle. Bordeaux: Ducros.Google Scholar
Giard, Luce. 1987. “Du latin médiéval au pluriel des langues: le tournant de la Renaissance”. HEL 61.35–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Terence. 1971. “Logical Grammar, Grammatical Logic, and Humanism in Three German Universities”. Studies in the Renaissance 181.9–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heymann, W. 1903. Französische Dialektwörter bei Lexicographen des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts. Giessen: Munchowsche Hof- und Universitäts-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Kassai, Georges. 1977. “Quelques aspects de la néolgie à propos de La precellence du langage françois d’Henri Estienne”. Français moderne 451.57–63.Google Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas A. 1985. “John Palsgrave’s Lesclarcissement de la langue françoyse (1530)”. HL 121.27–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukenheim, Louis. 1932. Contributions à l’histoire de la grammaire italienne, espagnole, et française à l’époque de la Renaissance. Amsterdam: Nv Nord-Hollandsche uitgevers-maatschappij. (Repr. Utrecht: H & S Publishers, 1974.)Google Scholar
Mathieu-Castellani, Gisèle. 1985. “Origine de la langue, langue de l’origine: Mythe et désir dans le Thresor de Claude Duret”. Réforme Humanisme Renaissance 151.79–85.Google Scholar
Padley, George Arthur. 1985. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700. (= Trends in Vernacular Grammar, I.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe, 1500–1700. (= Trends in Vernacular Grammar, II.) Ibid.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith. 1976. “Renaissance Grammar: Rebellion or Evolution?”. Interrogativi dell’ Umanesimo, II1, 73–89. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Riemens, K.-J. 1919. Esquisse historique de l’enseignements du français en hollande du XVle au XIXe siècle. Leiden: A. W. SijthoffGoogle Scholar
Rowe, John Howland. 1974. “Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Grammars”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms, ed. by Dell Hymes. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Christian. 1977. “La grammaire française des XVIe et XVIIe siècles et les langues régionales”. Travaux de Littérature et de Linguistique 151.215–225.Google Scholar
Sozzi, Lionello. 1988. “La polémique anti-italienne dans l’œuvre narrative d’Henri Estienne”. Cahiers V.-L. Saulnier 5. Henri Estienne: Actes du colloque organisé à l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne le 12 mars, 1987par le Centre V.-L. Saulnier, 97–111. Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure de Jeunes Filles.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward. 1982. “The ‘Genius’ of Language in Sixteenth-Century Linguistics”. Logos Semantikos: Studia Linguistica in honorem Eugenio Cosseriu, 1921–1981, Vol.11: Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie und der Sprachwissenschaft, ed. by Horst Geckeier, Brigitte Schlieben-Lange, Jürgen Trabant & Harald Weydt, 177–189. Berlin: De Gruyter; Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. Forthcoming. “Les grammaires françaises ‘pédagogiques’ du XVIe siècle: problèmes de définition et de typologie; analyse microscopique”. A History of Language Teaching, 1500–1800. Proceedings of the Wölfenbüttel Conference, October 1988, ed. by Konrad Schröder. Wolfenbüttel: Herzog August Library.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Riemer, Nick
2017. Prescription, description and ‘artefactualism’ in Renaissance vernacular grammar: the French case. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 39:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Batista, Ronaldo de Oliveira
2010. Formas da gramática renascentista: percepção e abordagem da diversidade linguística em Fernão de Oliveira. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 26:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Lodge, R. Anthony
2004. A Sociolinguistic History of Parisian French, DOI logo
Liddle, Michel H. W.
1992. For to Speke Frenche Trewely. The French Language in England, 1000–1600: its status, description and instruction. Par Douglas A. Kibbee. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.