Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:1 (1993) ► pp.49–66

History of linguistics

‘Standard Latin’, and Pedagogy

| University of Delaware

Recent work in the history of early medieval linguistics has challenged a number of assumptions about the representation of Latin and language usage during the period. Given the way Latin is often positioned as a standard for literacy and schooling, these revisions of early medieval linguistics also raise questions for teaching literacy, language arts, and standard English. Late classical and early medieval grammatical discourse presents not a monolithic view of Latin but various accounts of pronunciation, spelling, and semantics. Some stigmatize contemporary usage, others do not. In addition, historical texts such as the 9th-century History of the Langobards represent heterogeneous and bilingual speech communities in which Latin and Germanic languages are used in different contexts. Rather than constraining the history of linguistics as a ‘specialist’s add on’, we can reconceptualize writing histories of linguistics as contributions to a critical cultural history, uncovering the assumptions and practices of not only linguistic theory and description but also language teaching practices, ideological constructions of national languages, representations of language differences and identity, and attitudes toward language usage and standardization.

Published online: 1 January 1993
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.1.05ams
References
Amsler, Mark
1989 Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andresen, Julie
1985 “Why Do We Do Linguistic Historiography?”. Semiotica 561.357–70.Google Scholar
Augustine
1962 De doctrina Christiana. Ed. by Joseph Martin. (= Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, 32.) Turnhout: BrepolsGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Erich
1965 Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Transl, by Ralph Manheim. New York: Bollingen Foundation; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis
1982 Grammar and Good Taste: Reforming the American language. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bonner, Stanley
1977 Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert
1953 European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Transi, by Willard R. Trask. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C.
1925 “The Periphrastic Future with Shall and Will in Modern English”. PMLA 401.963–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1927 “The Rules of Common School Grammars”. PMLA 421.221–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gratwick, A. S.
1982 “Latinitas britannica: Was British Latin archaic?”. Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain. Ed. by Nicholas Brooks, 1–79. Leicester: Leicester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1962 “Types of Linguistic Communities”. Anthropological Linguistics 4:1.28–40.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis
1981 Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville
1911 Etymologiae sive origines. Ed. by W. M. Lindsay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth H.
1953 Language and History in Early Britain. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj
1986 The Alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. Urbana & Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Keil, Heinrich
ed. 1961 Grammatici Latini. 81 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. [Cited by volume and page.]Google Scholar
Kelly, Louis G.
1969 25 Centuries of Language Teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kramer, Johannes
1976 Literarische Quellen zur Aussprache des Vulgärlateins. Meisenheim/Glan: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1982 The Insular Latin Grammarians. Suffolk: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul M.
1979 “On the Definition of ‘Vulgar Latin’: The eternal return”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 801.110–122.Google Scholar
Macrobius
1969 The Saturnalia. Transl, by Percival Vaughan Davies. New York & London: Columbia Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McManus, Damian
1984 “ Linguarum Diversitas: Latin and the Vernaculars in Early Medieval Britain”. Peritia 31.151–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohrmann, Christine
1961 “Les formes du latin dit ‘vulgaire’” Études sur le latin des chrétiens. Vol. II1, 135–153. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Let-teratura.Google Scholar
Paul the Deacon
1907 History of the Langobards. Transl, by William Dudley Foulke. Philadelphia: Department of History, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1970 Historia Langobardorum. Transl, by Amedeo Giacomini. Venice: Electa Editrice. [Reprints Latin text from Monumenta Germaniae Historica ].Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph
1970[1762] A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language and Universal Grammar. Menston, England: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Riehé, Pierre
1976 Education and Culture in the Barbarian West, Sixth to Eighth Centuries. Columbia, S.C.: Univ. of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, David
1986 The Politics of American English, 1776–1850. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger
1982 Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Amsler, Mark E.
2010. Premodern Letters and Textual Consciousness. Historiographia Linguistica 37:3 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Marsico, Clementina
2017. Radical reform, inevitable debts. Historiographia Linguistica 44:2-3 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Pierce, Marc
2002. Even Hovdhaugen, Fred Karlsson, Carol Henriksen and Bengt Sigurd: The History of Linguistics in the Nordic Countries. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 2000. xv + 672 pp.. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.