Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:1 (1993) ► pp.111–126

The linguistic preoccupations of the glossators of the st gall priscian

| Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht
The existence of a native Irish grammatical tradition suggests that the intensive study of Priscian’s Institutiones grammaticae by Irish scholars which is attested to by the glosses in the St Gall Priscian should have been the occasion for a contrastive analysis of Latin and Old Irish. This is not the case, however, as is apparent from the glossators’ apparent identification of themselves with Latini and their silence about Old Irish usage. Evidence of an original contribution to linguistic thought may be found only in the use of construe marks (syntactical glossing) and vernacular calques of Latin grammatical terms. This is to be explained by the glossators’ narrowly didactic focus upon Latin forms.
Published online: 1 January 1993
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.1.07hof
References (40)
References
Ahlqvist, Anders. 1983. The Early Irish Linguist: An Edition of the Canonical Part of the Auraicept na nÉces (= Commentationes Litterarum Humanarum 73). Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Latin grammar and native learning”. Sages, Saints and Storytellers ed. by D. Ó Corráin, L. Breatnach, K. McCone, 1–6. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dirk M., and Geert R. W. Dibbets. 1977. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taalkunde. Den Bosch: Malmberg.Google Scholar
Ballaira, Guglielmo. 1989. Prisciano e i suoi amici. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.Google Scholar
Bergin, Osborn. 1938. “The native Irish grammarian”. Proceedings of the British Academy 241.205–35.Google Scholar
Binchy, David A. 1976. “Semantic influence of Latin in the Old Irish glosses”. Latin Script and Letters A.D. 400–900 ed. by John J. O’ Meara and Bernd Naumann, 167–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Bernhard. 1978. “Ergänzungen zur Überlieferung des Paperinus/ Papirius (Papirianus?)”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1001.420–2.Google Scholar
Brunhölzl, Franz. 1975. Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters. München: W. Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Calder, George ed. 1917. Auraicept na nÉces: The Scholars’ Primer. Edinburgh: John Grant.Google Scholar
Draak, Maartje. 1957. “Construe marks in Hiberno-Latin manuscripts”. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, afd. Letterkunde, new ser. 201.261–82.Google Scholar
. 1967. “The higher teaching of Latin grammar in Ireland during the 9th Cent.” Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, afd. Letterkunde, new ser. 301:41.107–44.Google Scholar
Düchting, Reinhard. 1968. Sedulius Scottus. Seine Dichtungen. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Grosjean, Paul. 1948. Review of van Hamel (1946). Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 261.137–45.Google Scholar
Van Hamel, Anton Gerard. 1946. “Primitieve Ierse taalstudie”. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, afd. Letterkunde, new ser. 9:9.295–339.Google Scholar
Herren, Michael. 1979. “Some new light on the life of Virgilius Maro Grammaticus”. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 791 C.27–71.Google Scholar
Hertz, Martin. 1855–59. Prisciani Institutionum Grammaticarum Libri XVIII, Grammatici Latini II–III. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof. 1988. “Glosses in a 9th cent. Priscian manuscript probably attributable to Heiric of Auxerre (d. ca. 876) and their connections”. Studi Medievali 3rd ser. 291.805–39.Google Scholar
. 1990. “Moines irlandais et métrique latine”. Études celtiques 271.235–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Louis. 1971. “Tradition et diffusion de l’oeuvre grammaticale de Pompée, commentateur de Donat”. Revue de Philologie 451.48–83.Google Scholar
. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical: Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe-IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Les innovations théoriques de la grammaire carolingienne: Peu de chose. Pourquoi?” In Rosier 1988:133–45.Google Scholar
. 1989. “L’enseignement de la grammaire au temps de Charles le Chauve”. Giovanni Scoto nel suo tempo: l’organizzazione del sapere in età carolingia (= Atti del XXIV Convegno storico internazionale ). Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’ Alto Medioevo. 153–70.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 1982. Foundations of Western Linguistics. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Jeep, Ludwig. 1893. Zur Geschichte der Lehre von den Redetheilen bei den lateinischen Grammatikern. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 1988. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korhammer, Michael. 1980. “Mittelalterliche Konstruktionshilfen und altenglische Wortstellung”. Scriptorium 341.18–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Pierre-Yves. 1987. “Les premières grammaires celtiques”. Les premières grammaires vernaculaires d’Europe, ed. A. Ahlqvist. (= HEL 9:1) 13–45.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1982. The Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. “Late Latin grammarians in the early Middle Ages”. HL 131.365–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “Serious aspects of the wordplay of Virgilius Maro Grammaticus”. In Rosier 1988:121–31.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Fragments from the lost portions of the Epitomae of Virgilius Maro Grammaticus”. Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 211.113–25.Google Scholar
Ó Cuív, Brian. 1965. “Linguistic terminology in the mediaeval Irish bardic tracts”. Transactions of the Philological Society, 641.141–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polara, Giovanni. 1988. “Virgilio Marone e la parodia delle dottrine grammaticali”. In Rosier 1988:109–20.Google Scholar
Robins, R[obert] H[enry]. 1990. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longman, 1967. (3rd ed., London: Longman)Google Scholar
. 1988. “Priscian and the context of his age”. In Rosier (1988), 49–55.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène, ed., 1988. L’héritage des grammairiens latins de l’Antiquité aux lumières, Paris: Société pour l’information grammaticale & Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, Stefan. 1970. Althochdeutsch in St. Gallen. St. Gallen: Verlag Ostschweiz & Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar
Stokes, Whitley and John Strachan. 1903. Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus 21. Cambridge: University Press (= Thes .).Google Scholar
Strachan, John. 1903. “On the language of the St Gall glosses”. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 41.470–92.Google Scholar
Wieland, Gernot R. 1983. The Latin Glosses on Arator and Prudentius (= Studies and Texts 61 ). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar