Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:1 (1993) ► pp.145–191

Syntax and dialectic in carolingian commentaries on priscian’s institutiones grammaticae

| University of Helsinki
The present article deals with two aspects of linguistic study associated with the reintroduction of Priscian’s Institutiones in the Carolingian Renaissance – the infiltration of logical concepts into linguistic description and the initiation of syntactic studies. In both of these fields the achievement of ninth-century scholars marks a significant departure from the grammatical tradition of preceding centuries. Evidence for the new orientation of linguistic studies can be found mainly in the philosophical elaboration of grammatical notions in grammatical commentaries as well as in glosses to Priscian’s Institutiones; the latter material is as yet unedited.
Sharing the concern of their philosopher contemporaries for the Aristotelian categories, the grammarians not only elaborated the philosophical notions present in Priscian’s work but searched continuously for new sources of inspiration, mainly in elementary logical texts. Syntactic doctrine, which figures throughout Priscian’s discussion of the parts of speech, is from the start an object of concern for the commentators. The Carolingian scholars achieve an interpretation of Priscian’s syntactic doctrine which is peculiar to them, placing a special emphasis on certain philosophical points of doctrine. An alternative approach to syntactic analysis, applying the dialectical notions of subject and predicate to syntactic description, offered by the De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii of Martianus Capella, is employed by at least one master concerned with both logical and grammatical issues.
Published online: 1 January 1993
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.20.1.09luh
References (71)
References
Primary works
Ars Ambrosiana. Commentum anonymum in Donati partes maiores. Ed. Bengt Löfstedt. CCSL 133C1. Turnhout: Brepols, 1982.Google Scholar
Alcuin. Dialogus Franconis et Saxonis de octo partibus orationis. PL 1011.854–902.
Alcuin. De dialectica. Translated with introduction and notes by B. Darrell Jackson, from the text newly edited by Jan Pinborg. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975.Google Scholar
Augustine. Sancti Aurelii Augustini de Trinitate libri XV (libri I–XII1). Ed. W. J. Mountain & Fr. Glorie. CCSL 501. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.Google Scholar
(pseudo-) Cassiodorus. Commentarium de oratione et de octo partibus orationis. PL 701.1219–1240.
Categoriae Decem. Ed. Laurentius Minio-Paluello. Aristoteles latinus 11,1–5. Bruges-Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1961.Google Scholar
CCCM = Corpus Christianorum Continuatio mediaevalis. Turnhout: Brepols.
CCSL = Corpus Christianorum Series Latina. Turnhout: Brepols.
Distributio omnium specierum nominum inter cathegorias Aristotilis. Ed. Paul Piper. Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule, pp. lxxv–lxxxix. Freiburg im Breisgau and Tübingen: Mohr, 1882.Google Scholar
Donatus. Ars minor and Ars maior. See Holtz 1981.Google Scholar
GL = Grammatici Latini. Ed. Heinrich Keil. 81 vols. Leipzig: Teubner, 1855–80.Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville. Etymologiae. Ed. W. M. Lindsay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Johannes Scottus. Iohannis Scotti Eriugenae Periphyseon (De diuisione Naturae) I–III1. Ed. by I.-P. Sheldon-Williams. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies, 1968, 1972, 1981.Google Scholar
. Iohannis Scotti Annotationes in Martianum. Ed. by Cora Lutz. Cambridge, Mass: Medieval Academy of America, 1939.Google Scholar
Macrobius. Ambrosii Theodosii Macrobii commentarii in Somnium Sci-pionis. 21 vols. Ed. by Iacobus Willis. Leipzig: Teubner, 1963.Google Scholar
Marius Victorinus. Q. Fabii Laurentii Victorini explanationum in rhetoricam M. Tullii Ciceronis libri duo. Ed. by Carolus Halm. Rhetor es latini minores, 153–304. Leipzig: Teubner, 1863.Google Scholar
Martianus Capella. De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii. Ed. by A. Dick. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1978.Google Scholar
Maximus. Ambiguorum liber. PG 911.1031–1418.
Murethach, In Donati Artem maiorem. Ed. by Louis Holtz. CCCM 401. Turnhout: Brepols, 1977.Google Scholar
PG = Patrologiae (graecae) cursus completus. 1611 vols. Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1837–66.Google Scholar
PL = Patrologiae (latinae) cursus completus. 2211 vols. Paris: J.-P. Migne, 1844–64.Google Scholar
Priscian. Institutiones grammaticae. GL II1. 1–597; GL III1. 1–377.
Quomodo VII circumstantie rerum in legendo ordinande sint. Ed. by Paul Piper. Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule, pp. xiii–lvi. Freiburg im Breisgau and Tübingen: Mohr, 1882.Google Scholar
Remigius of Auxerre. In Artem Donati minorem commentum. Ed. by Wilhelm Fox. Leipzig: Teubner, 1902.Google Scholar
. Remigii Autissiodorensis commentum in Martianum Capellam. Ed. by Cora E. Lutz. 21 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1962–1965.Google Scholar
Sedulius Scottus. In Donati Artem maiorem, In Donati Artem minorem, In Priscianum, In Eutychem. Ed. Bengt Löfstedt. Grammatici hibernici carolini aevi. Pars III1,1–2. CCCM 401, B C. Turnhout: Brepols, 1977.Google Scholar
. Collectaneum miscellanum. Ed. by Dean Simpson. CCCM 671. Turnhout: Brepols, 1988.Google Scholar
Smaragdus. Liber in partibus Donati. Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt, Louis Holtz & Adele Kibre. CCCM 681. Turnhout: Brepols. 1986.Google Scholar
Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. Epitomi ed Epistole. Ed. by G. Polara. Naples: Liguori, 1979.Google Scholar
Secondary works
Baratin, Marc. 1989. La naissance de la syntaxe à Rome. Paris: Les editions de minuit.Google Scholar
Charles, David. 1984. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Contreni, John. 1981. “John Scottus, Martin Hiberniensis, the Liberal Arts, and teaching”. Insular Latin Studies: Papers on Latin Texts and Manuscripts of the British Isles: 550–1066. Ed. by Michael Herren. 23–44. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, A. C.. 1988. “Greek grammars and dictionaries in Carolingian Europe”. In Herren 1988:1–56.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques. 1983. Isidore de Séville et la culture classique dans l’Espagne wisigothique. I1. Paris: Etudes Augustiniennes. (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Frakes, Jerold C. 1988. “Remigius of Auxerre, Eriugena, and the Greco-Latin circumstantiae-formula of accessus ad auctores ”. In M. Herren 1988:229–255.Google Scholar
Fredborg, Karin Margareta. 1988. “Speculative grammar”. A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, 177–95. Ed. by Peter Dronke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Margaret. 1981. “Rãg reads Priscian”. Charles the Bald. Court and Kingdom, 261–266. Ed. by Margaret T. Gibson and Janet L. Nelson. Aldershot: Variorum. (2nd, revised edition 1990.)Google Scholar
. 1992. “Milestones in the study of Priscian, circa 800-circa 1200”. Viator 231.17–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herren, Michael. 1986. “The Commentary on Martianus Attributed to John Scottus: its Hiberno-Latin Background.” Jean Scot Ecrivain. (= Actes du IVe colloque international Montréal 281 août – 2 septembre 1983), 265–286. Ed. by G. H. Allard. Montreal-Paris: Bellarmin – Vrin.Google Scholar
Herren, Michael W. 1988. Ed. in collaboration with Shirley Ann Brown. The Sacred Nectar of the Greeks: The Study of Greek in the West in the Early Middle Ages. London: King’s College London Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof. 1988. “Glosses in a Ninth Century Priscian Ms. Probably Attributable to Heiric of Auxerre (†ca. 876) and Their Connections”. Studi Medievali, 3rd series 291.805–839.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical: Etude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe -IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Les innovations théoriques de la grammaire carolingienne: peu de chose. Pourquoi?” L’heritage des grammairiens latins de l’Antiquité aux Lumières, 133–145. Ed. by Irène Rosier. Paris: Société pour l’Information grammaticale.Google Scholar
Hunt, Richard W. 1941–43. “Studies on Priscian in the eleventh and twelfth centuries I: Petrus Helias and his predecessors.” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 1:2.194–231. London: Warburg Institute. (Repr. in The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1980.)Google Scholar
1950. “Studies on Priscian in the twelfth century II. The school of Ralph of Beauvais.” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 21:1–56. London: Warburg Institute. (Repr. in The History of grammar in the Middle Ages, 39–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1980.)Google Scholar
Jeudy, Colette. 1972. “L’Institutio de nomine, pronomine et verbo de Priscien: manuscrits et commentaires médiévaux.” Revue d’histoire des textes 21.73–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982–1983. “Le ‘Scalprum Prisciani’ et sa tradition manuscrite.” Revue d’histoire des textes 12–13.181–93.Google Scholar
. 1989. “L’oeuvre de Remi d’Auxerre.” L’École carolingienne d’Auxerre de Murethach à Remi 830–908, 373–98; 457–99. Ed. by Dominique Iogna-Prat, Colette Jeudy & Guy Lobrichon. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Kenney, James F. 1929. The Sources for the Early History of Ireland: An Introduction and Guide I1. Ecclesiastical. Reprinted 1966, with addenda and corrigenda by L. Bieler. Dublin: Irish University Press, 1968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H. 1978. “Master Guido and his view on government: On twelfth century linguistic thought.” Vivarium 161.108–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987. Het iudicium constructionis. Het Leerstuk van de Constructio in de 2de Helft van de 12de Eeuw. 41 vols. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.Google Scholar
1990. “Transitivity, intransitivity and related concepts in 12th century grammar. An explorative study.” De Ortu Grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg. (= Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 43), 161–189. Ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbesen & Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korhammer, Michael. 1980. “Mittelalterliche Konstruktionshilfen und altenglische Wortstellung”. Scriptorium 341.18–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1982. The Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Linguistics in the earlier Middle Ages: the Insular and Carolingian grammarians.” Transactions of the Philological Society 831.171–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Carolingian Grammarians and Theoretical Innovation.” Diversions of Galway: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on the History of Linguistics, 27–38. Ed. by A. Ahlqvist et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (forthcoming). “The Study of Grammar.” Culture and Society under the Carolingians. Ed. by Rosamund McKitterick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luhtala, Anneli. 1992. “On the origin of the medieval concept of transitivity.” Diversions of Galway: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on the History of Linguistics, 39–48. Ed. by A. Ahlqvist et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marenbon, John. 1981. From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre. Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Early Medieval Philosophy (480–1150). An Introduction. London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul (2nd ed., 1988).Google Scholar
Mathon, Gérard. 1969. “Les formes et la signification de la pédagogie des arts libéraux au milieu du IXe siècle. L’enseignement palatin de Jean Scot Erigène”. Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen Age. Actes du quatrième congrès international de philosophie médiévale, 47–64. Paris – Montréal: Vrin/Institut d’Etudes Médiévales, 1969.Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. 1989. The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena. A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, John Reginald. 1976. “Alcuin’s Priscian ”. Latin Script and Letters A.D. 400–900. Ed. by J. J. O’Meara and B. Naumann, 222–235. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Marina. 1978. I codici di Prisciano. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
de Rijk, Lambertus Marie. 1963. “On the curriculum of the arts of the Trivium at St Gall from c. 850-c. 1000.” Vivarium 11.35–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. C. 1973. “Syntactical glosses in Latin manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon provenance”. Speculum 481.443–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans. 3rd edition 1990.Google Scholar
Rosier, Irène. 1983. La Grammaire spéculative des Modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
Stahl, William Harris, Richard Johnson & E. L. Burge. 1971. Martianus Capella and the Seven Liberal Arts. Vol 11. The Quadrivium of Martianus Capella. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Strachan, John. 1903. “On the language of the St. Gall glosses”. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 41.470–92.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles. 1868. Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Age. Notices et extraits des manuscripts de la Bibliothèque Impériale, 22:2. Paris: Impr. Nationale.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Bauer, Bernhard & Victoria Krivoshchekova
2022. Definitions, dialectic and Irish grammatical theory in Carolingian glosses on Priscian: a case study using a close and distant reading approach. Language & History 65:2 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
2014. Medieval Commentators on the Notion ‘persona agentis’ in Priscian’s Syntactic Theory. Historiographia Linguistica 41:2-3 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Pandžić, Zvonko
2004. Tense, mood and aspect in the first grammar of Croatian (Kašić 1604). Historiographia Linguistica 31:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez, Estrella Pérez
2002. Speculations about thePotestas Litterarumin medieval grammar (11th through 13th centuries). Historiographia Linguistica 29:3 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.