Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 21:1/2 (1994) ► pp.103–121

Laura Soames’ contributions to phonetics

| University of Glasgow
Laura Soames (1840–1895) came to the attention of the teaching and phonetics professions through her work in applying phonetic principles to the teaching of reading and to the pronunciation of English and foreign languages. Lauded by many European phoneticians, she was despised by Henry Sweet – much to his discredit. Her publications, especially the Introduction to Phonetics (English, French and German) (1891) and The Child’s Key to Reading (1894) reveal a capacity to simplify the more technical expositions of phonetic theory in order to achieve a popular and readable exposition of the subject. Together with a number of other phoneticians of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, she represents the bridge between the work of Henry Sweet (1845–1912) and Daniel Jones (1881–1967).
Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.21.1-2.06mac
References (72)
References
Anon. 1895a. “[Obituary of Laura Soames]”. The Times, 25 January 1895, 7f.Google Scholar
. 1895b. “[Obituary of Laura Soames]”. Brighton Gazette & Sussex Telegraph, 26 January 1895, 5c.Google Scholar
. 1895c. “[Obituary of Laura Soames]”. Brighton Guardian & Hove Recorder, 30 January 1895, 5d.Google Scholar
. 1895d. “Laura Soames”. Journal of Education, March 1895, 174–175.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia. 1873. “Saggi ladini”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 11.1–556.Google Scholar
Brebner, Mary. 1898. The Method of Teaching Modern Languages in Germany. Cambridge: C. J. Clay & Sons.Google Scholar
Bronstein, Arthur J. et al., eds. 1977. A Biographical Dictionary of the Phonetic Sciences. New York: Press of Lehman College.Google Scholar
Bretegnier, Charles. 1897. “Roumanche de Tarasp, Engadine, Grisons”. Le Maître Phonétique, mai-juin 1897, p. 121.Google Scholar
Cawthorn, Alice M. 1878. Lessons on the Gospels for Sundays and Holydays […]. With critical and explanatory notes by Laura Soames. London: Church of England Sunday School Institute.Google Scholar
Charities Aid Foundation. 1993. Directory of Grant-Making Trusts 1993. Tonbridge: Charities Aid Foundation.Google Scholar
Fowler, [Miss]. 1894. “[Extract from letter on the advantages of Laura Soames’ phonetic methods for teaching reading]”. Le Maître Phonétique, mai 1894, p.89.Google Scholar
Gartner, Theodor. (1843–1925). 1883. Rätoromanische Grammatik. Heilbronn: Gebr. Henninger.Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles Hall. 1894. Review of Soames (1893a). Le Maître Phonétique, octobre 1894, 159–161.Google Scholar
Hart, John. 1569. An Orthographie, Conteyning the Due Order and Reason, Howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, Most Like to the Life or Nature. London: W. Serres.Google Scholar
Howatt, Anthony P. R. 1984. A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 1914. “Phonetics and Phonetic Texts in the Teaching of Reading”. Miscellanea Phonetica I1, 33–37. London: Intl. Phonetic Association. [Distributed as Supplément du Maître Phonétique 1925.3337.]Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1892. Review of Soames (1891a). Le Maître Phonétique, mars 1892, 48–49.Google Scholar
Kelly, John. 1981. “The 1847 Alphabet: An episode of phonotypy”. Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by R. E. Asher & E. J. A. Henderson, 248–264. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. 1981. “Three Trends in Phonetics: The development of phonetics as a discipline in Germany since the nineteenth century”. Ibid., 161–178.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1979. “British Phonetics in the 1880s: The work of James Lecky”. HL 61.47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. “Thomas Hallam and the Study of Dialect and Educated Speech”. Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society 151.19–31.Google Scholar
1985. “James Murray and the Phonetic Notation in the New English Dictionary”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1985.72–112.Google Scholar
1986. “The International Phonetic Association: The first 100 years”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 161.30–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Passy, Paul Édouard. 1887. “Expérianses d’un professeur d’Anglais sur la nouvèle métode d’enseignement”. Englische Studien 101.506–514.Google Scholar
. 1889. Les Sons du Français. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
. 1895. “Miss Soames”. Le Maître Phonétique, mars 1895, 56–58.Google Scholar
. 1897. “Roumanche de Prets-Heinzenberg, Oberland, Grisons”. Le Maître Phonétique, mai-juin 1897, p.121.Google Scholar
. 1898. “[Note on the disbursement of funds from the Will of Laura Soames]”. Le Maître Phonétique, mars-avril 1898, 55–56.Google Scholar
. 1900. Review of Soames (1899 [= 2nd ed. of 1891a]). Le Maître Phonétique, février-mars 1900, 29–30.Google Scholar
. 1902. “[Answer to question concerning the Soames’ method of teaching reading]”. Le Maître Phonétique, février 1902, p.44 [see also Le Maître Phonétique, octobre-novembre 1901, p. 134].Google Scholar
. 1913. “Review of Soames (1913a [= 3rd ed. of 1891a]) and (1913b [= 2nd ed. of 1897]). Le Maître Phonétique, juillet-août 1913, 96–97.Google Scholar
Pop, Sever. (1901–1961). 1950. La Dialectologie: Aperçu historique et méthodes d’enquêtes linguistiques. Première partie. Louvain: J. Duculot.Google Scholar
Schröer, Arnold. (1857–1935). 1895. “Laura Soames†”. Englische Studien 211.197–199.Google Scholar
Soames, Laura. 1880. Scheme of English Spelling Reform. London: F. Pitman.Google Scholar
. 1882. A Three-Years’ Course of Bible Reading for Private Use, Based upon the Book of Common Prayer. London: Hatchards.Google Scholar
. 1887–88. “First Steps Towards Teaching Phonetics”. Journal of Education, December 1887, 523–524, May 1888, 234–238.Google Scholar
. 1888. “[Letter concerning sequences of three consonants in French; nasalized vowel in mon ami; Curwen’s rule for word-accent in English]”. Phonetic Teacher, December 1888, 492–493.Google Scholar
. 1889a. “On English Stress”. Le Maître Phonétique, mars 1889, 34–35.Google Scholar
. 1889b. “[Letter concerning the unstressed vowel in outcome etc.]”. Le Maître Phonétique, mai 1889.56.Google Scholar
. 1889c. “[Transcription of vowel of get]”. Le Maître Phonétique, juin 1889, 68–69.Google Scholar
. 1890a. “[Letter concerning phonetic spelling in the mf, and a standard form of English speech]”. Le Maître Phonétique, février 1890, 19–22.Google Scholar
. 1890b. “[Letter concerning the ability of young children to ‘observe some of the chief distinctions between the sounds of speech’]”. Le Maître Phonétique, mars 1890, p.31.Google Scholar
. 1890c. “Notes on the Sounds of the Romanch or Romanese of the Upper Engadine”. Phonetische Studien 31.154–161.Google Scholar
. 1890d. “[Letter concerning doubling of symbols to indicate length; stress in Finnish; usefulness of information in the mf about orthoepy]”. Le Maître Phonétique, novembre 1890, p.95.Google Scholar
. 1891a. An Introduction to Phonetics (English, French and German) with Reading Lessons and Exercises. London: S. Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan. (2nd ed., 1899, 3rd ed., 1913, both prepared by Wilhelm Viëtor.)Google Scholar
. 1891b. A Phonetic Reading Book (English, French and German) with Exercises. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
. 1891c. “[Use of syllabic /s/ in English]”. Le Maître Phonétique, janvier 1891, p.13.Google Scholar
. 1891d. “American Pronunciation”. Le Maître Phonétique, juin 1891, p.75.Google Scholar
. 1891e. Review of Sweet (1890a). Phonetische Studien 41.369–379.Google Scholar
. 1892a. Review of Sweet (1890a, 1890b). Englische Studien 161.107–113.Google Scholar
. 1892b. “Weak Words in English”. Le Maître Phonétique, avril 1892, 63–64.Google Scholar
. 1892c. “[Letter to the Editor: Introduction to Phonetics]”. Modern Language Notes 7:5.314–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1892d. “Answer to Dr. Sweet”. Phonetische Studien 51.119–120.Google Scholar
. 1893a. Albany Phonetic Reader. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
. 1893b. “Our Alphabet”. Le Maître Phonétique, juillet 1893, 98–100.Google Scholar
. 1893c. “[Letter in answer to question about stress-points in (mainly) compound nouns in English]”. Le Maître Phonétique, juillet 1893, 106107.Google Scholar
. 1893d. “[First Codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Laura Soames, 18 December 1893”]. [Probate was granted on 18 February 1895.] London: Somerset House. [Unpublished.]Google Scholar
. 1894a. The Child’s Key to Reading. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
. 1894b. “[Letter in answer to query about how to annotate cheers in English texts; mark-scales used in schools]”. Le Maître Phonétique, mars 1894, p.56.Google Scholar
. 1894c. “Unstressed Words in English”. Le Maître Phonétique, octobre 1894, p.158.Google Scholar
. 1897. The Teacher’s Manual. Edited by Wilhelm Viëtor. London: S. Sonnenschein. (2nd ed., 1913.)Google Scholar
Spieser, Hans. 1904. Ein Klassenversuch mit der begrifflichen Methode im ersten Leseunterricht. Leipzig: K. G. T. Scheffer.Google Scholar
. 1912. “Das Begriffliche Lehrverfahren, insbesondere beim Lesenlehren”. Beilage zum Maître Phonétique, mai-juin 1912.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1877. Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1885. Elementarbuch des gesprochenen Englisch. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1886. “The Teaching of Phonetics”. Journal of Education, April 1886, 148–149.Google Scholar
. 1889. “On English Stress”. Le Maître Phonétique, février 1889, p.18.Google Scholar
. 1890a. A Primer of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1890b. A Primer of Spoken English. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1892. “Answer to Miss Soames”. Phonetische Studien 51.117–119.Google Scholar
Viëtor, Wilhelm. 1884. Elemente der Fonetik und Orthoepie des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Heilbronn: Gebr. Henninger. (2nd ed., 1887; 3rd ed., 1890; 4th ed., 1895, Leipzig: O. R. Reisland; 5th ed., 1904; 6th ed., 1914). [Title varies.]Google Scholar
. 1894. “Laura Soames†”. Die Neueren Sprachen 21.489–491.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

MacMahon, Michael K. C.
2007. The work of Richard John Lloyd (1846–1906) and “the crude system of doctrine which passes at present under the name of Phonetics”. Historiographia Linguistica 34:2-3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.