Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 22:1/2 (1995) ► pp.197–216

Daniel Jones, Paul Passy, and the development of the cardinal vowel system

| University of Leiden
| Copenhagen Business School
Developed in the first quarter of the present century, Daniel Jones’s (1881–1967) Cardinal Vowel theory has proved for many years to be the most popular and enduring model of vowel description. Only relatively recently have doubts about its shaky theoretical foundations – first expressed as early as 1928 by G. Oscar Russell – begun to impinge on the linguistic world. Paul Passy (1859–1940) emerges as the most significant direct influence on Jones, who modified Passy’s ideas and transformed them into a model for vowel description with notionally universal application. For some years, Jones appeared curiously reluctant to release full information about his scheme, probably because he was unable to obtain sufficient hard evidence in the form of radiological data to support his principle of equidistant articulatory steps between the Cardinal Vowels. Eventually, Jones was forced to retreat to a weaker version of his theory based on a combination of articulatory and auditory criteria.
Published online: 1 January 1995
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.22.1-2.08col
References (38)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael. 1989. “A Note on the Vowel Quadrilateral”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 19:2.81–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville. 1867. Visible Speech: The science of universal alphabetics. London: Simpkin Marshall.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew. 1982. “Cardinal Vowels and Other Problems”. Linguistic Controversies ed. by David Crystal, 50–72. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley. 1988. The Early Career of Daniel Jones. Unpubl. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Leiden.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Tilly, William”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by Ron E. Asher et al., vol. IX1, p. 4618. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dumville, Benjamin. 1904. Elements of French Pronunciation and Diction. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1844. Phonetics: A familiar exposition of that science. Bath: Pitman; London: Bagster.Google Scholar
Galazzi, Enrica. 1992. “1880–1914: Le combat des jeunes phonéticiens: Paul Passy”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 461.115–129.Google Scholar
Hellwag, Cristoph Friedrich. 1781. Dissertatio inauguralis physiologico medica de formatione loquelae. University of Tübingen. (Facs.-repr., with Dutch transl., Amsterdam: Instituut voor Fonetische wetenschappen, Univ. of Amsterdam, 1967.)Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1955. A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. 1993. “The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 1993)”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23:1. centrefold.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1909. The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. (3rd, rewritten, ed. 1950.)Google Scholar
. 1917a. An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
. 1917b. “Experimental Phonetics and Its Utility to the Linguist”. Nature 1001.96–98 (Republished 1919 in Proceedings of the Royal Institution 221.8–21. London.)Google Scholar
. 1918. An Outline of English Phonetics. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed. 1922; 3rd ed. 1932; 8th, rewritten, ed. 1956.)Google Scholar
. 1941. “Paul Passy”. Le Maître Phonétique (3) 191.30–39.Google Scholar
. 1956. Cardinal Vowels. London & New York: Linguaphone Institute.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel & Solomon T. Plaatje. 1916. A Sechuana Reader. London: Univ. of London Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen. 1929. “Radiography and Pronunciation”. British Journal of Radiology 21.149–150 (followed by two unnumbered pages of photographic plates). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. 1981. “Three Trends in Phonetics: The development of the discipline in Germany since the nineteenth century”. Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by R[onald] E. Asher & Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 161–178. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1967. Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1986. “The International Phonetic Association: The first 100 years”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16:1.30–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Ernst A.. 1910. “Untersuchungen über Lautbildung” in Festschrift Wilhelm Viëtor , 166–248. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Noël-Armfield, G. 1916. General Phonetics: For missionaries and students of languages. Cambridge: Heffer. (2nd ed. 1919.)Google Scholar
Passy, Paul. 1887. Les sons du français. Paris: Firmin-Didot. (5th ed., 1899; 6th ed., 1906.)Google Scholar
. 1888. “Kurze Darstellung des französischen Lautsystems”. Phonetische Studien 11.18–40; 115–130; 245–256.Google Scholar
. 1891. Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
. 1907. The Sounds of the French Language. Transl. by Douglas L. Savory & Daniel Jones of Les sons du français (6th ed., 1906 [1887]). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd rev. ed., 1913.)Google Scholar
Perera, H. S. & Daniel Jones 1919. A Colloquial Sinhalese Reader. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Raudnitzky, Hans. 1911. Die Bell-Sweet’sche Schule: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der englischen Phonetik. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Rausch, F. & Daniel Jones 1911. Sound Charts. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Russell, G. Oscar. 1928. The Vowel: Its physiological mechanism as shown by X-ray. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1877. A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 1908. The Sounds of English: An introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed., 1929.)Google Scholar
Trofimov, Michael V. & Daniel Jones. 1923. The Pronunciation of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Viëtor, Wilhelm. 1884. Elemente der Phonetik des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Heilbronn: Henninger. (4th ed., Leipzig: O. R. Reisland, 1898.)Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney. 1982. X-Ray and Model Studies of Vowel Articulation. (= Working Paper, 23.) Lund: Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Lund.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wood, Sidney
2023. Dating the open /æ/ sound change in Southern British English. JASA Express Letters 3:3 DOI logo
Collins, Beverley & Inger M. Mees
2012. Jones,Daniel. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Collins, B.S. & I.M. Mees
2006. Jones, Daniel (1881–1967). In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.