Daniel Jones, Paul Passy, and the development of the cardinal vowel system
Developed in the first quarter of the present century, Daniel Jones’s (1881–1967) Cardinal Vowel theory has proved for many years to be the most popular and enduring model of vowel description. Only relatively recently have doubts about its shaky theoretical foundations – first expressed as early as 1928 by G. Oscar Russell – begun to impinge on the linguistic world. Paul Passy (1859–1940) emerges as the most significant direct influence on Jones, who modified Passy’s ideas and transformed them into a model for vowel description with notionally universal application. For some years, Jones appeared curiously reluctant to release full information about his scheme, probably because he was unable to obtain sufficient hard evidence in the form of radiological data to support his principle of equidistant articulatory steps between the Cardinal Vowels. Eventually, Jones was forced to retreat to a weaker version of his theory based on a combination of articulatory and auditory criteria.
References
Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Ashby, Michael
1989 “
A Note on the Vowel Quadrilateral”.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 19:2.81–88.
Bell, Alexander Melville
1867 Visible Speech: The science of universal alphabetics. London: Simpkin Marshall.
Butcher, Andrew
1982 “
Cardinal Vowels and Other Problems”.
Linguistic Controversies ed. by
David Crystal, 50–72. London: Edward Arnold.
Collins, Beverley
1988 The Early Career of Daniel Jones. Unpubl. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Leiden.
Collins, Beverley
1994 “
Tilly, William”.
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by
Ron E. Asher et al., vol. IX1, p. 4618. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.
Dumville, Benjamin
1904 Elements of French Pronunciation and Diction. London: Dent.
Ellis, Alexander J.
1844 Phonetics: A familiar exposition of that science. Bath: Pitman; London: Bagster.
Galazzi, Enrica
1992 “
1880–1914: Le combat des jeunes phonéticiens: Paul Passy”.
Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 461.115–129.
Hellwag, Cristoph Friedrich
1781 Dissertatio inauguralis physiologico medica de formatione loquelae. University of Tübingen. (Facs.-repr., with Dutch transl., Amsterdam: Instituut voor Fonetische wetenschappen, Univ. of Amsterdam 1967.)
Hockett, Charles F.
1955 A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.
International Phonetic Association
1993 “
The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 1993)”.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23:1. centrefold.
Jones, Daniel
1909 The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. (3rd, rewritten, ed. 1950.)
Jones, Daniel
1917a An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.
Jones, Daniel
1917b “
Experimental Phonetics and Its Utility to the Linguist”.
Nature 1001.96–98 (Republished 1919 in
Proceedings of the Royal Institution 221.8–21. London.)
Jones, Daniel
1918 An Outline of English Phonetics. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed. 1922; 3rd ed. 1932; 8th, rewritten, ed. 1956.)
Jones, Daniel
1941 “
Paul Passy”.
Le Maître Phonétique (3) 191.30–39.
Jones, Daniel
1956 Cardinal Vowels. London & New York: Linguaphone Institute.
Jones, Daniel & Solomon T. Plaatje
1916 A Sechuana Reader. London: Univ. of London Press.
Jones, Stephen
1929 “
Radiography and Pronunciation”.
British Journal of Radiology 21.149–150 (followed by two unnumbered pages of photographic plates).
Kohler, Klaus
1981 “
Three Trends in Phonetics: The development of the discipline in Germany since the nineteenth century”.
Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by
R[onald] E. Asher &
Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 161–178. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Ladefoged, Peter
1967 Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
MacMahon, Michael K. C.
1986 “
The International Phonetic Association: The first 100 years”.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16:1.30–38.
Meyer, Ernst A.
1910 “
Untersuchungen über Lautbildung” in Festschrift Wilhelm Viëtor
, 166–248. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.
Noël-Armfield, G.
1916 General Phonetics: For missionaries and students of languages. Cambridge: Heffer. (2nd ed. 1919.)
Passy, Paul
1887 Les sons du français. Paris: Firmin-Didot. (5th ed. 1899; 6th ed. 1906.)
Passy, Paul
1888 “
Kurze Darstellung des französischen Lautsystems”.
Phonetische Studien 11.18–40; 115–130; 245–256.
Passy, Paul
1891 Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.
Passy, Paul
1907 The Sounds of the French Language. Transl. by
Douglas L. Savory &
Daniel Jones of
Les sons du français (6th ed. 1906 [1887]) Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd rev. ed. 1913.)
Perera, H. S. & Daniel Jones
1919 A Colloquial Sinhalese Reader. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
Raudnitzky, Hans
1911 Die Bell-Sweet’sche Schule: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der englischen Phonetik. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.
Rausch, F. & Daniel Jones
1911 Sound Charts. London: Dent.
Russell, G. Oscar
1928 The Vowel: Its physiological mechanism as shown by X-ray. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ. Press.
Sweet, Henry
1877 A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sweet, Henry
1908 The Sounds of English: An introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed. 1929.)
Trofimov, Michael V. & Daniel Jones
1923 The Pronunciation of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Viëtor, Wilhelm
1884 Elemente der Phonetik des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Heilbronn: Henninger. (4th ed., Leipzig: O. R. Reisland 1898.)
Wood, Sidney
1982 X-Ray and Model Studies of Vowel Articulation. (=
Working Paper, 23.) Lund: Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Lund.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Collins, B.S. & I.M. Mees
2006.
Jones, Daniel (1881–1967). In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 131 ff.
Collins, Beverley & Inger M. Mees
2012.
J
ones,
D
aniel
. In
The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Wood, Sidney
2023.
Dating the open /æ/ sound change in Southern British English.
JASA Express Letters 3:3
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.