Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 22:1/2 (1995) ► pp. 197–216

Daniel Jones, Paul Passy, and the development of the cardinal vowel system

| University of Leiden
| Copenhagen Business School
Developed in the first quarter of the present century, Daniel Jones’s (1881–1967) Cardinal Vowel theory has proved for many years to be the most popular and enduring model of vowel description. Only relatively recently have doubts about its shaky theoretical foundations – first expressed as early as 1928 by G. Oscar Russell – begun to impinge on the linguistic world. Paul Passy (1859–1940) emerges as the most significant direct influence on Jones, who modified Passy’s ideas and transformed them into a model for vowel description with notionally universal application. For some years, Jones appeared curiously reluctant to release full information about his scheme, probably because he was unable to obtain sufficient hard evidence in the form of radiological data to support his principle of equidistant articulatory steps between the Cardinal Vowels. Eventually, Jones was forced to retreat to a weaker version of his theory based on a combination of articulatory and auditory criteria.
Published online: 01 January 1995
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.22.1-2.08col
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Collins, B.S. & I.M. Mees
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Collins, Beverley & Inger M. Mees
2012.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael
1989 “A Note on the Vowel Quadrilateral”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 19:2.81–88.Google Scholar
Bell, Alexander Melville
1867 Visible Speech: The science of universal alphabetics. London: Simpkin Marshall.Google Scholar
Butcher, Andrew
1982 “Cardinal Vowels and Other Problems”. Linguistic Controversies ed. by David Crystal, 50–72. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Collins, Beverley
1988 The Early Career of Daniel Jones. Unpubl. Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Leiden.Google Scholar
1994 “Tilly, William”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics ed. by Ron E. Asher et al., vol. IX, p. 4618. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dumville, Benjamin
1904 Elements of French Pronunciation and Diction. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J.
1844 Phonetics: A familiar exposition of that science. Bath: Pitman; London: Bagster.Google Scholar
Galazzi, Enrica
1992 “1880–1914: Le combat des jeunes phonéticiens: Paul Passy”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 46.115–129.Google Scholar
Hellwag, Cristoph Friedrich
1781 Dissertatio inauguralis physiologico medica de formatione loquelae. University of Tübingen. (Facs.-repr., with Dutch transl., Amsterdam: Instituut voor Fonetische wetenschappen, Univ. of Amsterdam 1967.)Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1955 A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association
1993 “The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 1993)”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23:1. centrefold.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel
1909 The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. (3rd, rewritten, ed. 1950.)Google Scholar
1917a An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
1917b “Experimental Phonetics and Its Utility to the Linguist”. Nature 100.96–98 (Republished 1919 in Proceedings of the Royal Institution 22.8–21. London.)Google Scholar
1918 An Outline of English Phonetics. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed. 1922; 3rd ed. 1932; 8th, rewritten, ed. 1956.)Google Scholar
1941 “Paul Passy”. Le Maître Phonétique (3) 19.30–39.Google Scholar
1956 Cardinal Vowels. London & New York: Linguaphone Institute.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel & Solomon T. Plaatje
1916 A Sechuana Reader. London: Univ. of London Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen
1929 “Radiography and Pronunciation”. British Journal of Radiology 2.149–150 (followed by two unnumbered pages of photographic plates).Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus
1981 “Three Trends in Phonetics: The development of the discipline in Germany since the nineteenth century”. Towards a History of Phonetics ed. by R[onald] E. Asher & Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 161–178. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1967 Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C.
1986 “The International Phonetic Association: The first 100 years”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16:1.30–38.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ernst A.
1910 “Untersuchungen über Lautbildung” in Festschrift Wilhelm Viëtor , 166–248. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Noël-Armfield, G.
1916 General Phonetics: For missionaries and students of languages. Cambridge: Heffer. (2nd ed. 1919.)Google Scholar
Passy, Paul
1887 Les sons du français. Paris: Firmin-Didot. (5th ed. 1899; 6th ed. 1906.)Google Scholar
1888 “Kurze Darstellung des französischen Lautsystems”. Phonetische Studien 1.18–40; 115–130; 245–256.Google Scholar
1891 Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
1907 The Sounds of the French Language. Transl. by Douglas L. Savory & Daniel Jones of Les sons du français (6th ed. 1906 [1887]) Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd rev. ed. 1913.)Google Scholar
Perera, H. S. & Daniel Jones
1919 A Colloquial Sinhalese Reader. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Raudnitzky, Hans
1911 Die Bell-Sweet’sche Schule: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der englischen Phonetik. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Rausch, F. & Daniel Jones
1911 Sound Charts. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Russell, G. Oscar
1928 The Vowel: Its physiological mechanism as shown by X-ray. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1877 A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1908 The Sounds of English: An introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed. 1929.)Google Scholar
Trofimov, Michael V. & Daniel Jones
1923 The Pronunciation of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Viëtor, Wilhelm
1884 Elemente der Phonetik des Deutschen, Englischen und Französischen. Heilbronn: Henninger. (4th ed., Leipzig: O. R. Reisland 1898.)Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney
1982 X-Ray and Model Studies of Vowel Articulation. (= Working Paper, 23.) Lund: Department of Linguistics, Univ. of Lund.Google Scholar