Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 24:3 (1997) ► pp.235–266

Notes on the beginnings of systematic dialect description and comparison in Chinese

| University of Washington
When 19th-century Westerners first began applying modern methods to Chinese linguistics, they were heavily influenced by Chinese phonological traditions. This influence is apparent in a number of their methodological decisions. For instance, they do not seem to have resolved their difficulties distinguishing plain from aspirated obstruents until they copied Chinese sources. Their work in comparative dialectology was almost always dominated by the Chinese rime-table tradition. Even the systems of universal orthography they developed for Chinese incorporated traditional Chinese tonal symbols. Yet these Western sinologists seem to have made little attempt to communicate their own work to Chinese scholars in a formal way; though they were influenced by Chinese ideas, they published their work in the main for other Westerners, with the result that their new synthesis did not directly influence native Chinese linguistics.
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.24.3.02bra
References (118)
References
Âng Uî-jîn 洪惟仁. 1990. “Jangjou Sanjoong Shyrwuu In jy Yuanliou jyi Chyi Inshih 漳州三種十五音之源流及其音系 [The origins of three Shyrwuu In books and their phonological systems]”. Tair’uan Fengwuh 臺灣風物 40:3.55–79.Google Scholar
. 1991. “May Dusy Fwujiann Fangyan Tzyhdean.de Jiahjyr 麥都思「福建方言字典」的價值 [The Value of Medhurst’s Dictionary of the Hok-Këèn Dialect ]”. Tair’uan Wenshiann 臺灣文獻 42:2.95–115.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Sheauchuan Shanqyih yeu Gau Beenhann Hannyeu Yeuin Yanjiow jy Biijiaw 小川尚義與高本瀵語語音研究之比較 [Original English title: A Comparison of Research on Chinese Phonology by Ogawa and Karlgren]”. Taiwan Historical Research [Tairuan Shyy Yanjiow 台灣史研究 I:2.25–84.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Caleb Cook (d. after 1905). 1871. A Manual of the Foochow Dialect. Foochow: Methodist Episcopal Mission Press.Google Scholar
Barrow, Sir John. 1806[1804]. Travels in China. London: T. Cadell & W. Davies.Google Scholar
. 1806. A Voyage to Cochinchina in the Years 1792 and 1793. London: T. Cadell & W. Davies. (Repr. as A Voyage to Cochinchina, introduction by Milton Osborne. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford Univ. Press, 1975.)Google Scholar
Borealis. 1874. Letter, dated 29 Sept. 1874. Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal 5:5.292–294 (Sept./Oct. 1874).Google Scholar
. 1875. Letter, dated May 27th, 1875. Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal 6:3.226–228 (May/Jun. 1875). [Reply to Douglas (1875)]Google Scholar
Bridgman, Elijah Coleman. 1841. A Chinese Chrestomathy in the Canton Dialect. Macao. [Samuel Wells Williams’ son lists his father as coauthor (F. Williams. 1889:244n); Cordier. (1878:774) says, “… Mr. Williams a non-seulement imprimé l’ouvrage, mais il en a écrit à peu près la moitié”.]Google Scholar
Brown, Nathan. 1836[1835]. “Proposal for Forming a Comparative Vocabulary of All the Indo-Chinese Languages”. Calcutta Christian Observer 5:10.n.p. (Repr., with additional material, as “‘Proposal for Forming a Comparative Vocabulary of All the Indo-Chinese Languages,’ Together With a Plan of the Vocabulary”. Chinese Repository 5:6(1836), Article v1.71–76.)Google Scholar
. 1837. “Comparison of Indo-Chinese Languages”. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 6:12.1023–1038.Google Scholar
Callery [Calleri], Joseph Marie. (1810–1862). 1841. Systema Phoneticum Scripturae Sinicae. Macao: no pub.Google Scholar
Chalmers, John. 1873/74. “Kanghi’s Dictionaries”. China Review 21.335–341.Google Scholar
. 1875. Kangshi Tzyhdean Tsuoyaw Tzoonginbeau 康字典磋要總音表 [Tables of selected sounds, or spelling tables to Kanghi’s Dictionary]. [Unseen. Compare 1878. There is a two-page extract inserted in Edkins (1880: between 216–217). See the unsigned review in China Review 4.325.]Google Scholar
. 1875/81. “The Rhymes of the Shi-King”. China Review 61.75–82, 61.166–167 (1875/76); 91.136–161, 297–301 (1880/81). [Also printed together as a pamphlet at Hong Kong: The China Review, 1877.]Google Scholar
. 1876/77. “Chinese Etymology”. China Review 51.296–303.Google Scholar
. 1878. Kangshi Tzyhdean Tsuoyaw 康字典撮要. Canton: London Presbyterian Church. [Unseen. Compare 1875b.]Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1930. “A System of Tone Letters”. Le Maître Phonétique 451.24–27.Google Scholar
. 1961. “What Is Correct Chinese?”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 81:3.171–177. (Repr. in Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics, selected and introd. by Anwar S. Dil, 72–83. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press, 1976.)Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1835. “An Alphabetic Language for the Chinese”. Chinese Rèpository 4:4, Article III1.167–176. [Unsigned, probably by E. C. Bridgman or S. W. Williams. Pp. 172–176 consist of an essay attributed by the index of the journal to Samuel Dyer.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1836a. “System of Orthography for Chinese Words”. Ibid 5:1, Article III1.22–30. [Unsigned, probably by Bridgman or Williams.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1836b. “Mode of Teaching the Chinese Language”. Ibid. 5:6, Article III1.61–65. [Unsigned but evidently written by the author of Chinese Repository 1835, probably Bridgman or Williams.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1836c. “Remarks and Suggestions Respecting the ‘System of Orthography for Chinese Words,’ Publ. in the Repository for May, 1836”. Ibid. 5:6, Article IV1.65–70. [Unsigned: prob. by Bridgman or Williams.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1838. “On a System of Orthography for the Chinese Language”. Ibid. 6:10, Article IV1.479–486. [Unsigned but evidently written by the author of Chinese Repository 1836a, probably Bridgman or Williams.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1842. “New Orthography Adopted for Representing the Sounds of Chinese Characters, by the Roman Alphabet, in the National Language and the Dialects of Canton and Fukien”. Ibid. 11:1, Article II1.28–44. [Unsigned but probably by Williams or perhaps Bridgman; contains material very similar to S. Williams 1844.]Google Scholar
Chinese Repository. 1843. “The Chinese Spoken Language”. Ibid. 12:11, Article II1.582–604. [Unsigned, probably by S. Wells Williams.]Google Scholar
Chyan Dahshin 錢大昕 (1728–1804). [No date] 1. “Guu Wu Chingchwenin 古無輕脣音 [There were no labiodental initials in ancient times]”. Yang 1933:1–20.Google Scholar
. [No date] 2. “Sherin Leyger Jy Shuo Bukeeshinn 舌音類格之説不可信 [The claim that lingual initials were of different types is dubious]”. Yang 1933:21–32.Google Scholar
Cordier, Henri. 1878–95. Bibliotheca Sinica: Dictionnaire bibliographique des ouvrages relatifs à l’empire chinois. Paris: Libraire de la Société Asiatique de Paris. Vol. I1: 1878; II1: 1885; Suppl.: 1895.Google Scholar
Dean, William. 1841. First Lessons in the Tiechew Dialect. Bangkok: no pub.Google Scholar
Don, A[lexander?]. 1882/83. “The Llin-nen (新寧) Dialect”. China Review 111.236–247.Google Scholar
Doty, Elihu. 1853. Anglo-Chinese Manual with Romanized Colloquial in the Amoy Dialect. Canton: no pub.Google Scholar
Douglas, Carstairs. 1873. Chinese-English Dictionary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Amoy, with the Principal Variations of the Chang-Chew and Chin-Chew Dialects. London: Trübner & Co. (New ed., London: Publishing Office of the Presbyterian Church of England, 1899; many repr.)Google Scholar
. 1875. “Boreal Spelling”. Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal 6:2.150–151 (Mar./Apr. 1875). [Reply to Borealis (1874).]Google Scholar
Duffus, William. 1883. English-Chinese Vocabulary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Swatow. Swatow: English Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Edkins, Joseph. 1853. A Grammar of Colloquial Chinese, as Exhibited in the Shanghai Dialect. Shanghai: London Mission Press. (Repr., Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press, 1868.)Google Scholar
. 1857. A Grammar of the Chinese Colloquial Language Commonly Called the Mandarin Dialect. Shanghai, London Mission Press. (2nd ed., Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press, 1864.)Google Scholar
. 1869. A Vocabulary of the Shanghai Dialect. Shanghai: Presbyterian Misson Press.Google Scholar
. 1874. “Old Sounds of the Chinese Characters”. Section V of the Introduction to Williams 1874:xxviii–xxxi.Google Scholar
. 1878/79. “On the Syllabic Spelling”. China Review 81.73–74.Google Scholar
. 1880. “Influence of Chinese Dialects on the Japanese Pronunciation of the Chinese Part of the Japanese Language”. Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan 81.478–482.Google Scholar
Elman, Benjamin A. 1984. From Philosophy to Philology, intellectual and social aspects of change in late imperial China. Harvard East Asian Monographs, #1101. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard Univ.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenyunn. Jianghwu Chyydwu Fenyunn Tsuoyaw Herjyi 江湖尺牘分韻撮要合集 [Collation of “Essential (Characters) Arranged by Rime” and “Letter-Writing on the Road”]. Collation of two rimebooks, influential in Canton, by “Wú Hioh-pú of Yu-shán” and “Wan K’í-shih of Wú-k’í”. Preface dated 1782. [Unseen: cited in S. Williams 1856:xi1.]Google Scholar
Forke, Alfred. 1894/95. “A Comparative Study of Northern Chinese Dialects”. China Review 211.181–203.Google Scholar
. 1903. Über einige südchinesische Dialekte und ihr Verhältniss zum Pekinesischen. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
de Francis, John. 1948. “A Missionary Contribution to Chinese Nationalism”. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 731.1–34.Google Scholar
. 1950. Nationalism and Language Reform in China. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Gibson, John Campbell. 1886. A Swatow Index to the Syllabic Dictionary of Chinese by S. Wells Williams, LL.D. and to the Dictionary of the Vernacular of Amoy by Carstairs Douglas, M.A., LL.D. Swatow: English Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Sir Herbert Allen. 1877. Handbook of the Swatow Dialect with a Vocabulary. Shanghai: no pub.Google Scholar
. 1892. A Chinese-English Dictionary. London: B. Quaritch; Shanghai-Hongkong-Yokohama-Singapore: Kelly & Walsh.Google Scholar
Goangyunn 廣韻. 1008. Published under Imperial auspices.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Joaquim Affonso. 1833. Diccionario Portuguez-China, no estilo vulgar mandarim e classico geral. Macao: Real Collegio de S. José.Google Scholar
de Guignes, Chrêtien Louis Joseph. 1853. Dictionarium Sinico-Latinum. Hong-Kong: Typis missionis de propaganda fide.Google Scholar
Gulick, John. 1870. “On the Best Method of Representing the Unaspirated Mutes of the Mandarin Dialect”. Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal 3:6.153–155 (Nov. 1870).Google Scholar
Imperial Dictionary. 1716. Kangshi Tzyhdean 康熙字典. Compiled under Imperial auspices. Many editions and reprints.Google Scholar
Ingle, James Addison. 1899. Hankow Syllabary. With references to Giles’ Dictionary. [Hankow?]: Printed by Kung Hing.Google Scholar
Jones, Sir William. 1788. “A Dissertation on the Orthography of Asiatick Words in Roman Letters”. Asiatick Researches 11.1–56. (Repr. in The Works of Sir William Jones, III1.235–318. London: Printed for John Stockdale, Piccadilly; and John Walker, Paternoster-Row, 1807.)Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1915–24. Études sur la phonologie chinoise. Uppsala: K. W. Appleberg. [In four parts: Archives D’Etudes Orientales No. 121 (1915); 131 (1916); 191 (1919); 241 (1924).]Google Scholar
Kingsmill, Thomas W. 1877/78. “Grimm’s Laws in Chinese”. China Review 61.342–344.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius. 1823. Asia polyglotta. Paris: A. Schubart.Google Scholar
Kühnert, Franz. 1890. “Zur Kenntniss der älteren Lautwerthe des Chinesischen”. Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Historischen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vol. 122, part 9. Vienna: K. K. Hofund Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
LaTourette, Kenneth Scott. 1929. A History of Christian Missions in China. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. (Repr., Taipei: Ch’engwen, no year.)Google Scholar
Lechler, Rudolf. 1866. “Table of Sounds in the Hakka Dialect”. Appears in Lobscheid 1866–69, Part I1, Introduction, 28–29.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Carl Richard. 1863. Standard Alphabet for Reducing Unwritten Languages and Foreign Graphic Systems to a Uniform orthography in European Letters. 2nd ed. London & Berlin. (Repr., with a new introd. by J. Alan Kemp. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1981.)Google Scholar
Leyden, John. 1808. “On the Languages and Literatures of the Indo-Chinese Nations”. Asiatick Researches 101.158–289.Google Scholar
Lobscheid, Wilhelm. 1866–69. English and Chinese Dictionary: With the Punti and Mandarin Pronunciation. Hongkong: Daily Press Office. [4 parts: I1 (1866); II1 (1867); III1 (1868); IV1 (1869).]Google Scholar
. 1871. A Chinese and English Dictionary. Hong Kong: Noronha & Sons.Google Scholar
Lockhart, James Haldane Stewart. 1881/82. “Canton Syllabary”. China Review 101.312–326.Google Scholar
MacGowan, John. 1877. English and Chinese Dictionary of the Amoy Dialect. Amoy: A. A. Marcal.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, John Lester. 1879/80. “Korean Pronunciation of Chinese”. China Review 71.34–38.Google Scholar
MacIver, Donald. 1905. A Chinese-English Dictionary: Hakka-Dialect, as Spoken in Kwang-tung Province. [This edition not seen.] (New edition, revised by M. C. MacKenzie. Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press, 1926.)Google Scholar
Maclay, Robert Samuel & Caleb C. Baldwin. 1870. An Alphabetic Dictionary of the Chinese Language in the Foochow Dialect. Foochow: Methodist Episcopal Mission Press.Google Scholar
Marshman, Joshua. 1809. Dissertation on the Characters and Sounds of the Chinese Language; Including tables of the elementary characters, and of the Chinese monosyllables. Serampore: no pub.Google Scholar
. 1814. Elements of Chinese Grammar, with a Preliminary Dissertation on the Characters, and the Colloquial Medium of the Chinese, and an Appendix Containing the Ta-Hyoh of Confucius with a translation. Serampore: Mission Press.Google Scholar
Medhurst, Walter Henry. 1832–37. A Dictionary of the Hok-Kёèn Dialect of the Chinese Language, according to the reading and colloquial idioms. Batavia & Macao: The Honorable East India Company. 11 vol.Google Scholar
. 1842a. Chinese and English Dictionary. 21 vols. Batavia: Palapaitan.Google Scholar
. 1842b. Notices on Chinese Grammar. Book I1: Orthography and Etymology. Batavia: The Mission Press. [Written under the pseudonym Philo-Sinensis. This is the identification penciled on the title page of the copy at Columbia Univ. by a librarian; it may be erroneous.]Google Scholar
Morrison, Robert. 1815–23. Dictionary of the Chinese Language. 61 vols. Macao: The Honorable East India Company’s Press. [Part I, Vol I1: 1815; Part I, Vol II1: 1822; Part I, Vol III1: 1823; Part II, Vol I1: 1819; Part II, Vol II1: 1820; Part III, English and Chinese: 1822. (Part II repr., 21 vols. Shanghai: London Mission Press, and London: Trübner & Co., 1865).]Google Scholar
. 1828. Vocabulary of the Canton Dialect. Macao: The Honorable East India Company’s Press. [Published in three parts, bound together with no pagination: Part I, “English and Chinese”; Part II “Chinese and English”; Part III “Chinese Words and Phrases”.]Google Scholar
Morrison, William T. 1876. An Anglo-Chinese Vocabulary of the Ningpo Dialect. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry L. & W. South Coblin. 1995. “A New Approach to Chinese Historical Linguistics”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 115:4.576–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, Edward Harper. 1874/75. “The Hankow Dialect”. China Review 31.308–312.Google Scholar
. 1877/78. “The Concise Dictionary of Chinese”. Ibid. 61.386–394.Google Scholar
. 1878. “The Comparative Study of Chinese Dialects”. Journal of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, n.s., 121.19–50.Google Scholar
. 1879/80a. “Syllabary of the Hakka Language or Dialect”. China Review 81.205–217.Google Scholar
. 1879/80b. “Canton Syllabary”. China Review 81.363–382.Google Scholar
. 1880/81a. “Foochow Syllabary”. China Review 91.63–82.Google Scholar
. 1880/81b. “Characterless Chinese Words”. China Review 91.85–88.Google Scholar
. 1882/83. “The Dialect of Eastern Sz Ch’uan”. Ibid. 91.112–120.Google Scholar
. 1883. “K’ang-hi’s System of Initials Compared with the Sanskrit Consonants”. 3 parts: Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal 14:4.325–328 (Jul./Aug. 1883); 14:5.414–417 (Sept./Oct. 1883); 14:6.476–478 (Nov./ Dec. 1883).Google Scholar
. 1887. “The ‘Yellow’ Languages”. Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan 151.13–49.Google Scholar
. 1892. “Philological Essay”. Giles 1892: xiv–xlvi.Google Scholar
. 1894/95a. “Reply to Dr. Edkins”. China Review 211.276.Google Scholar
. 1894/95b. “Notes by Mr. E. H. Parker”. China Review 211.415–416.Google Scholar
Peywen yunnfuu 佩文韻府 1711. Prepared under Imperial auspices.Google Scholar
Piton, Charles Ph. 1879/80. “Remarks on the Syllabary of the Hakka Dialect by Mr. E. H. Parker”. China Review 81.316–318.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. “European Studies on Chinese Phonology: the First Phase”. Europe Studies China ed. by Ming Wilson & John Cayley, 339–367. London: Han-Shan Tang Books, The Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange.Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus Kristian. 1818. Undersögelse om det Gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. (Translated as Investigation of the Origin of the Old Norse or Icelandic Language by Niels Ege, Copenhagen: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen, 1993.)Google Scholar
Rémusat, Jean Pierre Abel. 1822. Elémens de la Grammaire Chinoise, ou principes généraux de kou-wen ou style antique, et du kouan-hoa, c’est-àdire, de la langue commune généralement usitée dans l’empire chinois. Paris: Imprimerie Royale. (Repr., Paris: Maisonneuve et Cie, 1857.) [Preface dated 1820.]Google Scholar
Ride, Lindsay. 1957. Robert Morrison: The scholar and the man. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schaank, Simon Hartwich. 1897. Het Loeh-Foeng-Dialect. Leiden, E. J. Brill. (English transl. by Bennett M. Lindauer as The Lu-Feng Dialect of Hakka. Tokyo: Inst. for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, 1979.)Google Scholar
. 1897–1902. “Ancient Chinese Phonetics”. T’oung Pao 8.361–377, 8.457–486 (1897); 9.28–57 (1898), and “Supplementary Note”, T’oung Pao Ser. 2:3.106–108 (1902).Google Scholar
Shyrwuu In. Hueyjyi Yeaswu Tong Shyrwuu In 彙集雅俗通十五音 [Fifteen initials, in accordance with which the learned and vulgar are gathered and arranged]. 1818. [No publication information. Attributed to one Shieh Shiowlan 謝秀嵐, otherwise unknown.]Google Scholar
Soothill, William E. 1899. The Student’s Four Thousand 字 and General Pocket Dictionary. Shanghai: Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Summers, James. 1853. The Gospel of Saint John in the Chinese Language, According to the Dialect of Shanghai, Espressed in the Roman Alphabetic Character. [No publication information.]Google Scholar
. 1863. “On the Application of the Roman Alphabet to the Languages and Various Spoken Dialects of China and Japan”. The Chinese and Japanese Repository 1:3, Article III1.112–124.Google Scholar
Tzyhhuey 字彙. 1615? Attributed to Mei Ingtzuoh 梅膺祚 (fl.1570–1615).Google Scholar
Varo, Francisco. 1703. Arte de la Lengua Mandarin. Canton: [no publisher given]. [Unseen. Translation by W. South Coblin & Joseph A. Levi, Grammar of the Mandarin Language; with an introductory essay by Sandra Azmayesh-Fard, in progress.]Google Scholar
Volpicelli, Zenone. 1896. Chinese Phonology, an attempt to discover the sounds of the ancient language and to recover the lost rhymes of China. Shanghai: The China Gazette.Google Scholar
. 1898. “Prononciation Ancienne du Chinois”. Actes du onzième Congrès international des orientalistes, 2e section, Langues et archeologie de l’extrême-Orient, 115–190. Paris: E. Leroux. [This article seems to be unknown to the scholarly community today.]Google Scholar
Wade, Sir Thomas Francis. 1859. The Hsin Ching Lu, or, Book of Experiments; being the first of a series of contributions to the study of Chinese. Hong Kong: The Office of the “China Mail”.Google Scholar
Williams, Frederick Wells. 1889. The Life and Letters of Samuel Wells Williams, LL.D. – Missionary, diplomatist, sinologue. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons & London: The Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Samuel Wells. 1844. An English and Chinese Vocabulary, in the Court Dialect. Macao: The Chinese Repository.Google Scholar
. 1856. A Tonic Dictionary of the Chinese Language in the Canton Dialect. Canton: The Chinese Repository.Google Scholar
. 1874. A Syllabic Dictionary of the Chinese Language. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alexander. 1867. Memorials of Protestant Missionaries to the Chinese: giving a list of their publications, and obituary notices of the deceased. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Yang Shuhdar 楊樹達. 1933. Guu Shengyunn Taoluenn Jyi 古聲韻討論集 [Discussions on ancient phonology]. Peiping: no pub. given. (Repr., Taipei: Taiwan Student Book Co., 1965.)Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Gianninoto, Mariarosaria
2021. L’apprentissage du chinois langue étrangère (CLE) par des publics spécialisés entre le XVIIe et le XIXe siècle. Documents pour l'histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde :66-67 DOI logo
Gianninoto, Mariarosaria
2022. A Chinese textbook of Manchu and its Western translations. Language & History 65:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Gianninoto, Mariarosaria
2023. Chapter 9. Describing and learning the Chinese languages. In Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 20], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Tam, Gina Anne
2020. Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860–1960, DOI logo
ORLANDI, GIORGIO
2019. Joseph Edkins and the “Discovery” of Early Chinese: the linguistic ideas behind the first (partial) reconstruction of the sound system of Early Chinese. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 29:3 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Paternicò, Luisa M.
2019. Shaping Cantonese Grammar – Early Western Contribution. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 41:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Bolton, K. & A.S.L. Lam
2006. Applied Linguistics in China. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. A Chinese Language. In Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860–1960, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.