Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 26:3 (1999) ► pp. 343353
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959Review of Skinner (1957). Language 351.26–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1961 “Some Methodological Remarks on Generative Grammar”. Word 171.219–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
1979Language and Responsibility. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1965 “Some Controversial Questions in Phonological Theory”. Journal of Linguistics 11.97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Julia. S.
1998Review of Murray (1994). Language Sciences 201.441–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A.
1961 “Grammaticality”. Word 171.1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin
1967 “Bernard Bloch”. Language 431.3–19.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1983 “The ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ and Its Historiography”. Language & Communication 31.147–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1957Review of Chomsky (1957). Language 331.375–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André
1994 “Early History of Word, 1–25”. Word 451.27–31.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and ‘the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 Review of Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter-century of transformational generative grammar by Frederick J. Newmeyer (New York: Academic Press 1980) Historiographia Linguistica 81.107–112.Google Scholar
1986 “The Chomskian Revolution: An outsider perspective”. Submitted to Language 7 May 1986 [A fraction was included in the the “The Editor’s Department” at the end of the Dec. 1986 (62:4) issue, pp.966–967.]Google Scholar
1989 “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 161.149–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Theory Groups in the Study of Language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “A 1978 Interview with Mary Haas”. Anthropological Linguistics 391.695–713.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986 “Was There a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 621.1–18. (Repr. in Newmeyer, Generative Linguistics: A historical perspective, 23–38. London & New York: Routledge 1996.)Google Scholar
Rieger, Kliezer
1953Modern Hebrew. New York: University of Jerusalem Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B[urrhus] F[rederic]
1957Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Joseph, John E.
1999.  Chomsky no Brasil / Chomsky in Brazil (edição bilíngüe). Revista de Docu-mentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada (D.E.L.T.A.) . Historiographia Linguistica 26:3  pp. 421 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5  pp. 507 ff. Crossref logo
Koerner, E.F.K
2003. Remarks on the origins of morphophonemics in American structuralist linguistics. Language & Communication 23:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Noordegraaf, Jan
2001. On the publication date of Syntactic Structures . Historiographia Linguistica 28:1-2  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.