Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 26:3 (1999) ► pp. 343353
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Joseph, John E.
1999.  Chomsky no Brasil / Chomsky in Brazil (edição bilíngüe). Revista de Docu-mentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada (D.E.L.T.A.) . Historiographia Linguistica 26:3  pp. 421 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5  pp. 507 ff. Crossref logo
Koerner, E.F.K
2003. Remarks on the origins of morphophonemics in American structuralist linguistics. Language & Communication 23:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Noordegraaf, Jan
2001. On the publication date of Syntactic Structures . Historiographia Linguistica 28:1-2  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1959Review of Skinner (1957). Language 35.26–58.Google Scholar
1961 “Some Methodological Remarks on Generative Grammar”. Word 17.219–239.Google Scholar
1975The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
1979Language and Responsibility. New York: PantheonGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1965 “Some Controversial Questions in Phonological Theory”. Journal of Linguistics 1.97–138.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia. S.
1998Review of Murray (1994). Language Sciences 20.441–446.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A.
1961 “Grammaticality”. Word 17.1–10.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin
1967 “Bernard Bloch”. Language 43.3–19.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1983 “The ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ and Its Historiography”. Language & Communication 3.147–169.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B.
1957Review of Chomsky (1957). Language 33.375–408.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1994 “Early History of Word, 1–25”. Word 45.27–31.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and ‘the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16.73–88.Google Scholar
1981 Review of Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter-century of transformational generative grammar by Frederick J. Newmeyer (New York: Academic Press 1980) Historiographia Linguistica 8.107–112.Google Scholar
1986 “The Chomskian Revolution: An outsider perspective”. Submitted to Language 7 May 1986 [A fraction was included in the the “The Editor’s Department” at the end of the Dec. 1986 (62:4) issue, pp.966–967.]Google Scholar
1989 “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 16.149–171.Google Scholar
1994Theory Groups in the Study of Language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1997 “A 1978 Interview with Mary Haas”. Anthropological Linguistics 39.695–713.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986 “Was There a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 62.1–18. (Repr. in Newmeyer, Generative Linguistics: A historical perspective, 23–38. London & New York: Routledge 1996.)Google Scholar
Rieger, Kliezer
1953Modern Hebrew. New York: University of Jerusalem Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B[urrhus] F[rederic]
1957Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar