Article published In:
Historiographia LinguisticaVol. 27:1 (2000) ► pp.21–36
Robert Dodsley and the Genesis of Lowth’s
Short introduction to english grammar
On the basis of an analysis of the correspondence of the 18h-century London bookseller Robert Dodsley (1703–1764), a proposal is offered concerning the origin of Robert Lowth’s (1710–1787) Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762). The author presents arguments which suggest that Lowth’s grammar was not his own idea but that of Dodsley, who also invoked the assistance of another author whose work he published, William Melmoth (1710–1799). If this thesis holds, Lowth’s grammar is just as much the outcome of a ‘bookseller’s project’, as Dr Johnson’s Dictionary (1755), the idea for which, according to Johnson’s biographer Boswell, also came from Dodsley.
References (29)
Alston, Robin C. 1965. A Bbliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I: English Grammars Written in English. Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son.
Battestin, Martin C. & Clive T. Probyn, eds. 1993. The Correspondence of Henry and Sarah Fielding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 1993[1951]. A History of the English Language. 4th ed. London: Routledge. 
Boswell, James. 1970[1953]. Life of Johnson. Ed. by Robert William Chapman, 3rd rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DNB = The Compact Edition of the Dictionary of National Biography. 21 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Hepworth, Brian. 1978. Robert Lowth. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Ilson, Robert. 1985. “Usage Problems in British and American English”. The English Language Today ed. by Sidney Greenbaum, 166–182. Oxford & New York: Pergamon.
Leonard, Sterling A. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700–1800. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes […]. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and for R. & J. Dodsley. (Facs.-repr. from Lowth’s own copy, with a notice by Robin C. Alston, Menston: The Scolar Press, 1968.)
. 1995. The Major Works. Ed. by David Reibel. London: Routledge/Theommes Press.
Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1996. “Lowth, Robert”. Lexicon grammaticorum: Who’s who in the history of world linguistics ed. by Harro Stammerjohann, 588–590. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of learners […]. York: Wilson, Spence & Mawman.
Nagashima, Daisuke. 1968. “Mutual Debt between Johnson and Lowth: A contribution to the history of English grammar”. Studies in English Literature (Japan)
441.221–232.
The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Ed. by Tom McArthur. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Percy, Carol. 1997. “Paradigms Lost: Bishop Lowth and the ‘poetic dialect’ in his English grammar”. Neophilologus 811.129–144.
Reddick, Allen. 1996[1990]. The Making of Johnson’s Dictionary, 1746–1773. Rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redford, Bruce, ed. 1992–1994. The Letters of Samuel Johnson. 51 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Reibel, David. 1995. “Introduction” to Robert Lowth, A Short Introduction to the English Language, vii–xxxvii. London: Routledge/ Theommes Press. [Reprint of the 2nd, corrected ed. of 1763.]
Sledd, James H. & Gwin J. Kolb. 1955. Dr Johnson’s Dictionary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1988. “Dr. Johnson and the Auxiliary do
”. Hiroshima Studies in English Language and Literature 331.22–39.
. 1990. “Exemplification in Eighteenth-Century English Grammars”. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics ed. Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright, 481–496. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 1992. “John Kirkby and the Practice of Speaking and Writing English: Identification of a manuscript”. Leeds Studies in English 231.157–179.
. 1996. “Lindley Murray and the Concept of Plagiarism”. Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 81–96. Münster: Nodus.
. In prep. “The Reprints of Lowth’s Grammar”.
Tierney, James E., ed. 1988. The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vorlat, Emma. 1959. “The Sources of Lindley Murray’s ‘The English Grammar’”. Leuvense Bijdragen 481.108–125.
Ward, John. 1758. Four Essays upon the English Language. London: John Ward.
Williams, Marjorie. 1939. The Letters of William Shenstone (1714–1763). Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2019. The Hypothesis of Change from Above in the History of English: State of the Art and Perspectives. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 54:s1 ► pp. 251 ff. 
Wolf, Göran
2012. Heinrich Christoph Albrecht’s Versuch einer critischen Englischen Sprachlehre
. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Navest, K.
2006. Lowth, Robert (1710–1787). In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 334 ff.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2002. Robert Lowth and the strong verb system. Language Sciences 24:3-4 ► pp. 459 ff.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2012. “My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar”. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2012. Robert Lowth as a Codifier of the English Language. Historiographia Linguistica 39:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.