Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 3:3 (1976) ► pp.315–348

Langue and Parole Since Saussure

| Memorial University of Newfoundland
It is not possible and in fact not necessary to review everything that has been written since the publication of Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale concerning the langue / parole diachotomy. What is attempted in the present article is first of all a concrete analogy for langue and parole, so that these two notions, which have been so often misunderstood, can be presented in as concrete a manner as possible, and secondly to follow certain interesting developments of the basic Saussurian notions. The concrete analogy which is used is that of the child’s construction set, such as a Meccano set for example. The set itself is an analogy for langue, and the models, such as planes, cars, machines, etc., that the child makes are a model for parole or discourse. This concrete analogy also serves to illuminate ‘the infinite use of finite means’, the finite means being langue, and the infinite use parole. Next an examination is made of certain of the Saussurean notions that have provoked discussion over the years:
(1) langue as a pure ίοrm; (2) psychologism; (3) the sociological notions; (4) synchrony as static linguistics. Subsequent to (4) the notions of process and generation are examined, and this leads first of all to a critical examination of the terms competence and performance, along with their underlying notions, and then to a discussion of the psychomechanics of Gustave Guillaume. It is pointed out that Guillaume’s theory is an interesting development’ of the Saussurian notions and that some of the criticisms by Wunderli in HL 1:1/1974 are based upon a fundamental misapprehension of the notion of parole in Guillaume.
Published online: 1 January 1976
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.3.3.04hew
References (61)
References
Black, Stephen. 1969. Mind and Body. London: W. Kimber.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1923. Review of Saussure 1916. MLJ 81.317–19. (Repr. (a) CFS 211.133–35 (1964); (b) Hockett 1970.106–08.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1925. “On the Sound-system of Central Algonquian”. Lg. 11.130–56.Google Scholar
. 1926. “A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language”. Lg.21.153–64. (Repr. (a) IJAL 151.195–202 (1949); (b) Joos 1966.26–31; (c) Hockett 1970.128–38.)Google Scholar
. 1946. “Algonquian”. Linguistic Structures of Native America ed. by Harry Hoijer et al., 85–129. (Repr. in Hockett 1970.440–88.)Google Scholar
. 1958. Eastern Ojibwa. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
. 1962. The Menomini Language. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1967. “Language as Symbolization”. Lg. 431.57–91.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (2nd enl. ed., 1972.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clarke, S(andra), and R(onald) Sheen. 1973. “Comments on Guillaume’s Langue-Discours in the Light of Chomsky’s Competence-Performance Dichotomy”. Grammaire générative transformationelle et psychomécanique du langage, ed. by André Joly, 31–54. Lille: Editions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1952. Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: Univ. de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Inst. de Filología, Departamento de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Dell, François. 1973. Les règles et les sons. Paris: Collection Savoir.Google Scholar
Firth, J(ohn) R(upert). 1957. Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press. (Repr., 1964.)Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., and M. Garrett. 1966. “Some Reflections on Competence and Performance”. Lyons & Wales 1966.133–54.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Gustave. 1971a. Leçons de Linguistique, Série A. Paris: Klincksieck; Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
. 1971b. Leçons de Linguistique, Série B. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1973a. Leçons de Linguistique, Série C. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1973b. Principes de Linguistique théorique. Ibid.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr. 1968. An Essay on Language. Philadelphia: Chilton Books.Google Scholar
1969. Review of Walter H. Hirtle, The Simple and Progressive Forms: An analytical approach (Québec: Presses de l’Univ. Laval, 1967). RPh 231.230–34.Google Scholar
Halliday, M(ichael) A. K. 1961. “Categories of the Theory of Grammar”. Word 171.241–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John. 1971. “Underlying Forms”. Lingua 271.170–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C(harles) F(rancis). 1954. “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word 101.210–31. (Repr. in Joos 1966.386–99.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1970. A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1959. Essais linguistiques. Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog og Kulturforlag. (New ed., Paris: Ed. de Minuit, 1971.)Google Scholar
Ingram, Elizabeth. 1971. “A Further Note on the Relationship between Psychological and Linguistic Theories”. IRAL 91.335–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. “Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre”. TCLP 61.240–88. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics II ed. by Eric P. Hamp et al., 51–89. Chicago & London: Chicago Univ. Press, 1966.)Google Scholar
. 1961. “Linguistics and Communication Theory”. Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspect ed. by R. Jakobson. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. (Repr. in R. Jakobson, Selected Writings II, 570–79. The Hague & Paris: Mouton, 1971.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin, ed. 1966. Readings in Linguistics, I: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America, 1925–56. 4th ed. Chicago University Press. (First ed., Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies, 1957.)Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. 1964. “Mentalism in Linguistics”. Lg. 401.124–37.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1972. Bibliographia Saussureana 1870–1970: An annotated, classified bibliography…. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
1973. Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic thought in Western studies of language, a contribution to the history and theory of linguistics. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans, and Raven I. McDavid. 1961. The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Leroy, Maurice. 1966. Les grands courants de la linguistique moderne. Bruxelles: Presses Univ. de Bruxelles; Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1973. “Two Basic Kinds of Aphasie Disorders”. Linguistics 1151.57–66.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1970. “Generative Syntax”. New Horizons in Linguistics ed. by J. Lyons, pp. 115–39, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin books.Google Scholar
Lyons, John, and Roger J. Wales, eds. 1966. Psycholinguistics Papers. Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1916. Review of Saussure 1916. BSL 201.32–36.Google Scholar
Molho, Maurice. 1969. Linguistique et langage. Bordeaux: Ducros.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1960. “The Short Vowel Systems of Northern Switzerland: A Study in Structural Dialectology”. Word 161.155–821950 DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nivette, Jos. 1974. “Présentation des théories génératives”. Le Français moderne 421.309–18.Google Scholar
Olshewsky, Thomas M. 1974. “On Competence and Performance”. Linguistics 1221.47–62.Google Scholar
Palmer, F(rank) R. 1969. Review of C. F. Hockett, The State of the Art. (The Hague, Mouton, 1968) Lg 451.616–21.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder, and Lamar Roberts. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Price, H(enry) H(abberley). 1950. Perception. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Raffler Engel, Walburga von. 1970. “Competence: A term in search of a concept”. Linguistique contemporaine: Hommage à Eric Buyssens ed. by Jean Dierickx and Yvan Lebrun, 271–85. Brussels: Edit, de l’Institut de Sociologie, Univ. Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Rogger, Karl. 1941. “Kritischer Versuch über de Saussure’s Cours Générar ” ZRPh 611.161–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, Nicholas. 1973. An Introduction to Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Company. (Translation of Introduction à la grammaire générative, Paris: Plon, 1968.)Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot. (5th ed., Paris: Payot, 1955.)Google Scholar
Spence, N. C. W. 1957. “A Hardy Perennial: The problem of la langue and la parole ”. ArchL 91.1–27.Google Scholar
Teeter, Karl V. 1964. The Wiyot Language. Berkeley: California Univ. Press. Trager, George L., and Henry Lee Smith (1913–72). 1957. An Outline of English Structure. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1949. Principes de phonologie. Trans, by Jean Cantineau. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Valin, Roch. 1954. Petite Introduction à la psychomécanique du langage. Québec: Presses de l’Univ. Laval.Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William. 1974. “Saussure, Durkheim, and Sociolinguistic Theory”. Arch L N.S. 51.25–34.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1954. “Is a Structural Dialectology Possible?”. Word 101.388–400. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S. 1947. “De Saussure’s System of Linguistics”. Word 31.1–31. (Repr. in Joos 1966.1–18.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1925. Philosophy in the Modern World. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wunderli, Peter. 1974. “Zur Saussure-Rezeption bei Gustave Guillaume und in seiner Nachfolge”. HL 1:1.27–66. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, R. W. 1957. A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Contini-Morava, Ellen
1995. Introduction: On linguistic sign theory. In Meaning as Explanation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gordon, W. Terrence
1992.  Saussure: Signs, Systems, and Arbitrariness. By David Holdcroft. Historiographia Linguistica 19:2-3 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Antal, László
1990. Langue and parole or only parole?. Historiographia Linguistica 17:3 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Tobin, Yishai
1986. Foundations for a science of language. Lingua 70:2-3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Hewson, John
1980. Stress in English: Four Levels or Three?. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 25:2 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Hewson, John
1981. The Guillaumian Tradition in Canadian Linguistics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Hewson, John
1992. The ideal sentence as a linguistic datum. Journal of Pragmatics 18:6 ► pp. 579 ff. DOI logo
Hewson, John
2004. HUBERT CUYCKENS and BRITTA ZAWADA, eds., Polysemy in cognitive linguistics.. <i>WORD</i> 55:3 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.