Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 30:1/2 (2003) ► pp.239245
References
Alford, Henry
1864The Queen’s English: Stray notes on speaking and spelling. London: Strahan & Co.; Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W.
1991 “The Fowler Brothers and the Tradition of Usage Handbooks”. English Traditional Grammars: An international perspective ed. by Gerhard Leitner, 93–111. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Fowler, H(enry) W(atson)”. The Oxford Companion to the English Language ed. by Tom McArthur, 414–415. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulton, George G.
1934Society for Pure English Tract No. XLIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry W.
1926A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1927 “On ‘Ing’: A reply to Dr. Jespersen’s paper in Tract XXV”. Society for Pure English Tract No. XXVI, 192–196. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Henry W. & Frank G. Fowler
1905The Works of Lucian of Samosata, complete with exceptions specified in the preface. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1906The King’s English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1911The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gowers, Ernest
1957H. W. Fowler: The man and his teaching. London: The English Association.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1926 “On Some Disputed Points in English Grammar”. Society for Pure English Tract No. XXV, 141–172. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Little, William et al.
1933The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. London: George Newnes.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1898A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical. Part II1: Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
White, Richard Grant
1870Words and Their Uses, Past and Present: A study of the English language. New York: Sheldon & Co.Google Scholar
1880Every-day English. London: Sampson Low, Marston.Google Scholar