Review published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 31:1 (2004) ► pp. 164169
References
Aarsleff, Hans
1967The Study of Language in England (1780–1860). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1974 “The Tradition of Condillac: The Problem of the Origin of Language in the Eighteenth Century and the Debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Hymes 1974.93–156. (Repr. in Aarsleff 1982.146–209.)Google Scholar
1982From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
2001Etienne Bonnot de Condillac: Essay on the Origin of Knowledge. Translation and edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
ed. 1974Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kieffer, Bruce
1978 “Herder’s Treatment of Süssmilch’s Theory of the Origin of Language in the Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache: A re-evaluation”. The Germanic Review 531.56–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Megill, Allan
1975The Enlightenment Debate on the Origin of Language and its Historical Background. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte
1984 “Vom Vergessen in der Sprachwissenschaftsgeschichte: Zu den ‘Ideologen’ und ihrer Rezeption im 19. Jahrhundert”. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 14:53/54.18–36.Google Scholar