Article published In:
Linguistica Berolinensia
Edited by Thorsten Fögen and E.F.K. Koerner †
[Historiographia Linguistica 31:2/3] 2004
► pp. 345365
Aarsleff, Hans
1982 [1969] “The Study and Use of Etymology in Leibniz”. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history, 84–100. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Beeson, David
1987 “Maupertuis at the Crossroads: Dating the Réflexions Philosophiques ”. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 2491.241–250.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George
2000 [1709, 1710, 1713] “An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision”; “A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge”; “Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous”; Philosophical Works. Ed. by Michael R. Ayers. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
Bracken, Harry M.
1965The Early Reception of Berkeley’s Immaterialism, 1710–1733. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de
1998 [1746]Essai sur l’origine des connoissances humaines. Ed. by Michèle Crampe-Casnabet. Paris: Alive.Google Scholar
1984 [1754]Traité des sensations. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
2003Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Ed. by Jörn Albrecht, prefaced by Jürgen Trabant. Tübingen & Basel: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo
1987Leibniz: Language, signs and thought. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diderot, Denis
2000 [1749, 1751]Lettre sur les aveugles à l’usage de ceux qui voient; Lettre sur les sourds et muets à l’usage de ceux qui entendent et qui parlent. Ed. by Marian Hobson & Simon Harvey. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Jessop, T. E.
1968A Bibliography of George Berkeley. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de
1971 [1740/1748] “Réflexions philosophiques sur l’origine des langues et la signification des mots”. Maupertuis, Turgot, Maine de Biran 1971 [1740/48, 1750, 1815]. Sur l’origine du langage ed. by Ronald Grimsley, 27–46. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Piron, Maurice
1961Turgot – Étymologie. Brugge: De Tempel.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H.
1997 “New Views on the Role of Scepticism in the Enlightenment”; “Berkeley in the History of Scepticism”. Scepticism in the Enlightenment ed. by R. H. Popkin, 157–172, 173–186. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosiello, Luigi
1987 “Turgot’s ‘Étymologie’ and Modern Linguistics”. Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar and Philosophical Analysis of Language ed. by Dino Buzzetti & Maurizio Ferriani, 75–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turgot, Anne Robert Jacques
1971 [1750] “Remarques critiques sur les réflexions philosophiques de Maupertuis sur l’origine des langues et la signification des mots”. Maupertuis, Turgot, Maine de Biran 1971 [1740/8, 1750, 1815]. Sur l’origine du langage ed. by Ronald Grimsley, 59–84. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
1913 [1750] “Lettres à l’abbé de … sur le système de Berkeley”. Oeuvres de Turgot et documents le concernant ed. by Gustave Schelle, vol. I1. 185–193. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
1913 [1756] “Étymologie”, “Existence”. Ibid., 473538.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet de
1994 [1752], “Dictionnaire Philosophique” (II). The Complete Works of Voltaire, Vol. XXXV1 ed. by Christiane Mervaud. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Oz-Salzberger, Fania
2006. The Enlightenment in Translation: Regional and European Aspects1. European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire 13:3  pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Solari, Stefano
2022. Menger and the continental epistemology of uncertainty. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29:5  pp. 920 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.