Cover not available
Article published In:
New Approaches to the Study of Later Modern English
[Historiographia Linguistica 33:1/2] 2006
► pp. 39–56

James Merrick (1720–1769)

Poet, scholar, linguist

| University of Leiden
At the end of the preface to his Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762) Robert Lowth (1710–1787) makes an appeal for comments on his work. This article analyses his correspon­dence with James Merrick (1720–1769), a friend and fellow scholar, written between December 1761 and October 1764, in which he receives such comments. The discussion is an illustration of the current debate at the time as to whether Custom or Propriety should be invoked in deciding on correct usage. It shows first and foremost that Lowth’s attitude to grammar was focussed on the level of usage rather than the structure of the language.
Published online: 17 July 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.33.1.05tie
References (22)
References
Alston, R[obin] C[arfrae]. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I1: English Grammars Written in English. Leeds: Arnold & Son.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 2002. A History of the English Language. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Richard S. 1889. Diocesan Histories: Carlisle. London: S.P.C.K.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 1998. “The Commerce of Language in the Pursuit of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England”. English Studies 791.309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepworth, Brian. 1978. Robert Lowth. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
Leonard, S[terling] A[ndrus]. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700−1800. Madison: University of Wisconsin. (Repr., New York: Russell & Russell, 1962.)Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar; with critical notes. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar, and R. & J. Dodsley. (2nd ed., 1763; a new ed. 1764.) (Facs.-reprint of first ed., Menston, Yorks.: Scolar Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
Markham, Sarah. 1984. John Loveday of Caversham 1711–1789: The life and tours of an eighteenth-century onlooker. Salisbury: Michael Russell.Google Scholar
Nagashima, Daisuke. 1968. “Mutual Debt between Johnson and Lowth”. Studies in English Literature (Japan) 441.221–232.Google Scholar
Navest, Karlijn. “The Unidentified Hands: Annotating Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar ”. Unpublished manuscript.
OED: The Oxford English Dictionary, online edition, [URL]
Percy, Carol. 1997a. “Eighteenth-Century Book Reviewers’ Attitudes towards Language: A database project”. Tracing the Trail of Time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop ed. by Raymond Hickey, Merja Kytö, Ian Lancashire & Matti Rissanen, 215–231. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 1997b. “Paradigms Lost: Bishop Lowth and the ‘Poetic Dialect’ in his English Grammar”. Neophilologus 811.129–144.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1974. “Lowth’s Grammar: A re-evaluation”. Linguistics No. 131.63–78.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1997. “Lowth’s Corpus of Prescriptivism”. To Explain the Present ed. by Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 451–463. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Robert Dodsley and the Genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar ”. Historiographia Linguistica 271.21–36.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar Reprinted”. Publishing History 491.5–17.Google Scholar
. 2003. “‘Tom’s Grammar’: The genesis of Lowth’s Short Introduction to English Grammar revisited”. The Teaching of English in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Essays for Ian Michael on his 88th birthday ed. by Frances Austen & Christopher Stray (= Special issue of Paradigm 2/7), 36–45.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming a. “English at the Onset of the Normative Tradition”. The Oxford History of the English Language ed. by Lynda Mugglestone, 240–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. Forthcoming b. “Correctness and its Origins”. Blackwell Handbook of the History of English ed. by Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tierney, James E., ed. 1988. The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley 1733–1764. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2005. “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A community of practice or a discourse community?”. Paper presented at the first workshop within the project “The Codifiers and the English Language”, called “Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing”, Leiden, 9 December 2005.