Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 34:2/3 (2007) ► pp.333–349

Algonquian and Indo-European gender in a Historiographic Perspective

| Adam Mickiewicz University
This article examines shared motifs in the history of the study of grammatical gender in North American Indian and Indo-European languages. Specifically, I investigate the degree of semantic and cultural motivation attributed to gender in Algonquian languages, and present analogies with accounts of gender in Indo-European. The presence of exceptions within animate gender in Algonquian has led to conflicting interpretations: while some focused on the arbitrary nature of the categorization, others regarded them as culturally based. Algonquian languages provide an example of how claims that have traditionally been made about Indo-European gender, particularly its supposed semantic arbitrariness, have been extended to languages apparently less suited for the purpose.
Published online: 13 November 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.34.2.06kil
References (46)
References
Abbott, Clifford. 1984. “Two Feminine Genders in Oneida”. Anthropological Linguistics 26:2.125–137.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baraga, Frederic. 1850. A Theoretical and Practical Grammar of the Otchipwe Language. Detroit: Jabez Fox.Google Scholar
Black, Mary B. 1969. “A Note on Gender in Eliciting Ojibwa Semantic Structures”. Anthropological Linguistics 11:6.177–186.Google Scholar
Black-Rogers, Mary B. 1982. “Algonquian Gender Revisited: Animate nouns and Ojibwa ‘power’ – an impasse?”. Papers in Linguistics 15:1.59–76.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co. [Later reprints carry Holt, Rinehart & Winston as publishers.]Google Scholar
. 1946. “Algonquian”. Linguistic Structures of Native America ed. by Harry Hoijer, 85–129. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
. 1957. Eastern Ojibwa; Grammatical sketch, texts, and word list. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
. 1962. The Menomini Language. Ed. by Charles F. Hockett. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1889. “Das Nominalgeschlecht in den indogermanischen Sprachen”. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 41.100–109. (Repr., Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1973.)Google Scholar
. 1891. “Zur Frage der Entstehung des grammatischen Geschlechts”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 151.523–531.Google Scholar
Bryant, Doreen. 2003. Genus-Systeme im Wandel: Spezifität, Animazität und Femininum im Mohawk. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 2002. “Masculine and Feminine in the Northern Iroquoian Languages”. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture ed. by Nick J. Enfield, 99–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, David J. 2003. The Miami-Illinois Language. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Craik, Brian. 1982. “The Animate in Creek Language and Ideology”. Papers of the Thirteenth Algonquian Conference ed. by William Cowan, 29–35. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1995. “Motivation vs. Predictability in Algonquian Gender”. Papers of the Twenty-Sixth Algonquian Conference ed. by David H. Pentland, 52–66. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna & Anthony L. Vanek. 1976. “The Semantic Basis of the Animate/Inanimate Distinction in Cree”. Papers in Linguistics 9:3/4.159–180.Google Scholar
Duponceau, Peter Stephen. 1830. “A Grammar of the Language of the Lenni Lenape or Delaware Indians. Translated from the German manuscript of the Late Rev. David Zeisberger, for the American Philosophical Society”. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 31.65–251.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan. 1788. Observations on the Language of the Muhhekaneew Indians: In which the extent of that language in North-America is shewn, its genius is grammatically traced, some of its peculiarities, and some instances of analogy between that and the Hebrew are pointed out. New Haven: Printed by Josiah Meigs. (Repr. in American Linguistics. London: Routledge, 1997.)Google Scholar
Eliot, John. 1666. The Indian Grammar Begun. Cambridge: Marmaduke Johnson. (Repr. in American Linguistics. London: Routledge, 1997.)Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 2002. “Grammatical Gender in Algonquian”. Papers of the Thirty-Third Algonquian Conference ed. by H. Christoph Wolfart, 195–231. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1954. “Concerning Inferences from Linguistic to Nonlinguistic Data”. Language in Culture: Proceedings of a conference on the interrelations of language and other aspects of culture ed. by Harry Hoijer, 3–19. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving. 1960. “Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior, and World View”. Culture in History: Essays in honor of Paul Radin ed. by Stanley Diamond, 19–52. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1969 [1953]. The Norwegian Language in America: A study in bilingual behavior 21 vols. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1966. “What Algonquian is Really Like”. International Journal of American Linguistics 32:1.59–73.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1979. “On the Animate-inanimate Distinction in Cree”. Anthropological Linguistics 21:7.351–354.Google Scholar
Kilarski, Marcin. 2007. “On Grammatical Gender as an Arbitrary and Redundant Category”. History of Linguistics 2005. Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois,1–5 September 2005 ed. by Douglas Kibbee, 24–36. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]. 2002a. “The Historiography of American Linguistics”. Toward a History of American Linguistics by Koerner, 1–16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 2002b. “Toward a History of Americanist Linguistics”. Toward a History of American Linguistics by Koerner, 17–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1986. “Classifiers as a Reflection of Mind”. Noun Classes and Categorization ed. by Colette Craig, 13–51. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LeClaire, Nancy, George Cardinal & Earle Waugh, eds. 1988. Alberta Elders’ Cree Dictionary. Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press & Duval House Publishing. ([URL], consulted on 30 June 2007).
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1958. “On Earlier Stages of the Indo-European Nominal Inflection”. Language 34:2.179–202.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1949 [1903]. Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. 5th ed. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Conor. 2001. “A Preliminary Survey of Animacy Categories in Penobscot”. Actes du trente-deuxième Congrès des Algonquinistes ed. by John D. Nichols, 395–426. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Roethe, Gustav. 1890. “Zum neuen Abdruck”. Deutsche Grammatik by Jacob Grimm, vol. III1: ix–xxxi. Güthersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
. 1891. “Noch einmal das indogermanische Genus”. Anzeiger für Deutsches Alterthum und Deutsche Litteratur 171.181–184.Google Scholar
Schoolcraft, Henry R. 1852. “An Essay on the Grammatical Structure of the Algonquin Language”. Historical and Statistical Information, Respecting the History, Condition and Prospects of the Indian Tribes of the United States ed. by Henry R. Schoolcraft, vol. II1, 351–442. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob & Christian Lehmann, eds. 1982. Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Vol. I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Straus, Anne Terry & Robert Brightman. 1982. “The Implacable Raspberry”. Papers in Linguistics 151.97–137.Google Scholar
Thwaites, Reuben Gold, ed. 1896–1901. The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents: Travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610–1791. 731 vols. Cleveland: Burrows Bros.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, Louis-Philippe. 1980. “De la catégorie du genre en cris”. Papers of the Eleventh Algonquian Conference ed. by William Cowan, 33–39. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1996. “Sketch of Cree, an Algonquian Language”. Languages ed. by Ives Goddard (= Handbook of North American Indians, 17), 390–439. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Joseph, John E.
2022. Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America. Historiographia Linguistica 49:2-3 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
van Eijk, Jan & Vincent Collette
2021. Plains Cree animacy–inanimacy hierarchy. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 840 ff. DOI logo
Kilarski, Marcin
2016. Gender Asymmetries in Iroquoian Languages and their Cultural Correlates. Historiographia Linguistica 43:3 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Kilarski, Marcin
2018. American Indian Languages in the Eyes of 17th-Century French and British Missionaries. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 53:s1 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Bavant, Marc
2008. Proto-Indo-European Ergativity… Still to be Discussed. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44:4 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.