Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 35:1/2 (2008) ► pp.23–82

The Rise and Fall and Revival of the Ibero-Caucasian Hypothesis

| Université de Montréal
The hypothesis that the three indigenous Caucasian language stocks (Abkhaz-Adyghean, Nakh-Daghestanian, and Kartvelian) are genetically related has little support at the present day among linguists specializing in these languages. Nonetheless, the so-called ‘Ibero-Caucasian’ hypothesis had strong institutional backing in Soviet Caucasology, especially in Georgia, and continues to be invoked in certain contemporary discourses of a political and identitarian nature. In this paper the history of the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis will be presented against the background of research into the autochthonous languages of the North and South Caucasus, and also in connection with the historiographic debate over the relation of Abkhazia to Georgia.
Published online: 7 March 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.35.1-2.05tui
References (223)
References
Abuladze, Ilia, chief ed. 1963. “Grigol xandztelis cxovreba [The Life of Grigol of Xandzta]”. Dzveli kartuli agiograpiuli lit’erat’uris dzeglebi, c’igni I (V–X ss.), 248–319. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Adelung, Friedrich. 1815. Catherinens der Grossen Verdienste um die vergleichende Sprachkunde. St. Petersburg: Friedrich Drechsler. (Repr., with an introd. by Harald Haarmann, Hamburg: Helmut Buske, 1976.)Google Scholar
Alekseev, M. E. 2002. “Kavkazovedčeskie issledovanija v Otdele kavkazskix jazykov Instituta Jazykoznanija RAN [Research on the Caucasus at the Department of Caucasian Languages of the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences]”. Kavkazovedeniе 11.102–119.Google Scholar
Ančabadze, Zurab V. 1964. Istorija i kul´tura drevnej Abxazii. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar
1976. Očerki ètničeskoj istorii abxazskogo naroda [Notes on the ethnic history of the Abkhazian people]. Suxumi: Alašara.Google Scholar
And>uladze, Nodar. 1968. k’lasovani da p’irovani u>vlilebis ist’oriis zogi sak’itxi iberiul-k’avk’asiurenebši [Some questions concerning the history of class and person conjugation in the Ibero-Caucasian languages]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Ardzinba, V. G., 1979. “Nekotorye sxodnye strukturnye priznaki xattskogo i abxazo-adygskix jazykov [Some related structural characteristics of the Hattic and Abkhaz-Adyghe languages]”. Peredneasiatskij Sbornik III: Istorija i filologija stran drevnego vostoka, 26–37. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Baramidze, Aleksandre. 1958. šota rustaveli: monograpiuli nark’vevi [Shota Rustaveli: Monographic essay]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Benes, Tuska. 2004. “Comparative Linguistics as Ethnology: In search of Indo-Germans in Central Asia, 1770–1830”. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 24:2.117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, John. 1992. “The Dene-Caucasian Macrophylum”. Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind ed. by Vitaly Shevoroshkin, 334–341. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Bengtson, John D. & Merritt Ruhlen. 1994. “Global Etymologies”. On the Origin of Languages: Studies in linguistic taxonomy, 277–336. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Berdzenišvili, Nik’o. 1990. “šenišvnebni apxazetis ist’oriul ganvitarebaze [Notes on the historical development of Abkhazia]”. Sakartvelos ist’oriis sak’itxebi. masalebi sakartvelos ist’oriuligeograpiisatvis, 588–621. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Frédéric. 2002. L’anthropologie soviétique des années 20–30: Configuration d’une rupture. Pessac: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Bgažba (B>ažoba), X. S. 1964. Bzybskij dialekt abxazskogo jazyka. (Issledovanie i teksty). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Bodenstedt, Friedrich. 1848. Die Völker des Kaukasus and ihre Freiheits-Kämpfe gegen die Russen. Frankfurt am Main: Hermann Johann Kessler.Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfried. 1994. “Identität und Universalität: Volkssprache und Schriftsprache in den Ländern des alten christlichen Orients”. Georgica 171.66–84.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Sprache und Identität in der Geschichte der Georgier”. Georgien im Spiegel seiner Kultur und Geschichte: Zweites Deutsch-Georgisches Symposium ed. by B. Schrade & T. Ahbe, 68–81. Berlin: Berliner Georgische Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bokarev, E. A. 1954. “Zadači sravitel´no-istoričeskogo izučenija kavkazskix jazykov [The tasks of historical-comparative research of the Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 31.41–53.Google Scholar
Bokarev, E. A., K. V. Lomtatidze & Ju. D. Dešeriev, eds. 1967. Jazyki narodov SSSR. Vol. IV: Iberijsko-kavkazskie jazyki. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R. 1996. Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis. Charleston, N.C.: Signum.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz. 1846. “Über das Georgische in sprachverwandtschaftlicher Beziehung”. Abhandlungen der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften; Phil.-hist. Klasse 1848.259–339.Google Scholar
. 1847[1842]. Die kaukasischen Glieder des indoeuropäischen Stammes. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler, 83 pp. [“Gelesen in der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften am 11. December 1842.”]Google Scholar
. 1857, 1861. Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Send, armenischen, griechischen, lateinischen, litauischen, altslavischen, gothischen und deutschen. Vols. II and III1. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler.Google Scholar
Borbé, Tasso. 1974. “Einleitung: Zur Kritik an der Lehre Marr’s”. Kritik der marxistischen Sprachtheorie N. Ja. Marr’s ed. by Tasso Borbé, 5–20. Kronberg /Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl. 1949. Baskisch-kaukasische Etymologien. Heidelberg: CarlWinter.Google Scholar
Brosset, M. F., comp. and tr. 1858. Histoire de la Géorgie depuis l’antiquité jusqu’au commencement du XIXe siecle. St. Pétersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences.Google Scholar
Č’araia, P. 1912. Ob otnošenii abxazskago jazyka k jafetičeskim: Materialy po jafetičeskomy jazykoznaniju [On the relationship of the Abkhaz and Japhetic languages: Materials in Japhetic linguistics]. Vol. IV1. St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977. “Mountain of Tongues: The languages of the Caucasus”. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 61.283–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Çelebi, Evliya. 1983. Kniga putešestvija: izvlečenija iz sočinenija tureckogo putešestvennika XVII veka [The book of voyages: Excerpts from the works of a Turkish explorer of the 17th century]. Vypusk III1: Zemli Zakavkaz´ja i sopredel´nyx oblastej Maloj Azii i Irana. Perevod s kommentarii. Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR. Institut narodov Azii.Google Scholar
C’ereteli, Giorgi. 1965. “Sonant’ebisa da ablaut’is teoriis gamo kartvelur enebši [About the theory of sonants and ablaut in the Kartvelian languages]”. Foreword in Gamq’relidze & Mač’avariani 1965.09–051.Google Scholar
Charachidzé, Georges. 1968. Le système religieux de la Géorgie païenne: Analyse structurale d’une civilisation. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Cherchi, Marcello & H. Paul Manning. 2002. Disciplines and Nations: Niko Marr vs. his Georgian students at Tbilisi State University and the Japhetidology/Caucasology schism. (= Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, 1603.) Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Center for Russian & East European Studies.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1942. saxelis pudzis udzvelesi agebuleba kartvelur enebši [The oldest structure of nominal stems in the Kartvelian languages]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 1945. zogadi enatmecniereba, II. dziritadi p’roblemebi [General linguistics, Part II. Main problems]. Tbilisi: St’alinis sax. Tbilisis saxelmc’ipo universit’et’is gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
. 1946. zogadi enatmecniereba, I. p’rop’edevt’ik’uli nac’ili [General linguistics, Part I. Pedagogical section]. Tbilisi: Sakartvelos SSR saxelmc’ipo gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
. 1948. “Kartvel´skie jazyki, ix istoričeskij sostav i drevnij lingvističeskij oblik”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 21.255–275.Google Scholar
Čikobava, A. S. 1951. “Vystuplenie”. Sessija Otdelenij Obščestvennyx Nauk Akademii Nauk SSSR, posvjaščennaja godovščine opublikovanija genial´nogo proizvedenija I. V. Stalina ‘Marksizm i voprosy jazikoznanija’. Sbornik materialov, 168–171. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSRGoogle Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1953a. “Gramat’ik’uli k’las-k’at’egoria da zmnis u>vlilebis zogi sak’itxi dzvelkartulši” [Grammatical class and some questions concerning verb conjugation in Old Georgian]. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 51.51–63.Google Scholar
. 1953b. “Et’imologia dzveli kartuli t’erminebisa b>uari, samxari [The etymology of the Old Georgian terms “b>uari”, “samxari” [south]]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 51.65–71.Google Scholar
. 1954. “Mravalobitis supiksta genezisatvis kartulši [On the genesis of the Georgian plural suffixes]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 61.67–76.Google Scholar
Čikobava, A. S. 1955a. “O dvux osnovnyx voprosax izučenija iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykov [On two basic problems in the study of the Ibero-Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61.66–92.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1955b. “P. Uslar i voprosy naučnogo izučenija gorskix iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykov [P. Uslar and the questions of the study of the highland Ibero-Caucasian languages]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 71.461–471.Google Scholar
Čikobava (Tschikobawa), Arn. 1959. “Die ibero-kaukasischen Gebirgssprachen und der heutige Stand ihrer Erforschung in Georgien”. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 9:2.109–162.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1965. iberiul-k’avk’asiur enata šesc’avlis ist’oria [The history of the study of the Ibero-Caucasian languages]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arn. 1970. “K voprosy ob otnošenii kartvel´skix jazykov k indoevropejskim i severokavkazskim jazykam [On the relationship between the Kartvelian languages with the Indo-European and North-Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1970:2.50–62.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1979. iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecnierebis šesavali [Introduction to Ibero-Caucasian linguistics]. Tbilisi: TSU gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Kogda i kak èto bylo [When and how it happened]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecnierebis c’elic’deuli 121.9–52.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v istorii kartvel´skix jazykov”. Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykax ed. by K. V. Lomtatidze, 3–10. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Vjacheslav. 1998. “Origin of the Abkhazian People”. The Abkhazians: A handbook ed. by B. George Hewitt, 37–47. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Čit’aia, Giorgi. 2001 [1926]. “kartuli etnologia (1917–1926 [Georgian ethnology (1917–1926)]”. šromebi xut t’omad. T’omi III: XX s. kartuli etnograpia, savele-etnograpiuli dziebani, metodologia, 21–32. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 2000 [1946]. “šesavali sakartvelos etnograpiisatvis [Introduction to the ethnography of Georgia]. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi II. kartveli xalxis etnogenezi da k’ult’urul-ist’oriuli p’roblemebi, 9–30. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 2001 [1968]. “kartuli sabč’ota etnograpia (1930–1968) [Georgian Soviet ethnography (1930–1968)]”. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi III. XX s. kartuli etnograpia, savele-etnograpiuli dziebani, metodologia, 53–73. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 2000 [1975]. “Ivane Javaxišvili da sakartvelos etnograpia [Ivane Javaxišvili and the ethnography of Georgia]”. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi II. kartveli xalxis etnogenezi da k’ult’urul-ist’oriuli p’roblemebi, 64–87. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Colarusso, John. 1989. “Proto-Northwest Caucasian (or How to crack a very hard nut)”. NonSlavic languages of the USSR: Linguistic studies ed. by Howard I. Aronson, 20–55. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Winfried Boeder, George Hewitt & Helma van den Berg. 2003. “Caucasian languages”. Lingua 1151.1–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deeters, Gerhard. 1926–1927. “Armenisch und Südkaukasisch: Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Sprachmischung”. Caucasica 31.1–37, 41.32–64.Google Scholar
. 1955. “Gab es Nominalklassen in allen kaukasischen Sprachen?” Corolla Linguistica. Festschrift F. Sommer, 26–33. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor M. & Sergej A. Starostin. 1986. Hurro-Urartian as an East Caucasian Language. München: Kitzinger.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf. 1928. Einführung in das Studium der kaukasischen Sprachen, mit einer Sprachenkarte. Leipzig: Verlag der Asia Major.Google Scholar
D’Istria, Dora. 1860. Les femmes en Orient. Vol. II: La Russie. Zurich: Meyer & Zeller.Google Scholar
Dodašvili, Rusudan. 1962. Mari Brose: kartuli mc’erlobis mk’vlevari [Marie Brosset: Scholar of Georgian literature]. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota Sakartvelo.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1933a. Introduction à la grammaire comparée des langues caucasiennes du nord. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
. 1933b. Recherches comparatives sur le verbe caucasien. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
. 1937. “Morphologie comparée et phonétique comparée: à propos des langues caucasiennes du nord”. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 381.122–138.Google Scholar
Dunaevskaja, I. M. & D´jakonov, I. M. 1979. “Xattskij (protoxettskij) jazyk”. Jazyki Azii i Afriki, III: Jazyki drevnej perednej Azii (nesemitskie), Iberijsko-Kavkazskie jazyki, Paleoaziatskie jazyki ed. by G. D. Sanžeev, 79–83. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Džaparidze, Otar. 1989. Na zare etnokul´turnoj istorii Kavkaza. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.Google Scholar
Dzidziguri, Šota. 1985. Nik’o Mari: kartuli k’ult’uris mk’vlevari [Niko Marr: Scholar of Georgian culture]. Tbilisi: MecnierebaGoogle Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1991. “Kartwelisch-drawidische Sprachparallelen”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44:3.339–343.Google Scholar
Furnée, Edzard J. 1979. Vorgriechisch-Kartvelisches: Studium zum ostmediterranen Subtrat nebst einem Versuch zu einer neuen pelasgischen Theorie. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1982. Beiträge zur georgischen Etymologie. Faszikel 1: Georgisch-vorgriechische, georgisch-vorromanische und georgisch-vorindogermanische Materialien. Leuven: PeetersGoogle Scholar
Gabelentz, Hans Conon von der. 1861. “Über das Passivum: Eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung”. Abhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, vol. VIII1, 449–546. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Gamq’relidze, T[amaz] and G[ivi] Mač’avariani. 1965. sonant’ta sist’ema da ablaut’i kartvelur enebši: saerto-kartveluri st’rukt’uris t’ip’ologia [The system of sonants and ablaut in the Kartvelian languages: A typology of Common Kartvelian]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba. [Annotated German translation by Winfried Boeder, Sonantensystem und Ablaut in den Kartwelsprachen. Tübingen: Günter Narr, 1982.]Google Scholar
Gamq’relidze, T. V. 1971. “Sovremennaja diaxroničeskaja lingvistika i kartvel´skie jazyki”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1971:21.19–30 (part I); 31.34–48 (part II).Google Scholar
1991a. “K probleme istoriko-ètimologičeskogo osmyslenija ètnonimii drevnej Kolxidy: K istorii termina apxaz-//abazg- [On the problem of the historico-etymological meaning of the ethnonyms of ancient Colchis: On the history of the term abxaz-// abazg ]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1991:4.89–95.Google Scholar
1991b. “On the History of the Tribal Names of Ancient Colchis” Revue des Études Géorgiennes et Caucasiennes 6–7.237–245. [Translation by Brian George Hewitt.]Google Scholar
Gamsaxurdia, Zviad. 1990. Sakartvelos sulieri missia. Tbilisi: Ganatleba. [English translation: The Spiritual Mission of Georgia. Tbilisi: Ganatleba, 1991.]Google Scholar
. 1994. ra aris čveni sicocxle? brŠola! [What is our life? Struggle!]. Tbilisi: Aprasidze.Google Scholar
Gesner, Conrad. 1555. Mithridates: De differentiis linguarum tum veterum tum quæ hodie apud diversas nationes in toto orbe terrarum in usu sunt. Zürich: Froschoverus.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost. 1992. “The Caucasian Language Material in Evliya Çelebi’s Travel Book: A revision”. Caucasian Perspectives ed. by Brian George Hewitt, 8–62. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Gordadzé, Thorniké. 2000. “Moral´no-ideologičeskie prepjastvija k uregulirovaniju gruzinoabxazskogo konflikta [The moral and ideological obstacles to the settlement of the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict]”. Aspekty gruzino-abxazskogo konflikta 21.51–65. Irvine: University of California-Irvine.Google Scholar
. 2001. “La Géorgie et ses hôtes ingrats: Conflits politiques autour de l’autochtonie”. Critique Internationale 101.161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordeziani, Rismag. 1980. et’rusk’uli da kartveluri. Tbilisi: TSU Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. c’inaberdznuli da kartveluri. Tbilisi: TSU Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 2000. Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic language family. Volume I: Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gudava, T’ogo. 1964. “Regresuli dezaprik’at’izaciis erti šemtxveva zanurši (megrul-č’anurši) [A case of regressive deaffricatization in Zan (Mingrelian-Laz)]”. Sakartvelos SSR Mecnierebata Ak’ademiis Moambe 33:2.497–503.Google Scholar
Güldenstädt, Johann Anton. 1787, 1791. Reisen durch Russland und im Caucasischen Gebürge. 21 vols. St. Petersburg: Kayserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
. 1834. Beschreibung der Kaukasischen Länder. Aus seinen Papieren gänzlich ungearbeitet, verbessert herausgegeben und mit erklärenden Anmerkungen begleitet von Julius Klaproth. Berlin: Verlag der Stuhrschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gulya, Janos. 1974. “Some Eighteenth Century Antecedents of Nineteenth Century Linguistics: The discovery of Finno-Ugrian”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 258–276. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gvanceladze, Teimuraz, Manana T’abidze, Revaz Šerozia, Revaz Č’ant’uria. 2001. “>vtismsaxurebisa da sasuliero ganatlebis ena, rogorc rusipik’at’oruli p’olit’ik’is ganxorcielebis sašualeba [The language of liturgy and religious instruction, as a means of carrying out a policy of Russification]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 51.89–116.Google Scholar
Gvanceladze, Teimuraz. 2004. “Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enata ojaxis šemadgenlobisatvis [On the composition of the Ibero-Caucasian language family]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 81.67–75.Google Scholar
Haßler, Gerda. 2004. “Typologie und Anthropologie bei Lorenzo Hervás y Panduro”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.89–100.Google Scholar
Hervás (y Panduro), Lorenzo. 1784. Catalogo delle lingue conosciute, et notizia della loro affinità e diversità. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
Hervás y Panduro, Lorenzo. 1787a. Idea dell’Universo, vol. XX: Vocabolario poligloto, con prolegomeni sopra più di CL lingue. Dove sono scoperte nuove, ed utili all’Antica storia dell’uman genere, ed alla cognizione del meccanismo delle parole. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
. 1787b. Idea dell’Universo, vol. XXI: Saggio pratico delle lingue, con prolegomeni e una raccolta di orazioni dominicali in più di CCC lingue e dialetti. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B[rian] G[eorge]. 1981. “Caucasian Languages”. Comrie, ed. 1981.196–237.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. G. 1991. “The Valid and Non-valid Application of Philology to History”. Revue des Études Géorgiennes et Caucasiennes 6/71.247–263.Google Scholar
2005. “North West Caucasian”. Lingua 1151.91–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imart, G. 1968. “Uslar et la phonologie”. Linguistique 4:1.31–42.Google Scholar
Ingoroq’va, P’avle. 1954. giorgi merčule: kartveli mc’erali meate sauk’unisa [Giorgi Merčule: A Georgian writer of the 10th century]. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota mc’erali.Google Scholar
. 1963. “rustveliani”. Txzulebata k’rebuli, I. t’omi, 1–252. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota sakartvelo.Google Scholar
Jakovlev, N. F. 1949. “Izučenie jafetičeskix jazykov Severnogo Kavkaza za sovetskij period [Study of the Japhetic languages of the Northern Caucasus in the Soviet period]”. Jazyki Severnogo Kavkaza i Dagestana. Sbornik lingvističeskix issledovanij ed. by I. I. Meščaninov & G. P. Serd´jučenko, 296–315. Moscow: Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Janašia, Simon. 1940. “čerkezuli (adi>euri) element’i sakartvelos t’op’onimik’aši [The Circassian [Adyghe] element in the toponyms of Georgia]”. Mecnierebata ak’ademiis moambe I:8.623–627]. (Reprinted in his Šromebi III1 [1959]: 117–123.)Google Scholar
. 1942. “svanur-adi>euri enobrivi šexvedrebi [Svan-Adyghe linguistic contacts]”. ENIMK’-is moambe 121.249–278. (Reprinted in his Šromebi III1 [1959]: 81–116.)Google Scholar
Japaridze, Metropolitan Anania et al. 2005. “‘… an č’k’viani mt’eria, an ugnuri moq’vare’: sakartvelos sap’at’riarkostan arsebuli kartuli enisa da k’ult’iris samecniero sabč’os >ia c’erili [‘He’s either a clever enemy or a stupid friend’: An open letter by the ‘Scientific council on the Georgian language and culture’ of the Patriarchate of Georgia]”. Posted at mamuli.net, 5 December 2005.Google Scholar
Javaxišvili, Ivane. 1992 [1937]. [kartveli eris ist’oriis šesavali, c’igni meore:] kartuli da k’avk’asiuri enebis tavdap’irveli buneba da natesaoba [(Introduction to the History of the Georgian People, Book II:) The original nature and relation of the Georgian and Caucasian languages]. (= Txzulebani, 10.) Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 1950. kartveli eris ist’oriis šesavali, c’igni p’irveli: sakartvelos, k’avk’asiisa da maxlobeli a>mosavletis ist’oriul-etnologiuri p’roblemebi [Introduction to the History of the Georgian People, Book I: Historical and ethnological problems concerning Georgia, the Caucasus and the Near East]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
. 1960. Kartveli eris ist’oria [The history of the Georgian people]. Volume I1, 5th ed. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen. 2004. “The Role of Cultural Paradigms in Georgian Foreign Policy”. Ideology and National Identity in Post-Communist Foreign Policies ed. by Rick Fawn, 83–110. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Kakabadze, S. S. 1955. “O tak nazyvaemyx ‘xettsko-iberijskix’ jazykax [On the so-called ‘HatticIberian’ languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 41.65–72.Google Scholar
K’ak’abadze, Sargis. 1966. rustaveli da misi vepxist’q’aosani [Rustaveli and his ‘Knight in the Leopard’s Skin’]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Kaltz, Barbara. 2004. “‘Deutsche gründliche Kritik’: Christian Jacob Kraus zu Pallas’ Vergleichendem Glossarium aller Sprachen ”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.181–197.Google Scholar
Karst, Joseph. 1931. Origines Mediterraneae: Die vorgeschichtlichen Mittelmeervölker nach Ursprung, Schichtung und Verwandtschaft. Ethnologisch-linguistische Forschungen über Euskaldunak (Urbasken), Alarodier und Proto-Phrygen, Pyrenaeo-Kaukasier und Atlanto-Ligurer, West- und Ostiberer, Liguro-Leleger, Etrusker und Pelasger, Tyrrhener, Lyder und Hetiter. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kavtaradze, Giorgi. 1985. anatoliaši kartvelur t’omta gansaxlebis sak’itxisatvis [On the issue of the settlement of Georgian tribes in Anatolia]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Kholbaia, Vakhtang, Raphiel Gelantia, David Latsuzbaia & Teimuraz Chakhrakia. 1999. Labyrinth of Abkhazia. Translated and adapted by Nana Japaridze-Chkoidze. Tbilisi: Parliament of Georgia. [Text available on-line at <[URL]>]
Khoshtaria-Brosset, Edisher. 1997. History and Today: The Abkhazian problem in the light of conflict studies. Tbilisi: International Center on Conflict & Negotiation.Google Scholar
K itogam. 1956. “K itogam diskussii o ‘xettsko-iberijskom’ jazykovom edinstve [On the results of the discussion on the ‘Hattic-Iberian’ linguistic unity]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1956:11.68–73.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius von. 1812, 1814a. Reise in den Kaukasus and Georgien unternommen in den Jahren 1807 and 1808 auf Veranstaltung der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg. Enthaltend eine vollständige Beschreibung der kaukasischen Länder und ihrer Bewohner. 21 vols. Halle & Berlin: Buchhandlung des Hallischen Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
. 1814b. Kaukasische Sprachen. Anhang zur Reise in den Kaukasus und nach Georgien. Halle & Berlin: Buchhandlung des Hallischen Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
. 1826. Mémoires relatifs à l’Asie. Paris: Dondey-Dupré.Google Scholar
. 1827. Tableau historique, géographique, ethnographique et politique du Caucase et des provinces limitrophes entre la Russie et la Perse. Paris: Ponthieu et Cie.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius. 1831. Asia polyglotta. 2nd ed. Paris: Heideloff & Campe.Google Scholar
Klimov, G. A. 1964. Etimologičeskij slovar´ kartvel´skix jazykov. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1968. “O gipoteza vnutrennogo rodstva kavkazskix jazykov [On the hypothesis of the inner kinship of the languages of the Caucasus]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1968:6.16–25.Google Scholar
1969. Die kaukasische Sprachen. Transl. by Winfried Boeder. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
1970. “O vnešnix svjazjax kartvel´skix jazykov [On the external links of the Kartvelian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1970:6.36–45.Google Scholar
1973. “Kavkazskie (iberijsko-kavkazskie) jazyki [Caucasian (Ibero-Caucasian) languages]”. Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia, 3rd ed., vol. XI1, 121–122. Moscow: Naučnoe izdatel´stvo Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia.Google Scholar
1984. “Opyt stratifikacii kartvel´skix indoevropeizmov [Explorations of the stratification of Kartvelian Indo-Europeanisms]”. Ètimologija 1984.85–89.Google Scholar
1986a. Vvedenie v kavkazskoe jazykoznanie. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1986b. “Problems of Caucasian areal linguistics”. Aspects of Language: Studies in honour of Mario Alinei. Volume I: Geolinguistics. Papers presented to Mario Alinei by his friends and colleagues of the Atlas Linguarum Europae on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 123–131. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1991. “Some Thoughts on Indo-European-Kartvelian Relations”. Journal of IndoEuropean Studies 191.325–348.Google Scholar
1994. “Kartvelian Evidence for the Indo-European Laryngeal?”. Indogermanische Forschungen 991.62–71.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Aert. 1963. “Caucasian”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. I1: Soviet and East European Linguistics, 315–344. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
K’varacxelia, G. & V. Šengelia. 1998. arnold čikobavas dabadebis 100 c’listavisadmi midz>vnili saertašoriso simp’oziumis masalebi [Materials from an international symposium in honor of Arnold Čikobava’s 100th anniversary]. Tbilisi: Kartuli ena.Google Scholar
Lafon, René. 1929. “Quelques rapprochements entre les langues caucasiques septentrionales et les langues kartvèles”. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 291.138–152.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1998. “Language Myths and the Discourse of Nation-Building in Georgia”. NationBuilding in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The politics of national identities ed. by Graham Smith, Vivien Law, Andrew Wilson et al., 167–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von. 1989a [1768]. “Epistola ad Andream Acoluthum. Hanovera 10. Octobr. 1695”. Opera omnia, studio Ludovici Dutens, tomus sextus, 138–140. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1989b [1768]. “Desiderata Circa Linguas Populorum, ad Dn. Podesta, Interpretem Caesareum Transmissa”. Opera omnia, studio Ludovici Dutens, tomus sextus, 228–230. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Leont’i Mroveli. 1955. Kartlis cxovreba, I. cxovreba kartvelta mepeta [The Georgian Chronicles, I. The lives of the Georgian kings]. Ed. by Simon Q’auxčišvili. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Leščak, Oleg & Jurij Sitko. 2005. “Les considérations onto-gnoséologiques de Marr du point de vue de la méthodologie pragmatico-fonctionnelle”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.177–198.Google Scholar
Lomtatidze, K. V. 1955. “Nekotorye voprosy iberijsko-kavkazskogo jazykoznanija [Some questions of Ibero-Caucasian linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 41.73–82.Google Scholar
, red. 1989. Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykax. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Mač’avariani, Givi. 1966. “K tipologičeskoj xarakteristike obščekartvel´skogo jazyka-osnovy [On the typological characteristics of the Kartvelian protolanguage]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1966:1.1–9.Google Scholar
Machavariani, Givi. 1970. “The System of the Ancient Kartvelian Nominal Flection as Compared to those of the Mountain Caucasian and Indo-European Languages”. Theoretical problems of typology and the northern Eurasian languages ed. by László Dezső & Petar Hajdu, 165–169. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Mač’avariani, Givi. 2002. kartvelur enata šedarebiti gramat’ik’a [Comparative grammar of the Kartvelian languages]. Tbilisi: Tbilisis universit’et’is gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis. 1995. “On ‘Some Thoughts on Indo-European-Kartvelian Relations’”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 231.195–208.Google Scholar
Marr, N. Ja. 1908. “Predvaritel´noe soobščenie o rodstve gruzinskogo jazyka s semitičeskimi [Preliminary communication on the kinship of the Georgian language with Semitic]”. Marr. 1933.23–38.Google Scholar
1910. Grammatika čanskago (lazskago) jazyka [Grammar of the Chan (Laz) language]. (= Materialy po jafetičeskomy jazykoznaniju, 2.) St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
1912. K voprosu o položenii abxazskago jazyka sredi jafetičeskix [On the question of the place of the Abhhaz language within the Japhetic languages]. (= Materialy po jafetičeskom, 5.) St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
1916. “Kavkazovedenie i abxazskij jazyk [Caucasian and the Abkhaz language]”. Marr. 1933.59–78.Google Scholar
1920. “Jafetičeskij Kavkaz i tretij ètničeskij èlement v sozidanii Sredizemnomorskoj kul´tury [The Japhetic Caucasus and the third ethnic element in the creation of the Mediterranean culture]”. Marr. 1933.79–124.Google Scholar
1927a. “Iz Pirinejskoj Gurii (K voprosy o metode) [From Pyrenean Guria (On the question of method)]”. (= Izvestija kavkazskogo istoriko-arxeologičeskogo instituta, V.1–62.) Moscow.Google Scholar
1927b. “Predislovie k Jafetičeskomu Sborniku, tom V [Foreword to the Japhetic anthology, vol. V]”. Marr. 1933.249–253.Google Scholar
1930. “Abxazskij jazyk”. Literaturnaja Ènciklopedia I1, 18–23. Moscow: Izd. Kom. Akad.Google Scholar
1931. “Jafetičeskie jazyki”. Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia LXV1, 827–849. Moscow: Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia. [1st ed.]Google Scholar
1933. Izbrannye raboty. Tom I: Ètapy razvitija jafetičeskoj teorija. Leningrad, Izdat. GAIMK.Google Scholar
Melikišvili, Giorgi. 1959. K istorii drevnej Gruzii [On the history of Old Georgian]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich. 1887. Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft. III1. Band: Die Sprachen der lockenhaarigen Rassen. Wien: Alfred Hölder.Google Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max. 1854. Suggestions for the Assistance of Officers in Learning the Languages of the Seat of War in the East. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Nazarov, Vladimir P. 1974. “Der gegenwärtige Stand der Erforschung der kaukasischen Sprachen”. Kritik der marxistischen Sprachtheorie N. Ja. Marr’s ed. by Tasso Borbé, 21–61. Kronberg/Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. “Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar”. Language 62:1.56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “Nikolayev & Starostin’s North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary and the Methodology of Long-Range Comparison”. Paper presented at the 10th Conference on the Non-Slavic Languages of the ex-USSR (NSL 10), University of Chicago, 10 May 1997.
. 2003. “The Nakh-Daghestanian Consonant Correspondences”. Current trends in Caucasian, East European, and Inner Asian linguistics: Papers in honor of Howard I. Aronson ed. by Dee Ann Holisky & Kevin Tuite, 207–251. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolayev, S. L. & S. A. Starostin. 1994. A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk.Google Scholar
Nikol´skij, V. K. & N. F. Jakovlev. 1949. “Osnovnye položenija materialističeskogo učenija N. Ja. Marra o jazyke [Foundations of the materialistic teaching of N. Ja. Marr concerning language]”. Voprosy filosofii 11.265–285.Google Scholar
Öhrig, Bruno. 2000. “Adolf Dirr (1867–1930): Ein Kaukasus-Forscher am Münchner Völkerkundemuseum”. Münchner Beiträge zur Völkerkunde 61.199–234.Google Scholar
Oniani, Aleksandre. 1978. kartvelur enata ist’oriuli morpologiis sak’itxebi [Issues in Georgian historical morphology]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Oniani, A. L. 1985. “O grammatičeskoj kategorii klassa v kartvel´skix jazykax [On the grammatical category of class in the Kartvelian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1985:3.67–76.Google Scholar
Oniani, Aleksandre. 1989. kartvelur enata šedarebiti gramat’ik’is sak’itxebi: saxelta morpologia [Issues in the comparative grammar of the Kartvelian languages: Nominal morphology]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1983 [1916]. A Glance at the History of Linguistics, with particular regard to the historical study of phonology. Translated from the Danish by Caroline C. Henriksen; edited with an introduction by Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pictet, Adolphe. 1859. Les origines indo-européennes, ou les Aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique. Vol. I1. Paris: Joël Cherbuliez.Google Scholar
Potocki, Jean. 1829. Voyage dans les steppes d’Astrakhan et du Caucase. Paris: Merlin.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich. 1856. Die Ungleichheit menschlicher Rassen hauptsächlich vom sprachwissenschaftlichen Standpunkte, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von des Grafen von Gobineau gleichnamigem Werke. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer.Google Scholar
Put’k’aradze, T’ariel. 2001. “>vtismsaxurebis ena “q’ovelta kartvelta” ertianobis gamsaz>vreli ert-erti mtavari pakt’ori. samc’ignobro enisa da dialekt’ta mimartebis sak’itxisatvis [The liturgical language as one of the chief defining elements of the unity of “All Georgians”: On the question of the relation between a literary language and its dialects]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 51.227–241.Google Scholar
. 2002. “kartvelebi, zogadkartuli samc’ignobro ena da kartvelta dialekt’ebi [The Georgians, the Common-Georgian literary language and the Georgians’ dialects]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 61.187–203.Google Scholar
. 2003. “monatesave enobriv erteulta k’valipik’aciis sak’itxisatvis tanamedrove mecnierebaši [On the question of the qualification of related linguistic units in contemporary science]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 71.206–227.Google Scholar
. 2005. kartvelebi. ist’oriuli sacxovrisi, dedaena, dialekt’ebi. nac’ili I: krist’ianobamdeli ep’oka [The Georgians: Historical homeland, mother tongue, dialects. Part I: Pre-Christian period]. Kutaisi: Kutaisi State University Dialectology Research Institute.Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus. 1826. Über das Alter und die Echtheit der Zend-Sprache und des Zend-Avesta, und Herstellung des Zend-Alphabets; nebst einer Übersicht des gesammten Sprachstammes. Transl. by Friedrich Heinrich von der Hagen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Rogava, Giorgi. 1952. “kartvelur enata ponet’ik’is ist’oriul-šedarebiti šesc’avlis dziritadi sak’itxebi [Basic issues in the historical-comparative study of the phonetics of the Kartvelian languages]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 41.35–51.Google Scholar
. 1954. “iberiul-k’avk’asiur enata saerto k’utvnilebis tesvis a>mnišvneli pudze [The common Ibero-Caucasian root meaning ‘to sow’]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 61.51–53.Google Scholar
Sanžeev, G. D., ed. 1979. Jazyki Azii i Afriki. III: Jazyki drevnej perednej Azii (nesemitskie), Iberijsko-Kavkazskie jazyki, Paleoaziatskie jazyki. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Šaradzenidze, Tinatin. 1955. “brunvata k’lasipik’aciisatvis svanurši [On the classification of Svan declension]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 71.125–135Google Scholar
Sarĵveladze, Zurab, K’orneli Danelia & Elguĵa Giunašvili, eds. 1986. Iak’ob Xucesi “Šušanik’is c’ameba”, Giorgi Merčule “Grigol Xandztelis cxovreba”, sask’olo gamocema gamocema [“The Martyrdom of Shushanik” by Iakob Xucesi, and “The Life of Grigol of Xandzta” by Giorgi Merchule. School edition]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Schiefner, Anton. 1854. “Kurze Charakteristik der Thusch-Sprache”. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin historico-philologique de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St-Pétersbourg 21.402–426.Google Scholar
. 1856. Versuch über die Thusch-Sprache; oder, Die khistische Mundart in Thuschetien. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Horst. 1962. Studien zur Rekonstruktion des Lautstandes der südkaukasischen Grundsprache. (= Abhandlung für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 34:3), 1–160. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1896. “Über den passiven Charakter des Transitivs in den kaukasischen Sprachen”. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1331.1–91.Google Scholar
. 1912, 1914. “Zur methodischen Erforschung der Sprachverwandschaft (Nubisch und Baskisch)”. Revue Internationale des Etudes Basques 61.267–281; 81.389–396.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 1987. Review of Diakonoff & Starostin (1986). Kratylos 321.154–159.Google Scholar
Schulze[-Fürhoff], Wolfgang. 1992. “Zur Entwicklungsdynamik morphosyntaktischer Subsysteme: Die ostkaukasische Klassenzeichen”. Caucasologie und mythologie comparée ed. by Catherine Paris, 335–362. Louvain & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang. 1997. Review of Nikolayev & Starostin (1994). Diachronica 14:1.149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Person, Klasse, Kongruenz. Fragmente einer Kategorialtypologie des einfachen Satzes in den ostkaukasischen Sprachen. Band I: Die Grundlagen. München & Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Die kaukasischen Sprachen”. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques ed. by Martin Haspelmath et al., Tome I1, 1774–1796. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Grammars for East Caucasian”. Anthropological Linguistics 47.3: 321–352.Google Scholar
Sériot, Patrick. 1993. “La double vie de Troubetzkoy, ou la clôture des systèmes”. Le Gré des langues 51.88–115. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
, ed. 2005a. Un paradigme perdu: La linguistique marriste. (= Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage, 20.) Lausanne: Université de Lausanne.Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Si Vico avait lu Engels, il s’appellerait Nicolas Marr”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.227–254.Google Scholar
Shamba, Giorgi. 1998. “On the Track of Abkhazia’s Antiquity”. The Abkhazians: A handbook ed. by B. G. Hewitt, 48–58. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Slodzian, Monique. 2005. “Actualité de Marr, ou permanence de l’utopie”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.271–293.Google Scholar
Smeets, Rieks. 1989. “On Hurro-Urartian as Eastern Caucasian language”. Bibliotheca Orientalis 461.259–279.Google Scholar
Stalin, Joseph. 1972 [1951]. Marxism and Problems of Linguistics. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Strahlenberg, Philip Johan von. 1730. Das Nordund Östliche Theil von Europa und Asia, in so weit solches das gantze Russische Reich mit Sibirien und der grossen Tatarey in sich begriffet. Stockholm: In Verlegung des Autoris.Google Scholar
Tintemann, Ute. 2004. “ Asia Polyglotta: Zu den Sprachstudien von Julius Heinrich Klaproth”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.199–214.Google Scholar
Tintemann, Ute & Jürgen Trabant, eds. 2004. Sprache und Sprachen in Berlin um 1800. (= Berliner Klassik – eine Grossstadtkultur um 1800, 3.) Hannover-Laatzen: Wehrhahn.Google Scholar
Tiškov, V. A., chief ed. 1994. Narody Rossij: Ènciklopedija. Moscow: Naučnoe izdatel´stvo Bol´šaja Rossijskaja Ènciklopedia.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen. 2004. “Mithridates in Berlin”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.141–159.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2001. “The Whole History of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters: Before [Lewis Henry] Morgan, Morgan, and after Morgan”. Anthropological Theory 1:2.268–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1987 [1930]. “Severnokavkazskie slovarnye sopostavlenija”. Izbrannye trudy po filologii. Moscow: Progress, 271–282. [Russian translation, with annotations by Sergej Starostin, of “Nordkaukasische Wortgleichungen”, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 37:2: 79–92.]Google Scholar
1934. Review of Georges Dumézil, Études comparatives sur les langues caucasiennes du Nord-Ouest (Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve, 1932) and Dumézil. (1933b). Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 101.629–635.Google Scholar
Tseretheli, М. 1913–1916. “Sumerian and Georgian: A study in comparative philology”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 451.783–821; 461.1–36; 471.255–288; 481.1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin. 2003. “Explorations in the Ideological Infrastructure of Indo-European Studies”. Historiographia Linguistica 30:1/2.205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Of Phonemes, Fossils and Webs of Meaning: The interpretation of language variation and change”. Language, Culture and Society: Key topics in linguistic anthropology ed. by Christine Jourdan & Kevin Tuite, 229–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin & Wolfgang Schulze. 1998. “A Case of Taboo-Motivated Lexical Replacement in the Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus”. Anthropological Linguistics 40:3.363–383.Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques. 1966 [1756]. “Étymologie”. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers ed. by Denis Diderot & Jean D’Alembert, vol. VI1, 98–111. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann.Google Scholar
Uslar, P. K. 1888. Ètnografija Kavkaza: Jazykoznanie, II: Čečenskij jazyk. Tiflis: Upravlenie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma. 2005. “The East Caucasian Language Family”. Lingua 1151.147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. & F. M. Voegelin. 1964. “Languages of the World: Ibero-Caucasian and PidginCreole. Fascicle one”. Anthropological Linguistics 6:8.1–39.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hans. 1932. “Les groupes nominaux en arménien et en géorgien anciens”. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 51.57–81.Google Scholar
. 1942. “La parenté des langues caucasiques”. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 121.242–257.Google Scholar
. 1955. “Le basque et les langues caucasiques”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 511.121–147.Google Scholar
Voronov, Ju. N. 1994. Abkhazians – Who are they? Sukhum: Abkhazian State University.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Wier, Thomas R.
2024. Review of: Polinsky, Maria (ed.). 2021. Oxford handbook of the languages of the Caucasus . Linguistic Typology 28:3 ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
ШКИЛЬ, М.Д.
2023. RELATIONS BETWEEN SECULAR POWER AND THE CHURCH IN THE VITA OF GRIGOL OF XANDZTA: TEXTUAL ANALYSIS AND CONTEXTUALIZATION. Известия СОИГСИ :48(87) ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter
2022. Morphology of the Caucasian Languages: A Typological Overview. Jezikoslovni zapiski 28:1 DOI logo
Baker, Jennifer L., Charles N. Rotimi & Daniel Shriner
2017. Human ancestry correlates with language and reveals that race is not an objective genomic classifier. Scientific Reports 7:1 DOI logo
Grawunder, Sven
2017. The Caucasus. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 356 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2013. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2013. Isis 104:S1 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.