Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 35:3 (2008) ► pp.275–304

The Treatment of ‘Nomen’ in the First Slovenian Grammar (Bohorič 1584)

| Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences & Arts
The article focuses on the treatment of the noun (nomen) in the grammar published in 1584 by the first Slovenian grammarian, Adam Bohorič (c.1520–1598), under the title Arcticae horulae succisivae de Latinocarniolana literatura (“Spare winter hours on Latin-Carniolan grammar”). The chapter on the noun is examined in the larger context of European grammar-writing, revealing the Bohorič grammar to be a fully-fledged humanist text. In addition, the article explains certain aspects of the work which have sometimes been criticised as weaknesses, provides graphic representations of its structure, and describes Bohorič’s debt to Philipp Melanchthon (1497–1560), the similarities between his work and the German grammar by Johannes Clajus (1535–1592), and the parallels with other grammarians. Moreover, some new findings are presented concerning the glossaries accompanying the paradigms.
Published online: 15 August 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.35.3.02aha
References (55)
References
Albertus, Laurentius. 1573. Teutſch Grammatick oder Sprachkunſt. Certissima ratio diſcendae, augendae, ornandae, propagandae, conſeruandaeque linguae Alemanorum ſiue Germanorum, grammaticis regulis et exemplis comprehenſa et conſcripta: per Laurentium Albertum Oſtrofrancum. Augustae Vindelicorum: Michael Manger.Google Scholar
Anon. No date. Dictionarium latino-germanicum et germanuo-latinum. No place.
. 1482–1489. Vocabularius latino-germanicus. Spirae: Drach.Google Scholar
Bohorič, Adam. 1584. Arcticae horulae ſucciſivae. Wittenberg: [Johann Kraffts Erben]. (= BH 1584.)Google Scholar
Bohorizh, Adam. 1987. Arcticae horulae succisivae – Zimske urice proste. Translated into Slovenian by Jože Toporišič. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, Carolus Gottlieb, ed. 1990 [1854]. Philippi Melanchthonis Opera quae supersunt omnia. (= Corpus Reformatorum, 20.) Bad Feilnbach: Schmidt Periodicals. (= MGL-CR.)Google Scholar
Calepinus, Ambrosius. 1562. Dictionarium Ambrosii Calepini: postremo nunc supra omnes hactenus editiones magna omnis generis vocum accessione auctum, et ex Pauli Manutii Aldi obseruationibus locupletatum. Basileae: Ex officina Hieronymi Curionis.Google Scholar
Cassius, Bartholomaeus (Kašić, Bartul). 2005 [1604]. Institutiones linguae Illyricae/Osnove hrvatskoga jezika. Editionem alteram curavit, vernacula interpretatione prolegomenisque instruxit Zonko Pandžić. Zagreb & Mostar: Tusculanae Editiones.Google Scholar
Clajus, Johannes. 1578. Grammatica germanicae linguae … ex bibliis Lutheri Germanicis et aliis eius libris collecta. Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Colombat, Bernard. 1999. La grammaire latine en France, à la Renaissance et à l’Âge classique: Théories et pédagogie. Grenoble: Éditions de l’Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Dasypodius, Petrus. 1535. Dictionarium Latinogermanicum. Straßburg: Rihel.Google Scholar
Dubois, Jacques. 1531. In linguam Gallicam isagωge, una cum eiusdem Grammatica Latino-Gallica, ex Hebraeis, Graecis et Latinis authoribus. Parisiis: Ex officina Roberti Stephani.Google Scholar
Estienne, Robert. 1569 [1557]. Traicté de la grammaire françoiſe. Paris: Rob. Estienne, Imprimeur du Roy.Google Scholar
Faber, Basil. 1572. Dictionarium latino-graeco-germanicum. Lipsiae: Joh. Ranke.Google Scholar
Foerster, Wendelin, ed. 1888. Le Tretté de la grammere françoeze. Nach der einzigen Pariser Ausgabe 1550. Heilbronn: Gebr. Henninger.Google Scholar
Frisius, Joannes. 1556. Novum Latino-Germanicum et Germanico-latinum Lexicon. Basileae: Joannes König.Google Scholar
Garnier, Jean. 1591 [1558]. Institutio Gallicae linguae in usum juventutis Germanicae, ad illustrissimos juniores Principes, Landtgravios Hessiae, conscripta. Genevae: Apud haeredes E. Vignon.Google Scholar
Grdina, Igor. 1999. Od Brižinskih spomenikov do razsvetljenstva [From the Freising manuscripts to the Age of Enlightenment]. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Ising, Erika. 1966. Die Anfänge der volkssprachlichen Grammatik in Deutschland und Böhmen: Dargestellt am Einfluß der Schrift des Aelius Donatus De octo partibus ars minor: Teil I: Quellen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Junius, Hadrianus. 1577. Nomenclator omnium rerum propria nomina variis linguis explicate indicans. Antverpiae: Plantinus.Google Scholar
Keil, Heinrich, ed. 1961 [1855–1866]. Grammatici Latini II–IV. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. (= GL II–IV.)Google Scholar
Kidrič, France. 1925. “Adam Bohorič”. Slovenski biografski leksikon I1, 49–52. Ljubljana: Zadružna gospodarska banka.Google Scholar
Kolarič, Rudolf. 1971. “Die Sprache in Adam Bohoričs Arcticae horulae ”. Adam Bohorič: Arcticae horulae: Die erste Grammatik der slowenischen Sprache, 29–82. München: Rudolf Trofenik.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe from Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linacre, Thomas. 1998 [1524]. De emendata structura Latini sermonis. Introducción, edición crítica, traducción y notas por Luisa Harto Trujillo. Cáceres: Universidad de Extramadura.Google Scholar
Manutius, Aldus Pius. 1514 [1493]. Grammaticarum institutionum libri quatuor. Venetiis: Aldus Manutius.Google Scholar
McLelland, Nicola. 2001. “Albertus (1573) and Ölinger (1574): Creating the first grammars of German”. Historiographia Linguistica 28:1/2.7–38.Google Scholar
Meigret, Louis. 1550. See Foerster 1888.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp. [n. d.]. Grammatica Philippi Melanchthonis, Latina, iam denuo recognita, et plerisque in locis locupletata. Norimbergae: Apud Ioh. Petreium. (= MGL.)
. 1571. [Grammaticae Graecae libellus Philippi Melanchtonis cum accessionibus Joachimi Camerarii Papebergensis editus]. Lipsiae: Andr. Scheider. (= MGG.)Google Scholar
. 1585. Grammatica Philippi Melancthonis recognita et locupletata. Accessit tractatus de Orthographia, recens. Lipsiae: Imprimebat Iohannes Steinman. (= MGL-Cam.)Google Scholar
Merše, Majda & France Novak. 2001. Slovar jezika protestantskih piscev 16. stoletja: Poskusni snopič [The dictionary of the Slovenian language in the 16th century: Trial fascicle]. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC.Google Scholar
Merše, Majda & Kozma Ahačič, Andreja Legan Ravnikar, Jožica Narat, France Novak, Francka Premk. 2006. “Wortschatz der slowenischen Bibelübersetzungen des 16. Jahrhunderts”. Biblia Slavica, Serie IV: Südslavische Bibeln, Band 3,2: Kommentare, 99–325. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Megiser, Hieronymus. 1603. Theſaurus Polyglottus. Frankfurt: [Johann Spiess].Google Scholar
Müller-Fraureuth, Carl, ed. 1895 [1573]. Die deutsche Grammatik des Laurentius Albertus. (= Ältere deutsche Grammatiken in Neudrucken, 3.) Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Ölinger, Albert. 1574. Underricht der Hoch Teutschen Spraach: Grammatica seu Institutio Verae Germanicae linguae, in qua Etymologia, Syntaxis et reliquae partes omnes suo ordine breviter tractantur. In usum juventutis maxime Gallicae, ante annos aliquot conscripta […]. Cum D. Joan. Sturmii sententia, de cognitione et exercitatione linguarum nostri saeculi. Straßburg: Nicolaus Wyriot. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1975.)Google Scholar
Orožen, Martina. 1971. “Začetki slovenske jezikoslovne misli [The beginnings of the thought about language in Slovenia]”. Jezik in slovstvo 16:7.193–200.Google Scholar
Padley, G[eorge] A[rthur]. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. 1985. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pandžić, Zvonko. 2005. “The Semantics of Traditional Grammar”. Cassius 2005.5–188.Google Scholar
Pillot, Jean. 1586 [1550]. Gallicae linguae institutio. Lugduni: Apud Benedictum Rigaudum.Google Scholar
Pogorelec, Breda. 1984. “Štiristo let Bohoričeve slovnice”. Jezik in slovstvo 29:6.210–216.Google Scholar
Rösing-Hager, Monika, ed. 1973 [1578]. Johannes Claius: Grammatica Germanicae Linguae. (= Documenta Linguistica: Quellen zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache des 15. bis 20. Jahrhunderts; Reihe V: Deutsche Grammatiken des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts .) Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
, ed. 1975 [1574]. Albert Ölinger: Vnderricht der Hoch Teutschen Spraach. (= Documenta Linguistica: Quellen zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache des 15. bis 20. Jahrhunderts; [etc.].) Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Rupel, Mirko. 1956. “Reformacija [The Reformation]”. Zgodovina slovenskega slovstva I: Od začetkov do romantike, 183–260. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica.Google Scholar
Serbat, Guy. 1981. Cas et fonctions: Études des principales doctrines casuelles du Moyen Âge à nos jours. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Le septimus casus en latin: Un cas-fantôme?”. Florilegium Historiographiae Linguisticae ed. by Jan De Clercq & Piet Desmet Piet, 159–172. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Serranus, Johannes. 1539. Dictionarium Latinogermanicum. Nürnberg: Petreius.Google Scholar
Stabej, Jože. 1971. “Slowenisch-lateinisches-deutsches (zum Teil) Wörterbuch der Grammatik von Adam Bohorič”. Adam Bohorič: Arcticae horulae: Die erste Grammatik der slowenischen Sprache, 144–206. München: Rudolf Trofenik.Google Scholar
Statorius, Petrus. 1568. Polonicae grammatices institutio. Cracoviae: Apud Mathiam Wirzbietam, Typographum Regium.Google Scholar
. 1980 [1568]. Polonicae grammatices institutio. Nunc iterum edidit Reinhold Olesch. Köln & Wien: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Toporišič, Jože. 1984. “Oblikoslovje v Bohoričevih Zimskih uricah [The morphology in Arcticae Horulae by Bohorič]”. XX. seminar slovenskega jezika, literature in kulture, 189–222. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Zimske urice, prva slovenska slovnica [ Arcticae Horulae, the first grammar of the Slovenian language]”. Arcticae horulae succisivae / Zimske urice proste, 281–328. Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Trissino, Giangiorgio. 1729. Tutte le opere di Giovan Giorgio Trissino gentiluomo Vicentino non piu’ raccolte. Verona: Jacopo Vallarsi.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ahačič, Kozma
2014. The main characteristics of grammar-writing in Slovenia between 1584 and 1758. In History of Linguistics 2011 [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 123], ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.