Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 38:1/2 (2011) ► pp.5–36

Heritage and Innovation in the Grammatical Analysis of Latin

The Ars Ambrosiana commentary (6th/7th century) on Donatus (ca. 350 A.D.)

| Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
The Ars Ambrosiana is an early medieval Latin grammatical commentary on Donatus’ Ars maior, written in Northern Italy in the 6th or 7th century A.D. In comparison with preceding grammatical commentaries, the Ars Ambrosiana displays a much more profound Christian-exegetical way of thinking. This study opens with an overview of the historicalcultural context of the grammatical commentary and of the general way of thinking of its anonymous author. The remainder of the article consists in an analysis of the, to some extent highly original, framework which the author uses for describing the Latin language, illustrated by a brief study of the terms agnitio (“recognition”) and nuntiatio (“[linguistic] form”), and their combinations with the adjectives specialis (“special”) and tota (“entire/ whole”).
Published online: 26 May 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.38.1-2.01vis
References (79)
References
A. Text editions, text edition series, and reference works
Anonymus. Ars Ambrosiana. Commentum Anonymum in Donati Partes Maiores. Ed. by Bengt M. Löfstedt. (= CCSL 133C.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1982.Google Scholar
. Ars Bernensis. Ed. by Heinrich Hagen. (= G.L. VIII), 62–142. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1870.Google Scholar
. Congregatio Salcani filii de uerbo. Ed. by Bengt M. Löfstedt. Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus, 194–260. Uppsala: Ubsalensis S. Academia, 1965.Google Scholar
Anonymus ad Cuimnanum. Expossitio Latinitatis. Ed by Bernhard Bischoff & Bengt M. Löfstedt. (= CCSL 133D.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1992.Google Scholar
Augustinus, Aurelius. De Civitate Dei. 21 vols. Ed. by Bernhard Dombart & Alfons Kalb. (= CCSL 47–48.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.Google Scholar
. De genesi ad litteram. Ed. by Iosephus Zycha. Sancti Aureli Augustini De genesi ad litteram libri duodecim, eiusdem libri capitula, de genesi ad litteram imperfectus liber, locutionum in heptateuchum libri septem. (= CSEL 28.1.) Wien: Tempsky, 1894.Google Scholar
. De magistro. Ed. by William M. Green. (= CCSL 29.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1970.Google Scholar
. De trinitate. Ed. by William J. Mountain & F. Glorie. 21 vols. (= CCSL 50–50A.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus, In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta. Ed. by Georg Schepss & Samuel Brandt. Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii in Isagogen Porphyrii commenta. (= CSEL 48.1.) Wien: Tempsky.
. Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermēneias. Ed. by Karl Meiser. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1877–1880.Google Scholar
CCSL: Corpus Christianorum Series Latina. Turnhout: Brepols, 1953–.Google Scholar
CSEL: Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. Wien: Tempsky & Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1866–.Google Scholar
Diomedes, Artis grammaticae libri III. Ed. by Heinrich Keil. (= G.L. I), 297–529. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1857.Google Scholar
Donatus, Aelius. Ars maior. Ed. by Louis Holtz. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical, 603–674. Paris: CNRS, 1981.Google Scholar
. Ars minor. Ed. by Louis Holtz. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical, 585–602. Paris: CNRS, 1981.Google Scholar
G.L. : Keil, Heinrich, ed. 1855–1870. Grammatici Latini. 81 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Isidorus Hispalensis, Etymologiarum sive Originum libri XX. Ed. by Wallace Martin Lindsay. Oxford: Clarendon 1986[1911].Google Scholar
P.L. : Migne, Jacques-Paul, ed. 1844–1864. Patrologia Latina: Patrologiae cursus completus sive bibliotheca universalis, integra, uniformis, commoda, oeconomia, omnium ss. Patrum, doctorum scriptorumque ecclesiasticorum qui ab aevo apostolico ad usque Innocentii III tempora floruerunt. 2211 vols. Paris: J.-P. Migne.Google Scholar
Priscianus Caesariensis. Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII. 21 vols. Ed. by Martin Hertz. (= G.L. II–III.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1855.Google Scholar
. Institutio de nomine et pronomine et uerbo. Ed. by Marina Passalacqua. Prisciani Caesariensis Opuscula, vol. II1, 3–41. Roma: Storia e letteratura, 1999.Google Scholar
Sedulius Scottus, In Evangelium Matthaei. Ed. by Bengt M. Löfstedt. Sedulius Scottus: Kommentar zum Evangelium nach Matthäus 1,1–11,1. (= Vetus Latina: Die Reste der altlateinischen Bibel. Aus der Geschichte der lateinischen Bibel, 14.) Freiburg im Bresgau: Herder, 1989.Google Scholar
ThLL: Vollmer, Friedrich et al., eds. 1900–. Thesaurus linguae Latinae. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner; München: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Victorinus, Marius. In Epistulam Pauli ad Ephesios libri duo. Ed. by Franco Gori. Marii Victorini Opera Pars II: Opera exegetica. (= CSEL 83.2), 1–94. Wien: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986.Google Scholar
. Liber de definitionibus. Ed. by Andreas Pronay. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. Epistolae & Epitomae. Ed. by Bengt M. Löfstedt. Virgilius Maro Grammaticus: Opera omnia. Leipzig & München: K. G. Saur, 2003.Google Scholar
B. Secondary sources
Amsler, Mark. 1989. Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 44.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Commentary and Metalanguage in Early Medieval Latin Grammar”. History and Historiography of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS IV), Trier, 24–28 August 1987 ed. by HansJosef Niederehe & Konrad Koerner (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 51), 175–187. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baratin, Marc & Françoise Desbordes (avec la participation de Philippe Hoffmann & Alain Pierrot). 1981. L’analyse linguistique dans l’Antiquité classique. Vol. I: Les théories. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Beck, Jan-Wilhelm. 1996. Zur Zuverlässigkeit der bedeutendsten lateinischen Grammatik: Die ‘Ars’ des Aelius Donatus. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur; Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Berschin, Walter. 1991. “Griechisches in der Domschule von Verona”. Scritture, libri e testi nelle aree provinciali di Bisanzio. Vol. I1, ed. by Guglielmo Cavallo, Giuseppe De Gregorio & Marilena Maniaci, 221–234. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di studi sull’Alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
Büren, Veronika von. 2007. “La place du manuscrit Ambr. L 99 sup. dans la transmission des Étymologies d’Isidore de Séville”. Nuove ricerche su codici in scrittura latina dell’Ambrosiana. Atti del convegno Milano, 6–7 ottobre 2005 ed. by Mirella Ferrari & Marco Navoni, 25–44. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Copeland, Rita & Ineke Sluiter, eds.. 2009. Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language arts and literary theory, AD 300–1475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Giulio. 1986. Fons scientiae: La dialettica nell’Occidente tardo-antico. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
De Vogüé, Adalbert. 1988. Jonas de Bobbio, Vie de saint Colomban et de ses disciples. Bégrollesen-Mauge: Abbaye de Bellefontaine.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Jacques. 1959. Isidore de Séville et la culture classique dans l’Espagne wisigothique. Paris: Études augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Manfred. 1960. Das systematische Lehrbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Giannini, Stefania. 1997. “ Sensus ed elocutio: Sintassi e semantica nell’analisi delle partes orationis ”. Grammatica e ideologia nella storia della Linguistica ed. by Pierangelo Berrettoni & Franco Lorenzi, 153–170. Margiacchi: Galeno.Google Scholar
Grondeux, Anne & Colette Jeudy. 2001. “À propos de pus: Sens médiéval d’un mot antique”. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi (Bulletin Du Cange) 591.139–160.Google Scholar
Hill, Edmund, transl. 2002. “Saint Augustine, The Literal Meaning of Genesis”. The Works of Saint Augustine: A translation for the 21st century, vol. I.13, ed. by the Augustinian Heritage Institute, 153–506. New York: New City Press.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof. 1996. The Sankt Gall Priscian Commentary. Part I. 21 vols. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical: Étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe-IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
. 1983. “Les grammairiens Hiberno-Latins étaient-ils des Anglo-Saxons?”. Peritia 21.170–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Continuité et discontinuité de la tradition grammaticale au VIIe siècle”. Le septième siècle: Changements et continuités ed. by Jacques Fontaine & Jocelyn N. Hillgarth, 41–57. London: The Warburg Institute & University of London.Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin. 1994. The Making of Textual Culture: ‘grammatica’ and literary theory, 350–1100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1982. The Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Irish Symptoms and the Provenance of Sixthand Seventh-Century Latin Grammars”. Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques ed. by Sylvain Auroux, Michel Glatigny & André Joly, 77–85. Lille: Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
. 1990. “The History of Morphology: Expression of a change in consciousness”. Understanding the Historiography of Linguistics: Problems and projects ed. by Werner Hüllen, 61–74. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
. 1997. “From Aural to Visual: Medieval representations of the word”. Grammar and Grammarians in the early Middle Ages ed. by Vivien Law, 250–259. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Memory and the Structure of Grammars in Antiquity and the Middle Ages”. Manuscripts and Tradition of Grammatical Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Vol. 11, ed. by Mario De Nonno, Paolo De Paolis & Louis Holtz, 9–58. Cassino: Edizioni dell’ Università degli Studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
. 2000a. “The Middle Ages”. Morphologie – Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation ed. by Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (= Handbücher zur Sprachund Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 17), 76–90. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio, ed. 1994. History of Linguistics II: Classical and Medieval Linguistics. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, Bengt M. 1965. Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus. Uppsala: Ubsalensis S. Academia.Google Scholar
1980. “Zu den Quellen des hibernolateinischen Donatkommentars im cod. Ambrosianus L 22 sup.”. Studi medievali ser. 3, 21:1.301–320.Google Scholar
1998. “Zur Grammatik in Paris Bibl. Nat. ms. Lat. 7491”. Peritia 121.95–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Elias Avery. 1934–1971. Codices Latini antiquiores: A palaeographical guide to Latin manuscripts prior to the ninth century. 111 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. 2002. “On Definitions in Ancient Grammar”. Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity ed. by Pierre Swiggers & Alfons Wouters, 257–285. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Manitius, Max. 1911. Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters. Vol. I1. München: H. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 1988[1983]. Early Medieval Philosophy (480–1150): An introduction. London & New York.: Routledge. (2nd rev. ed., 1988.)Google Scholar
. 2008. “Logic before 1100: The Latin tradition”. Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. II: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic ed. by Dov M. Gabbay & John Woods, 1–63. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mariotti, Italo. 1967. Marii Victorini Ars grammatica: Introduzione, testo critico e commento. Firenze: Felice Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Laurentius, ed. 1966. Categoriarum supplementa: Porphyrii Isagoge, translatio Boethii et anonymi fragmentum vulgo vocatum “Liber sex principiorum”; accedunt Isagoges fragmenta M. Victorino interprete. (= Aristoteles Latinus 1.6–7.) Brugge: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Munzi, Luigi. Forthcoming. “Exégèse biblique et commentaire grammatical dans le Haut Moyen-Âge”. Ancient Grammar and its Posterior Tradition ed. by Nikolai N. Kazansky, Vladimir I. Mazhuga, L. G. Medvedev, Pierre Swiggers & Alfons Wouters. Leuven: Peeters.
Piazzi, Alberto. 1994. Biblioteca capitolare Verona. Fiesole: Nardini.Google Scholar
Piazzi, Alberto & Giuseppe Zivelonghi. 1984. La tradizione veronese nelle miniature dei codici capitolari. Verona: Biblioteca Capitolare.Google Scholar
Plezia, Marian. 1949. De commentariis isagogicis. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Remigio. 1903. “Spogli Ambrosiani latini”. Studi latini di filologia classica 111.165–388.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter Lebrecht. 1989. “Grammatik und Rhetorik”. Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike. Vol. V: Restauration und Erneuerung: Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n. Chr. ed. by Reinhart Herzog, 101–158. München: H. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Schoepflin, Maurizio. 1994. Il “De magistro” di Sant’Agostino e il tema dell’educazione nel cristianesimo antico. Torino: Paravia.Google Scholar
Stock, Christian. 2005. Commentarium de oratione et de octo partibus orationis artis secundae Donati: Überlieferung, Text und Kommentar. München: K. G. Saur. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stotz, Peter. 1996–2004. Handbuch zur lateinischen Sprache des Mittelalters. 51 vols. München: H. C. Beck.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre & Alfons Wouters. 1998. De Tékhne Grammatike van Dionysius Thrax: De oudste spraakkunst in het Westen. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Taeger, Burkhard. 1991. “‘Multiplex enim ut lex Dei etiam Latinitas’: Zu den Quellen des Anonymus ad Cuimnanum”. Studi medievali ser. 3, 32:1.1–91.Google Scholar
Thompson, James Westfall. 1967 [1939]. The Medieval Library. 3rd reprinting with a supplement by B. B. Boyer. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Toom, Tarmo. 2002. Thought Clothed with Sound: Augustine’s christological hermeneutics in ‘De doctrina Christiana’. Bern & Frankurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tosi, Michele. 1965. Jonas: Vita Columbani et discipulorum eius. Piacenza: Emiliana Grafica.Google Scholar
Vineis, Edoardo. 1994. “Medieval Linguistics”. History of Linguistics ed. by Giulio Lepschy, vol. II1: Classical and Medieval Linguistics, 134–271. Harlow: Longman. [Transl. into English by Emma Sansone.]Google Scholar
Visser, Louise J. 2011. “Latin Grammatical Manuals in the Early Middle Ages: Tradition and adaptation in the participle chapter”. Ancient Scholarship and Grammar ed. by Franco Montanari & Antonios Rengakos, 375–404. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zironi, Alessandro. 2004. Il monastero longobardo di Bobbio: Crocevia di uomini, manoscritti e culture. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bauer, Bernhard & Victoria Krivoshchekova
2022. Definitions, dialectic and Irish grammatical theory in Carolingian glosses on Priscian: a case study using a close and distant reading approach. Language & History 65:2 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Martinelli, Chiara
2018. Francesco da Buti −glossarum compendiumaldoctrinale. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 40:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Walvoort, Hendrik Christiaan
2018. Declension of the Latin present participle in connection with its syntactico-semantic use. Journal of Latin Linguistics 17:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.