Review article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 38:1/2 (2011) ► pp. 127157
References

References

Baratin, Marc
1984 “Grammaticalité et intelligibilité chez Priscien”. Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques éd. par Sylvain Auroux, Michel Glatigny et al., 155–162. Lille: Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
Baratin, Marc, Bernard Colombat & Louis Holtz
2009Priscien Transmission et Refondation de la Grammaire de l’Antiquité aux Modernes. (= Studia Artistarum, 21.) Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Chauvot, Alain
1986Procope de Gaza, Priscien de Césarée, Panégyriques de l’empéreur Anastase 1er. Bonn: Dr Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Coyne, Patricia
ed. 1991De Laude Anastasii Imperatoris. (= Studies in Classics, 1.) Lewiston-Queenston-Lampeter: Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof
1990 “The Priscian Text Used in Three Ninth-Century Irish Donatus Commentaries”. Diversions of Galway: Papers on the History of Linguistics from ICHoLS V, Galway, Ireland. 1–6 September 1990 ed. by Anders Ahlqvist (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 68), 7–15. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1990 “ Una et eadem: Some observations on Roger Bacon’s Greek Grammar”. De ortu grammaticae: Studies in medieval grammar and linguistic theory in memory of Jan Pinborg ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbesen & Konrad Koerner (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 43), 117–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Joannes de Balbi
1971Catholicon. Facsimile of Mainz edition 1460 Farnborough: Gregg International Publishers.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G.
2002The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 101.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005 “Adverbs, Definitions and Reality”. Flores Grammaticae: Essays in memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew R. Linn (= The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of Linguistics, 10.) Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H.
1995 “The Priscianic Tradition”. Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter ed. by Sten Ebbesen, 239–264. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1992 “Carolingian Grammarians and Theoretical Innovation”. Diversions of Galway: Papers on the History of Linguistics from ICHoLS V, Galway, Ireland. 1–6 September 1990 ed. by Anders Ahlqvist (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 68), 31–37. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1997Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages. London & New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli
2005Grammar and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 107.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Padley, G[eorge] A[rthur]
1976Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A.
1988Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W[alter] Keith
1987 “On Priscian’s Syntactic Theory: The medieval perspective”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III) ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 38), 65–76. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Petrus Helias
c.1150?Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by Leo Reilly, CSB. (= Studies and Texts, 111 & 113). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies 1993.Google Scholar
Priscian
1476Opera omnia. Venice: Johañes de Colonia & Mañthen de Gherretzen.Google Scholar
Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Libri Omnes
1528 Cologne: Eucharius Cervicornus.Google Scholar
Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Libri Omnes
1554 Basileae: apud Nicolaum Bryling.Google Scholar
Priscian 1832 “De Ponderibus et mensuris”. Ed. by Wilhelm Ernst Weber, Corpus Poetarum Romanorum 1371–1372 Frankfurt-am-Main: Ludwig Broenner.Google Scholar
Priscian 1859Ôpera omnia. (= Grammatici latini ed. by Heinrich Keil, vols. II–III). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.)Google Scholar
Rieux, Jacques & Bernard E. Rollin
eds. 1975The Port-Royal Grammar. (= Janua linguarum, Series minor, 208.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roger Bacon
1250?Summa grammaticae. ( = Rogeri Bacon Opera hactenus inedita I ed. by Robert Steele). Oxford: Clarendon Press 1940.Google Scholar
1250?Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Ed. by Edmund Nolan & S[amuel] A. Hirsch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1902.Google Scholar
c.1292Compendium Studii Philosophiae. Ed. by J. S. Brewer. (= Fr. Rogeri Bacon Opera quaedam hactenus inedita, 1; Rolls Series, 15), 391–519. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 1859.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène
2005 ‘The Glosulae in Priscianum and its Tradition’. Flores grammaticae: Essays in Memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew R. Linn (= The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of Linguistics, 10), 81–100. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Sedulius Scotus
. 9th century. In Priscianum Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt. (= Corpus Christianorum Continuatio medievalis, XLC.) Turnhout: Brepols 1957.Google Scholar
van de Woestijne, Paul
ed. 1953La Périégèse de Priscien. (= Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Werken, 116.) Brugge: De Tempel.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger
1982Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
2020.  In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212],  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.