Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 38:1/2 (2011) ► pp.127157
References (30)
References
Baratin, Marc. 1984. “Grammaticalité et intelligibilité chez Priscien”. Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques éd. par Sylvain Auroux, Michel Glatigny et al., 155–162. Lille: Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
Baratin, Marc, Bernard Colombat & Louis Holtz. 2009. Priscien Transmission et Refondation de la Grammaire de l’Antiquité aux Modernes. (= Studia Artistarum, 21.) Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chauvot, Alain. 1986. Procope de Gaza, Priscien de Césarée, Panégyriques de l’empéreur Anastase 1er. Bonn: Dr Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Coyne, Patricia, ed. 1991. De Laude Anastasii Imperatoris. (= Studies in Classics, 1.) Lewiston-Queenston-Lampeter: Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof. 1990. “The Priscian Text Used in Three Ninth-Century Irish Donatus Commentaries”. Diversions of Galway: Papers on the History of Linguistics from ICHoLS V, Galway, Ireland. 1–6 September 1990 ed. by Anders Ahlqvist (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 68), 7–15. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even. 1990. “ Una et eadem: Some observations on Roger Bacon’s Greek Grammar”. De ortu grammaticae: Studies in medieval grammar and linguistic theory in memory of Jan Pinborg ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbesen & Konrad Koerner (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 43), 117–131. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joannes de Balbi, 1971. Catholicon. Facsimile of Mainz edition, 1460. Farnborough: Gregg International Publishers.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. 2002. The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 101.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Adverbs, Definitions and Reality”. Flores Grammaticae: Essays in memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew R. Linn (= The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of Linguistics, 10.) Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H. 1995. “The Priscianic Tradition”. Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter ed. by Sten Ebbesen, 239–264. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien. 1992. “Carolingian Grammarians and Theoretical Innovation”. Diversions of Galway: Papers on the History of Linguistics from ICHoLS V, Galway, Ireland. 1–6 September 1990 ed. by Anders Ahlqvist (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 68), 31–37. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages. London & New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Luhtala, Anneli. 2005. Grammar and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 107.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padley, G[eorge] A[rthur]. 1976. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padley, G. A. 1988. Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: Trends in vernacular grammar II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W[alter] Keith. 1987. “On Priscian’s Syntactic Theory: The medieval perspective”. Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III) ed. by Hans Aarsleff, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 38), 65–76. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrus Helias. c.1150?. Summa super Priscianum. Ed. by Leo Reilly, CSB. (= Studies and Texts, 111 & 113). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1993.Google Scholar
Priscian. 1476. Opera omnia. Venice: Johañes de Colonia & Mañthen de Gherretzen.Google Scholar
Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Libri Omnes. 1528. Cologne: Eucharius Cervicornus.Google Scholar
Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Libri Omnes. 1554. Basileae: apud Nicolaum Bryling.Google Scholar
Priscian. 1832. “De Ponderibus et mensuris”. Ed. by Wilhelm Ernst Weber, Corpus Poetarum Romanorum, 1371–1372. Frankfurt-am-Main: Ludwig Broenner.Google Scholar
Priscian. 1859. Ôpera omnia. (= Grammatici latini ed. by Heinrich Keil, vols. II–III1). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1961.)Google Scholar
Rieux, Jacques & Bernard E. Rollin, eds. 1975. The Port-Royal Grammar. (= Janua linguarum, Series minor, 208.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roger Bacon. 1250?. Summa grammaticae. ( = Rogeri Bacon Opera hactenus inedita I ed. by Robert Steele). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar
. 1250?. Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a fragment of his Hebrew Grammar. Ed. by Edmund Nolan & S[amuel] A. Hirsch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902.Google Scholar
. c.1292. Compendium Studii Philosophiae. Ed. by J. S. Brewer. (= Fr. Rogeri Bacon Opera quaedam hactenus inedita, 1; Rolls Series, 15), 391–519. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1859.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2005. ‘The Glosulae in Priscianum and its Tradition’. Flores grammaticae: Essays in Memory of Vivien Law ed. by Nicola McLelland & Andrew R. Linn (= The Henry Sweet Society Studies in the History of Linguistics, 10), 81–100. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Sedulius Scotus. 9th century. In Priscianum. Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt. (= Corpus Christianorum Continuatio medievalis, XLC.) Turnhout: Brepols, 1957.Google Scholar
van de Woestijne, Paul, ed. 1953. La Périégèse de Priscien. (= Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Werken, 116.) Brugge: De Tempel.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger. 1982. Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Imrényi, András & Zsuzsa Vladár
2020. Chapter 5. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. In Chapters of Dependency Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 212],  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.