Shall and Will in English Grammars
A Revised History
The future tense in English has been difficult to understand and describe, particularly where rules for the verbal auxiliaries shall and will are concerned. The impression that rules for shall and will were largely the fabrication of 18th-century grammarians was first created by the work of Charles C. Fries. Evidence from the grammatical tradition, however, does not warrant the conclusions Fries drew. Whereas Fries suggested that the first hint of a differentiation in the use of shall and will was in Mason’s grammar (1622), evidence strongly suggests that even before Mason, grammarians hinted at differences in the uses of the two auxiliaries. Fries credited John Wallis (1653) with the definite rule for shall in the first person to correspond with will in the second and third; actually, the distinction was made before Wallis. Fries credited Lowth (1762) with the rules for interrogative sentences, yet a full discussion of questions is found in Maittaire (1712). Fries indicated that the first complete scheme of conventional rules was found in William Ward (1767), yet Ward was anticipated by James White (1761). Fries implied a closer relationship between Ward and Murray (1795) than the evidence warrants. And Fries provided no evidence for his assertion that the rules became a standard feature of English and American grammars only after 1825. Thus the rules for shall and will were actually remarkably perceptive, if incomplete, descriptions of an elegant usage of some speakers of the language, framed in spite of methodological restrictions of the tradition grammarians worked in.
References
Alston, R(obin) C(arfrae)
1965 A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Volume I1, “
English Grammars Written in English and English Grammars Written in Latin by Native Speakers”. Leeds: printed for the author by E. J. Arnold & Sons.
Baugh, Albert C(roll)
1957 A History of the English Language. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (1st ed. 1934.)
Brightland, John
(d
1717), and
Charles Gildon (1665–1724) 1711
A Grammar of the English Tongue. London: printed for John Brightland. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Brown, Goold
(
1791–1857) 1851
Grammar of English Grammars. London: Delf & Trübner.
Charleston, B(ritta) M(arian)
1941 Studies on the Syntax of the English Verb. Berne: Francke.
Cooper, Christopher
(c
1655–1698) 1685
Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. London. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1968.)
Dobson, E(ric) J(ohn)
1968 English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Vol. I1:
Surrey of the Sources. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (1st ed. 1957.)
Ehrman, Madeline
1966 The Meanings of the Modals in Present-Day American English. The Hague: Mouton.
Fiehler, Rudolph
1969 “
Regional Influence on Shall and Will
”.
Studies in Language, Literature; and Culture of the Middle Ages and Later. Ed. by
E(lmer) Bagby Atwood and
Archibald A(nderson) Hill, 13–19. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Fowle, William B.
(
1795–1865) 1829
The True English Grammar, Founded on Authority as well as Propriety; being the second part of an attempt to form a grammar of the English language not modelled upon those of Latin, Greek, etc. Boston: Hilliard Gray.
Fries, Charles Carpenter
(
1887–1967) 1925 “
The Periphrastic Future with Shall and Will in Modern English”.
PMLA 401.963–1024.
Gil, Alexander
(
1565–1635) 1621
Logonomia Anglica. London: Johannes Beale. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Greenwood, James
(d
1737) 1711
An Essay Towards a Practical English Grammar. London: R. Tookey. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Hulbert, James R(oot
b1884) 1947 “
On the Origin of the Grammarians’ Rules for the Use of Shall and Will
”.
PMLA 521.1178–82.
Jespersen, Otto
1931 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part IV1:
Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin. (Repr. 1961.)
Johnson, Samuel
(
1709–84) 1755
English Grammar (Appended to his Dictionary of the English Language). London: W. Strahan for J. and P. Knapton. (Repr. in facs., New York: AMS Press 1967.)
Joos, Martin
1968 The English Verb: Form and meanings. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press. (1st ed. 1964.)
Kennedy, Arthur G.
1927 A Bibliography of Writings on the English Language, from the Beginning of Printing to the End of 1922, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. (Repr., New York: Hafner 1967.)
Lowth, Robert
(
1710–1787) 1762
A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: J. Hughs for A. Millar and J. Dodsley. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Lyman, Rollo L.
1922 (for 1921)
English Grammar in American Schools before 1850. (
= U.S. Bureau of Education Bulletin
no. 121.) Washington: Government Printing Office.
Maittaire, Michael
(
1668–1747) 1712
The English Grammar. London: W. B. for H. Clemens. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1967.)
Mason, George
1622 Grammaire Angloise. Londres: Nat. Butter. (Ed. by
Rudolf Brotanek, Halle: M. Niemeyer 1905.)
Michael, Ian
1970 English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Moody, Patricia A.
1972 Charles C. Fries on ‘Shall’ and ‘Will’: An Episode in the History of Schoolroom Grammar. Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin. (Summary in
DAb
33:3621A [1972].)
Murray, Lindley
(
1745–1826) 1799
English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of Learners. 4th ed. Dublin: John Gough.
Nist, John
1966 A Structural History of English. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Palmer, F(rank) R(obert)
1968 A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. Coral Gables, Fla.: Univ. of Miami Press.
Palsgrave, John
(
1480–1554) 1530
L’Esclaircissement de la langue françoyse. London. (Repr., Geneva: Slatkine 1972.)
Peyton, V. J.
1794 Les Elemens de la Langue Angloise. Philadelphia: Wrigley & Berriman, for Mathew Carey. (Orig. publ., London: Payne & Cropley, and J. Walter 1761.)
Poldauf, Ivan
1948 On the History of Some Problems of English Grammar before 1800. Prague: Nákl. Filos. Fak., Univ. Karlovy.
Poole, Joshua
(d before
1657) 1646
The English Accidence. London: R. C. for Henry Scile. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Priestley, Joseph
(
1733–1804) 1761
The Rudiments of English Grammar. London:for R. Griffiths. (Facs.- repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Pyles, Thomas
1964 The Origins and Development of the English Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (2nd ed. 1971.)
Robertson, Stuart
(
1892–1940) 1954
The Development of Modern English. 2nd ed. rev. by
Frederic G(omes) Cassidy. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall 1954 (1st ed. 1934.)
Taglicht, J(oseph)
1970 “
The Genesis of the Conventional Rules for the Use of Shall and Will
”.
ES 511.193–213.
Tomkis, Thomas
(d
1634?) 1612
De Analogia Anglicani Sermonis. (MS cited by Michael 1970:398–99.)
Visser, F. Th.
1969 Historical Syntax of the English Language. III1,
First Half: Syntactical Units with Two Verbs. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Vorlat, Emma
1964 Progress in English Grammar, 1585–1735. 41 vols. Luxembourg: A. Peiffer.
Wallis, John
(
1616–1703) 1653
Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae. Oxford: for Leon. Lichfield. (Photostat of 4th ed. of 1674 in Brit. Mus.)
Ward, William
(
1708–72) 1765
An Essay on Grammar. London: for Robert Horsfield. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Ward, William
[
1766?]
A Practical Grammar of the English Language. York: A. Ward for C. Etherington.
Wekker, H. Chr.
1976 The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
White, James
(d. about
1812) 1761
The English Verb. London: for A. Millar. (Facs.-repr., Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.