Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 40:3 (2013) ► pp.377–408

Otto Jespersen and “The Woman”, then and now

| Boston College
Danish linguist Otto Jespersen’s (1860–1943) Language, its Nature, Development, and Origin was published more than 90 years ago, in 1922. This article focuses on Jespersen’s often-cited Chapter 13, entitled “The Woman”, a text that has served since the 1970s as a touchstone for feminist narratives of the history of discussion of language and gender. The author of the present article shows that modern treatment of the chapter sometimes misconstrues Jespersen in casting him into the role of mouthpiece for ideas about women and language that contemporary scholars have discredited. She suggests instead that “The Woman” deserves a new reading, which neither apologizes for Jespersen’s views, nor diminishes his importance to the history of feminist linguistics, but rather recognizes the intricacies of this text and seeks to better understand its position in relation to present-day scholarship on language and gender.
Published online: 3 September 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.40.3.03tho
References (85)
References
Awan, Safeer & Muhammad Sheeraz. 2011. “Gender-Oriented Code-Switching: A case-study of English language teachers at Pakistani universities”. International Journal of Academic Research 31.410–415.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1913. Le langage et la vie. Geneva: Éditions Atar.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis. 1986. Grammar and Gender. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bergvall, Victoria L. 1999. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Language and Gender”. Language in Society 281.273–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1922. Review of Jespersen (1922). The American Journal of Philology 431.370–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983 [1914]. An Introduction to the Study of Language New ed. with introduction by Joseph F. Kess. (= Classics in Psycholinguistics, 3.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Patricia Hayes. 1981. “The Folk-Linguistics of Women’s Speech: An empirical investigation”. Communication Monographs 481.73–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 1995. “Introduction”. Gender Articulated ed. by Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz, 1–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1985. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The Feminist Critique of Language: A reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Gender and Language Ideologies”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.447–467.Google Scholar
. 2003b. “Gender Issues in Language Change”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 231.187–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1986. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman. (2nd ed., 1993; 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2004).Google Scholar
Collinson, W[illiam] E[dward]. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Modern Language Review 181.91–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dauzat, Albert. 1910. La vie du langage. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
De Reul, Paul. 1922. Review of Jespersen (1922). Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 11.731–738.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock. 1894. Man and Woman. New York: William Scott.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia. 1992. “Otto Jespersen, Leonard Bloomfield, and American Structural Linguistics”. Language 681.465–491. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fögen, Thorsten. 2004. “Gender-Specific Communication in Graeco-Roman Antiquity”. Historiographia Linguistica 211.199–276.Google Scholar
Frank, Francine Wattman. 1978. “Women’s Language in America: Myth and reality”. Women’s Language and Style ed. by Douglass Butturff & Edmund L. Epstein, 47–61. Akron, Ohio: Department of English, University of Akron.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice F. 1995. “Language and Gender”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 151.3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. “Epilogue: Reflections on language and gender research”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.699–721.Google Scholar
Furfey, Paul Hanley. 1944. “Men’s and Women’s Language”. The American Catholic Sociological Review 51.218–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Angela & Lindsey Meân Patterson. 2000. Language and Gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graddol, David & Joan Swann. 1989. Gender Voices. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira. 2003. “Exceptional Speakers: Contested and problematized gender identities”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.353–380.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy & Cheris Kramarae. 1991. “Gender, Power, and Miscommunication”. Miscommunication and Problematic Talk ed. by Nikolas Coupland, Howard Giles & John M. Wiemann, 18–43. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hill, Alette Olin. 1986. Mother Tongue, Father Time: A decade of linguistic revolt. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Miriam Meyerhoff, eds. 2003. The Handbook of Language and Gender. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. 1984. A History of English Language Teaching. (2nd ed. with H[enry] G. Widdowson. 2004.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Review of Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, and assisted by Albert Riedlinger (Lausanne & Paris: Payot, 1916). Nordisk Tidsskrift for Filologi 61.37–41.Google Scholar
. 1907. “Mands sprog og kvindes tale [Man’s language and women’s speech]”. Gads Danske Magasin 1906/1907 ed. by C. Gulman & L. Moltsen, 581–592. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.Google Scholar
. 1909–1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part I: Sounds and Spellings, 1909; Part II: Syntax Vol. 11, 1914; Part III, Syntax Vol. 21, 1927; Part IV, Syntax: Time and Tense Vol. 31, 1931, Heidelberg: Carl Winter; Part V, Syntax Vol. 41, 1940; Part VI, Morphology (with the assistance of Paul Christophersen, Niels Haislund & Knud Schibsbye), 1942; Part VII, Syntax (completed and published by Niels Haislund), Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1949.Google Scholar
. 1922. Language, Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin. (Repr., New York: W. W. Norton, 1964).Google Scholar
. 1929. An International Language. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
. 1941. Sproget: Barnet, Kvinden, Slaegten [Language: Child, woman, family]. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
. 1946. Mankind, Nation, and the Individual. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
. 1995 [1938]. A Linguist’s Life: An English translation of Otto Jespersen’s autobiography with notes, photos and a bibliography ed. by Arne Juul, Hans F. Nielsen & Jørgen Erik Nielsen. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Fern L. 1983. “Political and Pedagogical Implications of Attitudes Towards Women’s Language”. Communication Quarterly 311.133–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1992. “Paul Hanly Furfey and the Origins of American Sociolinguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 191.111–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juul, Arne & Hans F. Nielsen, eds. 1989. Otto Jespersen: Facets of his life and work. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 52.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Arthur G. 1924. Review of Jespersen (1922). Modern Philology 211.328–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Ronald G. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Modern Language Journal 71.314–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1996. Male / Female Language. 2nd ed. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Cheris. 1974. “Wishy-Washy Mommy Talk”. Psychology Today 81 (June 1974). 82–85.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. “Language and Women’s Place”. Language in Society 21.45–80. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 2004 [1975]. Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper & Row. (Rev. and expanded ed. published as Language and Women’s Place: Text and commentaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.)Google Scholar
Mahony, Patrick. 1983. “Women’s Discourse and Literature – The question of nature and culture”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 191.444–459. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1975. “Our Father Tongue: Essays in linguistic politics”. Diacritics 51.44–50. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, R[ichard]. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Classical Review 37.90.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara & Louise Mullany. 2011. Language, Gender and Feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max. 1875 [1863]. Lectures on the Science of Language. Second Series. New York: Scribner, Armstrong & Co. [Originally: Longmans, Green & Co.]Google Scholar
Müller, F. Max. 1876. Chips from a German Workshop. Vol. IV1. London: Longmans, Green & Co.; New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans F. 1989. “On Otto Jespersen’s View of Language Evolution”. Juul & Nielsen, eds. 1989.61–78.Google Scholar
Nordenstam, Kerstin. 2008. Genusperspektiv på sprak [Gender perspectives on language]. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.Google Scholar
Oertel, Hanns. 1902. Lectures on the Study of Language. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Ostermann, Ana Christina. 2003. “Communities of Practice at Work: Gender, facework and power of habitus at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil”. Discourse and Society 141.473–505. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Qi. 2011. “On the Features of Female Language in English”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 81.1015–1018.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1889 [2 1886]. Principles of the History of Language. Transl. by Herbert Augustus Strong. London: Sonnenschein & Co.; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Charles S. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The English Journal 121.432–433. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 221.298–301.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randoph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rischel, Jørgen. 1989. “Otto Jespersen’s Contribution to Danish and General Phonetics”. Juul & Nielsen, eds. 19891.43–60.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. Communicating Gender. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Santaemilia, José. 2002. “Towards a Pragmatics of Gendered Conversation: A few general considerations”. Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis lingüístics 71.93–103.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, assisted by Albert Riedlinger. Lausanne & Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Sayce, Archibald H. 1875 [1 1874]. The Principles of Comparative Philology/ 2nd ed. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
1880. Introduction to the Science of Language. Vol. I1. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1985. Language, the Sexes, and Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sommerfelt, Alf. 1924. Review of Jespersen (1922). Maale og Minne [no vol. number], 153–157.Google Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1985. Man Made Language. 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E[dgar] H[oward]. 1917. Linguistic Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. 1923. Review of Jespersen (1922). The Classical Weekly 171.12–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. 2006. Language and Gender: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1900. The History of Language. London: J. M Dent.Google Scholar
Talbot, Mary M. 1998. Language and Gender: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Gender Stereotypes: Reproduction and challenge”. Holmes & Meyerhoff, eds. 2003.468–486.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Nancy Henley, eds. 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Valentine, Tamara M. 2008. “Language and Gender”. Language in South Asia ed. by Braj B. Krachu, Yamuna Krachu & S. N. Sridhar, 429–450. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1867. Language and the Study of Language. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
. 1898 [1 1875]. The Life and Growth of Language. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
West, Candace. 1995. “Women’s Competence in Conversation”. Discourse and Society 61.107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wyld, Henry Cecil. 1907. The Growth of English. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Stanlaw, James
2020. Jespersen, Otto. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2014. Isis 105:S1 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.