Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 5:3 (1978) ► pp. 253273
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

ARCANGELI, MASSIMO
2003. Schegge di sintassi della comunicazione. Prove di ricognizione su tema/rema, dato/nuovo, noto/non noto nella teoria dell’enunciato. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 119:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Casielles-Suárez, Eugenia
2003. On the Interaction between Syntactic and Information Structures in Spanish. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 80:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kelly, Louis-Gérard
2011. La Stylistique comparée et la traduction: de l'ordre des mots à une linguistique de la parole. Language & History 54:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Potter, Lorena
2016. Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: a systemic functional approach. Functional Linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Adjémian, Christian
1978A Functional Generative Theory of the Structure of French: Intonation and problems in syntax. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Arrivé, Michel, and Jean-Claude Chevalier
1970La grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain
1973L’Encyclopédie “Grammaire” et “langue” au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Marne.Google Scholar
Blinkenberg, Andreas
1928L’ordre des mots en français moderne. 2 vols. Copenhague: A. F. Høst.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1974 “Language and Consciousness”. Lg 50. 111–133.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, et al.
1964Grammaire Larousse. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
1971 “Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation”. Semantics, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1977 “On wh-movement”. Formal Syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik
1977 “Filters and Control”. LIn 8.425–504.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles
1976A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1969Topic and Comment: A study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Göteborg: Elandres Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1964 “A Three-level Approach to Syntax”. TLP 1.225–240.Google Scholar
1967 “Order of Elements and Sentence Intonation”. To Honor Roman Jakobson, 499–512. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
ed. 1974Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1964a “From Comparative Word-Order Studies”. BSE 4.111–26.Google Scholar
1964b “On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis”. TLP 1.267–280.Google Scholar
1974 “Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective”. Daneš 1974.11–37.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan, and K. Pala
1971 Review of Dahl 1969 JL 7.91–101.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1919Petite Syntaxe de l’Ancien Français. Paris: H. Champion. (Repr. of 3rd ed. 1972.)Google Scholar
Francis, Nelson
1966 Review of Brno Studies in English, vol.4. Lg 42.142–49.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1974The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin. (Available through Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Hajičová, Eva, and Petr Sgall
1975 “Topic and Focus in Generative Grammar”. PiL 8.3–58.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967–68 “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Parts 1–3”. JL 3.37–81, 199–244; 4.179–215.Google Scholar
Kellenberger, Hunter
1932The Influence of Accentuation on French Word Order. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. (Repr., New York: Kraus 1965.)Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1975 “Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax”. Functionalism, ed. by R. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 1975.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N.
ed. 1975Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
ed. 1976Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1928 “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 56–63. La Haye: Mouton. (Repr. A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. by J. Vachek, 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1964.)Google Scholar
Müller-Hauser, Marie-Louise
1943La mise en relief d’une idée en français moderne. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo
1972The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, and Eva Benečová
1973Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
Weil, Henri
1844De Vordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: F. Vieweg. (3rd ed. 1879.)Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin S.
1977 “Discourse and Logical Form”. LIn 8.101–39.Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, W.
1965Recherches sur la prosodie de la phrase française. Leiden: Univ. Pers.Google Scholar