Theme, Rheme, and Word Order
From Weil to Present-Day Theories
Henri Weil’s thesis, published in Paris during the first half of the 19th century, is the first cogent theory of word order in European linguistics. Weil’s work is the first to argue that discourse structure has an effect on the internal structure of the sentence. His ideas are the direct ancestors of the concepts ‘psychological subject’ and ‘psychological predicate’ which so highly influenced stylistic work into the 20th century. Weil’s insights had very little direct influence on French linguistics but are the source of V. Mathesius’ ‘theme’ end ‘rheme’ and the subsequent Prague School theory of word order. This paper presents an overview of Weil’s thesis, followed by a critical evaluation, in the light of Weil’s work, of a sample of later studies on French word order. The fundamental concepts of Weil’s theory are traced into 20th-century linguistics, with particular attention to their evolution in Prague School theory. Finally, a brief survey of work in generative grammar on discourse and the sentence is presented. In conclusion it is claimed that the rediscovery in formal grammar of the role of discourse structure in shaping the internal structure of the sentence is a comtemporary confirmation of Weil’s thesis.
References (35)
Adjémian, Christian
1978 A Functional Generative Theory of the Structure of French: Intonation and problems in syntax. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arrivé, Michel, and Jean-Claude Chevalier
1970 La grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auroux, Sylvain
1973 L’Encyclopédie “Grammaire” et “langue” au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Marne.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blinkenberg, Andreas
1928 L’ordre des mots en français moderne. 21 vols. Copenhague: A. F. Høst.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L.
1974 “
Language and Consciousness”.
Lg 501. 111–133.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, et al.
1964 Grammaire Larousse. Paris: Larousse.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1971 “
Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation”.
Semantics, ed. by
Danny D. Steinberg and
Leon A. Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1977 “
On wh-movement”.
Formal Syntax, ed. by
Peter W. Culicover,
T. Wasow, and
A. Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik
1977 “
Filters and Control”.
LIn 81.425–504.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contreras, Heles
1976 A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen
1969 Topic and Comment: A study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Göteborg: Elandres Boktryckeri.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, František
1964 “
A Three-level Approach to Syntax”.
TLP 11.225–240.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, František
1967 “
Order of Elements and Sentence Intonation”.
To Honor Roman Jakobson, 499–512. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, František
ed. 1974 Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan
1964a “
From Comparative Word-Order Studies”.
BSE 41.111–26.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan
1964b “
On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis”.
TLP 11.267–280.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan
1974 “
Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective”.
Daneš 1974.11–37.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan, and K. Pala
1971 Review of
Dahl 1969
JL 71.91–101.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foulet, Lucien
1919 Petite Syntaxe de l’Ancien Français. Paris: H. Champion. (Repr. of 3rd ed. 1972.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, Nelson
1966 Review of
Brno Studies in English, vol.41.
Lg 421.142–49.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin. (Available through Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hajičová, Eva, and Petr Sgall
1975 “
Topic and Focus in Generative Grammar”.
PiL 81.3–58.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967–68 “
Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Parts 1–3”.
JL 31.37–81, 199–244; 41.179–215.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kellenberger, Hunter
1932 The Influence of Accentuation on French Word Order. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. (Repr., New York: Kraus 1965.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuno, Susumu
1975 “
Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax”.
Functionalism, ed. by
R. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 1975.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N.
ed. 1975 Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N.
ed. 1976 Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathesius, Vilém
1928 “
On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”.
Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 56–63. La Haye: Mouton. (Repr.
A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. by
J. Vachek, 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1964.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller-Hauser, Marie-Louise
1943 La mise en relief d’une idée en français moderne. Genève: Droz.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scaglione, Aldo
1972 The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, and Eva Benečová
1973 Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weil, Henri
1844 De Vordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: F. Vieweg. (3rd ed. 1879.)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin S.
1977 “
Discourse and Logical Form”.
LIn 81.101–39.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwanenburg, W.
1965 Recherches sur la prosodie de la phrase française. Leiden: Univ. Pers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Potter, Lorena
2016.
Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: a systemic functional approach.
Functional Linguistics 3:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kelly, Louis-Gérard
2011.
La Stylistique comparée et la traduction: de l'ordre des mots à une linguistique de la parole.
Language & History 54:1
► pp. 58 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
ARCANGELI, MASSIMO
2003.
Schegge di sintassi della comunicazione. Prove di ricognizione su tema/rema, dato/nuovo, noto/non noto nella teoria dell’enunciato.
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 119:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.