Theme, Rheme, and Word Order
From Weil to Present-Day Theories
Henri Weil’s thesis, published in Paris during the first half of the 19th century, is the first cogent theory of word order in European linguistics. Weil’s work is the first to argue that discourse structure has an effect on the internal structure of the sentence. His ideas are the direct ancestors of the concepts ‘psychological subject’ and ‘psychological predicate’ which so highly influenced stylistic work into the 20th century. Weil’s insights had very little direct influence on French linguistics but are the source of V. Mathesius’ ‘theme’ end ‘rheme’ and the subsequent Prague School theory of word order. This paper presents an overview of Weil’s thesis, followed by a critical evaluation, in the light of Weil’s work, of a sample of later studies on French word order. The fundamental concepts of Weil’s theory are traced into 20th-century linguistics, with particular attention to their evolution in Prague School theory. Finally, a brief survey of work in generative grammar on discourse and the sentence is presented. In conclusion it is claimed that the rediscovery in formal grammar of the role of discourse structure in shaping the internal structure of the sentence is a comtemporary confirmation of Weil’s thesis.
References (35)
References
Adjémian, Christian. 1978. A Functional Generative Theory of the Structure of French: Intonation and problems in syntax. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Arrivé, Michel, and Jean-Claude Chevalier. 1970. La grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
Auroux, Sylvain. 1973. L’Encyclopédie “Grammaire” et “langue” au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Marne.
Blinkenberg, Andreas. 1928. L’ordre des mots en français moderne. 21 vols. Copenhague: A. F. Høst.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1974. “Language and Consciousness”. Lg 501. 111–133.
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, et al. 1964. Grammaire Larousse. Paris: Larousse.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1971. “Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation”. Semantics, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. “On wh-movement”. Formal Syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. “Filters and Control”. LIn 81.425–504.
Contreras, Heles. 1976. A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dahl, Östen. 1969. Topic and Comment: A study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Göteborg: Elandres Boktryckeri.
Daneš, František. 1964. “A Three-level Approach to Syntax”. TLP 11.225–240.
Daneš, František. 1967. “Order of Elements and Sentence Intonation”. To Honor Roman Jakobson, 499–512. The Hague: Mouton.
Daneš, František, ed. 1974. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton.
Firbas, Jan. 1964a. “From Comparative Word-Order Studies”. BSE 41.111–26.
Firbas, Jan. 1964b. “On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis”. TLP 11.267–280.
Firbas, Jan. 1974. “Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective”. Daneš 1974.11–37.
Firbas, Jan, and K. Pala. 1971. Review of Dahl 1969. JL 71.91–101.
Foulet, Lucien. 1919. Petite Syntaxe de l’Ancien Français. Paris: H. Champion. (Repr. of 3rd ed., 1972.)
Francis, Nelson. 1966. Review of Brno Studies in English, vol.41. Lg 421.142–49.
Gundel, Jeanette K. 1974. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin. (Available through Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
Hajičová, Eva, and Petr Sgall. 1975. “Topic and Focus in Generative Grammar”. PiL 81.3–58.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967–68. “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Parts 1–3”. JL 31.37–81, 199–244; 41.179–215.
Kellenberger, Hunter. 1932. The Influence of Accentuation on French Word Order. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. (Repr., New York: Kraus, 1965.)
Kuno, Susumu. 1975. “Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax”. Functionalism, ed. by R. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 1975.
Li, Charles N., ed. 1975. Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Li, Charles N., ed. 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
Mathesius, Vilém. 1928. “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 56–63. La Haye: Mouton. (Repr. A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. by J. Vachek, 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1964.)
Müller-Hauser, Marie-Louise. 1943. La mise en relief d’une idée en français moderne. Genève: Droz.
Scaglione, Aldo. 1972. The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, and Eva Benečová. 1973. Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.
Weil, Henri. 1844. De Vordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: F. Vieweg. (3rd ed., 1879.)
Williams, Edwin S. 1977. “Discourse and Logical Form”. LIn 81.101–39.
Zwanenburg, W. 1965. Recherches sur la prosodie de la phrase française. Leiden: Univ. Pers.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Potter, Lorena
2016.
Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: a systemic functional approach.
Functional Linguistics 3:1
Kelly, Louis-Gérard
2011.
La Stylistique comparée et la traduction: de l'ordre des mots à une linguistique de la parole.
Language & History 54:1
► pp. 58 ff.
ARCANGELI, MASSIMO
2003.
Schegge di sintassi della comunicazione. Prove di ricognizione su tema/rema, dato/nuovo, noto/non noto nella teoria dell’enunciato.
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 119:1
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.