Theme, Rheme, and Word Order
From Weil to Present-Day Theories
Henri Weil’s thesis, published in Paris during the first half of the 19th century, is the first cogent theory of word order in European linguistics. Weil’s work is the first to argue that discourse structure has an effect on the internal structure of the sentence. His ideas are the direct ancestors of the concepts ‘psychological subject’ and ‘psychological predicate’ which so highly influenced stylistic work into the 20th century. Weil’s insights had very little direct influence on French linguistics but are the source of V. Mathesius’ ‘theme’ end ‘rheme’ and the subsequent Prague School theory of word order. This paper presents an overview of Weil’s thesis, followed by a critical evaluation, in the light of Weil’s work, of a sample of later studies on French word order. The fundamental concepts of Weil’s theory are traced into 20th-century linguistics, with particular attention to their evolution in Prague School theory. Finally, a brief survey of work in generative grammar on discourse and the sentence is presented. In conclusion it is claimed that the rediscovery in formal grammar of the role of discourse structure in shaping the internal structure of the sentence is a comtemporary confirmation of Weil’s thesis.
References
Adjémian, Christian
1978 A Functional Generative Theory of the Structure of French: Intonation and problems in syntax. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Arrivé, Michel, and Jean-Claude Chevalier
1970 La grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.
Auroux, Sylvain
1973 L’Encyclopédie “Grammaire” et “langue” au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Marne.
Blinkenberg, Andreas
1928 L’ordre des mots en français moderne. 21 vols. Copenhague: A. F. Høst.
Chafe, Wallace L.
1974 “
Language and Consciousness”.
Lg 501. 111–133.
Chevalier, Jean-Claude, et al.
1964 Grammaire Larousse. Paris: Larousse.
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1971 “
Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation”.
Semantics, ed. by
Danny D. Steinberg and
Leon A. Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1977 “
On wh-movement”.
Formal Syntax, ed. by
Peter W. Culicover,
T. Wasow, and
A. Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik
1977 “
Filters and Control”.
LIn 81.425–504.
Contreras, Heles
1976 A Theory of Word Order with Special Reference to Spanish. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Dahl, Östen
1969 Topic and Comment: A study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Göteborg: Elandres Boktryckeri.
Daneš, František
1964 “
A Three-level Approach to Syntax”.
TLP 11.225–240.
Daneš, František
1967 “
Order of Elements and Sentence Intonation”.
To Honor Roman Jakobson, 499–512. The Hague: Mouton.
Daneš, František
ed. 1974 Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton.
Firbas, Jan
1964a “
From Comparative Word-Order Studies”.
BSE 41.111–26.
Firbas, Jan
1964b “
On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis”.
TLP 11.267–280.
Firbas, Jan
1974 “
Some Aspects of the Czechoslovak Approach to Problems of Functional Sentence Perspective”.
Daneš 1974.11–37.
Firbas, Jan, and K. Pala
1971 Review of
Dahl 1969
JL 71.91–101.
Foulet, Lucien
1919 Petite Syntaxe de l’Ancien Français. Paris: H. Champion. (Repr. of 3rd ed. 1972.)
Francis, Nelson
1966 Review of
Brno Studies in English, vol.41.
Lg 421.142–49.
Gundel, Jeanette K.
1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of Texas at Austin. (Available through Indiana University Linguistics Club.)
Hajičová, Eva, and Petr Sgall
1975 “
Topic and Focus in Generative Grammar”.
PiL 81.3–58.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967–68 “
Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Parts 1–3”.
JL 31.37–81, 199–244; 41.179–215.
Kellenberger, Hunter
1932 The Influence of Accentuation on French Word Order. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. (Repr., New York: Kraus 1965.)
Kuno, Susumu
1975 “
Three Perspectives in the Functional Approach to Syntax”.
Functionalism, ed. by
R. Grossman et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 1975.
Li, Charles N.
ed. 1975 Word Order and Word Order Change. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
Li, Charles N.
ed. 1976 Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.
Mathesius, Vilém
1928 “
On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”.
Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 56–63. La Haye: Mouton. (Repr.
A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, ed. by
J. Vachek, 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press 1964.)
Müller-Hauser, Marie-Louise
1943 La mise en relief d’une idée en français moderne. Genève: Droz.
Scaglione, Aldo
1972 The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, and Eva Benečová
1973 Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.
Weil, Henri
1844 De Vordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: F. Vieweg. (3rd ed. 1879.)
Williams, Edwin S.
1977 “
Discourse and Logical Form”.
LIn 81.101–39.
Zwanenburg, W.
1965 Recherches sur la prosodie de la phrase française. Leiden: Univ. Pers.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
ARCANGELI, MASSIMO
2003.
Schegge di sintassi della comunicazione. Prove di ricognizione su tema/rema, dato/nuovo, noto/non noto nella teoria dell’enunciato.
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP) 119:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Kelly, Louis-Gérard
2011.
La Stylistique comparée et la traduction: de l'ordre des mots à une linguistique de la parole.
Language & History 54:1
► pp. 58 ff.
Potter, Lorena
2016.
Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: a systemic functional approach.
Functional Linguistics 3:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.